4847
Comments (154)
sorted by:
94
deleted 94 points ago +95 / -1
51
xkgb 51 points ago +51 / -0

These companies are going to be screwed after the election regardless of who wins.

11
Tellguy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hijacked for archived link:

https://archive.vn/pCleu

Personally I think we should click on the original link since the Hill deserves recognition for letting a free speech advocate speak on the issue.

It's just that I am doubtful it will stay up.

16
Puglosi4Prison 16 points ago +16 / -0

The comments on the hill article are cancer though.

Libtards are literally saying :”I WONT LISTEN, I don’t care if Biden was corrupt, It does not matter”

And these low iq shits have a say in forming the government. Jfc

3
Johnson 3 points ago +3 / -0

He literally said he was corrupt on video, saying he wanted to sell out early to special interests, and they said, 'wait until you're 40.' He does not realize how this makes him sound.

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

They enable the left to nsteal.from them

2
Tellguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah they are cancer. But it's good to see that every once in a while. Just to confirm one isn't in a bubble.

2
Puglosi4Prison 2 points ago +2 / -0

It shows how many blood sucking commies are among us and Trump needs every voter to come out and vote

6
Chopblock 6 points ago +6 / -0

’Pedes seem to operate under the misconception that the Democrats and Deep State even CARE about the actual votes, the tally, or even the electoral college delegate fight or congressional vote...

Their strategy, statements, and media censorship drive makes it clear that their domination point of attack is the DE FACTO ANNOUNCER OF A WINNER FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS: THE MSM CORPORATE NEWS AND THE TECH-CONTROLLED SOCIAL MEDIA SPHERE.

They’ve moved beyond trying to control who COUNTS the ballots, right to who gets to DECLARE THE VICTOR.

With a little infrastructure and insider ‘resistance’ help, they can simply announce Biden as the winner; censor virtually all opposition and debate, paralyze the government agencies in charge of stopping them, legitimize the ‘decision’ with some spectacle, distraction, and sowed confusion, use force or simple inaction to ‘sideline’ Trump, and then cement the outcome with a smear campaign against ‘sour grapes’ Trump, make arrests of ‘violent coup-plotting white supremacists’, lockdown everyone else into demoralized isolation, make some small ‘conciliatory’ gestures, run a ’false flag’ or two, and manufacture a foreign crisis that ‘demands’ we ‘move on’ and ‘adjust to the new normal’.

That’s why they don’t care that today’s reality doesn’t match today’s headlines.

Today’s headlines are being written to match tomorrow’s reality, and create a record on which tomorrow’s false history can be supported

1
lumpster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct. Their survival as info monopolies requires a long period of status quo. none of the warring factions (socialists, redpills+blackpills) are fighting for the status quo. One side will win. If its the socialists, they will turn on each other 1st thing - the independence of information is too great a threat. Also, eventually they will have a hot civil situation. If the patriots win, the institutions will be gutted through constitutional means. Having surfaced, they are prime targets for all.

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish that were true, but I doubt it.

24
ippwndu 24 points ago +24 / -0

I took my profits on FB and Google a few months ago. I was getting nervous about section 230 and antitrust action.

7
K-Harbour 7 points ago +7 / -0

230 worked as intended, until (once again) a court case gave a new interpretation that unleashed all this censorship non-sense.

9
tonightm16 9 points ago +11 / -2

In today's world were lockdowns are commonplace (even if it's just regional). Companies like Amazon are only going to go up in value. Governments have kicked their high streets and retail sectors in the nuts this year. Many will never recover.

If Amazon moves into the tourism sector (buying up bankrupt holiday firms) then its all going to be gravy for people hilding Amazin stocks.

5
VetforTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

AMAZON HAS COMPETITION COMING. can't say anymore than that.

2
johnrambo 2 points ago +2 / -0

They need some

7
Slyhillary 7 points ago +11 / -4

We need more than that

7
kebabdrogo 7 points ago +9 / -2

You can short/buy puts.

3
Jenmon 3 points ago +4 / -1

Good idea!

83
Vivadiscordia 83 points ago +83 / -0

The real story is how social media became an apparatus of the CCP.

25
Slyhillary 25 points ago +27 / -2
13
540k-Again 13 points ago +13 / -0

Marxist Media

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
9
blackdudeinresidence 9 points ago +9 / -0

They got first hand experience in how to censor by working with China to censor there. I worked on a legal matter for a major tech company that allowed for third party developers to sell their software through this company, and I would regularly see CCP (primarily Cyberspace Admin of China) related agencies send in requests on how to censor information in that region and other regions.

2
olliec420 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obama

43
deleted 43 points ago +43 / -0
10
dingdongbob 10 points ago +10 / -0

The narrative that has formed appears to be that people need to disregard the information because it was obtained using questionable methods. Basically the same gameplan they ran with the Clinton emails.

6
verycute 6 points ago +6 / -0

No news outlet that discussed Trump's taxes gets to do so.

8
ProdigalSon1997 8 points ago +8 / -0

yeah (not being rude here but) fuck if i care what Commie News Network says

3
bellamy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I confirmed that CNN is saying this is false!

37
Liberty_Prime 37 points ago +37 / -0

pay real close attention to what legislation is being introduced to fix this. I guarantee you these monopolies already have it drawn up for legislation.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
magafi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Law loopholes to continue as it is.

4
K-Harbour 4 points ago +4 / -0

To counter their legislation, we need to jump ahead of them.

++++++++

https://thedonald.win/p/GbkDytrN/the-freedom-of-eassembly-act-of-/

The Freedom of e-Assembly Act of 2021 - send to both your state and federal legislators

100.01. On application of any two or more US Citizens, representing all members of an electronically gathered collective, any platform provider:

(a) is prohibited from censoring or restraining any communication of a member of the collective to any other member or members of the collective; and

(b) is prohibited from adding or deleting members of the collective, except by agreement of the original members of the collective having membership at the time of application.

100.02 Violation by a platform provider of 100.01(a) shall constitute a civil offense with a civil penalty of not less than $1000 per censored or restrained communication; violation by a platform provider of 100.01(b) shall constitute a crimingal offense with a criminal penalty of not less than $10,000 or one year in prison, or both.

1
Liberty_Prime 1 point ago +1 / -0

The most painful part of that legislation is that it would fine mods of this forum for deporting shills.

It would seem existing law and antitrust actions might be a better action. I'm really not sure what the solution is, but I want any proposed legislation presented to the public long before a vote is taken.

2
BetsyRossRocks 2 points ago +2 / -0

But, but....I thought you had to vote for it to know what's in it?

2
K-Harbour 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely correct. One objective is legislation/regulation that will have the effect of keeping new competition out.

24
infinitysupreme 24 points ago +24 / -0

They only need to censor it long enough to get those sweet, ignorant early Democrat votes in and counted.

13
Aoikaze2000 13 points ago +13 / -0

That's why us early Republicans gotta get out and outvote their idiocy.

2
MsQleo 2 points ago +3 / -1

there are many more registered dems than reps. we have to demoralize them or convert them, or our only chance is to turn out the vote better but with the rabid anti trump syndrome, they won't be lacking in numbers.

5
Aoikaze2000 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, when you're registering corpses, won't clear our people that shouldn't be on the voter rolls, and decided NOT to put the people with mental health issues into sanitariums... what did you expect would happen?

3
MsQleo 3 points ago +4 / -1

Exactly but yet again conservatives dont fight the progressives openly but the progressives fight us in the streets

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
19
kebabdrogo 19 points ago +23 / -4

Whoever thought waiting to release important info until the final 2 weeks, on the very social media platforms that they KNEW were censoring more and more up to the election, is either Joe Biden-level demented, or has some miraculous ace up their sleeve.

15
675-EVIL 15 points ago +15 / -0

If we win, we will have lots of great arguments to break them up.

16
kebabdrogo 16 points ago +16 / -0 (edited)

Right. If you assume we win, with zero doubt, then this is a great tactic to break up big tech, social media and destroy reputations of entire networks, journalists and possibly dismantle the FBI itself, and remove all doubt that CCP and many politicians are actively to destroy America, bring charges of treason, RICO, crimes against humanity etc.

Not sure thats a bullet-proof safe assumption however. If Biden wins, half the country KNOWS hes beyond corrupt, an communist agent and deals in CP blackmail, while the other half has no idea what we're even talking about, and applauds when we get thrown in covid concentration/re-education camps.

Contested results would mean military intervention, foreign/UN intervention civil war, etc. Really not a good time.

8
Guac_Bowl_Merchant 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is if they have Hunter in custody.

1
kebabdrogo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, is it a safe assumption? Perhaps, as no one is really addressing where Hunter is, like they know the answer already or something.

6
Guac_Bowl_Merchant 6 points ago +6 / -0

I dunno, but it's becoming pretty suspect. Trump keeps asking where he is, but in kind of a joking manner, I read this as he knows where he is, or they have him.

Also, that clip of Hunter speaking at the DNC was widely panned as odd, potentially fake, or prerecorded, regardless, in that clip he did not appear to be a 50 year old man with a years long hard drug addiction.

This is some tin foil hat shit, but I would not be surprised that, being a direct family member of a US VP that he's got a chip. Abductions of family members of prominent politicians is a national security issue, they've gotta have some kind of safeguards for that sort of situation. If true, I would think that alone would dissuade anybody from committing the crimes being alleged here.

2
kebabdrogo 2 points ago +2 / -0

True. Every aspect of the DNC was prerecorded and edited, already knew that. Actually I forgot they even used Hunter there. Literally just in a greenscreen room.

And everyone seems to know exactly where he is, and isnt exactly worried that Hunter could be currently MIA. Trump pokes at it in a mocking way, for sure. Very interesting.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not only did they use Hunter, he looked like a young, fantastically fit man.

1
K-Harbour 1 point ago +1 / -0

Possible to be pre-impeached?

9
Jaybone86 9 points ago +9 / -0

Clarence Thomas provides the road map to sue with a recent opinion. The lawsuits are about to start flying.

4
Nomoralcompass89 4 points ago +4 / -0

Does this mean ill get to sue for each time Facebook censored any comment or status regarding Eric Ciaramella. Not looking for a hand out, but i got Jeep parts and pew pews on a wish list.

1
K-Harbour 1 point ago +1 / -0

++++++++

https://thedonald.win/p/GbkDytrN/the-freedom-of-eassembly-act-of-/

The Freedom of e-Assembly Act of 2021 - send to both your state and federal legislators

100.01. On application of any two or more US Citizens, representing all members of an electronically gathered collective, any platform provider:

(a) is prohibited from censoring or restraining any communication of a member of the collective to any other member or members of the collective; and

(b) is prohibited from adding or deleting members of the collective, except by agreement of the original members of the collective having membership at the time of application.

100.02 Violation by a platform provider of 100.01(a) shall constitute a civil offense with a civil penalty of not less than $1000 per censored or restrained communication; violation by a platform provider of 100.01(b) shall constitute a crimingal offense with a criminal penalty of not less than $10,000 or one year in prison, or both.

18
CMDRConanAAnderson 18 points ago +18 / -0 (edited)

Follow the investors, they make decisions for corporations. Look at WHO is pushing back on the Biden story (people, not companies). It isn't just like the Chinese state media, it literally is the Chinese state suppressing the story.

18
DRKMSTR 18 points ago +18 / -0

Twitter is banning tons of people and it's scary seeing it happen in real time.

The dude who got his teeth knocked out by antifa was just now deplatformed from all his social media.

2
ohhwerd 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm "suspended" and there is no recourse for me to appeal the suspension from twitter.

1
K-Harbour 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just like what was happening to people over 100 years ago in “private” telephone exchanges.

Laws still on the books — can censor, and unsubscribe a customer.

Social media is just a 21st century version of the 19th Century telephone.

Have a state declare them a private telephone exchange and Apply the laws we already have.

10
Russian_Troll_Bot 10 points ago +10 / -0

Wait the fucking HILL posted this????

What the fuck is happening right now?

6
nufosmatic [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Interesting, isn't it?

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

We assume that all media is controlled by the CCP, but this is not accurate.

There are most certainly some that are just incredibly left leaning, and realize that what we're seeing right now destroys the freedom of the press and their future livelihoods.

3
Overkillengine 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or specifically, that they got declined for a position in the Inner Party and realized that they'll be among the first waves to face Party firing squads.

3
veritasvincit 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's an opinion piece. But, The Hill did approve it to be posted. Will the rats start jumping ship once the evidence hits critical mass?

1
Russel_Coitus 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I hover over the Share button, only LinkedIn is available... Why no FB/Twitter?

https://imgur.com/8OKWhGD

2
verycute 2 points ago +2 / -0

The hill is more populist than blatant leftist.

1
CousinEddie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Social media dared to censor one of the unicorn class of journalist.

Suddenly they care about something everyone has been screaming for 5 years. Bc a journalist was affected at the NY Post, now censorship is a problem.

1
leg_hairs 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Hill is definitely left but sometimes relatively fair.

1
kirovri 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, this surprised me a lot.

9
nufosmatic [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm fairly certain that this is the first time one of my posts has been STICKIED! WOO-HOO!

3
StarGirl 3 points ago +3 / -0

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

4
nufosmatic [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Damn! This is at the top of the HOT page now, too...

6
Jaffa5 6 points ago +6 / -0

I applaud the creators of this website. When Reddit went full on TDS they created something better.

Facebook, Twitter etc needs competition. If they have an unfair monopoly than the government should break them up. But I would prefer to defeat them by providing a better product that doesn’t censor its users.

6
DemsH8America 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hey fucktards: STILL VOTING TRUMP!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸

5
Thomas_Paine 5 points ago +5 / -0

The HIll always has the dumbest comments, Democratic echo chamber. Our opponents are not so bright.

1
NedTugent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, but they'll constantly tell you how smart they are. You don't even have to ask!

5
tonightm16 5 points ago +6 / -1

Do people still think Facebook was thought up by some "school kids"? That Twitter was just some innocent thought someone came up with to "content people" together?

Lmao! They were and are built from the ground up to be the far lefts big brother. Was always meant to turn out this way. The only thing that fucked it up was Trump winning in 2016.

What kind of power would the Democrats wield when they can use social media to influence the American people? Start a war with Russia? Nuke Iran? Start another round of wars in the Middle East?

"Why not? People on Twitter support it." A future Dem president.

Fuck the MSM. Yes, they are still dangerous in terms of influence. But they can only dream of having the kind of power Twitter has atm.

5
GoldwaterVoter 5 points ago +6 / -1

The universities are long complicit. I am embarrassed to be an alumnus here:

"Should journalists rethink objectivity? Stanford professors weigh in

By Zadie Winthrop on August 20, 2020 “Journalists need to be overt and candid advocates for social justice, and it’s hard to do that under the constraints of objectivity,”said Ted Glasser, communications professor at Stanford, in an interview with The Daily. The murder of George Floyd and the racial reckoning that followed have opened a conversation around journalistic objectivity.

Glasser believes journalists must step away from the blanket idea of objectivity to achieve social change — but not everyone agrees with him. Many journalists are now asking: Can journalism contribute to social change while maintaining its objectivity? ... Glasser disagreed. For him, objectivity and social justice are in conflict, and he urged that journalism “free itself from this notion of objectivity to develop a sense of social justice.”

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/08/20/should-journalists-rethink-objectivity-stanford-professors-weigh-in/

4
fraterggnm 4 points ago +4 / -0

In other words, admit that you are propagandists and embrace it.

2
CousinEddie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Covering joggers stories with bias sounds like a great way to never get a job anywhere.

Are all professors poison to students? Is their entire purpose to tell people retarded ass shit that'll never work in reality and leave them broke or unemployed?

I went to college 20 years ago and even as a 19 year old I was surprised how out of touch and irrelevant their material was.

"Write stories about social justice! With a bias!" Says Standford teacher. May as well drink bleach and buy bitcoin too bc you're going nowhere with that nonsense

3
GoldwaterVoter 3 points ago +4 / -1

I graduated in '65 in engineering, so I was able to avoid most of the bullshit, thankfully. Even back then, 2 + 2 was exactly 4.

2
Overkillengine 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Note how they try so hard to sell the assumption that journalism must contribute to social change, instead of, you know, just reporting on it.

1
Rufus_Shinra 1 point ago +1 / -0

In other words, journalists should be communist controlled state media, which they practically are already.

4
RabidZoo 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is an imminent threat to our Republic. Get ready...shit might get interesting.

4
brainwash 4 points ago +4 / -0

Help. The Hill's comment section has given me cancer.

3
nufosmatic [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

We'll keep you in our prayers. Because, after ObamaCare, that's all we can do...

2
Nomoralcompass89 2 points ago +2 / -0

ObamaCare will go the way of the dodo soon.

1
nufosmatic [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those damned dodo's are SOOOOOOO hard to kill...

3
SBOJ_JOBS 3 points ago +3 / -0

This season there will be no One-Coup Limit

3
DeplorableLA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Combined they are the GNN (Globalist Network News). Not for me, I’m America First all the way.

3
grndmrshlgando 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why do they think they can censor the entire fucking internet? These of all people should know once something get into the wild there is no stopping it

2
NobodyLikesSplatter 2 points ago +2 / -0

They think their subjects are stupid. They really do.

2
forsh 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fix is unbelievably simple and Republicans have had years to repeal or reform 230 protections and did nothing. Now it's the 11th hour and these companies protected by 230 have a combined power that exceeds the power of the United States. These companies literally censor the government and promote their own agenda and they do it with absolute impunity. What, is the government going to ask a few questions and issue a stern warning? Yea, that's all they're going to do. The American government has literally been handing power and protection to the people destroying them. These companies decide what people can say, when they can say it, and decide the punishment for those to who break their laws.

2
MrQuacker2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are all in unison calling this a Kremlin operation, I fucking kid you not. they're saying that Hunter Biden being stupid enough to leave his laptop at a repair shop with incriminating blatant evidence of crimes between him and his father is the work of Putin. This is clown world 2016 x100

2
NedTugent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone read the comments? These useful idiots really do NOT get it, do they?

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +3 / -1

Even in this article:

There are ample reasons to question whether this material was the product of a foreign intelligence operation, which the FBI apparently is investigating.

Ultimately, and I'll give them credit for acknowledging:

Yet the funny thing about kompromat — a Russian term for compromising information — is that often it is true.

Ultimately if the content is true I don't care where it came from.

If you're a dirty piece of trash and you're in our government, I want you out. I don't care if it comes from Russia, China or my ass hole -- if it's true that you're a corrupt piece of trash, that's ALL that matters.

4
zekin 4 points ago +4 / -0

I doubt it was Russia, I wouldn't concede the Russia angle unless actual good verifiable proof came out. The Russia angle is a conspiracy theory as far as I'm concerned and people who believe that should be smeared - there's no proof or evidence or any kind of hints it came from Russia as of right now. It adds an incredible amount of complexity to something that is simple and easily taken at its word.

If you concede and add some Russian agent did this into your worldview you're setting yourself up to be full of shit and you'll allow a lot of other crap and bad axioms you base your decisions and thought processes on.

2
Slyhillary 2 points ago +6 / -4 (edited)

Should we issue massive orders and then cancel them?

. Occupying their warehouses feels leftist to me

Excuse me for my mistake. I guess it needs correction by someone who has nothing else to say

1
WestPalm 1 point ago +4 / -3

Warehouses

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
WestPalm -1 points ago +2 / -3

What I'm trying to say is that you don't know how to spell.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
WestPalm -1 points ago +2 / -3

Faggot.

-8
Slyhillary -8 points ago +1 / -9

Go back to Reddit. Or Twitter. Or nyc. You aren't an American and you know it.

-2
WestPalm -2 points ago +1 / -3

I've never had a reddit or twitter account. I know that may seem strange to most who spend a significant amount of time online these days, but it's true!

-8
Slyhillary -8 points ago +1 / -9

Liar https://thedonald.win/p/HrcytA8L/x/c/19A0tW3vkY you can't spell, so you lash out

-3
WestPalm -3 points ago +1 / -4

No, I just correct spelling.

Glad you edited your post; learning is a good thing and I do my best to promote better knowledge of language!

-8
Slyhillary -8 points ago +1 / -9

Then spell your father's name correctly. You misspelled it earlier.

And you're a liar, too. Pedes don't act like you do.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
WestPalm -1 points ago +1 / -2

Rational people don't act the way you're acting at present. You may wish to evaluate your own statements before criticizing others.

-8
Slyhillary -8 points ago +1 / -9

Watch more Rambo and talk less frequently unless you have something to say

2
ErOsion9o 2 points ago +2 / -0

The comments on that article... Shills are out in force

2
Charlietexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't forget the bushes.

2
xkgb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deep state media.

1
SoldierOnFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of the people that work at these places are there on a visa and are doing what is okay in their homeland.

1
christosgnosis 1 point ago +1 / -0

well, now that makes the accomplices to Biden's criminality

1
Phins360_FL 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah but our guy controls the "state" right now, so I fully expect him to dispatch them with extreme prejudice

1
VinnyMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remove section 230 protections.

4
nufosmatic [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Clarify the 230 protections. Keep the baby, throw out the bathwater...

1
joebud 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's interesting you put Facebook first and not Twitter.

1
RichardNixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

If DJT loses, it's 100% because of social medial influence. The press has been around 300 years and have always been left...these folks are the new mind control experts.

1
Jenmon 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean DNC media

1
nickybops 1 point ago +1 / -0

DEEEEE...BOOONKED????

1
ReeeeeeFundthePolice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Social media = State Media Kek

1
SnowflakeJuice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty funny coming from The Hill, where I have been banned since 2016 for supporting POTUS.

1
clemsontiger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no faith that the GOP or DOJ will put these corporations on a leash. Trump is a god send but he can only do so much without getting the DoJ behind him.

I think this country is on the brink of war.

1
AtariArtist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too bad the internet is leakier than a sieve.

This just bolsters my case for keeping all social aspects related to the site I want to build internal and cut out Twitter and FB altogether (easy enough to do, you can create messaging and SMS integration as well as user-walls internally thanks to github).

1
RedditCCP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't forget Concast

1
dingdongbob 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is actually a good article. Reminds me of how news articles were written in the early 2000s, before social media and web 2.0 ruined everything.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Time to take Amazon, Google and Facebook away from the owners. They are hurting the country terribly with their lies and bullshit.

1
ServerTowerofBabel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Big Brother Corp is always watching and listening.

Apple, Google, Windows. All watching and combing your meta data. Predicting and anticipating your behavior with our Intel Hoemmittees all up in that like flies on shit, eating the corn out of our crap.

1
riveju 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ionlyknowoo

1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Expected for YEARS. Y E A R S . No salt from me.

1
Fullidat1 1 point ago +1 / -0

The comments section is disturbing. Nobody has the intelligence to address the substance of the article, just character assassination of Turley and Relimks for articles damaging belittling trump. It’s wholly disturbing that people don’t understand how terrible this is.

1
TheSuperStableGenius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just watched the documentary "the plot against the president" im convinced 100% the media will announce and declare on election day that Biden has won and in unison call for Trump to leave, they couldn't get him with bundle stormy, bullshit taxes, bullshit Russia, they can't assassinate him that's too obvious... The election... Easiest way

1
HeavyHebrew 1 point ago +1 / -0

No offense to opticsfags, but I am ready to ride or die on these leftists.

1
SteelDriver 1 point ago +1 / -0

...and that, ladies and gentlemen, is how you create a "scandal-free presidency".