0
sloppyjobmossad [S] 0 points ago

that’s a shitty argument for Lincoln not being a tyrant

2
sloppyjobmossad [S] 2 points ago (edited)

so you have no defense for your argument, got it

-1
sloppyjobmossad [S] -1 points ago (edited)

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tyrant

Definition of tyrant

-an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution

-a usurper of sovereignty

-a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally

-one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power

.

That’s literally Lincoln to a T

Again, actually explain how Lincoln was not a tyrant

0
sloppyjobmossad [S] 0 points ago

not being a tyrant because of a memorial is a retard tier argument. Stalin has plenty of memorials.

Explain why Abraham “Habeas Whatus?” Lincoln was not a tyrant

-3
sloppyjobmossad [S] -3 points ago (edited)

Lincoln was a despotic tyrant and unconstitutional dictator.

He arrested Maryland legislators to prevent them from voting on secession

Provoked the South to fire on Ft. Sumter by sending an armada of eleven ships to invade Charleston Harbor while Seward was telling the South they would evacuate Ft. Sumter

Illegally raised an army to invade Virginia, caused North Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas and Virginia to secede (after they had voted to stay in the Union) after Lincoln called for troops and war

He shut down at least 300 Northern newspapers calling for peace and opposing his war polices

He endorsed his army waging total war against civilians by burning cities, churches, schools

He imprisoned 10,000 Northerners without due process of law.

It was never about slavery, Lincoln simply used this excuse as a weapon for war.

Even Jefferson David knew slavery was coming to an end. He proposed that slaves be freed, but before he would support it they would need to be educated and given some way to survive in their new found freedom.

Lincoln was as racist as any slave owner as can be easily demonstrated by reading his debate records. He was a proponent of relocating blacks to other parts of the world (Liberia)

His Emancipation did not free any of the 450,000 slaves in Border or Northern states or in New Orleans, Tennessee or Norfolk, Virginia under the control of Federal armies

Lincoln's strategy to wage war to address the peaceful secession of the Southern states killed 850,000 soldiers and 50,000 CIVILIANS caught in the horror.

-4
deleted [S] -4 points ago
1
sloppyjobmossad [S] 1 point ago (edited)

The police are one of the only things I disagree with the president on

The militarization, complete lack of accountability, and willingness of the police to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws is unacceptable.

3
sloppyjobmossad [S] 3 points ago

missed opportunity to use the Sacagawea dollar

1
sloppyjobmossad [S] 1 point ago (edited)

“We will continue our tradition of not investigating Michael Bloomberg, his family, and foundation, and we will extend the same policy to his rivals in the Democratic primaries”

-Bloomberg News Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait

9
sloppyjobmossad [S] 9 points ago (edited)

who is paying for these giant mosques?

who is buying up the strip malls?

where is the money coming from?

26
sloppyjobmossad [S] 26 points ago (edited)

Agreed, I don’t know how people get “peaceful religion” or “not a problem” out of “Establishment of a universal caliphate & conversion or death of all non-believers”

1
sloppyjobmossad [S] 1 point ago

>illegals breeding exponentially

>Texas not turning blue

pick one

1
sloppyjobmossad [S] 1 point ago (edited)

Anyone who introduces a bill like this is an enemy of the people and the constitution. There should be zero tolerence for this

we are in a constituional crisis, and just because it hasn’t happened to you yet, doesnt make it any less of a crisis

Your state of Texas will be blue in the next decade from migration and what is happening in VA will happen to you.

view more: Next ›