4
adawk91 4 points ago +4 / -0

havent we already seen this? ie: “Ivanka Trump looked disgusting—nipples protruding— in her blue shirt before the UN General Assembly. Very Very Disrespectful”

2
adawk91 2 points ago +2 / -0

Big Corporate is hurting. They need your taxes raised, and money printed which devalues your savings, to fund their bailouts. They also need the opportunity to hand your job to a “hungrier” person who will work twice as many hours for half the salary.

12
adawk91 12 points ago +13 / -1

or, they want the republicans to accept a moral victory out of keeping the senate rather than have a bunch of senators also challenging the results

1
adawk91 1 point ago +1 / -0

the person denying them entry probably had a gun, and they only had an 8.5x14 piece of paper with a court order printed on it

1
adawk91 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s to remove the 2A right for people under the guise of regulation. If you make it illegal to possess a gun within a 1 mile radius of schools, hospitals, and government buildings, then all the people that live near those things are not allowed to own guns.

3
adawk91 3 points ago +3 / -0

how much do you want to bet this fraud is happening with the census too, to ensure that reliably blue areas get more house seats?

2
adawk91 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are having back room meetings about which house and senate races to flip for their ”mandate”

8
adawk91 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is the first election in history where big tech gaslit as many people as they could, that you better vote D or you will literally die

3
adawk91 3 points ago +3 / -0

no, she said ballots that can’t be linked to a registered voter in their database, indicating either a fake name or a person that voted who wasnt a registered voter. even worse IMO

2
adawk91 2 points ago +2 / -0

these were the “mail in ballots” in years prior

1
adawk91 1 point ago +1 / -0

it dates to before things like air travel, rail travel, the internet etc. the original intention was for each state to conduct it’s election for president, then send their electors to DC to vote for the president based on the will of their constituents. so this is why the left says it’s obsolete. however, in more modern times, it has since been discovered that it forces presidential candidates to pay attention to all of the states, and the issues facing them, rather than campaign to win the most populated areas (like CA TX FL NY) and just flat out ignore the others, because a winning strategy would be to do shit like say sieze all of the privately held land in AK MT and KS that is rich in natural resources, create indentured servants out of the local population to work in mines, and use the proceeds to fund free healthcare and education in the most populous cities. i know this is extreme hyperbole, but the basic strategy to win national elections would be to redistribute wealth from the less populated states to the more populated ones.

2
adawk91 2 points ago +2 / -0

the explanation is that a bunch of the big business republican types broke ranks and voted biden at the top and republican down ballot

1
adawk91 1 point ago +1 / -0

No

Big Corporate has halted the result to figure out how to plan for the inevitable riots

1
adawk91 1 point ago +1 / -0

can someone from PA fill me in on what Speed Cushions are?

i have an image in my head of couch cushions laid across the road where speed bumps would normally be?

2
adawk91 2 points ago +2 / -0

“I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.” - Joseph Stalin, 1923

49
adawk91 49 points ago +50 / -1

the reason jobs now require degrees IMO is because they want at least part of their workforce in debt bondage

33
adawk91 33 points ago +33 / -0

i voted early in Dallas county yesterday and there was a biden volunteer asking around “where are all the mail in ballots!?? i havent seen anyone coming to drop off mail in ballots! do you have a mail in ballot sir??”

view more: Next ›