1
stevejobs871 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was yesterday's video about the Reddit hacking.

4
stevejobs871 4 points ago +4 / -0

You have to realize construction didn't really start until Q3 2019 when the SCOTUS ruled it could start. We had Paul Ryan stall for 2 years, and then Democrats refuse to fund the wall at all. And then the frivolous litigation began. 265 miles in a year is decent. Imagine if they gave him funding in 2017...he could be on track to complete 1000 miles by the end of his term.

3
stevejobs871 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rand can be irritating at times, but I don't think he's cucked per se. I think he's just libertarian and thinks the wall is govt overreach. He's too principled for his own good sometimes imo.

27
stevejobs871 27 points ago +28 / -1

And his Natl. Emergency EO is hanging on by a thread. Congress passed a joint resolution in March '19 to revoke the emergency and Trump vetoed it. They couldn't override bc it only had ~55% iirc. Imagine what could potentially happen if we kick the Dummycraps out of office. Vote in November!

4
stevejobs871 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've read he's seriously considering it and could drop it in an EO by October or campaign on it potentially for a 2nd term but idk.

6
stevejobs871 6 points ago +8 / -2

No! SHUT THEM DOWN. They only teach kids COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA. Homeschool the kids and teach them real history, civics, and government. Also teach them real mathematics (and not the common core shit) and real science (not the fake ass biology that teaches you there's 87 genders or whatever that you find in schools). Use this opportunity. I'd say shut public schools permanently they're communist training camps.

5
stevejobs871 5 points ago +5 / -0

For context, this guy runs a tech channel on youtube and doesn't usually comment on politics. Last time he commented during the 2016 election, he didn't vote b/c he didn't like either of them. Now, seeing the insanity of leftist economic policies, this guy and his followers are all SHITTING on liberal policies, and are echoing pro-Trump sentiment. The people who were apolitical are now anti-Democrat. He even points out in his video that his support for lower taxes would be portrayed as a "right-wing talking point" by the libs, and even goes to say it's common sense. EVERY OTHER COMMENT IS PRO-TRUMP. It seems like people are waking up. It may be nothing, but I've been noticing more people are waking up to leftist insanity.

6
stevejobs871 6 points ago +6 / -0

Contingent elections happen with the NEWLY ELECTED congress that is sworn in on Jan 3, 2021. Which means that if we can keep the Senate and widen our majority in the House state delegations (it's 26 GOP-24 Dem rn) then we can win. It's why the congressional downballot races will be super important bc a contingent election is likely this year.

3
stevejobs871 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah we will take it back and the commies will lose. Demokkkrats tried seceding in 1861 and patriots took it back. If the demonrats try again, the soyboy cucks will lose again.

7
stevejobs871 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Poor kids are just as smart as white kids" ~ Sleepy Joe Biden

1
stevejobs871 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nah it goes into effect in 45 days so it still gives them time.

1
stevejobs871 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think it'll matter much. Both AOC and Terrorist Tlaib won after "strong" primary challengers. Let's not get distracted by these fucks and instead look towards flipping the House & Senate.

39
stevejobs871 39 points ago +39 / -0

Because of democrats. Vote them all out!

3
stevejobs871 3 points ago +3 / -0

You know what we need? Someone like Clarence Thomas. He's easily the best judge on the court.

1
stevejobs871 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, check out the "war games" that the DNC and never Trumper RINOs played recently. They (the game was orchestrated by Podesta) brazenly admitted that there's no scenario in which the DNC will allow Biden to concede. This means that we have to win in a landslide and be vigilant.

5
stevejobs871 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just a reminder to phone bank for Biden. Play it straight up until the last 2 questions.

  1. would you be in favor of paying a one time $3000 towards reparations for BIPOC?

  2. are you worried about Biden's mental decline?

Follow the instructions here: https://www.docdroid.net/f8seioN/non-existent-democratic-phonebank-security-pdf

14
stevejobs871 14 points ago +14 / -0

Couple of things to note: -It's an MSM poll, so Trump is probably up way higher, but they just can't hide it anymore and say Biden +14 b/c it's blatantly bullshit. -He's gaining among independents and Midwestern voters (key swing demographics) -The Dems are getting ABSOLUTELY DESPERATE...race riots, COVID, canceling debates, censorship, pandering, and tyranny, and they keep backfiring so they're pulling out all the stops which shows we're winning. -We still need to vote to make this a reality...vote in record numbers and bring friends/family with you!

4
stevejobs871 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need to change the party from within. Just like the leftists changed the dem party to support commies like sanders and aoc and ilhan omar. We need to change the GOP by voting Pro-MAGA candidates in primaries.

210
stevejobs871 210 points ago +213 / -3

This website IS retaliation. The fact that leftist cucks keep trying to DDoS us week after week shows we're winning and the left is OUT OF IDEAS. People are waking up and this website is soaring in terms of rankings.

4
stevejobs871 4 points ago +4 / -0

COMMIEFORNIA gonna commie. Nothing to see here folks, the same people who accuse Trump of being dictatorial are the actual fascists. Classic leftist projection as usual.

24
stevejobs871 24 points ago +25 / -1

So then it's confirmed Heels up Harris is the nominee. You know what to do pedes...find as much dirt as you can on this woman and start redpilling.

1
stevejobs871 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reagan (80), Reagan (84), Bush 41 (his VP won in 88). So theoretically it could happen again. And Bush would've won in 92 had it not been for the whole "read my lips no new taxes fiasco"

view more: Next ›