Reply to myself...lol. Obviously it's not all mail-in ballots as there were loads more than this.
Do they have documentation for any of them? Or is it for all mail-in ballots? They just didn't keep any documentation whatsoever?
Agree. That doesn't disenfranchise anyone as far as I can see. If they are genuinely illegal then accepting them disenfranchises every Trump voter in the state. They would all be able to take legal action then, surely?
I don't understand how this has happened. Voters must know they are supposed to apply? Are the ballots just literally fraudulent?
That isn't supposed to be the case. There should be barcodes, or watermarks, or specific paper that can identify them. If they haven't done this they should throw the whole state out anyway. That is shocking if it is true. I believe election officials can print them out to replace ballots that are damaged for some reason, and that's bad enough, but no attempt at security measures to begin with, is not acceptable at all.
But how did they get these ballots if they weren't requested? Fraud, or just oops, sent them to everyone, shame about the law?
I honestly don't really understand this. Are you saying it is true that there are a 100,000 ballots more than written requests, but we don't know which ones, so can't throw any out? Does it matter which ones? Can't the total just be adjusted. Who precisely would that disenfranchise?
But more importantly, if there are a hundred thousand ballots without a ballot request, doesn't that mean some of them must be fraudulent. There are several ways to establish that.
If there are 100, 000 ballots more than requested which are NOT fake, then as much as that sucks for people who voted within the rules, the precinct / State must be invalidated. You can't just do that! Massive fraud has been proved. Or at least an irregularity on a scale that affected the result. I can even think of ways it could be foreign interference / hacking.
It disenfranchises every single Donald Trump voter in the State. All of them.
Or, is this some sort of technicality I'm missing?
They've made this totally meaningless now by putting on too many posts. I don't even really process it anymore. You could put it on anything with ongoing litigation. You could put it on virtually any comments where there is a difference of opinion.
It's technically correct and basically says, some other people disagree. Idiots.
Still telling that they DON"T put on all these other areas with conflicts.
Different paper should be enough to identify a fake ballot.
I would like to know how many of these there are. It is possible that it isn't part of any organised fraud, just people acting on their own, but even then, it could be enough when the margin is so thin. PBS did a video (in Georgia) suggesting the Dominion machines don't recognise copies. I'm still struggling to quite believe this, but I haven't found any evidence it's wrong. PBS video also then can be seen as teaching people how to commit fraud.
If there is organised fraud and they haven't come up with something better than this then it should be game over. Also, the paper itself can be a form of identifying a real ballot.
Of course a lot of the potential fraud does involve real ballots in a number of ways
Lots of evidence people just copied ballots and Dominion accepted them. The watermarks / paper would be different. This should be an easy catch then if it's true.
Yes, so long as Trump loses it's fine. Then ask them why they don't like him and you don't get rational answers either. It is literal brainwashing. I've noticed some of it breaking down though recently.
"This claim about election fraud is disputed".
Voter fraud of any kind is exceedingly rare in the US, election experts confirm
Experts and officials said there has been no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 US elections. The election process was secure and voter fraud of any type is incredibly rare, according to The Associated Press and Reuters.
THIS CLAIM ABOUT NO ELECTION FRAUD IS DISPUTED.
It's just embarrassing now really.
Yes, 100% Biden would win when they "counted" all the votes even though Trump won the state last time. Should have been sacked on the spot.
in 2021 "Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is wanted for subverting democracy through technology and #electronicvoting"
Ironically, it was the "support" from Zuckerberg that pushed some of them to jump the shark so badly due to the pressure they were under.
He looked terrified BEFORE the election. Didn't understand it at the time, but he was talking about how later votes would definitely give Biden the win. It was weird. The way he said it was weird. His behaviour was very strange and nervous. Or it was at the time. Now it makes sense. I'll try and find the video.
all the better to seize his assets with...
Well I think it's potentially worse than that, as there could be foreign actors involved.
agreed. The odd one seems to be popping up here and there. Oh, oops I did it again, lost thousands of votes. No.
As an American, as someone who has gone to sea, gone to war...
Now a hero again.
Yeah great point actually, get the children out and expose the school. Perhaps this won't go the way they think...
Too many people to threaten now. It will snowball.
I'm glad they find this attempted coup funny.
You would not be laughing if you understood what was at stake.
I agree. Mark Zuckerberg is now utterly corrupt.