Relevant username is relevant
That’s 21 murdered children she will have to answer for when God calls her.
Nothing to see here folks, move along.
When critical thinking is designed around bashing and demonizing conservative idea and anyone who opposes you, the system is dead.
Another do nothing situation
“So anyway I started blasting...”
Vigilante justice it is, then.
Title is kind of click-baity. They didn’t say they were going to war. “Self defense...” and, “armed patrols black panther style.”
I say we give them California and build a wall
*ATF has entered the chat *
Hide your dogs
Systemic, long standing enabling from the top (president) down. This goes for all presidents, not just DJT.
Sounds like a mental health issue to me...
There is data that supports they infringe on right more than they protect it... that's proven across all races and actual enforcement of law.
So... I get the whole argument, but the "demonizing police" part... The whole police community is a good ole' boys club. The "bad apples" are that way and stay on because they are allowed by the majority. They don't really do anything to their own...
HeS sCaReD HiDiNg iN HiS bUnKeR...
These social media cucks don’t understand how and what the president means to do to save this country.
Hey, just wanted you to know, police are now arresting and issuing summons for this...
ATF does nothing for the rights of law abiding citizens, it also doesn't do anything for the oath that they swore to protect.
When tried in court or a case is brought against the police, the question of procedure and communication comes up. Therefore, having said the piece about violation, the citizens are informed they are “breaking the law” and have a duty to comply.
Cops were showing up today handing out tickets at this same gym. Care to amend your statement?
I read the article this excerpt came from. It's very sad, sickening, disheartening. And while it's not a representation of the whole, it seems, through my observation of current social media trends, this is becoming the norm. Sad that a profession which used to be hailed with praise has fallen to a state of absent decorum.
I understood that reference.
An executive order that violates the constitution is not a law... In 1866 the SC determined that it was illegal to suspend the Constitution under pretense of a "state of emergency"
Oooooh right... so then...
Orange man bad?