1
chlorophyll 1 point ago +1 / -0

You only know it's a Trump ballot once it's at the polling place IE when it's gone through postal service. "So you received the ballot but it didn't get counted?"

3
chlorophyll 3 points ago +3 / -0

The identity of the ballot can be documented as having reached the polling place but never counted if there are enough computers looking at them, counting them.

5
chlorophyll 5 points ago +6 / -1

Not only that, if the ballot is uniquely tied to a human identity then it changes the game in terms of voter integrity... Doris who has been dead for 5 years should never have sent back in her ballot, and we can know which vote belonged to her.

6
chlorophyll 6 points ago +6 / -0

It makes it realistic to reference who voted for what.

In a nightmare scenario: everyone who voted for Trump is on AOC's list

In Trump's scenario: they can know ballots got destroyed, received and never scanned, or filled out in place of a dead person

4
chlorophyll 4 points ago +4 / -0

The scantron style computers should be able to keep track of things like this pretty easily, and thankfully Trump has Rudy Giuliani for cybersecurity advisor https://web.archive.org/web/20200920114411/https://www.complianceweek.com/cyber-security/bill-proposes-national-cyber-security-czar/29126.article

And cybersecurity is part of the space force, something so new it can't have swamp roots in it https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/09/04/trump-administration-launches-first-cybersecurity-principles-space-technologies

4
chlorophyll 4 points ago +4 / -0

They know how many ballots they send out, and the ballot is tied to the voter itself, if the machine scans ballots it would show it has multiple ballots from the same person potentially, or log that a ballot came from a voter that can be referenced in the population. They're not just pieces of paper, each one has a unique identity that is supposed to be tied to somebody real.

10
chlorophyll 10 points ago +11 / -1

If the "watermark" is a QR-Code style unique identifier in tiny yellow dots then it's a complete game-changer.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20170607-why-printers-add-secret-tracking-dots

27
chlorophyll 27 points ago +28 / -1

This just shows us that votes were sent to whom, and which votes came back... so they can't shred them and say they never received them if they really scanned it or it really went through post.

Electronic voting is its own system. Trump made the Space Force so it is a swamp free zone and CyberSec is part of space force! Look at this timeline:

8/2/18: "Strong action to secure elction systems" https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-strengthening-security-elections/

Jan 29 2020: US Cyber command poised to support US election security... https://web.archive.org/web/20200716024316/https://www.nsa.gov/News-Features/News-Stories/Article-View/Article/2069163/us-cyber-command-nsa-poised-to-support-us-election-security/

6/26/20: "National cyber director act" with CyberSecurity Advisor Rudy Giuliani https://web.archive.org/web/20200920114411/https://www.complianceweek.com/cyber-security/bill-proposes-national-cyber-security-czar/29126.article

9/4/20:CyberSec principals for Space Force: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/09/04/trump-administration-launches-first-cybersecurity-principles-space-technologies

10/21/20: Trump signs making hacking voting systems a federal crime: https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/522151-trump-signs-legislation-into-law-making-hacking-voting-systems-a-federal

1
chlorophyll 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is kinda lame but... the Star Wars sequels were the final straw. I always sensed a "disturbance in the force" but could never put my finger on it. Yeah banks are bad, yeah mainstream media lies... but once I finally was pissed enough to say "no, I don't even give a fuck about Star Wars and they're ruining it... what is happening" I started watching all these commentaries...

commentaries lead to redpill... redpill leads to Donald Trump... Donald Trump leads to winning.

14
chlorophyll 14 points ago +14 / -0

He's here to rail cocaine and confirm ACB and he's all outta cocaine.

5
chlorophyll 5 points ago +5 / -0

Cryin' chuck thinks its "bad faith" because faith in God goes against satanism.

2
chlorophyll 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes it only gets viewed by you, what happens to your copy has no connection to the channel or youtube anymore.

1
chlorophyll 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the spirit of widespread use and trustworthiness... blender is an open source 3D modelling software that doubles as a powerful video editor.

2
chlorophyll 2 points ago +2 / -0

I made this because then people only have to place their trust in VLC (something that lots of us already have) rather than taking recommendations for a lot of lesser-known products.

1
chlorophyll 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you can do something with "Media -> Stream" to save what's currently playing to a file but I've not experimented with that yet. Normally I would have the entire file and crop what I need.

3
chlorophyll 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not yet! Maybe youtube will do something to prevent this in the future though. I don't know how well it works for very long videos.

2
chlorophyll 2 points ago +2 / -0

Video that might get deleted or video you might want to edit.

53
chlorophyll 53 points ago +53 / -0

Because then you have a copy of videos that might get removed - also you can use it for video editing.

21
chlorophyll 21 points ago +21 / -0

I figured VLC is trustworthy enough - most people already have it and the solution is this easy without questionable websites that do it for you.

4
chlorophyll 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are they all as trustworthy as VLC?

5
chlorophyll 5 points ago +5 / -0

You would have to do this for each video.

view more: Next ›