Comments (354)
sorted by:
Journey95 488 points ago +488 / -0

Fuck the leftist media. They are the enemy of the people

deleted 236 points ago +236 / -0
JesusisKing 134 points ago +135 / -1

It will be their doom. They will project themselves off a cliff. All we have to do is drive them insane while we control power and they will end themselves.

Trump is determined to obliterate the DNC after what they have done to him and his family.

Captain-D 74 points ago +74 / -0

So are we.

SpaceForceMilitia 35 points ago +36 / -1

And my axe!

JKillen 3 points ago +3 / -0

And my...I have a polesaw..

Ya? We can allow polesaws?

christianknight 34 points ago +34 / -0

He needs to obliterate the Federal Reserve. The DNC is just a low level boss.

MacheteSanta 12 points ago +12 / -0

That Goliath needs more kek power amassed into his 2nd term to kill

deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
womp-womp-twice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Make Rand the last governor of the fed

Friendly_B 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yassss slay queen

deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
LordTancretus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Operation Mocking Bird

Smith-Mundt Modernization Act 2013

Hotsaucebagels 3 points ago +3 / -0

He’s also said the fake news media will no longer exist in four years.

JesusisKing 2 points ago +2 / -0

One can only pray. Most of America is hopelessly lost in a sea of FairyTales

deleted 76 points ago +76 / -0
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 32 points ago +32 / -0

It doesn't take a genius to figure out the myriad ways in which to commit fraud with vote by mail, I mean, the Democrats here in Oregon figured it out decades ago.

Covfefe_Injection 19 points ago +20 / -1

So infuriating.

WestPalm 13 points ago +13 / -0

Do not be angered, that is what they want. Laugh at their idiocy.

LordTancretus 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you can't laugh, you're already dead.

Rekot24 8 points ago +8 / -0

They do this with every claim he makes. SOP.

Whenever I see that phrase I'm sure the claim is true. They wouldn't say this otherwise

anon1011101 18 points ago +18 / -0

I love the "without evidence" BS they stick into their headlines. It just confirms they are not in the business of reporting the news. If you were actually reporting the news, you'd look for the fucking evidence.

TonsOfSalt 9 points ago +9 / -0

repeatedly condemned, without evidence, as susceptible

If only there was some kind of organization who had an actual job to substantiate claims with available evidence...

luke21 9 points ago +9 / -0

They frequently cite "Russian collusion" and other whoppers "without evidence."

Hotsaucebagels 3 points ago +3 / -0

Denying evidence of a possibility is a leap into the abyss. It’s basic algebra. Only an unthinking imbecile would accept such claims.

stoic_troll 9 points ago +10 / -1

C'mon we all know that inkjet technology is tightly controlled and without that it would be difficult to create fraudulent ballots.

featherwinglove 2 points ago +3 / -1

I get claims like this well into debates which sometimes last weeks, after I have presented crazy piles of evidence which they never respond to. Supporting the existence of God (and I have a bulletproof case) and the Bible's historical timeline is probably why I got banned from Twitter back in 2015.

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
featherwinglove 1 point ago +2 / -1

The other example I've selected is for a story not related to the featherwings, Civil Defense: The Survivors of Nuclear Terrorism, which was briefly published on my Minds channel before I got griefed and screwed over by the staff, forcing me to disable the channel on what I was hoping to be a temporary basis, but turned out to be permanent. So yes, fuck you Bill Ottman and everyone else on the Minds payroll if you're reading this. (I think I can say that; it's no worse than what Jesus had for the scribes and Pharisees in Matthew 23, except maybe for the actual f-bomb.) So, while I only first published Civil Defense just over a year ago, I actually wrote the bulk of it in 2011.

You might be thinking that it is the coincident song inspiring the story because I have consciously forgotten the song and my subconscious is remembering the story beats as I'm writing - this argument has actually been presented. For Over The Hills And Far Away, that works (the song makes no sense if the characters are human: why go to prison for 10 years if you're planning to get back together with your married girlfriend once you get out?) Unfortunately for those, four of the songs had not yet been released at the time I wrote the story; I have selected one of those for my second example. On 2011 July 15, during Lights' pre-release tour for Siberia, her second album, I wrote Chapter 13, including Alberta's account of the nuclear explosion from within a community center's fenced swimming pool. Here's a snip:

A wave must have hit her toes odd as she went under, because they felt intensely hot just after she passed completely under the surface. Opening her eyes, she finds it unusually bright under the water, and turns her head towards the shallow end, where the light is coming from. The kids there are diving under the water and madly swimming towards, her, terrified. Staring in disbelief, but still with the presence of mind to hold her breath, she watches as chunks of black debris fall into the pool after the children, and her mind briefly perceives them as terrible monsters from some fantasy world terrorizing the poor children.

The community center building was destroyed, and the northern fence behind the deep end, was destroyed, providing the escape path for her group. Also bear in mind that I pasted this from the first draft before I discovered the song, and the errors were fixed in later drafts.

Introducing Where The Fence Is Low - I clicked on this on 2011 July 16, the day after I wrote the chapter's first draft on 2011 July 15. Now if you have trouble making it out, click here - the lines are obviously not in temporal order, but it is a pretty complete description of Alberta's perspective of Civil Defense's nuclear explosion. Sample point: "And dark fills the skies in."

As the light suddenly dims, the teenaged diver, resting on the bottom of the pool at the deep end, blinks again at the sun, and suddenly the sky is instantly overcast. She feels the water beat against her as though a sumo wrestler had just performed a cannonball from the platform above her head.

The phenomenon here (which is also detailed by other witnesses in the novel) is the Prandtl-Glauert Singularity, usually incorrectly referred to as a Wilson Cloud, visible in many high yield explosions, including many nuclear tests (especially Crossroads Baker) and the recent ANFO catastrophe in Beirut. The rest of the lines aren't as technical, e.g. "I've been here before, then again I'm guessing" after most of the buildings have been knocked over by the blast. The resemblance of this song to this story chapter was so frighteningly specific that I almost immediately emailed her to ask if the "recurring dream" she referred to at Utopia was a nuclear explosion, and went over the above in some detail. She never replied.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
featherwinglove 1 point ago +2 / -1

The Creator of the universe will not be impressed by your big sounding words if you present that as your excuse for not believing in Him when you face the Judgment in the next age.

featherwinglove 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now for the first example: Featherwing Tatakai's song, which I encountered about two weeks after writing the related story, which ...the original post is probably still online, lemme check, yup. Also link the finished chapter; they wound up with different chapter numbers between the blog draft and final edit. The first draft was written (directly into Blogspot's editor, which was a bad idea) on 2009 July 22. Some key things to remember are the basic rules of the featherwings that I introduced in my first reply, that Featherwing Tatakai is "playing" Doom 3 as her reality, she has replaced the player character and will eventually marry extant game character Jack Campbell, transforming him into a featherwing and saving him from the death depicted in the game. Haibane Tatakai is her resurrected 1271 years later to defend Glie, and as she does so, she is recalling her featherwing precursor's life in a series of dreams. Up until a certain moment in the game, Tatakai is just a codename to character who's legal name is Devon Greenborough, a Corporal in the United Earth Marines, and of considerably more significance in the secret Featherwing Brotherhood. It becomes more when God calls her Tatakai (my own equivalent experience was in 2001 September, shortly before the attack on the World Trade Center.)

As she draws his lids over his eyes, she worries, <What if I have to do that to a friend ... to Jack?> "God!" she cries aloud, "I'm just not cut out for this, why did you bring me here?"

"Remember who you're talking to, Tatakai," her Saviour answers, "I created you myself. And like it or not, you are cut out for this. Get used to it."

The distinctive sound of the shotgun's action fills the elevator...

That elevator is a loading zone in this game, it has 26 stages, and therefore 25 loading zones which are represented by physical locations on their fictional edition of Mars. I'll now post the second verse of the song I discovered on 2009 August 8 (I linked the exact upload I clicked on.)

My flower, withered between / The pages 2 and 3 / The once and forever bloom gone with my sins / Walk the dark path / Sleep with angels / Call the past for help / Touch me with Your love / And reveal to me my true name

That was 17 days after I wrote the chapter, and 2 days after the Blogspot editor repeatedly crashed on my next post attempt, convincing me that Blogspot was fscked, and I later edited the header to brief the story, not actually blogging there again for nearly two years. The elevator is indeed the loading zone between Doom 3's second and third stages. "Walk the dark path" refers to the game's linear campaign; Id Tech 3 was not a popular game engine because it sucked at bright outdoor environments (even within Doom 3, which has a couple.) "Sleep with angels" recalls that aspect of the featherwing beings, and "Call the past for help" is what Haibane Tatakai is doing 1271 years later. This description of Tatakai was so amazing that the first time I ever listened to the song, I was getting excited to learn the character's name, and wondered if maybe Tarja was about to sing "Once and for all, and all for once, Tatakai is my real name." Nope, it's Nemo, the name of the song; I felt a bit silly. Reply 2 of 3...

featherwinglove 0 points ago +1 / -1

Faith doesn't have to be blind, and the case is pretty big... just a sec, I have to laugh off a certain aspect of your comment (i.e. a literal bulletproof case you can hide behind.)

The overview for this case: Born again in 1998 April, sidetracked by Wagnerism for a while, betrayed by 6 churches (now 7, found my home away from home in the next one after that.) On 2009 February 1, I received the first vision of the featherwings, a creature type it later turned out I was to write about; got some basic details from and with that vision: There are other effects related to the principle, but the basic rule is that wings can be shared: if a featherwing shares his wings with a human, she will be transformed into a featherwing; wings can also be shared among featherwings, which similarly produces a shared set. If a third participant is introduced into the shared set, they are destroyed for all three, and they become merely human. As in, these aren't angels, they're basically humans with wings and an associated set of minor superpowers, several of which have to do with keeping the wings secret. So I started writing, and got the sense that God was helping me write Featherwing Love, FHD Remix, and other stories some related to featherwings, some not. It suddenly occurred to me that if I were to actually claim that I was hearing these stories from God, I actually didn't have any evidence to prove external inspiration, and that it could be easily argued that this "God" was a figment of my imagination (recently, it is more often argued by cessationists that I'm hearing from demons, rather than atheists that I'm hearing from no one.)

On 2009 April 26, I prayed for evidence that I was indeed hearing from God; it wasn't from a place of doubt, I wanted a testimony I could use to persuade skeptics. Of the sort of coincidence this was about to take, I already had one from 2004, but one is not enough to be persuasive. I now have at least twenty, I posted a list on YouTube when it was 13, it used to be here. And this comment is already getting long. i plan to give you two, neither of which is the strongest (because the strongest is a major FHD Remix spoiler, just in case you want to read that - it involves an instrumental song's music video made three years before I wrote it, which unwittingly depicts the unifying event of FHD Remix's three worlds of Featherwing Love, Haibane Renmei, and Doom 3.) Thus concludes 1 of 3 replies...

stjdalen 29 points ago +29 / -0

Dems and their media still haven't accepted the 2016 election

Flipbarryfromreddit 37 points ago +39 / -2 (edited)

YEP! MEANWHILE HILLARY TOLD JOE IN A BROADCASTED INTERVIEW “NOT TO CONCEDE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES” yet the lamestream media is silent on it. That’s why Pedo Rapist Joe’s team hired 600 lawyers! To challenge the results of the election for our dully elected supreme leader, President Trump aka “Your excellency”

deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
NotoriousCIC 14 points ago +14 / -0

Long overdue.

TrumpsBigBalls 7 points ago +7 / -0

meh, I used to think this...but I really believe we have a large majority vote incoming voter fraud or not. On top of that, the ones actually willing to 'go to war' on the left are actually few and far between, I would guess not as common as you would think on the right either though definitely a lot more. It may seem that way on here of course. Not out of fear necessarily either, though that is certainly a part of it. 'Most' humans...especially in today's times are so detached from 'war' so to speak and want no violence the same way most are detached from the meat and poultry they eat. Case in point on the left....If they were the common man, they wouldn't have to bus or fly these peaceful protesters around, they wouldn't have to pay them. A true civil war would be out of heart and passion. Something we all know most on the left just don't have for their side right now...Black support alone has skyrocket, have you ever known someone to decide no, they don't support Trump after all? No...but you do see countless on the left coming to our side. If we won the electoral without all of that support and close if not THE popular vote if you account for fraud...that's only going to be much larger this time around. I'm not saying let's get complacent by any means either. I would bet money though, that our wins are going to be so overwhelming, the sheer amount of fraud required to flip it would be virtually impossible.

WestPalm -16 points ago +2 / -18

Learn to spell, you moron.

Flipbarryfromreddit 10 points ago +11 / -1

Fuck off triggered cuck go cry some more

WestPalm -8 points ago +1 / -9

Lol you edited your comment to fix your mistakes after I called you out and there is still a mistake in it.

"dully elected"

"your excellentsy"

LordTancretus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I politely correct grammar.

You, are a four legged dick.

WestPalm -8 points ago +1 / -9

You string buzzwords together like a leftist zombie on twitter.

Low IQ.

LordTancretus 1 point ago +1 / -0


You're reacting as if vinegar was poured on soda powder ffs

StaffRex 6 points ago +6 / -0

Scentsy sells stinky candles.

Aluminoti 4 points ago +4 / -0

And already said they won't concede this one under any circumstances. Somehow that's a peaceful transition?

iactuallylovetrump 9 points ago +9 / -0

Every. Single. Time.

WestPalm 5 points ago +7 / -2

Oy vey, no noticing allowed!

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
JudgeWhoAllowsStuff 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • There was no peaceful transfer of power to Trump by Dems.

  • Dems played this exact same hand 4 years ago when they thought Hillary would win. Then happily turned around and did not peacefully transfer power to Trump.

  • Dem war game (run by Podesta) literally just said the only scenario in which Dem operatives will not initiate widespread street violence is a Biden landslide victory.

Begone, shill faggot.

DisrespectfulNipples 82 points ago +82 / -0

They are not media. They are not journalists. They are not reporters. They are professional hecklers. You ask a question, respectfully, and you get an answer. You do not get to argue with the President. He should not tolerate them. CNN, MSNBC, and all Democrat propaganda outlets should be banned from the White House.

USMC_Capt 35 points ago +35 / -0

Agitprop, communist filth.

TD_Covfefe_Crusader 13 points ago +13 / -0

They are Democrat activists and should all be wearing DNC badges. Adding a hammer and sickle lapel pin would also be appropriate.

deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
the_sky_is_falling 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the one thing I cant understand about Trump.

He keeps giving these fucks multiple chances.

His problem seems to be that he wants to charm them still and try and get them on his side.

He has chosen to mostly ignore media outlets that actually like him or are on his side but also hold his feet to the fire like Breitbart.

Obama spent 8 years literally never asking Fox News reporters if they have a question for him.

Why on earth are these hacks even asked if they have questions is beyond me.

I really hope if he wins, he doesnt spend the next 4 years trying to get the MSM on his side.

Stop giving these fools airtime and literally ignore them.

He needs to start focusing on the right-wing press that is still standing in the shadows because he won't acknowledge them enough.

TrumpsBigBalls 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

I agree and disagree with you pede. I 100% agree with the sentiment, but I don't believe Trump is trying to get the MSM to like him at all. He is fully aware of the deep state and it's tentacles. It's those on the other side of the camera. If he completely ignores them...he would be doing exactly what Obama did. So how could we criticize Obama for doing it and then want Trump to also. Sure to say fuck off, but in reality that would only be cutting off his nose despite his face and would not grow him any new support. The more smooth, and charming he is in his response...not angry and bitter...the more Americans will start to see him the same way we all do. Now things like filling the seat...THAT is how he pissed THEM off! Yes along with a large group on the left but I don't think a majority by any means. A majority of these worthless kids we see in the protests sure, but who gives a fuck about that group. EDIT: I would think and hope the majority of Americans regardless of party are constitutionalists at heart. The left truly ripped off their mask this political season and I think we're witnessing the collapse.....many on here giving them entirely too much credit.

the_sky_is_falling 4 points ago +4 / -0 (edited)

I don't mind owning the MSM but he needs to start including and showing alot more enthusiasm for the right wing sites, who keep lacking credibility and not getting their due because he chooses to not give them fair time as well.

So I agree. Don't do an Obama but he needs to give the other guys a lot more airtime

plaaaa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Word! Breitbart is most excellent. Daily Caller too.

masshole3 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're whores.

Heroickitten 21 points ago +21 / -0

I feel pretty vindicated. I've been warning people about anfitifa and the media for the last 5 or 6 years now.

quartz 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is psychological warfare.

deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
Rererefreshing 227 points ago +227 / -0

Don't link to CNBC wtf?? You are driving traffic and clicks to their garbage, putting money in their pockets.

VisualScience 106 points ago +106 / -0

Use archive.is

DisrespectfulNipples 29 points ago +32 / -3

Archive doesn't work anymore. I stopped trying months ago. It never loads.

Amaroq64 65 points ago +65 / -0

The owner blocks the brave browser because it doesn't give him enough information about you I guess.

VoidWanderer 29 points ago +29 / -0

That explains quite a bit.

McFatty7 21 points ago +21 / -0

Archive.is works, except if you have any kind of Cloudflare VPN or DNS configurations on your device or router.

They specifically block Cloudflare.

South_Florida_Guy [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

I use a combination of Brave and Pi Hole DNS, archive.is gives me problems with that.

slashp 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep, is there any kind of alternative to them?

free-money- 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is good old-fashioned archive.org compromised?

MacheteSanta 4 points ago +4 / -0

Archive.org often works better and hides the usual initial popup on the result that archive.is can't remove from some annoying sites.

MacheteSanta 5 points ago +5 / -0

Archive.org, click tiny web icon then scroll down to the box "save page now"

Shortcut: https://archive.org/web/ then scroll down

I use this and Archive.is

IntergalacticWalrus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t we have a maga archive.host now or something like that?

TrippingRed 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anyone mind dropping a quick summary what happened for those of us who rather not patronize their site? Thanks.

SNRNXS 3 points ago +3 / -0

I use adblocker anyways.

PM_ME_UR_MAGIC_CARDS 2 points ago +2 / -0

Still gives em a page hit which they can use as metrics to get more investor capital.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
South_Florida_Guy [S] 155 points ago +155 / -0

The only thing faster than CNBC posting fake news are the mods here sticky-ing us mocking it!

Tellguy 24 points ago +25 / -1

Your post earned them a few dozen bucks or so. It's important we use archive.today as to not support the rage bait.

deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
Tellguy 7 points ago +7 / -0

'It's also a security feature'

raven0ak 2 points ago +2 / -0

laughs in no-script, I can highly suggest this advanced adblock that also drops out all track scripts, usually you need 0-3 scripts total loaded per page out of 20-70 scripts offered for loading (it also blocks adblock-blockers from working)

JoeIsAHoe 122 points ago +122 / -0

They didn't write the article afterwards, the wrote the article first and the guy's question was the sound byte to camouflage it. The goal is to get more people in the streets tonight, MSM is the enemy of the people.

"The people are rioting".....don't you mean "some people did something" ? LOOOOL

South_Florida_Guy [S] 54 points ago +54 / -0

Yes, I came to that conclusion as well. It was IMMEDIATE.

JoeIsAHoe 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yeah but see the reason they did it so quick was because they need the riots to grow NOW, they can't wait 3-4 hours and then post it. Every minute that passes the opportunity for mass unrest over this trap house drug addict dissolves. Police were ready, riots are failing, they need a jump start. TRUMP WONT LEAVE OFFICE!!!! READ ALL ABOUT ORANGE MAN BAD LMAO

donkeebs 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's funny that out of all the news that came out today, this is the only thing that's clogging up my Facebook feed.

Hunter Biden and corruption, the indictment in the Breonna Taylor killing, the new riots starting in Louisville with pre-printed signs, the potential SCOTUS nominees, more science saying that Covid isn't that dangerous.... all within the past 24 hours.

I at LEAST expected to see some screeching about Breonna Taylor. But noooo, everyone's worried about hypothetical Trump never leaving the hypothetical White House.

themightykekfish 6 points ago +7 / -1

Que media “comon do the riot thing” meme

deleted 29 points ago +29 / -0
Amaroq64 13 points ago +13 / -0

Even after watching that I had to look up what a "wrap-up smear" is.


False! Pelosi was saying that that's what Republicans do!

So she projected their guilt onto us like they always do.

TD_Covfefe_Crusader 3 points ago +3 / -0

This pede knows how the misleadia operates.

JovialKlutz 79 points ago +79 / -0

But when Hillary tells Biden not to believe the election results, that's A-OK.

Fredo_Cuomo 28 points ago +28 / -0

So much this - his response should have been Where was the peaceful transition of power when I won? Next.

berson129 8 points ago +8 / -0

That would be so perfect. Like his Q response

MexiCubMerican 73 points ago +82 / -9

Civil war incoming.

USA1 46 points ago +52 / -6

No it's not. We had a contested election not so long ago.

South_Florida_Guy [S] 68 points ago +68 / -0

The difference between then and now is that the left/Dems/media, etc. have completely undermined the idea that an election can ever be "fair" again; they've injected so much doubt into the outcome that now BOTH sides will never truly accept having lost one way or the other and assume EVERY election is questionable from here on out.

NotoriousCIC 24 points ago +24 / -0

The Democrats believe they haven't lost a fair election in nearly 40 years.

Buttfart88 14 points ago +14 / -0

Conservatives should have won every election if not for information control which does not a fair election make

WinnerPlaysTCU 3 points ago +3 / -0

And 3rd party. Clinton never beats Bush 1 if Perot didn’t steal a ridiculous amount of votes away

DeetleMcsneedlestein 5 points ago +5 / -0

Without Perot do we get Trump? Clinton and Bush are both Epstein boiz, not sure the outcome really mattered either way there.

WinnerPlaysTCU 2 points ago +2 / -0

I definitely agree. Things worked out. But point still stands, conservative losses in elections have been quirky

TennesseePride 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perot should have won.

BobsNoCommie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perot was a proto-Trump. A big eared, cowardly, failure of an experiment, but he tried to do what Trump is succeeding at. And the left beat the ever living shit out of him and his family (figuratively speaking.) I get why people liked him initially, but he was the diet version of whatever trump is :)

merkmerk73 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which is weird because the Kennedy election was full of fraud

Throwawaycuzmeh 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t understand how we can keep having these contested elections and yet there is never enough political will to properly secure our voting processes. Third world countries have more election integrity than we do. It’s embarrassing.

deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
DonutDog 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree - if it's a blowout victory for either Biden or Trump (hint: it'll be Trump). If there's a close result, things could get ugly.

papaMAGA 30 points ago +30 / -0

Nope. We will all vote and the winner will be clear on Election Day. Then the gloves are truly off.

KurtMueller 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'll need to make some spicy 'leftists finding more votes' memes. Maybe some Miracle on 34th Street bringing in the letters to the courthouse here, a little Harry Potter owls there, hmm...

CoreyAnder 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will not be decided on Election Day due to the mail in votes not being counted.

papaMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Depends on which state. Most red states will have their electoral votes decided. If he gets over 270 with states that are done counting / are a blow out. It's over that day.

deleted 4 points ago +19 / -15
deleted 29 points ago +30 / -1
ValleyForge 18 points ago +18 / -0

China’s probably been the one pulling the strings the entire time. It seems as if every Politician, Activist and corporate CEO in America has their hands in the pockets of the Chinese somehow.

Hail_Milo 13 points ago +13 / -0

I hope the Chinese can figure out how to deal with 11 million deer hunters that blow bucks away at 400 yards for fun.

Jk they can't and I don't.

dakin116 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haven't done this in 20 years but still have my .243, need to get it sighted in...

MexiCubMerican 5 points ago +7 / -2

Not wishing for.

motm2012 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yea maybe the Chinese would have antifa on their side but a attempted Chinese takeover would easily be the fastest way to unite the country on levels not seen since 9/11 if not WW2.

GrandpereDean 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doubt it

Dead_Sennacherib 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel like this gets thrown around a lot, and I understand the sentiment - but it's really, really, really not what we want. If there is a civil war, I'm sure the patriots with guns will win, but I'm also sure that China will be at our back door taking advantage of our time of weakness.

Our fervent goal needs to be to accomplish the right thing peacefully.

Mynamesprivate 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm thinking their setting themselves up to attack taiwan after the election: if bidens in power in january, good, if Trump is dealing with massive civil unrest, also good. We'll see if the ccp can hold onto their country, though.

deleted 67 points ago +68 / -1
The_Litehaus_Abides 27 points ago +27 / -0

transition integrity project

Soros always, always names his projects the exact opposite of what they really are. POS demon.

1cewolf 10 points ago +10 / -0

Quinn's First Law: liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.

JesusisKing 8 points ago +8 / -0

inversion is a basic spell...ancient.

KS-76- 5 points ago +5 / -0

Satanic inversion.

Buttfart88 4 points ago +4 / -0

Double think

supersecretaccount82 15 points ago +15 / -0

Honestly just wish Trump would respond with, "will you?"

Light_HIV_Effect 9 points ago +9 / -0

Exactly. How absurd this is even a question, and coming from the side that lost and still hasn't gotten over it and from the side currently rioting and burning cities down because they don't get their way.

TD_Covfefe_Crusader 7 points ago +7 / -0

They tried the same bullshit in 2016. They are doing the same things and expecting different results.

anon1011101 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a pretty good sign we will win again. 2020 is a repeat of 2016 all the way down to Bernie getting fucked by the DNC, a second time.

TD_Covfefe_Crusader 3 points ago +3 / -0

It sure as hell is following the same pattern all the way down to the fake polls assuring a Biden victory.

rentfREEEE_since2016 4 points ago +4 / -0

Answer: will you?

Seriously. I want him to just say “ok, so let’s say I’m up 15 points in all states on election night. And a week after. And the next week. Will you uphold the election results then?”

deleted 56 points ago +57 / -1
UpTrump 41 points ago +41 / -0

Detroit: https://archive.is/rf5pi Guilty in NY: https://archive.is/S8Y6L West Dallas: https://archive.is/ZHGfh North Carolina: https://archive.is/zuisT Florida fraud: https://archive.is/4UlVW Voter fraud in NJ: https://archive.is/siXGu GOP voter fraud: https://archive.is/UunbO New Jersey Ballots: https://archive.is/3t4VJ Guilty plea in Philly: https://archive.is/AF2ZU Cat gets voter reg app https://archive.is/ruU87 6 felonies in Michigan: https://archive.is/nyNuK Chaos in NY. The Atlantic https://archive.is/pJdV8 South Texas Vote Harvesting: https://archive.is/Cxi71 Millions of extra registrants: https://archive.is/W8oOB Local news experiment https://youtu.be/pPP7Dx8Yq5k Obama mail in voting: https://youtu.be/EuiDBcWa7W0 Unauthorized absentee ballots: https://archive.is/ZbvFn Mail in ballots for dead people: https://archive.is/9G5ue Ballot harvesting investigation: https://archive.is/UCQZr Skid Row signatures for cigarettes: https://archive.is/MirTb Miss counted absentee ballots Detroit: https://archive.is/k1rXb CBS Experiment shows mail in voting flaw: https://archive.is/wAK6i Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots https://archive.is/EIz51

White House Voter Fraud PDF: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/docs/pacei-voterfraudcases.pdf Voter Fraud Database: https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud/search Source: https://thedonald.win/p/Gvd9WcAz/mega-thread-on-mail-in-voting--a/c/

dontUseVinegerAsLube 14 points ago +14 / -0

Next time someone tries to tell you mail in ballots are safe, dump this on them:


anon1011101 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excellent post pede. This should be it's own submission. Call it "verified cases of election fraud"

BecMonTchew 9 points ago +9 / -0

It always strikes me as odd that the fucks always think the president can not possibly, under circumstances, be privy to information of which they are unaware. And when evidence is provided, it's denied. It's a circle of fuckery. I'm so tired of this bullshit.

dontUseVinegerAsLube 8 points ago +8 / -0

Next time someone tries to tell you mail in ballots are safe, dump this on them:


papaMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

I feel like he’s provided plenty of evidence of their susceptibility. This is actually a lie.

donkeebs 3 points ago +3 / -0

And yet they don't seem to think that evidence of mail-in vote efficacy should be REQUIRED before forcibly switching millions of people to mail-in only, weeks before an election.

If they want to create such a large switch in how we vote, sorry not sorry, THEY should be the ones proving that it works. All the little experiments with it for the summer primaries were IMO failures

Wheredidiputit 36 points ago +38 / -2

Wonder what the phone call was. Likely another Middle East camel fucker country begging to be let into the peace deals.

deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
sickofaltspin 12 points ago +12 / -0

You are a good gorilla. I like the way to punched that other gorilla.

slashp 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ugh. It's boring when the gorillas aren't fighting.

SisyphusRockAndRoll 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ride wife, life good! Wife fight back! Kiiiill wife!

Apersonofinterest 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ackshually, that might be it. I just saw another article about a 3rd ME Nation announcing tomorrow.

findthewarmspot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saudi Arabia coming on board.

deleted 31 points ago +31 / -0
supersecretaccount82 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think he needs to pivot to "massive inaccuracies" instead, they try to weasel around with fraud being a technical legal charge vs plain old missing mail, invalid ballots, etc.

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
supersecretaccount82 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even the generic looking screw ups could well be fraud. A TDS postal worker "losing" a box of mail counts as fraud in my book but gives the media enough wiggle room to pull their wiTHouT eViDenCe game.

Buttfart88 6 points ago +6 / -0

Their logic is “yes it’s failed massively in small elections and yes it’s common sense it will fail but there’s no evidence it will fail in a large election”

“That’s because we’ve never done it on a large election”

angry npc face

NotoriousCIC 6 points ago +6 / -0

You can't even guarantee a bill or love letter makes it in the post office but somehow votes are foolproof?

Keiichi81 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Trump claims, without evidence, that an election without a secure chain of custody for cast ballots in which vote tabulation may take weeks, could be susceptible to fraud."

As others have said, if any mouth-breathing leftist moron thinks that vote-by-mail is secure and trustworthy, they can feel free to stick a couple thousand dollars cash in an envelope and mail it to themselves.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
pillcosby2 22 points ago +22 / -0

"WiThOuT EvIDeNcE"

_fuckallofyou_ 18 points ago +19 / -1

Trump won’t commit to peaceful transfer of power if he loses the election

He won't have to.

mfatica 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think the people will commit to a peaceful transfer of power of he loses either

_fuckallofyou_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I won't. With all the corruption and illegal shit Democrats are pulling? My family and I have already made "arrangements".

Brokenpurpletoaster3 9 points ago +9 / -0

The reeeee will be loud

Hypnotoad24 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's the proper way to answer a loaded question.

deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
Auroraalpha 7 points ago +7 / -0

But but but...i learnt that:

  1. violent protest is actually peaceful
  2. silence is violence
  3. speech is also violence

So what do they want here, since everything is evil and violent?

Traiya 4 points ago +4 / -0

Violence. They want violence.

Preferably from us.

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
Arriveria 6 points ago +6 / -0

I dont think a Democrat should rule ever again under any circumstance. Just because they get voted in by extremely dumb and useless people doesn’t mean the rest of us have to stand with their bullshit

CaptainChrisPBacon 6 points ago +6 / -0

https://archive.fo/YYzdn Archive.DO NOT GIVE THE COMMUNIST NETWORK CLICKS<

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
Shitposter69 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah that was not the most obvious bait ever. He should've just skipped him.

Pukeahontas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup.. should have told them nancy's comment asking biden to not accept the results.

uzuruha 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump is a smart man but not taking the bait isn't his strong suit. Takes it every fucking time. Then again he's pretty old so kind of common for people his age.

Shitposter69 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think it's really age, it's definitely his ego. I mean, he has dragon blood so I guess it's just his nature.

Filo76 5 points ago +5 / -0

They pulled this same stunt in 2016. Trump refused to play their game and they threw a hissy fit.

They want him to agree so they can spin his answer as giving up and throwing in the towel.

South_Florida_Guy [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's exactly it, try to depress and demoralize his base and make it sound like he's entertaining the idea of actually losing, which he would NEVER do.

Sodium_miner 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m not making a threat here just a statement of fact. People come at my family, friends, and community with intentions of harming them and destroying everything we will see their riots and raise them a crusade. If they try to steal the election it may be inevitable.

Watch_TheKarma_Burn 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was just telling my wife last night that at this point, if the Dems somehow cheat their way into getting Trump out of office, I would have no issue with Trump assuming full military control of the Government and begin arresting and trying all the Globalist traitors who have sold out our country.

No problem at all.

MythArcana 5 points ago +5 / -0

As if the democrats gave us a peaceful transfer of power. I'm so tired of these fucking idiots!

JustHereForTheSalmon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why didn't they use a picture of that sweaty mongoloid presstitute pointing his filthy finger at the Leader of the Free World while disrespecting him with such a shill question?

Notice he ran out of the room afterwords. He wasn't there for questions, he was there for a gotcha. I hope he's on the short list of helicopter rides.

ohpleaseuhhelpame 5 points ago +5 / -0

They are nasty and disrespectful to our POTUS. I hope to GOD we win in a landslide and take back the Congress and keep the Senate. Fuck the left and their proxy's they send to the White House press briefings!....meanwhile Biden is in his basement rehearsing the answers to the questions he already knows for the upcoming debate.

Alpha-As-Fuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

After all the dodgy shit the Dems have pulled the last 4 years, does anyone with a functioning brain seriously doubt they are gonna pull more dodgy shit during this election? How naive or full of shit would you have to be.

Kylekenx10 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fellow pedes, what's this I keep hearing about Jerry Nadler shitting himself? Is this recent? xD

QSWO1 5 points ago +5 / -0

We the people agree with our president.

fingerofkek 5 points ago +5 / -0

If trouble does break out, the media has to be held responsible for incitement

that_sound 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is programming. They are brainwashing people to think that it's ok to commit violence against nazis (that's anyone who is not antifa) and burn down cities because OrangeManBad said "we'll have to see what happens".

"Trump won't commit to peaceful transfer to Biden (after an election that Trump will win), so it's ok not to be peaceful".

Watch, The Narrative will become clear soon...

PotentialWizard 5 points ago +5 / -0

The media tried the same narrative in 2016, and it didn't change anyone's vote then either.

remember1776 5 points ago +6 / -1

Did Hillary and O'Bummber commit to peaceful transfer of power when they lost?

Neogeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hillary never had power to transfer

remember1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

She was part of the O'Bamba cartel

WinningTrump2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

they love their little phrase "without evidence" but freely take "anonymous sources" as fact.

superalienhyphy 4 points ago +4 / -0

"It appeared Trump was referring to mail-in ballots, which he has repeatedly condemned, without evidence, as susceptible to massive fraud."

The evidence is common fucking sense.

If mailing a ballot to my house is secure, then mailing guns and ammo to my house is too!

geocitiesuser 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm still waiting on the peaceful transition of power that was supposed to happen 4 years ago.

Steeleproduction 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump always knows what he's doing. He is baiting them because something else is about to drop which will cause them to eat their words. He never just creates a sound byte for the fake news media...he always sets them up for failure.

Wait for it...it will be glorious.

Tommy_Patriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also he didn’t rush out. He continued to take questions for about 10 more minutes. Fucking cnbc made it sound like he made a threat and split. Not true. What asshiles

Deplora 4 points ago +4 / -0

How the hell is President Trump supposed to "commit to a peaceful transfer of power"? And why did the scumbag reporter ask the question over and over again without ever including an "if" clause? It's like he was announcing that there definitely will be a transfer of power, and also implying that there's a huge danger of a nonpeaceful post-election period only if Biden is declared the winner. He expressed no concern about the most likely scenario, namely that there is no transfer of power, and that the lack of a transfer will be used by the domestic terrorists as an excuse to orchestrate rioting, looting, arson, and murders on a huge scale.

South_Florida_Guy [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

He wanted one of two things and got what he expected (the second thing):

A. Trump concedes defeat

B. Trump ostensibly refuses to accept defeat

Deplora 4 points ago +4 / -0

He only got the second thing in his imagination.

Wharf_Rat 4 points ago +4 / -0

He should say his transfer would be as peaceful as it was for me

Thingthing22 4 points ago +4 / -0

Anyone got the mega thread or a live update site / thing on updates fraud cases and outcomes across the US?

Okillmakeanaccount 4 points ago +4 / -0

It baffles me that links to leftist media are posted here all the time. Why TF are we giving these assholes traffic??

nc777 4 points ago +4 / -0

Such an irresponsible narrative they are pushing here.

Does anyone here really believe he wouldn't leave if not duly elected.

AlphaOmaga 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol citing dnc driven riots to transfer his power?! Wtf is this a threat on the reporters part? Or absolute ignorance? Wtf?!

Captain-D 4 points ago +4 / -0

This was one of my first red pills in 2016. No sooner did he finish the debate where he also refused to commit (in appropriate context) did the media IMMEDIATELY launch a coordinate attack using the exact same language word for word pushed out from all main stream media at the exact same time. I remember making a collage and sharing it on Facebook and experiencing my first internet attack mob by my own friends list.

Double red pill day and deleted Facebook within a few months.

DefeatSoros 4 points ago +4 / -0

Didn't they say the same thing about him in 2016? Well, look at what happened, and last time it wasn't us that didn't commit to the peaceful transfer of power.

HocusLocus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Peperidge Farm Remembers:

“On Wednesday night Donald Trump did something no other presidential nominee has ever done… he refused to say that he would respect the results of this election[boos] now make no mistake, by doing that he is threatening our democracy. He is basically saying hey — we’ve been around 240 years and we’ve always had peaceful transitions no matter who won, or who lost. Look, if you lose an election — I’ve lost elections — you don’t feel very good the next day do you. But we know in our country the difference between leadership and dictatorship, right? [cheers] And the peaceful transition, the peaceful transition of power is one of the things that sets us apart. It’s how we hold our country together no matter who’s in charge. You know I went to 112 countries as your Secretary of State [cheers] I saw the difference between what we do and what others do … I was in countries where people jail their political opponents, or execute them, or exile them or invalidate elections that they didn’t win... that can never be allowed to happen here. I believe that’s true no matter who you support in this election, whether or not you support me or you support my opponent, together we must support American democracy and the country that has given every one of us so many opportunities … and the best way to do that my friends is to turn out and vote!”

~(video) remarks of Hillary Clinton, 21-Oct-2016, Cleveland OH

MJ85 2 points ago +2 / -0

I keep having deja vu this election cycle.

MAGA_dev 4 points ago +4 / -0

"It appeared Trump was referring to mail-in ballots, which he has repeatedly condemned, without evidence, as susceptible to massive fraud."

How could he have evidence of something that hasn't even happened yet? Morons

sustainable_saltmine 4 points ago +4 / -0

oh of course. they write these things as drafts, THEN have their shills ask the question, then fill in the placeholders and publish