3
MeSewCorny 3 points ago

I like it. Social media NEEDS a censorship free platform that can compete with the liberal shitholes currently infested with all of the whiny snowflakes and pussies that make up reddit and Twitter. You're absolutely correct in us being in a unique position. The best part is reddit is entirely responsible for creating their own worst nightmare in thedonald.win.

9
MeSewCorny 9 points ago

It's not only that, but when social media is the primary means by which most Americans get their news, and that is a data driven fact, and Big Tech is disappearing one side of the conversation, and only allowing the other to be seen, that is blatant election interference. That in and of itself makes them a publisher. They rose to prominence screaming to the world how they were free speech and no censorship. Now that they control the totality of market share on what information everyone sees they totally flip flop and go full communist propaganda.

18
MeSewCorny 18 points ago

This was my hope all along. If what Big Tech is doing isnt election interference against Conservative voices as a whole then I don't know what is. They have 2 sets of rules: one for the leftist ideology and one for the right. Honestly this is why I was hoping he would do an Executive Order against anchor babies so they would sue him saying it violated the 14th amendment and send it before the Supreme Court, but think we should get one more solid conservative justice before we do.

2
MeSewCorny 2 points ago

Sounds like the liberal left. I love how Big Tech and Liberal Media has somehow convinced these pussies they are the majority yet they still consistently lose on election day.

3
MeSewCorny 3 points ago

What a bunch of fucking pussies. I'll bet those morons, both men and women, would get down on their knees and suck a black mans cock just to virtue signal. The amount of fucking pussies on the left is laughable. Living in Texas it defies my imagination to even see people like this. If I did not see them on Twitter or Reddit I would not believe anyone could actually be this much of a fucking pussy that they are so insecure they are literally getting on their knees and apologizing for being white. Its enraging to see such pathetic insecurity in needing to be accepted by others.

2
MeSewCorny 2 points ago

Seriously. That's a huge fucking sub. What in the actual fuck does BLM have to do with current television shows. I always drop in to see the current shows dropping each month.

3
MeSewCorny 3 points ago

It was kind of weird. I was thinking out was about to watch like a news edited video, but then all it showed was like a random video being shot of this group of guys just doing whatever lol. Thank you for the link as I did enjoy watching it.

1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago

That's not how a loan works. So they couldn't do that.

3
MeSewCorny 3 points ago

Are you a literal retard? Trump is federal. Your state is supposed to be defending itself. It has both a police force and a national guard to do so. What is Trump supposed to do? Send in the military? Sorry, but that's a violation of the Constitution. Learn how the fuck shit works before you open your ignorant fucking mouth.

1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago

When you're old enough to remember the first time that SNL skit aired "Schlitz Gay" when SNL was still actually good.

9
MeSewCorny 9 points ago

Time to start tagging the FBI anytime you see leftist and Antifa coordinating on Twitter. Anyone who calls for criminal activity tag the FBI and DOJ. That will scare the shit out of them now that they have been deemed terrorists.

16
MeSewCorny 16 points ago

I think the big question everyone has been asking is how the Executive Order affects a huge company like Twitter, and how it affects sites like thedonald.win that are specifically built as biased. Hope I asked that right. Would this EO affect thedonald.win?

3
MeSewCorny 3 points ago

You know what, you should do an AMA. That would be fucking awesome.

Please please please u/sharksgrill u/shadowman3001

102
MeSewCorny 102 points ago

This comment deserves it's own self post tbh. Wish I had the power to pin at the top of my post.

2
MeSewCorny 2 points ago

It kind if sucks that this is all of a sudden an issue with just 6 months left to election. If we'd started this 4 years ago it'd already be through the courts and set in stone.

1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago

Just because you want to say that's why the EO was signed today doesn't make it so. Trump specifically pointed to the editorial of his tweet as violating federal law Election interference. That's the facts. You can say "Well they did this !nd that, and so does td so that's why it's being done. That's called speculation to drive your argument. One can literally be verified as leading to this, the other is just a talking point used to bolster your opinion. Either way, I'm done here.

1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago

That wasn't your point. You specifically stated Twitter was doing the same thing thedonald.win does. I pointed out they weren't.

Banning users isnt a violation of state or federal law. Trump has sued Washington Post and New York Times for violating law. But Section 230 protects these digital media outlets who hide behind it. That is the purpose of the Executive Order. They are getting government protection no other private media outlet is afforded.

1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago

That's not an opinion. It's a fact. There have been literal news articles shown of Twitter censoring posts and ads of Republican candidates. There is literally a post on the President's timeline where Twitter, the company itself, editorialized his post. THAT, is election interference. It doesn't matter if you dont like the answer. It doesn't matter if you dont want to accept it. These are LITERAL verifiable facts that you can go read about this very second. You not wanting to accept FACTS, not opinions, but VERIFIABLE FACTS, is not a condition of something being a fact. It's just being dense. If a Democrat AG can point to an outlet protected by Section 230 that is violating federal law by suppressing, censoring, or narrating a political candidate then YES, they have full authority to act.

1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago

Because he wanted so bad to say we were hypocrites when in actuality he just has no understanding of how Section 230 works. If Joe Biden came on here the mods wouldn't edit his post or suppress his post from being seen or anything like that. If they did it could be construed as election interference. He thinks it's like, oh no site is allowed to have a theme or be for anyone or it violated section 230. Twitter isnt in violation because they are a leftist shithole. They are in violation because they are actively censoring and interfering in the election by targeting actual candidates running for office against Democrats.

1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago

Did you just miss everything I said or are you just refusing to acknowledge it? That's intellectually dishonest. Twitter was never in violation because they were suspending Joe Blows like me. They were in violation because they were actively suppressing information from politicians running for office. They, the company itself. They censored Marsha Blackburn posts and censored multiple opponents of Democrats who they refused to verify in spite of doing everything policy stated in order to be verified as someone running for political office. They editorialized running candidates that ran in opposition to their own ideology. Link me to a single time thedonald.win has done this to an elected official. You cant. And you dont get to just be like, "oh nevermind everything you just said that answers why they are violating section 230, let's go back to this point which has nothing to do with Section 230 whatsoever." You wanted to know how Twitter was in violation? I told you continuous election interference with a multitude of Republican candidates officially running for office. How is thedonald.win not in violation? Show me where they have violated a political candidate running for office. You wont be able to. Theres your answer.

1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago

230 protections protect a private company from being held liable for what is said on their platform. If a libelous or law breaking act is said or done their platform 230 protects them from being prosecuted. HOWEVER, if the company itself is violating the law and making the libelous or law breaking action the Section 230 is currently protecting them, something no private non tech media outlet, such as NY Times is afforded. Twitters current editorializing is construed as election interference because THEY, the actual company itself, not an individual, is interfering with parties currently running for office with their editorializations. This is why it is not protected. The moment they editorialized a running political official in an election they violated that 230. Has thedonald.win editorialized a post by Joe Biden himself?

view more: Next ›