89
19

"The disposition, in any conflict, to side with 'them' against 'us', and the felt need to denigrate the customs, culture and institutions that are identifiably 'ours.' " British philosopher Roger Scruton

69
27
39
27

[TFF Lobbyist] “We found that there are a number of things in [the bill] that really don’t provide protections for religious entities in particular – churches, and so forth. There are some exemptions in the bill, but they are pretty narrow.

As for the punitive damages, there is no limit on the punitive or compensatory damages. There’s also an award of attorney’s costs and fees – only to the Plaintiff if they prevail, but not to the Defendant. In addition, there are fines that are pretty hefty. In totality, this makes it a Plaintiff attorney’s DREAM, to go suing everyone and everything.” [cut off at this point]

[Delegate Simon on the Committee] “I’ve actually looked at the [unlimited punitive damages] language…and I think it’s actually doing exactly what we intended for it to do. If you don’t want to be subject to unlimited punitive damages, don’t discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

I mean, this wasn’t meant to be a non-punitive bill. We created a private right of action for a reason. And so I think that the bill accomplishes exactly what it’s intended to do in the form that it’s intended to do it. And so, at this point, I would move that we report the bill.” (To which all the other Democrats “seconded” in unison and voted to pass the bill.)

And we shouldn’t be surprised, either. After all, that was from the same Delegate who, just two years ago, when speaking in favor of a similar bill and responding to similar SOGI concerns of religious groups and universities, said: "There are certain sincerely held religious beliefs which are so discriminatory that we don't give them the protection of the law, and this is one of those cases."

19

"Never, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in, except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force, never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy." -- Winston Churchill

11
21
29
27
50

A friend has been talking to a lawyer in VA and, according to this lawyer, with the state of emergency in place in VA, Northam can blanket designate everyone there as domestic terrorists and mark them as felons, effectively wiping out their ability to vote or buy guns. Additionally, there will be Israeli surveillance companies there, who were invited by Northam to meet him in February, using the event as a showcase for their capabilities. Do with this info as you think wisest.

126
39
35
28

What countries would supply them?

What would they be armed with?

How would they be transported?

How long would it take for them to mobilize (how much time would we have to get ready)?

If they were sourced from China, what other countries might they be routed through to make them harder to track?

43
100
39
58
28
52
180
36
40
277
view more: Next ›