1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey I just found it on this vid at 8:32:00

2
Kramercalled 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was also a curious moment when the "reporter" asked Trump if he would attend Biden's inauguration. He said something like, "I think I know the answer to that but I can't say it now."

2
Kramercalled 2 points ago +2 / -0

Happy Thanksgiving to all--even the haters and losers!

2
Kramercalled 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey in my eye rolling, I actually didn't catch that. Thanks for pointing that out!

Happy Thanksgiving :)

1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for the well thought out response! I really enjoyed reading it and it was good context right before I dove into Sidney's GA filing. I haven't had a chance to review MI yet or take a look at any exhibits.

The narrative was largely unsurprising. Many of these pieces have dripped out in some form and she tied them all together. All of your points were very relevant during this review, especially the distinction between a criminal & civil filing and your explanation of circumstantial evidence.

I certainly think, given the vote tallies she provided for each area, she has enough here to prove a preponderance of evidence. I think people are thirsty for the criminal side of this whole thing and remembering that "she doesn't have to prove the ENTIRE criminal network in this trial. One small section will totally suffice" was a good takeaway for me. I know I went into today hoping to see Kemp's kickbacks in the news, but that's not the intent of this fight. Today we walk so tomorrow we run.

Happy Thanksgiving! 🙂

2
Kramercalled 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why is this all happening in the dead of night??????????? When I went to bed on 11/25, Joe Biden was my president-elect!

3
Kramercalled 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey thanks for this! I was hoping the lady in the vid would go into why Sidney may be comfortable tipping her hand so much.

I stand with Sidney x a mil but btw her Twitter and press appearances, it feels like she's putting it all out there. Are you of the opinion there's a lot more facts and evidence we don't know yet or is it a sign of confidence that she's shared so much?

1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0

SIDNEY DELIVERS THE SAUCE WE NEED FOR OUR THANKSGIVING ARGUMENTS YASSSSS

21
Kramercalled 21 points ago +21 / -0

Haha I agree with you. The only thing I expected was that they'd try to steal the election and the media would try to delegitimize the election results.

I did not expect it all to go this far. Call me naive, I guess. I still can't shake that surreal feeling on election night when my eyes told me Trump won but my ears heard otherwise. It's been a wild ride.

1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Dude deep state lawyers have no reason to talk directly to the people. You sound a lot like 1 of those people that whined about Trump tweeting.

Here I rewrote your post as if it's 2016 and Trump's being "unpresidential" ---

Actually I'm getting to where I can't stand Trump. He need to shut his mouth and act like the president. He is so amateur it is infuriating. Do you see Obama on twitter!??? Could you imagine other presidents acting like him!?? It is unbelievable!!!

1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like this thought. I think some people are assuming everyone is dooming by questioning the purpose of this announcement. Not so.. it's just a curious clarification & curious timing from a man that never seems to do anything on accident. Any ol drifter could've predicted this would drum up the fake news into dismissing her credibility, which they've been all too anxious to do since the bombshell presser.

So I've got to think, he walked right into this and you're rationale makes sense to me.

1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's true. Even just from media appearances, Rudy focuses almost entirely on equal protection under the law and lack of meaningful observers and Sidney is always talking high crimes, corruption, and domestic + foreign influence.

Both are important but Rudy may have to walk first for Sidney to run.

1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0

Definitely, I agree - I wish I had titled my post differently. I knew she wasn't on the team but I do find the timing of the clarification unusual especially coming from Trump, who knows how to play the media, and knows this will cause the fake news to attack the credibility of her claims.

But you make sense - this is about to hit both sides of the aisle square in the ass. It transcends politics and she needs to stand apart from it. Right on!

1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0

Definitely, I agree - I wish I had titled my post differently. I knew she wasn't on the team but I do find the timing of the clarification unusual especially coming from Trump, who knows how to play the media, and knows this will cause the fake news to attack the credibility of her claims.

But you make sense - this is about to hit both sides of the aisle square in the ass. It transcends politics and she needs to stand apart from it. Right on!

1
Kramercalled 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's true. She's been in lockstep with Lin about Kemp.

I gotta wonder as well if they [Trump] are stirring the pot on purpose. Surely anybody knows this statement would be gasoline on the fake news firestorm that's been doubling down on attacking the legitimacy of the legal efforts since the Thursday bombshell presser.

It's all so curious!! Not bad, necessarily, just got me 🤔🤔

2
Kramercalled 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude that's what I'm talking about! Haha super hopeful this clarification somehow positions her better to replace Wray

3
Kramercalled 3 points ago +3 / -0

Totally agree about the teams working interdependently. I guess I'm just thinking the clarification is gonna drum up some fake news in the next day or so. They will probably use this statement to attack her credibility.

2
Kramercalled 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you! Good post. I know Lin is separate and his efforts in GA were framed in the context of a concerned GA voter. That narrative existed from the beginning. No denying that this Powell announcement is reframing her position in the lawsuits.

I don't think it's a bad thing, necessarily. Surely fake news will make it sound like she's lost credibility. I'm actually hoping it's somehow (although I don't know how or why) positioning her better to take Wray's place.

view more: Next ›