0
agile_a [S] 0 points ago

and at the end of that letter itll say "sorry about all thatm can we have donations?

2
agile_a [S] 2 points ago

but putting antifa in gulags could be fun

0
agile_a [S] 0 points ago

I don't think you understand what speaking up even means. making angry posts in the dark corners of the internet is not speaking up

conservatives like to whine a lot. They like to yell at their TV and make angry posts on the comment sections but they don't actually like to DO anything about it

in fact if you even try to help them make better posts and get their comments seen by more people there even resistant to that..

they don't speak up. They whine on tiny comment sections that nobody reads. there's a difference.

and frankly I think that they're scared of that changing. They don't want to beat the Democrats because then they would have nothing to complain abou

0
agile_a [S] 0 points ago

if your argument of how they're not lazy is that they managed to once every four years take 15 minutes out of their day to pull a lever in a building and you kind of made the opposite of your point. voting is the bare minimum you can possibly do. If you're bragging about how it's the literal most you've contributed to politics and you are by far the laziest person in the country.

it's the most you've contributed to politics is once every four years you take 15 minutes out of your day to go into a building and pull a lever. If that's the absolute most you've contributed. And you've contributed roughly zero..

1
agile_a [S] 1 point ago

if you have that kind of money maybe you should consider helping me by Facebook ads promoting Trump. everybody hates Facebook but if you want to win you better use it.

for a small amount of money you can reach tens of thousands of people with any add you want. any meme you want..

and you can even choose whether it is displayed to liberals or conservatives

1
agile_a [S] 1 point ago

the proper response when someone calls u racist is not to recoil in horror

the proper response is "so what?" or "racism doesnt exist""

don't don't let them control the narrative

1
agile_a [S] 1 point ago

I mean Trump's administration is filled with Trump haters so it's going to be difficult for him. If he had appointed an attorney general who is a hardcore Trump supporter like Obama appointed a hardcore Obama supporter you'll be in a better position..

2
agile_a [S] 2 points ago

it's a wind because she literally admitted in court that she was fake news..

you can rub their faces in

7
agile_a [S] 7 points ago

ITS OFFICIAL: rachel maddow admits in court and is declared to not be a real journalist

http://www.cernovich.com/rachel-maddow-oann-lawsuit/

4
agile_a [S] 4 points ago

make sure that you bring it up all the time. save the link so that you can show liberals anytime they're scratching their bullshit

6
agile_a [S] 6 points ago

it's always better to have her admitting it. now whenever a liberal confronts you you can literally point to the fact that a court upheld that she was fake news and she admitted in court to being fake news..

and honestly if we were ever going to regulate the press like we should that would be at least the very basic standard. If a journalist has to claim in court that they are fake news to avoid being sued than they should be at the very least required to have a disclaimer on their show at the bottom showing that they are not real news. either a little disclaimer in text along the bottom of the screen or at the beginning of every show they should be required to give a quick disclaimer that they are not real news and the things they say on their show should not be assumed to be true

142
agile_a [S] 142 points ago

the problem is that conservatives keep trying to be "unbiased" and "impartial"

it's time for a new appointee there always like "nooooo we don't want to appear biased!"

why not? whats wrong with that? why is that a bad thing? because some old pilitician said so?

Democrats committed crimes. I WANT a biased prosecutor who is biased against crimes

want some who is passionate about enforcing the law and not indifferent to it

and that's the problem. Republicans continue a point people who really don't care either way because they're more concerned with appearing nonpartisan and non-threatening

it's time to cut the shit. we're talking about the Trump administration. there's no reason that there should be a single person in the Trump administration who is not a hardcore Trump supporter. Don't give me your bullshit about bias and then partiality. Presidents are supposed to appoint their supporters to their capital. That's how it's supposed to work. If you don't want their supporters in the administration and vote for a different president. but don't tell me that the president has to appoint his haters and his administration so that he can't get anything done. That's not the point of an election

undertale Republicans including the voters start getting serious about putting people who are passionate in office then you're never going to see anything change. If you appoint secret Democrats like Jeff sessions or indifferent complacent idiots like William Barr you're never going to get anything

Democrats don't make that mistake. They wanted to try to nail Trump with their unsubstantiated Russia conspiracy theories. so what did they do? The appointed Obama's FBI director as special investigator and he hired a bunch of democrat donors to his team. Because that's how you do it when you want to go after somebody

damn it if they went after people. They tried to put Flint in jail they tried to put Rodger Stone in jail and Papadopoulos in jail and a bunch of other people that didn't deserve to go to prison or put in jail because of the Democrats order cute. there is no excuses why the Republicans cannot do that. If the Democrats are able to put innocent people in jail there is no excuse why Republicans can't put guilty people in jail except that they are not motivated enough

building on that. Republicans are not motivated enough. or 2 years in office they didn't accomplish Jack fucking shit. Because old people are not motivated so we need to vote out the old people and vote in young people. 40 years you have his career politicians that are old and they didn't get anything done. People like Candace Owens Milo yiannopoulos etc work for 2 years and they accomplish more than the old people did in 40 years

so another way you win is to get rid of the old people and vote them out. it's time for the old people that fail step aside for the young people that succeeded..

-2
agile_a [S] -2 points ago

yes that's what you want to believe. I mean you have no problem believing other. mystics to justify your racism in white supremacy so it shouldn't be too hard for you to manipulate what I said in order to justify anti white supremacy. unless of course you just have an agenda of promoting white supremacy and you will take any statistic out of context and ignore any other statistic in order to support your white supremacy because your goal is to hate black people. not get to the truth..

-2
agile_a [S] -2 points ago

they don't though. African Americans are convicted at a higher rate but they don't commit more crimes than any other race

it's just that racist policing typically targets them more often so they're caught more often. A poor African-American is more likely to be caught and sent to jail for a crime then some white collar billionaire white guy who committed financial fraud...

other than that studies have consistently proven that black people are not more likely to commit crimes than white people. poor people are more likely to commit poor people crimes than rich people who commit rich people crimes. studies have taken poor communities that are majority white and majority-black and compared the crime rates and there was virtually no difference. The real difference is that more black people in America or at least a higher percentage of black people live in poverty due to hundreds of years of oppression versus white people who typically do not have the same high percentage living in poverty..

awesome also the fact that the legal system was set up in a racist and classist way to Target for people committing crimes more than rich people committing crimes. A four person robbing a store is more likely to go to jail than a rich person who millions of people by committing fraud..

but when you take a white community that's in poverty and compare it to a black community to some poverty there's virtually no difference in crime rates. does it just out of context statistics that white supremacists used to justify their irrational hatred of black people..

hatred of black people that they had long before they ever first discovered that out of context statistic. I hate you to black people that they had before they ever first logged on to the internet. And I hate you two black people that they would have even if they had never read that statistic. Because for the white supremacists they don't hate black people because of these out of context fake news reasons. those are the excuses they use to the "normies""

in reality they just hate black people because these are white supremacists..

they have hate in their hart. A hatred that doesn't go away regardless of what the statistics say..

1
agile_a [S] 1 point ago

yes I want Adam Schiff and control. seriously? Libertarians don't actually understand how the world works and that's one of the biggest problems is that the education system failed them

they literally think that Adam Schiff is going to personally be deciding what's allowed on Facebook and what's not LOL

see the government does this model s. I was just this one big building with tentacles popping out of it with a mind of its own. instead of the millions of different people that work within it..

1
agile_a [S] 1 point ago

this. it's what we did with the post office. The founding fathers believed at the facilitation of communication just too important to be left in the hands of private interests who would misuse it

1
agile_a [S] 1 point ago

I'm fine with making them a public forum so that they can't ban people. I'm not fine with twisting and destroying the law to turn a social media company into illegal news outlet so that you can sue them into bankruptcy over every post on their website..

2
agile_a [S] 2 points ago

and that's exactly the fear that they want you to have it keeps you in a check. As long as you're so scared of the other side that you vote for them no matter what then they know that you don't have to listen to you or do anything for you. you will still vote for them no matter what out of fear of the Democrats. And they do that every year. sure they ignore you and they do a bunch of frostings and they show that they don't give a fuk about you but then they show you the latest Democrat to scare you into voting for them anywa

3
agile_a [S] 3 points ago

they've been in office for so long they don't care. They want their donor money. unless you're paying them a substantial amount of money they don't give a fuk about you..

view more: Next ›