8
Damiano 8 points ago +8 / -0

I suggest also reaching out to your local GOP people and your state legislature. Yeah, lots of them are worthless swamp creatures but you only need one.

Pedes here can all help blast them. Let us know where you have resistance.

2
Damiano 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hate myself for laugh my ass off at your comment. It is so true yet so sad.

3
Damiano 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is possibly the best presentation of the problems with this election I have seen to date.

RUDY- Step aside and bring these ladies in! kek

6
Damiano 6 points ago +6 / -0

Agreed.

I have been saying repeatedly that we need to make sure that legislators, courts, etc. clearly understand that we will not allow this to get swept under the rug and gain understanding that their "leadership" is whatever Party flunky they've been bowing to, but The People.

Courts will be particularly hard since they have no real accountability to The People

2
Damiano 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good point. I'll take a half step back.

I do maintain, however, that the riots were a threat and have little to nothing to do with dead drug addicts.

2
Damiano 2 points ago +2 / -0

A couple more bounces around various courts, then probably SCOTUS. Hail Mary option of Article 2/ Legislatures stepping up.

Beyond that, ammo box.

3
Damiano 3 points ago +3 / -0

They've been pretty much saying it themselves, but they're being coy about it and hiding it behind a bunch of procedural bullshit.

Same shit as always. All sorts of head nodding and theater to keep the rubes in their place, then they will do nothing and babble about how they tried.

6
Damiano 6 points ago +6 / -0

Even the Justice that wrote the concurring/ dissenting opinion seems to go along with "laches is a bullshit cop out".

https://twitter.com/Elaijuh/status/1332827481951363077/photo/1

19
Damiano 19 points ago +20 / -1

The main decision is typical technicality bullshit that activist judges pull whenever their commie feelz get hurt. The concurring/ dissenting opinion is interesting.

https://twitter.com/Elaijuh/status/1332827481951363077/photo/1

As I understand it, the Justice is basically saying, "Get bent on your invalidating votes remedy, but your constitutional challenge has merit"

The uphill battle on this in all courts is, right thing or not, no one wants to be "that guy" who overturned millions of votes. In inescapable outcome of doing so- even though I personally think it MUST be done- is going be like setting off a nuke in every U.S. city simultaneously.

I've said before, all those riots and cities burning... did you think that was for a dead drug addict? Nope. It was a threat and preview of what would happen on a much grander scale if the free shit army does get its way. No judge is going to say it, but you can be damn sure that it is influencing their opinion.

6
Damiano 6 points ago +6 / -0

The main decision is typical technicality bullshit that activist judges pull whenever their commie feelz get hurt. The concurring/ dissenting opinion is interesting.

https://twitter.com/Elaijuh/status/1332827481951363077/photo/1

As I understand it, the Justice is basically saying, "Get bent on your invalidating votes remedy, but your constitutional challenge has merit"

The uphill battle on this in all courts is, right thing or not, no one wants to be "that guy" who overturned millions of votes. In inescapable outcome of doing so- even though I personally think it MUST be done- is going be like setting off a nuke in every U.S. city simultaneously.

I've said before, all those riots and cities burning... did you think that was for a dead drug addict? Nope. It was a threat and preview of what would happen on a much grander scale if the free shit army does get its way. No judge is going to say it, but you can be damn sure that it is influencing their opinion.

9
Damiano 9 points ago +9 / -0

This big issue is that "leadership" are blocking this while making wuss noises, followed by most legislators are more concerned with towing the Party line than representing their constituents.

It is a good step forward, but we are miles from victory.

-5
Damiano -5 points ago +1 / -6

Did they get the data on the Rosewell alien spacecraft too? I heard that is codenamed "Kraken" too.

/s

1
Damiano 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really? Maxine Waters? That woman is a lunatic who can barely spell her own name.

Besides that, she's babbling about the Obama campaign's donation database. In her pea sized brain, surely it is magical alien technology.

1
Damiano 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no idea. All I know is that I can’t find the bombshell smoking gun evidence of voter fraud that’s proven by allegations of special ops guys dying in a plane crash while conducting a raid on a German server farm. Did the CIA shoot them before or after crashing the plane?

1
Damiano 1 point ago +1 / -0

Personally, I am not sold on Hammer and Scorecard either. Yeah, I know Sidney has been on about that and it’s in her lawsuits but I’m not buying into that until I see evidence beyond some self proclaimed expert’s statement.

1
Damiano 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know who else refused to elaborate on stuff? Adam Schiff. But trust him! There is mountains of evidence about Trump peeing on hookers and being Putin’s puppet! It’s all classified but will come out soon!

12
Damiano 12 points ago +12 / -0

For fucks sake.

I’m invoking the 24 hour rule. If facts show up to confirm this in 24 hrs or more, I’ll bite.

For now, I hope Powell, Flynn, etc. stay away from this guy.

1
Damiano 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone on earth predicted electronic election fuckery before the election, including the alphabet networks.

This dude has a checkered history with facts and loves going on TV to opine on conspiracy theories.

8
Damiano 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yup. McInerney has a checkered history with facts. Besides that, how does a retired general break news on 5 dead soldiers, rather than DoD or POTUS?

7
Damiano 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ain’t it something how the “peaceful protestors” always show up with weapons and shields? Meanwhile, the “violent white nationalists” show up with flags?

3
Damiano 3 points ago +3 / -0

They need at least 16 in the Senate to get this off the ground.

CALL NOW: https://thedonald.win/p/11QSCLGW1Y/calling-all-pennsylvania-pedes-y/

If you have already called, send email all of them.

If you have already emailed, send them a USPS letter

If you have already done all that, give the information to your friends, family, neighbors, etc. and help them do it.

If you have done all of this, contact your local GOP officials, pressure them into helping, and volunteer to help.

If you have done all that, do it again.

view more: Next ›