-1
chupacabra5 -1 points ago +1 / -2

maybe he's just fed up. not everything is some secret George Soros CIA psy op, Jesus. sometimes you guys just want to be a part of a conspiracy

2
chupacabra5 2 points ago +4 / -2

maybe he's just fed up. not everything is some secret George Soros CIA psy op, Jesus. sometimes you guys just want to be a part of a conspiracy

7
chupacabra5 7 points ago +7 / -0

I realised this can be a red flag. I had some exes whose mothers would keep a close eye on them to make sure I was looked after.

Often that signals that the mother knows something about the girl that you don't, and might think her daughter 'lucked out' with you and is preventing her from fucking up like she has with her exes.

2
chupacabra5 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's like 3 dudes but saying that wouldn't have been nearly as funny

2
chupacabra5 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

What would happen if someone broke into your buddy's wife's practice and happened to find the files? And then posted these peoples' addresses online?

3
chupacabra5 3 points ago +3 / -0

A big family with well-raised kids is the ultimate defence against the left.

1
chupacabra5 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to defend tick tocks, but to answer your question:

Promoting a reveal will get more eyes on it when it comes out

It takes time to prepare info in a presentable format. Veritas takes time to edit his videos. Braynard took time to write up his analysis., etc.

74
chupacabra5 74 points ago +74 / -0

A lot of my friends from uni became clinical psychologists. The problem is they spend all day, all year, with the small minority of people that were legitimately doomed from the get-go by the way they grew up.

They start getting a warped view of how unfair the world is because of this biased sample.

Some people do mean well. But, they do need to look at the bigger picture, and greater good.

11
chupacabra5 11 points ago +11 / -0

How does he get this wrong. It's literally his job. We can't afford basic fuck ups like this

2
chupacabra5 2 points ago +3 / -1

There's no source because the number is wrong - it was 1.8 in the primaries

9
chupacabra5 9 points ago +11 / -2

THE 1.8 MILLION NUMBER IS FROM THE PRIMARIES. FOR ALL THE DISTRUST YOU HAVE OF EVERYONE BEING A SHILL, YOU SURE TRUST WHATEVER YOU SEE FROM RANDOMS ON TWITTER WITHOUT SPENDING 5 SECONDS CHECKING IT YOURSELF

20
chupacabra5 20 points ago +21 / -1

Headline should read “federal workers planning suicide by patriot”

5
chupacabra5 5 points ago +5 / -0

Despite being 13% of the dog population, pit bulls commit 50% of maulings

Really gets the noggin joggin

1
chupacabra5 1 point ago +1 / -0

GP isn’t fake per se but they’re definitely misleading. It’s so hard to undo their misinformation once it’s in the collective psyche.

I made a post asking people to use epoch times or a similar alternative but people got butthurt.

3
chupacabra5 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ve been saying this from the start. They could have easily waited four years and have had a wayyy better shot at it because they wouldn’t have to contend with Trump.

Showing their hand in 2020 was an act of desperation

view more: Next ›