2
LoneStarWinner [S] 2 points ago

Being older, I’ve heard this same speech several times before. If the airlines came back after 9/11, they’ll come back from this. There might be a few lean years, but it’ll bounce back.

1
LoneStarWinner [S] 1 point ago

Indictments Bill, go work on some indictments.

1
LoneStarWinner [S] 1 point ago

Elizabeth Warren tested 1/1024 positive, and has self-checked herself into an ICU facility in her home state.

1
LoneStarWinner [S] 1 point ago

You have to really have an issue you care about before you see the media for what it is. The average liberal doesn’t particularly care for Donald Trump, so the media can say what they want and the average liberal doesn’t really check into it. It passes their confirmation bias test. Even then, from time to time, they might have thought the media got a “little carried away” when reporting about Trump, but that was all.

This is different. They care about this pandemic. They want accurate info, and they are willing to spend the time to see if what they are being told checks out. They are genuinely appalled by what we’ve seen from the beginning: the media’s open willingness to lie if it means “getting” Trump.

5
LoneStarWinner [S] 5 points ago

They might as well be sticking pins in a Trump voodoo doll. Wishing death upon someone? It’s not a thing. Unless you are so detached from reality that you believe your hoping for something somehow makes it true.

Four years ago, these were the people talking down to us about how we just didn’t understand the “nuances” of their argument. Now they sit in their basements “hoping” for the deaths of their enemies. My how far they’ve fallen.

1
LoneStarWinner [S] 1 point ago

Well, it definitely distracted you. Sad, yet true.

2
LoneStarWinner [S] 2 points ago

Woah! Millions of events in the universe. Two of them happen on the same day!!! It’s proof! (Proof of what I have no clue)

1
LoneStarWinner [S] 1 point ago

Yeah, you should probably vote for Biden instead.

2
LoneStarWinner [S] 2 points ago

Biden won’t be the nominee. Not sure who will, but I’d be surprised if it’s Biden. He’s not up to the task.

1
LoneStarWinner [S] 1 point ago

We elected Trump exactly for a situation such as this. Thousands of lives have been saved with the hydroxychloroquine drug combo. If Hillary was President what would she have been saying? Whatever Dr. Fauci said! “Don’t use untested medicines”, etc. we’d be in much worse shape.

Don’t forget we started with a very, very strong economy. If Hillary had been in power, she would have kept adding crushing regulations. We would have been barely holding our heads above water when this hit. So the long-term effects on our economy would have been far greater. We are still in a position to bounce back if we can get out of this before too long.

Don’t forget that virtually all the major countries have done this, not just the US. Trump would have been crucified if he had not gone along with the message. He was appropriately skeptical, but at some point you have to go along when they are ready to blame thousands of deaths on you. He’s saved thousands, maybe tens of thousands, but will get no credit.

Trump has also used this opportunity to re-envigorate state’s rights. Some states were incensed at first that Trump was trying to make them do their jobs. States have then made local governments do their job. Trump has set the takeover of the US by the Federal Government back 60 years (a very good thing).

I suspect Trump is short order will begin to recommend that states start getting things slowly back to normal. It’ll be a long process. But the experts were all wrong. Trump has been proven right. The ‘experts’ know this, even if they won’t admit it publicly.

So Trump has done everything we could possibly expect from him here, and shown that he is able to understand unique situations better than the experts. Trust in Trump. Where do you think we’d be headed with anyone else at the helm?

1
LoneStarWinner [S] 1 point ago

I’m not trying to “rule it out”. But there is a lack of evidence. You are trying to “rule it in” based on a lack of evidence. That is flawed logic.

7
LoneStarWinner [S] 7 points ago

That’s how it’s done in countries with lots of malaria, I believe.

2
LoneStarWinner [S] 2 points ago

Oh, you better believe they are doing it. That’s why this whole talk of Trump taking over the Feds is so 180 degree laughably wrong.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-03-27/federal-reserve-s-financial-cure-risks-being-worse-than-disease

2
LoneStarWinner [S] 2 points ago

There was the crazied Trump & husband hater who killed her spouse with fish tank cleaner false flag.

5
LoneStarWinner [S] 5 points ago

Well, they are correctly reporting what the new model shows. They drastically lowered the number of hospital beds and ventilators needed at the peak (in one case by almost half), yet barely dropped the expected deaths. It doesn’t make sense. The model is obviously ridiculous. It would be right to point out how ridiculous the model has become, but I suppose it’s not exactly wrong to report on what it is showing.

It is the way CNN operates: report DNC lies in a just-the-facts manner, while calling Trump a liar on even the most obvious true thing if there’s no immediate way it can be conclusively proven to be exactly 100.0% true.

3
LoneStarWinner [S] 3 points ago

.. another possibility: your company could adapt to the current circumstances and change their policies according. If I can be told to sit at home, and not even do as much as go play poker with my friends, I think your company can find a way to hire people without immediate government background checks.

Companies that adapt thrive. Companies set in their ways slowly, but surely, die.

view more: Next ›