How the hell many people do you think we're arresting? Clinton, Brennan, and a half dozen others?
Try James Baker, James Rybicki, Andrew McCabe, Josh Campbell, Michael Kortan, Patrick Brodsky, Greg Brower, Lisa Page, Jeffrey Tricoli, David Resch, Scott Smith, Howard Marshall, Carl Ghattas, Peter Strzok, Trent Teyema, Eric K. Barnhart, Bill Priestap, Salvatore Cincinelli and that's just the members of the FBI who have been fired or """resigned"""
That's not even the tip of the iceberg. resignation.info/dashboard/organizations for more, U.S. Department of Justice, White House, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. State Department, and more relevant and these resignations only started being recorded after a certain point so names are missing and even still that doesn't include anyone involved with the Clinton Foundation
Do your research before spewing a load of shit. I doubt the list of names could fit the character limit of a post here and you think 3 years is too long? It would be a miracle if it was ONLY 3 years...
He is doing his job, just like Gowdy was doing his job. Maybe you should learn how their jobs work before commenting on how well you think they're doing them.
"b-b-but if a Democrat was in his place and had evidence into you, you'd be in jail within the week!" and it would be a sham of a trial rushed through without using the evidence for anything more than getting an arrest warrant to save them time on faking evidence because they'd just pay off everyone involved and nobody would challenge it for fear of being Arkancided.
If you're going to call Barr a swamp rat for moving slow then you might as well call Trump a swamp rat for not firing everyone day one like Bill Clinton did when he was elected.
If you're calling him a swamp rat for going with the Epstein suicide story then you REALLY need to look up how his job works because that's an official story he cannot legally comment on without giving legal ammunition to have all his cases thrown out at the snap of a Democrat's fingers.
livestreamed from hidden camera to both document her getting served and the assassination
It's also typically not funny because rather than humor they just post an expression of their vitriolic hatefulness with some queue to tell people to laugh and pretend it's humor.
They'll post something like "What if we impaled Donald Trump on a rusty spike, raped his wife and kids, and then buried their corpses in shit? LMFAO!!!" and then pretend it's a joke with a condescendingly bad facade because they actually believe that they don't even have to try because we can't see through it because Don Lemon, dumbest man on television, told them that we're that dumb and they believe it.
Well that depends on who specifically was investigating Hillary Clinton.
If you're in the "nothing's happening" camp then it's probably because you weren't paying attention when all of the following people stopped being part of the FBI
James Baker, James Rybicki, Andrew McCabe, Josh Campbell, Michael Kortan, Patrick Brodsky, Greg Brower, Lisa Page, Jeffrey Tricoli, David Resch, Scott Smith, Howard Marshall, Carl Ghattas, Peter Strzok, Trent Teyema, Eric K. Barnhart, Bill Priestap, Salvatore Cincinelli
Probably hanging from a rope because I'm a single person and they're a multi-level international cabal of elites and criminals so far reaching that even with all the evidence in their lap they'd still need time to actually sort through the evidence to form it into a case that can be brought before a court and get a conviction without them fleeing to New Zealand or being sacrificed to radicalize more leftists and replenish their ranks.
But then again you don't actually have even a remote understanding of the justice system, the size of the cabal, the way they operate, what Trump has done to fight it, or really anything at all and so you just complain that nothing is happening while remaining ignorant of the things that are actually being done. I'd bet my last paycheck that you weren't aware that Trump couldn't even declassify his own Ukraine call transcript if he didn't fire DNI Dan Coats first ~2 months prior.
And while I know you don't know shit all about anything, please don't give me the "he stepped down" line. Even the dumbest Democrats are smart enough to realize he was given the ultimatum of "give us the benefit of the optics and step down or lose your pension and get fired". I'm not going to play word games over here, Dan Coats wasn't give the option to keep working, ergo, he was fired.
no, you're right, we should just arrest dozens of people without an investigation, let the DNC suicide the lot of them, then bus over 2000 assorted Antifa, MS13, Islamic Terrorists, etc. armed to the teeth to the Whitehouse to slaughter everyone in their coup while the media calls them "heroes taking out the fascist dictator Trump who used the judicial process to round up his political opponents to assassinate them", and people like Tim Pool and every moron left of him who decided to support Trump suddenly does a 180 and supports the slaughter of every Republican or right leaning Independent in the country because you had to have your arrests over actual justice.
Get a clue moron
Why are there so many retards over here who think you can just up and arrest somebody?
You got your high profile arrest with Jeffrey Epstein and we all saw how that turned out. Maybe you should actually get a clue as to what's going on before whining that you want more arrests.
Except rather than inspiring positive action these people cry "nothing is happening, it's just going to be another slap on the wrist" and serve no further purpose than to demoralize.
"want at least one trophy from the swamp by now" well aren't y'all just the most entitled impatient children over here. Well it's too bad your little trophy got assassinated in his cell, but I'm sure you think Epstein's arrest was just more "nothing happening"
You're not a "show me" kind of guy, you're an "eyes glued shut" kind of guy who is too ignorant to realize that when you fire the people in the system and appoint new people to the system to prosecute the fired people that it's not even close to "trust the system to prosecute itself" but you're just going to put words in my mouth like "trust Sessions" because your head's too far up your ass to dignify the idea of this situation being less terrible than the shit you keep feeding yourself.
You waited decades eh? Big freaking whoop, we all have, for those of us younger folks we've been waiting since we were children, having learned about corruption in politics while we were still counting on our fingers. 9/11 and the '07 Recession were our childhood and we had to wait in a state of helplessness as children wondering if there would be a world left to save by the time we were old enough to participate in politics, so suck it up and get a clue. If you actually kept yourself informed rather than laze around and act like nothing ever happens then you'd know what's happening and how much has already happened.
When you cut out all the explanation surrounding why those are legitimate questions it's pretty easy to make them seem to not be legitimate
If you're only going to hear what you want to hear then why should I bother trying to respond to you?
Rather than "I don't think those are legitimate concerns", I should've rather said "they're simply not legitimate concerns"
Lack of term limits proves nothing about who is or isn't doing anything for the reasons I provided
Lack of arrests proves nothing about who is or isn't doing anything for the reasons I provided
Events of the past refers to "We have seen the FBI give up with the Las Vegas Shooting, fishy moments where witness's disappeared, Laptops were magically deleted, ETC" and they have been dealt with by people getting fired. If I named just a dozen of the people that have been fired since then and how firing them has contributed to things moving forward I'd be able to write a book about it and would still have barely scratched the surface.
and yet you're perfectly content to edit out every one of those reasons in your quotes like CNN tier reporting to justify your concerns. I gave reasons for why your concerns aren't legitimate, you deliberately edited those reasons out to claim your concerns are legitimate. Being so disingenuous with your concerns like this is exactly why I'm so dismissive of them. Address the reasons themselves or shut up, I'm not going to play these kinds of games with you.
Well if you're not assuming nothing is happening then why do you assume that every single person appointed by Trump or appointed by a Trump appointee is doing nothing or has done nothing in response to the attempted coup?
There's so much wrong with what you're saying here that I don't even know where to begin without making this another 7 paragraph rant so I'll just go over it in bullet points
Barr's not just going to declassify things at YOUR whim, get over yourself
Durham's investigation into FISA abuse is literally the process to aquire those documents that would reveal how this was a Deep State coup in addition to the process for holding these people accountable. Durham's report will be indictments because that's what his position is for.
Declassifying documents isn't holding people accountable. Arresting and prosecuting them is and every time the investigations that are supposed to lead to that are discussed, people like you come around acting like these people aren't doing anything or that it'll just be a slap on the wrist.
I don't have to "trust the plan". Barr says Huber did nothing with the FISA investigation and that's why he gave it to Durham. If Barr was just another Deep State tool then he could've kept his mouth shut about Huber but the fact that he didn't and acted in response is much more telling then your ridiculous presumptions about what and when Barr should declassify. I can't comment on Huber and Sessions anymore than anyone else has made public, maybe they were deep state, maybe they were doing something important behind the scenes. Who knows, who cares, they're frankly quite irrelevant right now.
Here's a little headline I found from a while back. "Adam Schiff calls on Dan Coats to tell him if William Barr declassifies over intelligence community objections". Well Dan Coats was fired later but I'm sure you've never heard of Dan Coats or even assumed that it was possible for Barr to be obstructed in the process of declassifying documents, but if you're so smart then please explain to me in full the process for declassifying the documents to prove that it's possible for Barr to do so at this present moment without being obstructed by yet another government official who you've probably never heard of.
Honestly, and I repeat myself, you know less than nothing about jack shit and should do some research before flapping your lips with such ignorant nonsense.
Of course they won't take long when they control the agencies but as I mention here things are beginning to change.
Of course we can't expect Trump to do everything himself, that's why he's appointing people but nobody is willing to put any trust or hope in anyone Trump appoints even if they have a record so spotless that we'd have to dissolve the entire government to remove everyone who doesn't hold up to them as the standard.
So what if there are no term limits? Do you know the process for implementing term limits? You can't just draft up an executive order and make it so and there's no point in writing up legislation for it if it won't pass.
So what if all these people are free? As I mentioned here we've only just begun to have enough sway in the DOJ to shut down the Mueller investigation for being a nothing burger. Real investigations take time and we haven't had 3 years of control over the DOJ, we've had maybe 6 months.
Why are the past events such a big deal when the causes of those events have since been dealt with? I don't think those are legitimate concerns. Trump might as well have been sworn into office in 2019 with how much he has been obstructed and 1 year isn't much time to get things done.
My concern is justified and I'm not going to sit quietly while people spread demotivating lies based on ignorance, nor is my concern worded in such a way as to spread pessimism over this but rather to inspire positive action in researching points and not taking your info from the Fake News media outlets.
Justice can also move swiftly when you control the department that's supposed to be carrying it out and disregard the law in carrying out the investigation because your team controls every department that could hold you responsible.
Mueller's team wasn't exactly being obstructed by every 3 letter agency in the country and it wasn't too hard for Mueller to draft a team composed entirely of Democrats to carry out the investigation.
But as you can see with Trump's appointees compelling Mueller to make a report on the findings of his investigation and the consequential closing of the investigation as a result of it being a big nothing burger, we're gradually reaching the point where our side actually has sway in the DOJ.
This is a cause for optimism, not ignorantly dismissive pessimism.(edit: and yet the downvotes flow in...)
You just need to check the comments of any post that so much as mentions the name of Barr, Durham, Horowitz, or Huber, or any investigation into any member of the deep state, or anything that suggests that remotely that any Democrat committed any crime and you'll have a top post saying "hurr durr they're just gonna get a slap on the wrist, nothing ever happens"
3 separate threads about the investigations into Ilhan Omar with comments like that after finding posts like that for months is what prompted me to make this post.
Oh yes, all those investigations that took place while the Deep State still occupied top positions in the FBI, DOJ, CIA, DNI, DOD, Pentagon, etc. while you conveniently ignore all the work done to fire the people who obstructed and prevented those investigations.
Newsflash! Barr hasn't released a single document because it's not his job to release documents. You want documents? How about the recently released newly found CLASSIFIED Clinton Emails in the FBI vault site? Just going to ignore that while you complain about documents not being released by someone whose job doesn't involve releasing documents? Just going to assume nothing is happening despite new finds being released?
Of course you'll just ignore it all since you're just another concern troll crying "nothing is happening" without regard for the facts
"we need to violently take down these people" says keyboard warrior with no intention of actually following through for the 16th time this week
Yeah you're right, Bob Mueller DEFINITELY would have prosecuted them along with the rest of his DOJ lackeys. James Comey too I suppose? I'm sure Mike Pompeo would've called the CIA spooks in to stand trial in your fantasy world too. I guess we'll just start locking them up like Epstein eh? THAT sure turned out well rolls eyes
THE DOJ, FBI, CIA, DNI, etc. WON'T PROSECUTE THEMSELVES!!! GET A CLUE
"DOJ, UNDER Trump, has had enough info... blah blah blah"
Yeah, I'm sure 2 years ago we could've just turned over the documents to the DOJ and I'm sure that they'd tell Robert Mueller and the rest of the special counsel to put the Trump Russia investigation on hold to throw Hillary in jail within the week, eh? Or now that he's gone we can knock it out in a couple days or something? Is that what you think?
This isn't CSI Miami, it's not going to be knocked out in a few months. Do you have any idea just how many high level government officials Trump had to fire while playing up the political theater to not start a civil war?
FBI Director James Comey
Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein
Director of the CIA Mike Pompeo
Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats
That's not even the tip of the iceberg. Dan Coats had to be fire for Trump to be able to declassify the Ukraine call transcript. Think about how much his hands were tied with the, not just 5, but hundreds of other government workers, dozens of high level employees, that have been fired over the past few years. But if you've been paying attention to sources other than the MSM then you might actually have noticed that things are going on behind the scenes and just because the MSM says the investigation is "closed" doesn't mean it is, or that "closed" means "shut down" or whatever bullshit they're trying to spread.
Adarsh Prathap's page still lists that he manages Greta Thunberg's page.
Besides that fact that presuming the ignorance of someone with "I bet you would be surprised if I told you.. that Jesus' last name isn't Christ" is terribly egotistical and fallacious I'm going to have to correct you on your supposed idea that "a Jew running God's facebook" is somehow fine because of what the jews of over 2000 years ago believed in addition to your clear lack of knowledge about the history of Christianity from your suggestion of the idea that it has become "very watered down over the years"
First off, I presume that what you call "the original Jewish religion", Christians call "the old testament" (or rather the rules/laws and guidance set out for God's chosen people to follow as detailed in the Hebrew Bible which Christians regard as "the old testament". I'd hate for semantics to drag this out). If that is the case you really have no idea what you're talking about as the old testament scriptures are full of prophecies that the coming of Christ would satisfy the purpose of those historical practices of their religion originating from the same scripture and so moving away from these practices is not in any way a "watering down" of Christianity but rather building up Jesus [the] Christ's teachings and sacrifice as the foundations of Christianity.
As for those who did not accept Jesus to be the Messiah, There's a reason that the Christian Bible refers to "those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan". A prophecy all the way in Revelations fulfilled in the modern day as "jew" has become synonymous with Judaism, a twisted perversion of the original jewish religion that practically if not literally celebrates the sins defined by the original Hebrew Bible in their myriad of Rabbinical texts while they steal the name "jew" from its original designation as referring to the Tribe of Judah or later, the Israelites in general. Frankly, I think the idea of a "Jew" running God's facebook is neither hilarious, nor fine, but rather the exact type of religious mockery I expected from the synagogue of Satan and I'm not surprised in the slightest.
Barr's position does not allow him to say whatever he wants, He's the Attorney General. Whatever gets put in an official report, no matter how absurd, cannot be disputed except through an official investigation into the validity of that report.
quote from the creator on an unrelated subreddit he moderates
"Dear person reporting perfectly valid threads as spam: Know that every time you report such a thread, when I re-approve it, I upvote it if I hadn't already just to spite you."
careful guys, we've got a badass over here!😂😂😂
Neither does 99% of the list fleeing the country if we started arresting a few dozen without being prepared to handle the other thousands left.