He says they are down and depressed and "embarrassed" over the articles of impeachment that have been presented, and that the freshman "socialists" are clueless and thrilled.

Not an afterthought, like the US Constitution:

https://ballotpedia.org/Article_I,_Virginia_Constitution

Text of Section 11:

Due Process of Law; Obligation of Contracts; Taking or damaging of Private Property; Prohibited Discrimination; Jury Trial in Civil Cases That no person shall be deprived of his life, liberty, or property without due process of law; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts; and that the right to be free from any governmental discrimination upon the basis of religious conviction, race, color, sex, or national origin shall not be abridged, except that the mere separation of the sexes shall not be considered discrimination.

That in controversies respecting property, and in suits between man and man, trial by jury is preferable to any other, and ought to be held sacred. The General Assembly may limit the number of jurors for civil cases in courts of record to not less than five.

That the General Assembly shall pass no law whereby private property, the right to which is fundamental, shall be damaged or taken except for public use. No private property shall be damaged or taken for public use without just compensation to the owner thereof. No more private property may be taken than necessary to achieve the stated public use. Just compensation shall be no less than the value of the property taken, lost profits and lost access, and damages to the residue caused by the taking. The terms "lost profits" and "lost access" are to be defined by the General Assembly. A public service company, public service corporation, or railroad exercises the power of eminent domain for public use when such exercise is for the authorized provision of utility, common carrier, or railroad services. In all other cases, a taking or damaging of private property is not for public use if the primary use is for private gain, private benefit, private enterprise, increasing jobs, increasing tax revenue, or economic development, except for the elimination of a public nuisance existing on the property. The condemnor bears the burden of proving that the use is public, without a presumption that it is.[1]

Text of Section 13: Militia; Standing Armies; Military Subordinate to Civil Power

That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.[1]

PENSACOLA, Fla. (AP) — A US official says the Saudi student who fatally shot three people at a Florida naval base had hosted a dinner party the night before to watch videos of mass shootings. The official was briefed by federal investigators and spoke on condition of anonymity. He says authorities tell him one Saudi student was recording outside the building while the shooting took place. He says 10 Saudi students are being held at the base and that several others are still unaccounted for.

https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/saudi-student-opens-fire-at-florida-naval-base-killing-3

Youtube has been sending me "recommended" links to the various Mainstream Leftist Propaganda Agents, but mostly CNN. Recently I've been pulling them up just to down-vote them (don't need to listen to them, we've heard it all). To my surprise, most of them are about 50-50 between upvotes and downvotes.

Sites like Next News Network, OANN, FoxNews, FoxBusiness run about 90-10 upvotes to downvotes.

Do you suppose that the CNN 50-50 numbers are BECAUSE they are "recommending" these videos to people who are downvoting them?

And then I noticed a recent FoxNews Judge Napolitano video which was 2:1 DOWNVOTES to UPVOTES.

I've been posting "Free Speech is an algorithm, Censorship is a heuristic." The problem with heuristics is that they can get stuck doing exactly the wrong then when conditions under which the heuristic was developed change. Do you suppose Youtube's "algorithm" is causing exactly the opposite of their desired result?