47
Comments (15)
sorted by:
3
Trumpsbigbrassballs 3 points ago +3 / -0

5-4. Roberts is a cuck.

2
Anaconda [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

touche. i should have added a footnote about roberts will cuck out 50% of the time

1
Trumpsbigbrassballs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still winning!

3
rentfREEEE_since2016 3 points ago +4 / -1

How about 6-3 repeal of the NFA?

And rule all CA firearm restrictions unconstitutional

2
SwampSlayer2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL

Some Naïve MFers

AFter they cheat and take back the WH and Senate they are gonna pack the court any damn way, and ACB can do her liberal turn and say it was for her black kids!

Catholics are more Chickenshit than GOP, together they are treacherous!

2
mack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, Roberts is a liberal rino and only votes occassionally conservative. Hopefully ACB is a real conservative/constitutionalist when it comes to the 2nd Amendment and we can have some 5-4 decisions recognizing a constitutional right to carry, no bans on so called assault weapons and standard magazines. Hell in my dreams they throw out the NFA or at least silencers and short barreled rifles. Also despite some hopes, I don't see the court overturing Roe v Wade, Roberts will never vote to overturn it and I'm willing to bet one and probably more of the other conservative justices will not vote to overturn either.

0
Anaconda [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

how does this sound to you? ACB wrote an opinion that states NON-VIOLENT FELONS HAVE 2A RIGHTS. she would be one huge positive vote to hear 2A cases everytime in our favor because the SCOTUS has been half-assing on taking big 2A cases for the whole 200+ years of our country other than heller and mcdonald.

That silence has left key aspects of the Second Amendment’s scope unsettled, and gave Barrett an open field in which to work. So what does that tell us about her? Barrett praised Antonin Scalia, for whom she once clerked at the Supreme Court, at the White House on Saturday, telling the audience, “His judicial philosophy is mine too.” Her writings in Kanter proves how much her approach to constitutional law resembles his. Barrett’s dissent is a dense, historical review of how the founding generation viewed felony offenses and gun ownership. It mirrors Scalia’s own majority opinion in Heller, which laboriously reviewed the history of gun ownership in Anglo-American law.

https://newrepublic.com/article/159512/amy-coney-barrett-wants-felons-guns-not-votes

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
President_Xi_Jinping 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck off cuck I’ll make my own decisions. You’re no different than a liberal trying to get things banned. Those things can be harmful but I don’t need instructions from some bureaucrat.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
SketchyDetails 0 points ago +1 / -1

I agree with banning porn because prostitution is illegal, but it’s legal as long as it’s being filmed? 🤔.... Possessing flowers from a plant should have never been made a crime though. I don’t care how dumb it makes people seem.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
SketchyDetails 0 points ago +1 / -1

The flower itself should be legal. Concentrated forms is a debatable argument. I’m for more freedoms. If people want to ruin their lives, go for it. But a plant is a plant. I don’t support outlawing something that was put here for us by God.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
SketchyDetails 1 point ago +1 / -0

No doubt. I completely agree