Oddly, now I'm picturing Duterte as a Super Smash Bros character
The fact you could tell it was her tells me that the Westernized whore wasn't wearing her burqa. I assumed you stoned her swiftly, correct?
Looking at Australia and southern California, you'd think Eucalyptus trees were embarrassingly flammable or something
(of course, Australians weren't dumb enough to import them from the other side of the world)
I don't think he's controlled opposition but I understand why that's a common theory. The "unhinged, tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist" is a basically a character he acts as, which is obvious to anyone who watches him regularly. The problem is one of external optics; that is, people understandably conflate this crazy self-strawman character with the many truthful things that he says, so in effect he poisons his own well. It's not clear to me why he thinks it's worth it to do this, as it makes it easy for leftists to dismiss him as crazy and for people on the right to dismiss him as controlled opposition. Charitably, anyone who questions the narrative presented by the MSM is bound to be dismissed as a "conspiracy theorist," "fear monger," etc. so he's just having fun with the trope while he advances his message to people who are able to see past the deliberate obfuscation
That might be why Libertarians ought to use less gas but it's definitely not why lefties support green energy. Did leftists have much to say about Obama's militaristic approach to the Middle East? As with everything else they do, green energy and climate change alarmism are about centralizing power
Bottom row, 2nd from left is actually "Bill Clinton is a rapist Infowars.com"
That's not an accurate definition of fascism. It's privately-owned companies that are heavily regulated and are told how much to produce, how much to sell it for, etc. It's a centrally planned economy, i.e. socialism.
Under fascism, government owns the corporations. Under communism, there are no corporations. What the US has concerning corporate lobbying is troubling, but it's not fascism.
In an unrelated story, Jack Dorsey just bought a fleet of yachts (probably)
If there were a gender for every brave FBI/CIA/NSA/DOJ "rank and file" who blew the whistle on the obvious FISA abuse and spying, we would still need two more genders
"Impending disaster will end life on earth, minorities most affected"
Shhh, we can't weaponize snekbite victims to push the globohomo agenda
Leftists prefer to steal and redistribute rather than create? Well, imagine my shock!
Maybe it's just problem with my display, but it's too small to read
You've got the theory down pat, but the term "anarcho-communism" is also useful in describing a brief timeline of how things would work in practice: Step 1) anarchy - violent, destructive upheaval of the established order Step 2) communism - the useful idiots from step 1 are lined up against the wall along with the bourgeoisie and the dissidents