3
iMAGAnation [S] 3 points ago

Oh, man. I can see why they did it now. Read this article from NBC. Keep in mind that the new narrative coming from the swamp is that Barr is Trump’s lap dog that does whatever he says. This article accidentally rebukes that very narrative in its excitement over charges being dropped.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1137066?__twitter_impression=true

6
iMAGAnation [S] 6 points ago

I get your point and I’m with you. I’m tired of the constant, “but just wait for the next investigation” bs myself. And this “not the rank and file” bs either. 40 FBI agent worked with Mueller full-time. A bunch of others raided Stone’s house. Still others destroyed the Muslim terrorist training camp in NM(?) and yet still others swept up Epstein’s house for him only after he died.

I do want to point out that this isn’t really about making a deal as it is securing key witnesses to prosecute a case. McCabe can be used to testify and still face larger charges for his part in the “insurance policy.” This was about the IG lack of candor.

5
iMAGAnation [S] 5 points ago

As seen from a post on 8kun:

If you’ve flipped a suspect into a witness in a lager case, you don’t sabotage the credibility of your witness before he/she can testify in the larger case.

Thoughts?

1
iMAGAnation [S] 1 point ago (edited)

The media will never side with Barr. When Guilliani stated that he was giving info to the DoJ, that’s when the Dems started going apeshit and throwing all this slander at Barr and Jordan and Nunes. Did you see the new OH state wrestler who just now wants to make new accusations against Jordan about his days coaching wrestling? Weird how that happened right after Jordan was elevated to a new position where he’ll be Chair of the HJC if the Republicans win-back the House.

It’s all going to come out. That’s the thing about truth and facts - you can scream, holler, thrash and gnaw, but facts don’t give a f*ck. The corruption became too massive to hide without HRC as POTUS and they knew it.

-1
iMAGAnation [S] -1 points ago

From my link - 2nd sentence:

“ It is owned by the Fox News Group, which itself was owned by News Corporation from 1996–2013, 21st Century Fox from 2013–2019, and Fox Corporation since 2019.”

FOX News is owned by Fox Corporation. Fox Corporation is owned by Disney. Disney owns FOX News.

1
iMAGAnation [S] 1 point ago

All it would take is reading the first two sentences of my link. It’s like you’re determined to show your ignorance.

6
iMAGAnation [S] 6 points ago

Exactly. Misinformation is only powerful when it goes unnoticed. Fortunately, the Dems have totally destroyed any credibility the MSM had. No one believes them anymore.

1
iMAGAnation [S] 1 point ago (edited)

Impeachment was their last serious hope. It’s the reason Schiff cried. The reason Nadler “ran” for the first time in 40 years. It’s the reason Nancy has no more fucks to give about decorum. The reason Dumbledore’s sexuality was openly debated on the Senate floor during an Impeachment hearing.

It’s over, folks. Time to watch it all burn.

3
iMAGAnation [S] 3 points ago

“Should it matter if it’s a male or female? Who cares it’s not important.” (Paraphrasing)

Uh, it seems to matter to Dems in just about every single topic except sex partners. Only then does gender not make a difference. I love listening to her faux respect for the woman’s religious views.

8
iMAGAnation [S] 8 points ago (edited)

IOW, male sex drive is inherently violent and deserves a different set of standards and punishments than a woman who committed sex crimes. BTW, this piece of shit raped boys and girls, none above the age 13. But now, according to this judge, this thing isn’t going to rape anyone anymore - boy or girl - and should only serve 5 years for RAPING 15 CHILDREN!! Iowa should be pissed!

0
iMAGAnation [S] 0 points ago

Nobody was defending him. I can’t believe that you’re already moving goal posts and making strawman arguments so quickly. All I did was make a clarification. If you want to claim Weinstein is a pedophile (which he probably is) you need to support your claims with sources. But we both know you don’t have those sources, don’t we?

0
iMAGAnation [S] 0 points ago

Lulz, you suck at this. All I’m asking for is sources for the rampant pedophilia and sex trafficking in Israel that aren’t quotes from the Talmud. I want news articles, and if it’s as bad as you claim you should be able to produce vast amounts of links to articles about grooming gangs, pedophilia, and sex trafficking incidents in Israel.

I think you lurk on /pol/ and come over here and regurgitate what you read there without actual understanding or context.

Yes, what a conniption fit ?

0
iMAGAnation [S] 0 points ago

Wow. You totally destroyed me with your solid rebuttal. I hadn’t considered “wrong” as an ulterior motive. Could you perhaps supply a fucking source you twat?

3
iMAGAnation [S] 3 points ago

Could you clear up a couple things? Harvey Weinstein isn’t a pedophile - he’s a rapist. Pointing a finger and saying “all of Hollywood” is kind of ... lazy?

Also, your theory of Israel being a major hub for pedophilia and sex trafficking ignores ALL the Muslim countries surrounding Israel where child rape and child marriage are considered sacred cultural customs. I’ve read many stories of such things in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Egypt, and more. How is it that Israel has been so careful in hiding their rampant pedophilia and the surrounding Muslim nations seemingly flaunt theirs? I mean, if they really do believe that God permits it, then why would they hide it when their neighbors don’t?

You’re spending too much time on /pol

view more: Next ›