4
HermitKidd [S] 4 points ago

No the 110 story building fell almost completely in its own footprint and WTC7 was not crushed by it in even the official story. The official story is WTC7 fell hours later because fire. Tell me what part of the University of Alaska study that was just completed is flawed. NIST cant and neither can you

3
HermitKidd [S] 3 points ago

Nope absolutely not. NIST study of WTC7 is completely flawed and the University of Alaska study proved it. NIST has been asked to retract their claims. Also the twin towers could not have have pancaked the floors. The top portion of the towers that broke loose and started to fall does not contain near enough energy to destroy all the floors below it. It would lose energy with each floor it crushed and the majority of the building would be still standing.

-1
HermitKidd [S] -1 points ago

Yes and now because of the UAF study AE911 has asked NIST to retract their conclusions and correct them.

1
HermitKidd [S] 1 point ago

Look at the Flynn case. Corrupt judges and corrupt FBI. Until the system is cleaned up, the indictments mean nothing. If theres an indictment and a corrupt judge lets them off then thts case over and done and makes us look even worse like the charges were baseless to normies. No point charging anyone until we know the charges have a chance of sticking

1
HermitKidd [S] 1 point ago

Glowing story yes but I was expecting a story talking about how the mosques are open and not our churches but the mosque in the story is also closed.

Found this funny from the article:

“In Islam, protecting and preserving human life is one of the most important goals,” he said. “Protecting and preserving human life comes before preserving the religion.”

2
HermitKidd [S] 2 points ago

Think about how iconic of a souvenir this will make bro

13
HermitKidd [S] 13 points ago

The guy who spoke before trump used the word disinfectant to describe light. I assumed when trump started speaking and used the same word he meant light too. Uv catheters are a thing. A reporter clarifys 5 mins later and trump says no i dont mean using injecting bleach or iso into the body. Only for objects

1
HermitKidd [S] 1 point ago

Thank you. Repeating fake news only hurts our cause

1
HermitKidd [S] 1 point ago

5 minutes after this exchange Trump clarifies to a reporter he says “no im not talking about using iso or bleach inside the humans, im talking about that for stationary objects”. I think he meant to say inanimate. Its hard to hear because people are over talking but if u try you can hear him say that

18
HermitKidd [S] 18 points ago

Very true hes sitting on the fence with a hand out helping people hop over

3
HermitKidd [S] 3 points ago (edited)

Aah shit i didn't know he walked it back. Fuck. I was defending him too. UV catheter into the lung makes sense to me

14
HermitKidd [S] 14 points ago

I havent heard to many people saying anything about what i heard around the 30 minute mark. Another reporter asks if he means putting iso or bleach in an injection and a bunch of reporters over talk but trump specifically says. No i dont mean injections like that. Only on stationary surfaces for that type of disinfectant. So he specifically says the opposite of what they claim. Again its hard to hear but its there if u try to listen.

37
HermitKidd [S] 37 points ago

Dont forget for those of us that arent even american he is a beacon of hope. People around the world are counting on that one man to change the entire world.

1
HermitKidd [S] 1 point ago

I dont pay attention enough to know why everyone hates Talcum X but it things like this that we all gotta cross the isle for. Truth tellers, even when we disagree with them must be respected.

2
HermitKidd [S] 2 points ago

Good fucking luck commie scum. You wont find NPC’s here. Go eat a bat and fuckoff

1
HermitKidd [S] 1 point ago

This was when i knew we had the right man for the iob

view more: Next ›