1
Reltius 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s the worst larp I’ve ever read

5
Reltius 5 points ago +5 / -0

That should be bad for Hunter, but we need to implicate Joe so when the media finally admits these are real it shows his role

21
Reltius 21 points ago +21 / -0

Even worse, they say they are investigating to see if it was Russian disinformation. They already know it isn’t because when they confiscated it they had paper work with the serial number of the MacBook. No way in hell they didn’t immediately try to confirm that serial number with Apple’s records of ownership/AppleID.

They’ve known for almost a year it is Hunters

19
Reltius 19 points ago +19 / -0

This is confirmation that one of the deals for Hunters pay, was “deliverables” this email describes, including him getting high profile US officials to speak out in support of Burisma so that Ukrainian officials would stop investigating them.

4 months after this email, Viktor Shokin was fired.

Now why would Burisma think Hunter Biden had this kind of power except for daddy?

34
Reltius 34 points ago +34 / -0

This is the full text of the email if you don’t want to download it..

From: Vadym Pozharskyi [email protected] Subject: Re: Revised Burisma Proposal, Contract and Invoice Date: November 2, 2015 at 4:36 PM To: Devon Archer [email protected] Cc: Hunter Biden [email protected], Eric D. Schwerin @rosemontseneca.com Dear colleagues, Hope, you are well. Thank you for the docs provided. I have analyzed them most carefully and came up with the following observations: the first thing is that the suggested scope of work is largely lacking concrete tangible results that we set out to achieve in the first place, mostly focusing on the process. Also, it doesn't offer any names of top US officials here in Ukraine (for instance, US Ambassador) or Ukrainian officials (the President of Ukraine, chief of staff, Prosecutor General) as key targets for improving Nikolay's case and his situation in Ukraine.

If, however, this is done deliberatly to be on the safe and cautious side, I can understand the rationale. And if all parties in fact understand the true purpose of the BS engagement and all our joint efforts, it's ok and we should proceed immediately. My only concern is for us to be on the same page re our final goals. With this in mind, I would like us to formulate a list of deliverables, including, but not limited to: a concrete course of actions, incl. meetings/communications resulting in high-ranking US officials in Ukraine (US Ambassador) and in US publicly or in private communication/comment expressing their "positive opinion" and support of Nikolay/Burisma to the highest level of decision makers here in Ukraine :President of Ukraine, president Chief of staff, Prosecutor General, etc The scope of work should also include organization of a visit of a number of widely recognized and influential current and/or former US policy-makers to Ukraine in November aiming to conduct meetings with and bring positive signal/message and support on Nikolay's issue to the Ukrainian top officials above with the ultimate purpose to close down for any cases/pursuits against Nikolay in Ukraine. Looking forward to your feedback! Vadym

1
Reltius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop pussyfooting around and drop an injunction on their ass NOW! Don’t give a flying fuck if it gets overturned in 3 months!

7
Reltius 7 points ago +7 / -0

The time for the military to nuke San Francisco has long since passed

1
Reltius 1 point ago +3 / -2

Hopefully Bongino will stfu about his “muh free markits!” now.

14
Reltius 14 points ago +14 / -0

No one is allowed to be fucking surprised. Big tech PROMISED to do this in 2017 hearings. They’ve been planning for this for 4 years.

view more: Next ›