3
GOTRUMPAPUMPA 3 points ago +4 / -1

Does this also take into account the election fraud??

2
GOTRUMPAPUMPA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Joe Biidens target voters are people with anxiety it seems?

3
GOTRUMPAPUMPA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes it seems the tweet is not 100% historically correct, but the church did end up banning his manuscript for 200 years later on. The same point would still apply, The catholic church would be seen as the authorative source and if they banned the manuscript, it must be because it was incorrect -> so the tweets would have been marked as incorrect

4
GOTRUMPAPUMPA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm from Europe, I visited Denver and also SF/LA 7 years ago. I remember that Denver seemed like a really clean city, don't remember seeing any homeless people.

By that time SF had about 1 homeless guy on every street and thought it was a bit excessive .

How fast it can change

2
GOTRUMPAPUMPA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought this was sarcasm. Sadly not

" She earned a Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Conservation with a certificate in women's studies from the University of Colorado Boulder in 1981 and a J.D. degree and certificate in environmental law from the Lewis & Clark College Law School in 1985."

-> 3 useless degrees

1
GOTRUMPAPUMPA 1 point ago +1 / -0

No not really, tbh I don't really care about it that much. However I don't like companies that try to be woke while using almost slavery behind the scenes

4
GOTRUMPAPUMPA 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is mostly a shitpost don't take it too seriously haha

8
GOTRUMPAPUMPA 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think liberal conspiracy is better, then it doesn't seem to be a direct response to the 'right wing' conspiracy nomenclature and therefore will seem to be more credible. Am I making sense?