3246
Comments (361)
sorted by:
338
RussianBotWithNoID 338 points ago +339 / -1

Stack the Supreme Court. Get rid of Electoral College. Allow permanent mail-in voting and get rid of fraud measures.

The next Democrat win will cement the permanent shift towards Chinafication.

137
deleted 137 points ago +175 / -38
51
bloodyminded 51 points ago +65 / -14

Yes, I know that you think that "The Jews" are responsible.

But, what's the solution?

66
Ronald_Dregan 66 points ago +66 / -0 (edited)

Constitutional Amendment is in order to prevent this fuckery.

They lose...so they move the goal posts. Well, that shit needs to end and conservatives need to step up in the Senate and start doing real work for a change.

33
bloodyminded 33 points ago +35 / -2

Yes, but what Constitutional amendment?

What would you do? What language would you use to "prevent this fuckery" that doesn't do more harm than good?

70
Ronald_Dregan 70 points ago +70 / -0

Limit the number of justices on SCOTUS to 9.

28
bloodyminded 28 points ago +28 / -0

Can't really argue with that one, no.

12
you_can_do_it 12 points ago +12 / -0

Granted in our particular situation this makes perfect sense buttttt....

How easy is it for the people behind the scenes to get 9 blackmailed/corrupted people in a seat for their lifetime?

Anyone else get this weird feeling?

9
rootGoose 9 points ago +10 / -1

^This is probably the only reason to 'pack' the court.

If it comes apparent that Roberts is compromised, that could become an impetus to pack away.

... continue reading thread?
1
Snuke 1 point ago +3 / -2

They could just pass a new amendment invalidating that one.

9
tombombadil 9 points ago +9 / -0

That goes for every amendment. But it’s extremely hard to get an amendment passed by design. And one that limits the amount of Supreme Court justices is not only essential, but one that I think a huge majority of Americans would support.

... continue reading thread?
20
Justhalftheshaft 20 points ago +20 / -0

Dual citizens may not hold office.

14
NvJohansson 14 points ago +14 / -0

1st generation landed immigrants should not hold office. I don't care where you're from whether it's Sweden, Somalia or Japan, if you were born there you shouldn't be allowed to hold office in America and decide upon our policies and laws.

11
MelonLabia 11 points ago +12 / -1

Immigrants shouldn't be able to vote until 3-4 generations minimum, retroactively.

Also, halt all immigration and start discussions on repatriation...

... continue reading thread?
2
PamelaCincinnatus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, not when the volume of immigrants is so high, our own culture is under attack, and the people coming in are likely to be indoctrinated with an anti-American view of America by the city people they first come in contact with.

12
PraiseBeToScience 12 points ago +14 / -2 (edited)
  1. birthright citizenship revoked, retroactive 16 years.

  2. communist control act, expanded to more than just the communist party but to encompass any subversive Marxism.

  3. Second amendment clarified: The right of the people to purchase, make, own, and use all martial weaponry, national security technology notwithstanding, is absolute. The government may enter no contract with a defense company who does not espouse and exercise these ideals.

  4. Libel and slander for public officials is revoked. No more public persona clause that lets you say whatever you want.

  5. Absolute revocation of press protections for any journalist who engages in bias. All mistakes will be assumed to be lies made with malicious intent until otherwise proven with an affirmative defense.

  6. Absolute death penalty and total asset forfeiture for any individual or organization who lends any material support for any Marxist ideology.

  7. Senate controls state level voting laws on federal elections.

  8. Ban on voting when moving states for 10 years unless such move is for military service.

  9. Voting age raised to 26, military service excepted.

  10. any attempt to harbor or facilitate illegal immigration is considered an act of warring invasion and will be responded to as such. Any districts or cities will be considered rogue states.

  11. freedom of speech is absolute in all publicly accessible domains.

2
Thrasymachus 2 points ago +2 / -0

You forgot voting rights via property ownership; if you're going to be extreme you can't rightly forget the one that matters most. Replace the Symptom-Treating number 8 with No Voting Without Net Positive Tax Receipts and/or Property Ownership and you've got a pretty good list going here.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

I also forgot a prohibition on owning land or structures by any non citizen, or corporation operated by more than 40% noncitizens.

China is buying our country out from underneath us, like they did Vancouver.

11
RedDon 11 points ago +11 / -0

I like that you’re asking questions. Often it’s just, “We need to do something,” then nothing else. We all know something needs to be done so asking questions and putting forth ideas is what we should be doing.

9
BeefyBelisarius 9 points ago +9 / -0

The entire 1954 Communist Control Act, so it can be enforced without being ruled unconstitutional on 1st Amendment grounds.

7
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 7 points ago +8 / -1

Collins made suggestions. Evidently its had several drafted measures.

4
MemeFactory 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is arguably not a bad solution that he proposed. If we find ourselves in a situation where enlarging the size of the Supreme Court is prudent, a 10 year delay in the implementation of that growth would allow time for voters to clearly decide which parties should play a role in deciding who gets the new seats. It would not allow for kneejerk politicians to bastardize the supreme court for solely political reasons.

3
bill_in_texas 3 points ago +3 / -0

What would I do? If I was Trump, I'd thank Mazzie for her idea and start fucking packing the court. Nominate another 11 judges and cram them through. Want to do this? Let's fucking do this!

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
5
tombombadil 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are things other than the constitution that constitutionalist judges use to make their decisions. The Federalist papers, for example, clarify exactly what the founding fathers meant when they wrote the constitution.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
ippwndu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Voter ID and in-person only voting for election of any federal office.

6
Breakfaststout 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh please dont forget about an amendment against communism. I have been begging that this get traction. Its the only way the new soviet states of America can be stopped.

1
PamelaCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are still pushing the Equal Rights Amendment through, too. Basically trying to make social justice the supreme law of the land. That needs to be stopped.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +20 / -23 (edited)
12
JudgeWhoAllowsStuff 12 points ago +18 / -6

Why are you rampantly posting this when nobody here actually has input on picking a judge?

5
FormerGraveheart 5 points ago +5 / -0

Spammer's gotta spam.

4
nakedjay 4 points ago +6 / -2

To counter the shills that came out of the woodwork the last couple of days.

4
EvanOnTheFly 4 points ago +8 / -4

Did you just get smarter? That's why. Believe me the other side is dumb and they don't care about learning the truth.

Learn. Be able to argue against their talki g points. Sow cognitive dissonance.

3
HockeyMom4Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Speak for yourself. They lurk here.

7
FormerGraveheart 7 points ago +9 / -2

Fact: Amy Coney Barrett adopted 2 Haitian kids, ignoring the thousands of American kids who badly need adoption, and showing that she makes decisions emotionally, not rationally. She cannot be trusted on immigration and is a terrible choice. Plus look at her stance on the bullshit lockdowns, the fact that she said she won't go against the Pope, who is a globalist stooge, etc.

5
JackLemon 5 points ago +8 / -3

This is off-topic spam. I've seen you post the same message elsewhere.

3
FormerGraveheart 3 points ago +4 / -1

Spamming is his second favorite activity, second only to reporting people online.

3
Pres_Trump 3 points ago +8 / -5

Thank you for this. The rampant ACB hate on this board is surprising since the last time everyone on this board was mad that ACB wasn't picked over Kavenaugh. Whatever. Lies get thrown about by both sides...I just wish people were more consistent and quit making decisions based on how the wind blows.

2
Watch_TheKarma_Burn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has she made any rulings about the COVID lockdowns?

6
DocOne 6 points ago +7 / -1

Sure has and it wasn't good.

18
AdamShitIsAPedo 18 points ago +18 / -0

Start by getting rid of the federal reserve.

8
bloodyminded 8 points ago +8 / -0

Another one that I can't argue with, really.

4
YourTendiesWillBurn 4 points ago +4 / -0

That comes later. In fact, watching all these deals and peace negotiations all over the world in seemingly random spots over the last few years...do you get the feeling the chessboard is being set? I think they're setting up for the showdown with the global central banking empire in it's entirety. They keep in power through centuries of conflict. Trump likes doing big things. Doesn't get much bigger than that. We'll see.

10
CandyBarr 10 points ago +19 / -9

Bolshiviks were less Jewish than the menshiviks

Trying to make Bolshiviks into some sort of Jewish disparagement is ignorant of history.

3
Dictator_Bob 3 points ago +9 / -6

Ilhan Omar's people are here propagating ideas.

5
christianknight 5 points ago +7 / -2

Omar is a Soros plant, so this is accurate, but not in the way you think...

1
Dictator_Bob 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm fairly certain.

1
CandyBarr 1 point ago +3 / -2

I don't know what you are referring to but my major in college was Geography and History of the former soviet union

I wrote my capstone on the Russian Civil War and the multiple power struggles that were outside of the traditional white and red forces. Like Makhno, Czech legion and Kolchaks forces.

I know more about the Russian Civil War and the fallout than one person should. Autism is a hell of a drug. Bolshiviks were not particularly Jewish and were actually less Jewish than their contemporary socialist rivals.

-1
Dictator_Bob -1 points ago +2 / -3

I'm only making the claim that antisemites here stand with Ilhan Omar.

4
CandyBarr 4 points ago +4 / -0

One can stand against both.

I wouldn't characterize it like that. Some people are just assholes.

On the flip side their is a lot of Jewish that are assholes.

I'd like to point out that Ginsburg was the most over represented IDPOL

Jewish and a women

3 Jewish people are on the SC and two of those are women.

Wouldn't it be an issue to have 3 J-dubs on the SC?

... continue reading thread?
-3
bloodyminded -3 points ago +4 / -7

Yes, but the answer to "who owns the media" and "who can't we criticize" is always "The Jews."

That's what I focused on.

5
CandyBarr 5 points ago +8 / -3

This isn't the first time I've seen the word Bolshivik being shoe horned into being anti-semetic

The truth of the matter was more menshaviks were Jewish than Bolshiviks and the one prominent Jewish bolshivik (Trotsky) was originally a menshivik

I'm just trying to stop the rewriting of history.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
BathouseBarry 2 points ago +3 / -1

Some Jews certainly not all or the vast majority. It's a little disingenuous

4
Throwawaycuzmeh 4 points ago +6 / -2

Do you think LGBT are massively overrepresented in media, education, entertainment, and government? Because there are way more Jews in all of those fields, and their total population is significantly less than total LGBT numbers.

0
bloodyminded 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just a smidgen, yes.

0
Thrasymachus 0 points ago +1 / -1

That'd be nice, if it were true, which it is not.

1
CandyBarr 1 point ago +1 / -0

One can simply look at the last names of the founding members of the Menchaviks and the Bolshiviks and count the amount of Jewish people and do the math.

There was about 3 times more jews in the menchaviks and the only prominent Jew in the Bolshiviks leadership was Trotsky whom started as a menchavik and switched sides.

Look it up and get out your counting fingers if you don't belive me and you can figure it out yourself.

8
deleted 8 points ago +15 / -7
0
bloodyminded 0 points ago +7 / -7

You do know that list is largely devoid of context, right? Most of those were them getting kicked out of countries, being blamed for plagues and such that they were in no way responsible for.

Likewise, your suggestion involves denying American citizens their citizenship, largely because of guilt by association.

Can't say I'm impressed.

4
deleted 4 points ago +14 / -10
3
bloodyminded 3 points ago +7 / -4

Your way is not a solution.

4
DarkMemeDuck 4 points ago +5 / -1

Some have called the "final" one, and it was as terrible an idea then as it is now.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +6 / -8
... continue reading thread?
4
unique_string 4 points ago +10 / -6

You have your head in the sand if you don't think that bolshevism is a jewish run religious cult. Communism is an irrational belief system, its no different than worshiping a rock, one of the communist irrational inventions is "racism", which is a thought crime invented by Trotsky for the purpose of destroying establish social bonds and the nuclear family amongst the endemic people of Russia. "Racism" doesn't exist in the real world, it only exists in your imagination because Leon Trotsky put it there with the help of Karl Marx and Hollywood, but "racism" is what keeps you fearful of publicly identifying the group of people who are perpetrating bolshevik communism on you, because you choose to believe in their thought crimes - ideas which were put in your head by hollywood and the public school system - instead of thinking for yourself. Communism isn't even American, if you're going to insist on following an irrational belief system, please at least choose a domestic one. How about mormons? Mormon girls are the prettiest girls in America, give it a whirl, you'll love being a moron.

1
PamelaCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think anyone here is "afraid" to point out what groups are causing problems. We just don't believe in collectivism. We believe in personal responsibility. I do not think personal responsibility is compatible with most racial ideologies, because by definition a racist, like a Marxist, views the individual as a product of the group rather than the reverse. Western racial ideologies, in my opinion, originate from Darwin and from Enlightenment-era attempts to justify chattel slavery. Prior to that, Europeans were not protective of their races, but rather of their family names and religion. You may find Wolfram von Eschenbach's description of a mixed-race (black and white) moslem knight in Parzival interesting. This knight behaves honorably, and then converts to Christianity later in the story, and then serves Arthur and weds a pretty girl. This book was written in the early 1200s, by a German knight!

I do not think it is wise to let the current attempts to produce racial tension sway you one way or another. It is all madness, and all the participants, black, white, Jews, or what have you, are making their groups look bad. The reason the ones at the top are often Jews is because Jews have higher average IQs, and unlike the white SJWs, they work hard. We also had whole synagogues chanting "four more years!" for Trump. Those people do not want SOGI garbage, Mosaic law condemns it absolutely. Mosaic law condemns homosexuality and cross-dressing. They do not want the atheist degeneracy.

It's not Jews that are the problem, it's demons and the people who serve them.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
-2
bloodyminded -2 points ago +1 / -3

They tried that one already, donchano.

Didn't turn out too good...

0
DoesItWorkAlready 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think both groups are responsible.

Constitutional amendment? First Amendment only applies to Christians

2
bloodyminded 2 points ago +2 / -0

Constitutional amendment? First Amendment only applies to Christians

Establishment Clause? Anyone? Anyone? Beuller? Beuller? Beuller?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
3
NvJohansson 3 points ago +3 / -0

I really have no opinion one way or another when it comes to Jews, but there is in fact a huge rift being created between Israeli Jews and American Jews. They're starting to dislike each other politically.

3
PamelaCincinnatus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Care to elaborate? Genuinely curious.

2
NvJohansson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Israelis see how Trump is supporting Israel with the embassy move, full backing and peace accords making them safer. Yet American jews especially from New York, even though they are business oriented and profit like every other business owner, from tax cuts and better trade deals still overwhelmingly vote Democrat. I don't understand why American Jews wouldn't support everything he's doing for Israel.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/04/opinion/sunday/israeli-jews-american-jews-divide.html

23
Tomtoonami93 23 points ago +32 / -9

I yelled "toddlers fucking suck!!" in a restaurant the other day and was escorted out.

Toddlers rule us.

11
thingaboutarsenal 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fucking toddlers.

9
Imransgarage 9 points ago +9 / -0

😆😆

8
Mammoth_Actuary 8 points ago +10 / -2

But were you jailed though? In Europe you can literally get jailed for criticizing one group

3
Tomtoonami93 3 points ago +6 / -3

Yell "All blacks are criminals" in Germany and see what happens.

That brilliant quote isn't from Voltaire by the way, it's from a registered pedophile.

3
Mammoth_Actuary 3 points ago +5 / -2

Doesn't matter where the quote is from. I didn't quote Voltaire. The quote is still true.

1
Tomtoonami93 1 point ago +5 / -4

The quote is based on the same retarded ideas that fuel BLM.

BLM believes that the only reason white people are successful is because there is a secret group of white males controlling everything from the shadows. Every time they perform poorly on a test compared to other racial groups or don't earn as much, it's muh discrimination.

And yet, you and I might laugh at such an assertion. We laugh because we know that their culture frowns on basic literacy and scholastic achievement. We know that IQ matters and is a big determinate factor in outcomes.

We laugh because the assertion seeks to redefine reality so it works in their favor.

And yet you seem to then go on to do the exact same thing. Ashkenazi Jews have IQs on par with Asians; just look at any major orchestra or law firm. They and Asians have a culture that promotes bilingual literacy by elementary school. Are there a lot of Jewish millionaires? Fuck yes there are. It's a mixture of culture and genetics.

Not sure why you support Trump if you're not a fan of Jews, Asians, or any other race for that matter. Donald is a staunch advocate for all Americans of all races.

5
Throwawaycuzmeh 5 points ago +8 / -3

Here’s a Jewish man openly admitting the Jews’ miscalculation in pushing mass immigration on America.

Here’s a Jewish man pushing for holocaust education in third world countries because third world peoples don’t give Jewish victimhood its due primacy.

You don’t have to be an anti-Semitic person to understand how the tribe operates. You just need to read what they write and hear what they say. They aren’t shy about it. Just like democrats.

... continue reading thread?
0
Mammoth_Actuary 0 points ago +4 / -4

Ever read the Talmud?

... continue reading thread?
7
publ1us 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well, the left has been threatening to burn things down if they don't get their way, so if the shoe fits...

2
kish-kumen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those of us who are parents have known this truth for millenia, kek! 😂

13
WestPalm 13 points ago +15 / -2

No noticing allowed, goyim!

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
8
Indianapede 8 points ago +9 / -1

China, Soros, Rothschild

7
rebelde_sin_causa 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)

As the terminology goes, I think Chinafication is probably more what they driving for than Bolshevikation.

Bolsheviks are by definition Russian communists, and that's not the style of communism they are aiming for I don't believe.

More like China, with large dominant corporations and single party rule. It differs from China a in that it's the corporations pushing for it, rather than the single party eventually coming around to it and allowing the corporations. Because in our version of China, the corporations would control the single party.

They will be happy to pay "reparations" or whatever they are called, and submit to "regulations" (that they write) in order to keep the masses placated in their police state.

No doubt many of the useful idiots believe they are Bolsheviks, or Jacobins, or anarchists, or whatever the fuck, but it is the corporations that they serve, knowingly or not. In most cases not.

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bolsheviks are by definition Russian communists

A swing and a miss

6
Drazhya 6 points ago +6 / -0

To know who rules over you, find out who decides who you're not allowed to criticize. If a king decrees that his peasants can't say bad things about cats, they're not ruled by cats.

0
Mammoth_Actuary 0 points ago +2 / -2

Good point

1
deleted 1 point ago +6 / -5
1
UpTrump 1 point ago +2 / -1

Fact: ACB has strongly defended 1A. In IL GOP v. Pritzker, she ruled in favor of allowing Pritzker to exempt churches from the lockdown. Despite critics falsely claiming she "ruled for the lockdown," she actually ruled in order to preserve free exercise of religion.

This Executive Order does not limit the free exercise of religion. To protect the health and safety of faith leaders, staff, congregants and visitors, religious organizations and houses of worship are encouraged to consult and follow the recommended practices and guidelines from the Illinois Department of Public Health. As set forth in the IDPH guidelines, the safest practices for religious organizations at this time are to provide services online, in a drive‐in format, or outdoors (and consistent with social distancing requirements and guidance regarding wearing face coverings), and to limit indoor services to 10 people. Religious organizations are encouraged to take steps to ensure social distancing, the use of face coverings, and implementation of other public health measures.

Although we do not rule out the possibility that someone might be able to prove this type of favoritism in the enforcement of an otherwise valid response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the record in this case falls short. Indeed, the problems of late have centered on ordinary criminal mobs looting stores, not on peaceful protestors.

Essentially underpinning the biased selective enforcement by Pritzker due to "muh peaceful protestors". Now they have precedent to ensure Pritzker can/will always have the unlimited power to decide based on political motives how much/little he wishes to enforce the recommendations put forth by the IDPH.

1
1
LeaderToLiberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Socialism only works when information can be controlled.

The Fabians could never have predicted the internet and the democratization of information.

2
Slyhillary 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah - socialism doesn't ever work.

China and the Soviet states had complete info control. China had to accept some capitalism or its people would have starved to death. The Soviet states except for Belarus all failed.

The baathist states fell into permanent war.

Venezuela and Iran control their internet and they require massive violence against their own people.

I have no idea how you could think socialism works. Did you eat lead paint chips as a kid?

2
LeaderToLiberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks... should have said, "only comes into being..."... it never works!

2
Slyhillary 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry for the last line but I was just a little shocked!

Your rephrasing makes a lot of sense. Hope you have a great day

-2
PEPEpeepee -2 points ago +1 / -3

We should literally wipe them off the planet this time.

4
sun_wolf 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not down with that, and it’s a fool’s errand. Nobody should go attack some innocent Jewish person who has really nothing to do with Hollywood or the banking system, and if you do, all that does is feed the narrative that all Jewish People, even at an individual level, like Soros, are victims beyond criticism. Don’t give them the satisfaction of that. Instead what we need is to increase the number of based, normal, Torah Jews who are willing to call out these pedophilic Talmudist Jews. And that is gradually happening. But the problem is a lot of Jewish People are conditioned to protect their tribe no matter what, so we need to break that. Jewish People need to understand that it’s okay for them to criticize a creep like Epstein in the same way it’s okay for Candace Owens to criticize BLM Riots or for a Catholic to criticize the communist Pope.

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never, ever going to happen. Don't even waste your time thinking it might.

2
PamelaCincinnatus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I disagree. In fact, the break has probably already begun. Think of those synagogues chanting "four more years." It's traditionalists vs degenerate globalists all over the world, and I don't think politics after 2020 is ever going to be the same. I think nationalism and populism are here to stay, and are now the dominant ideologies, supplanting globalism and secularism. It's gonna be really interesting.

1
PEPEpeepee 1 point ago +1 / -0

They've been controlling the narrative for a couple hundred years. They killed and maimed everyone they consider to be against because they believe they are the chosen people and untouchable. Im against lumping groups together except this one is causing irreversible damage. They are like a hydra.

1
Mammoth_Actuary 1 point ago +2 / -1

No dude. What about the innocent and good people?

1
PEPEpeepee 1 point ago +1 / -0

They wiped my people out because we believe their god is Ialdabaoth the demiurge. If you don't pull corruption out by it's roots it spreads.

16
PB_Mack 16 points ago +16 / -0

They do that and it will be war. Seriously you can’t tell 1/2 of the population and 85% of the land are they no longer have any power.

13
Saremei 13 points ago +14 / -1

If the dems did that, it would prompt a watering of the tree of liberty.

3
kish-kumen 3 points ago +3 / -0

With what does one water the tree of liberty?

6
rangers24 6 points ago +6 / -0

Blood.

1
kish-kumen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't always bleed, but when I do, it's red.

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

The blood of tyrants.

1
LeaderToLiberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

... and Patriots!

6
Leatherwood 6 points ago +6 / -0

There will not be a "next democrat win". Even Maisie, who has to be one of the dumbest people in the Senate, cautioned at the end of that clip "if the dems take back the Senate".

Their threats to "pack the court" are going to be awfully hard for them pull off when they do not hold the Presidency, the House or the Senate. They really are not in a position to make threats. In fact, they are showing their hand prematurely. Imbeciles.

3
neehl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Getting rid of the electoral college is on the ballot this election for Colorado. Proposition 113: adopt agreement to elect US president by national popular vote. If this passes, Colorado will be the fifteenth state, plus the District of Columbia to join the agreement, bringing the number of committed electoral votes to 196, short of the 270 needed

2
DesertBatman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't wait for this to bite them in the ass when their candidate could have won had they not been required to toss their votes to the majority winner decided by some other state.

Why would any Colorado resident just toss away their states power? No one will campaign for you or address your needs if they get your votes anyway!

5
neehl 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well unfortunately I know a lot of people who will vote for this because 1. They hate Donald Trump and are still angry over his win “despite Hillary’s popular vote” (I don’t believe she won legitimately) and 2. They don’t teach the importance of the constitution in schools they way they should and 3. People are stupid.

3
stratocaster_patriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't forget increasing the black Dem vote by helping them overcome their felonies.

3
christianknight 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is Bolshevism, not Chinaification. Sadly the latter is easier to deal with.

3
banumerchantmarine 3 points ago +3 / -0

The next Democrat win will cement the permanent shift towards Chinafication.

No it won't. It will start the next Civil War, and the US will either purge the Commie cancer from our nation or it will no longer exist.

1
LeaderToLiberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the current Left regains power, it will enforce its rule the same as it protects its power... with the military!

1
banumerchantmarine 1 point ago +1 / -0

And how do you think that will play out? lol

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MAGAbetterargument 2 points ago +2 / -0

What would stop the republicans from doing this as soon as they get power?

Nothing.

Either they haven't thought this through or they deliberately want to delegitimize our government.

I think it's the latter.

1
skumario 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just take a look around. Our Universities are Marxist Incubators. They churn out trash and just look at the trash pouring into the streets. We are doomed. If not now, certainly in the future. Education is Cancer right now.

2
Greg_the_Grim_Doctor 2 points ago +2 / -0

According to this ching chong cunt, putting more democrat justices on the court is "more objective".

Deport this failure.

2
Fabius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why so glum?

Lets just pack the court first. They've stated that they want more justices, lets give it to them.

2
Bigman1844 2 points ago +2 / -0

You forgot open borders and amnesty for illegals. That’s the real end goal and when they achieve it they won’t need to engage in voter fraud. Permanent one party rule.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

The next Democrat win will cement the permanent shift towards Chinafication 1776.

FTFY

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not if we pack the court first.

1
InsaneStreamMedia 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the scary part. Even before RBG died, the Dems were threatening all of these things. The next time they have all 3 houses (white house, house of reps, Senate), it's a done deal. It's vital that the Republicans keep at least one of the 3 for probably the next couple decades, at minimum.

138
ChipahTss 138 points ago +138 / -0

This lady is the biggest piece of shit in the country.

42
King 42 points ago +42 / -0

shes the new feinstein

19
ChipahTss 19 points ago +19 / -0

Hirono- D CH

4
King 4 points ago +5 / -1

was she even born in the usa?

5
yurimodin 5 points ago +5 / -0

even if she wasn't that only means she can't be president.

10
TheWolf 10 points ago +11 / -1

I know a Kenyan who would disagree with you on that

3
FuckRedditWithADildo 3 points ago +3 / -0

CHIN-STEIN. Bat eating demon

10
DrRedPill 10 points ago +10 / -0

right next to Mittens but yea pretty much

7
Donald_Farage 7 points ago +7 / -0

Mazie might be the dumbest member of the Senate. I mean that with all my heart. Truly idiotic.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
ChipahTss 5 points ago +7 / -2

Mittens will vote yes though.

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

No he wont

6
Bot8556 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ilhan Omar. At least hirona didn’t commit immigration fraud.

2
ChipahTss 2 points ago +2 / -0

Theres no proof she isn't sleeping with family members.

3
chahn1138 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup...

Along with the Squad.

And Jay-a-pal....now, remember, that's "Jay" just like "Pay". Got that?!?

2
Strike_Eagle784 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of the biggest pieces of shit in a sea of shit.

1
JackIsALarp 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can name bigger. Come on now.

0
Farage_massage 0 points ago +1 / -1

Looks like we need to run another Jap out of Pearl Habor to me...

67
stevejobs871 67 points ago +67 / -0

This communist needs to be deposed. OTOH, if Republicans keep the Senate, let's talk about packing the courts in Trump's second term. That'll shut the Dims up for good.

30
Slick_Willy 30 points ago +30 / -0

The Dems would add 100+ SCJs and would not give a single shit and the MSM would gush over them while they do it.

14
NADSAQ 14 points ago +14 / -0

Remember when 0bama was mulling the idea of minting a Trillion dollar coin and the news claimed how brilliant it was?

3
Oldjeansandbelt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Two of them, the plan was to mint two of them. If I were him I'd make a third and hide it in a room that can only be found using the map on the back of the declaration of Independence.

17
mr_meatball_disaster 17 points ago +17 / -0

Exactly. When President Trump wins, let’s stack the court. Add two more seats. And while we are at it, we should add two more states: I nominate splitting the Dakotas into South North Dakota and North South Dakota along with the current North Dakota and South Dakota.

11
stevejobs871 11 points ago +11 / -0

Annex the rural Canadian provinces. Offer them statehood in exchange for splitting away from the cucked Canadian govt.

1
nanowerx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Split north New York and north California into their own states and you have two new deep red states!

7
FUCK_DemonRATS 7 points ago +7 / -0

Republicans should pass a law prohibiting more than 9 Supreme Court judges if they take back the house next year.

8
stevejobs871 8 points ago +8 / -0

but that law could be repealed by the next congress. we need a constitutional amendment to make it permanent. that's really difficult to do.

1
FUCK_DemonRATS 1 point ago +1 / -0

How would a constitutional amendment get passed? What's the process to get that done? That should be one of the things on top of the list to get done to keep the democrats from shitting all over our constitution.

2
stevejobs871 2 points ago +2 / -0

2/3 House + 2/3 Senate + 3/4 States or alternatively 2/3 of states call a convention and 3/4 ratify (never been done before)

3
FUCK_DemonRATS 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm hoping Republicans take over the house, keep the senate and Trump gets re-elected. Hopefully Republicans take over locally as well (governors, mayors, city council, DA's, etc). A Red Tsunami.

4
ADAM_SCHITT 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's already the law. The only way to make it stronger is to pass a constitutional amendment.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
49
IncredibleMrE1 49 points ago +49 / -0

Mazie Hirono is the most retarded person in the Senate and an absolute piece of shit. Legitimately one of the dumbest people in existence.

39
Magus_Strife 39 points ago +39 / -0

"Make it more objective"..... by adding political actors until you're guaranteed to have only one side's subjective, feeling based opinions represented? What a fucking clown.

2
Brucesky420 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea well, a person who knows a person who knows a family member of RBG told me her dying wish was actually "It's not okay for democrats to pack the Supreme Court". So to pack the SCOTUS would be a VIOLATION of her dying wish. I can only hope the democrats aren't terrible people who would put their politics before a dying wish!!!

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
10
ExtendedMAGAzine 10 points ago +10 / -0

Underrated

24
Swallwell_Gas_Co 24 points ago +24 / -0

Hirono was abandoned by her father and is a great example of daddy issues in politics.

2
fitzy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I FCKN SPIT OUT MY TEA AHAHAHAHA

16
CanadianMeathead 16 points ago +17 / -1

What happens if Congress flips and Republicans keep the Presidency and the Senate... hmmm

That is why they won't come right out and say it.

16
NotSpyRussian 16 points ago +17 / -1

1.) Pack the court with 100 judges

2.) Rule that 9 judges is the max, grandfather the current judges in

3.) Profit?

5
PRAISETHESUN 5 points ago +5 / -0

Step 3: Keep America great

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
12
TheStoneOfSisyphus 12 points ago +13 / -1

Give Hawaii back to the natives, de-state it, make it a territory, and go with 49.

9
2Fangz 9 points ago +9 / -0

Divide California into multiple states while you're at it.

5
dumpsterfire 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is there any way we can trade Hawaii for Greenland? We make great deals.

15
Rand2024 15 points ago +15 / -0

By their logic, if that is a correct thing to do, why wouldn't Republicans just pack the court now? What's to stop them if that's a legal and moral option for everyone? It's just the latest "if you don't do what we want, we will punish you" threat.

Also if they don't, and dems make it 12 judges, what's to stop Republicans from coming back to make it 15... or 24... or fuck it... put 50 conservative judges on the court lol

It seems that there is a limit to appeals to emotion. They can only say "this is it! This crosses the line and nothing is suddenly of the table because of this xyz! You're going to be sorry! " I feel it starting to wear thin, even with the brownshirt kids.

9
Oback_Barama 9 points ago +9 / -0

IF the dems win the senate in 2021 and they pull this stunt, then every two years once the other party gets the majority, then they will just pack the court the other way. It will be a complete shit-show. Dems make it 13 in 2021, R's make it 17 in 2023 so on and so forth until every SCOTUS decision is along party lines and no one has any faith in SCOTUS anymore.

HEADLINE 2043: SCOTUS reverses all of last years rulings in controversial 72-71 decision!

That is their plan. They are openly trying to erode faith in our election process with this mail in ballots (cheat by mail) and now they are telling us they want to erode faith in the judicial system. They want to dismantle this great country.

6
27Sandino 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is especially odd given that Trump is about to fill the vacant seat. So they're essentially threatening to stack the court when there's a conservative majority, so it's implied that it would be done by bypassing the courts.

This would basically lead to a precedent where every new President stacks the court with his cronies, making them de facto in charge of the Judicial branch.

2
DoesItWorkAlready 2 points ago +2 / -0

By their logic, if that is a correct thing to do, why wouldn't Republicans just pack the court now?

Yes. Trump is effectively doing so. Given another term, he'll have 7-2 in non-cucked cases and 6-3 or 5-4 in cucking cases.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
14
PB_Mack 14 points ago +14 / -0

Honestly starting to feel this is their plan. I don’t think they can win the Presidency, but there are a lot of Republican Senators up for election this cycle. And in a lot of those states, a little ballot harvesting will go a long way. I think the main fraud will be in he Senate races

2
victory2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well packing the court can't really work unless you gain control of both houses of Congress (to pass a law increasing the size of the court), and the Presidency (to sign the new law and to appoint new justices)

2
PB_Mack 2 points ago +2 / -0

They'll do it if they win in 2020. It's important to keep that from happening. Vote.

12
cortosis_turkey 12 points ago +12 / -0

lol Dems still making free campaign commercials for Trump

9
BabyTrump 9 points ago +9 / -0

Dumbest person in the Senate.

3
salvecitizen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah. For second-dumbest, I think of Blumenthal, Markey, Kaine, a couple others. But for the absolute dumbest, I don't see a strong competitor for Mazie.

9
Sybilludington77fr 9 points ago +9 / -0

You know, I've been doing some thinking after reading a few things and watching a few videos, and asking myself, why did the democrats chose Gropey Joe Biden as their 2020 democrat presidential candidate, and Kamala Harris, a failed presidential candidate herself? Well, maybe it's because the party really is using Gropey Joe as a Front for their real plan and don't care that he has no chance of winning at all. They ‘want’ Donald Trump to win. What they are doing is taking all that money and applying it to the lower campaigns for Congressional seats. The campaign money is being spread around to every state so in the end the mail-in ballots will give both chambers to the Marxist democrat party. They're hoping we don't realize if the mail-in ballots cause chaos and confusion for the presidential election, it also causes confusion for the Congressional, and local elections. We won't pay attention to the congressional votes, we'll accept the congressional votes, while fighting over the presidential ballots. They will quietly swear in the fraudulently elected democrat candidates to form a majority for the 117th Congress where Nancy 'might keep her Speaker seat' hoping we don't notice.

They don't care if Trump wins or not, they want both chambers! Then they'll impeach and convict Donald Trump and Michael Pence and put whomever they want in the White House. They'll impeach the last three SCOTUS judges calling them fraudulently seated on the SCOTUS bench and replace those justices with Valerie Jarett, Eric Holder, and Barack Obama. Then, the Marxists will own America. I know it seems far fetched, but I wouldn't put it pass the democrats to plan that very scenario to bury America. I know it sounds like is it possible for them to be that vile? Uhhhhhh, yeaaaaa!!!

9
Womb__Raider3 9 points ago +9 / -0

They want to change the rules again?

After they got fucked over with the Biden rule?

After they got fucked over by the Nuclear option?

It's hilarious when they cry about shit they brought onto themselves a decade later.

2
Sea_Still 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cocaine Mitch warned them this would happen

6
1standboobs 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump should just take her advice! Why wait till the democrats get back in power? If it's truly good for the people then we need to get on that asap! 2 scoops, 4 more years, and 8 more judges! Thanks Hirono, very cool.

6
liberty4alll 6 points ago +6 / -0

“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time,” Ginsburg told NPR in July 2019. “I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court. If anything it would make the court look partisan.”

6
dumpsterfire 6 points ago +6 / -0

Tropical islands would be pretty cool if it weren't for all the tropical island people. I haven't found one yet that isn't kind of a shit hole once you get off the beach.

2
victory2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Taiwan is pretty sweet.

6
King 6 points ago +6 / -0

they just want to change everything

4
Ithrowawaay 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because they can’t win on a level playing field.

2
King 2 points ago +2 / -0

i expect them to end as a political party after the election

1
Ithrowawaay 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope you are right.

1
bakuuu 1 point ago +1 / -0

This isn’t a political party. Read culture of critique

5
TrumpForeverEver 5 points ago +5 / -0

Asian Karen

I hate this woman’s self righteousnous

5
FUCK_DemonRATS 5 points ago +5 / -0

We need to defund and dismantle the Democratic party. If they want to completely change all the norms of how our government functions, than nothing should be "off the table" as they say

5
AbrahamLincoln 5 points ago +5 / -0

IF

3
juulmasterflex 3 points ago +3 / -0

"If-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if-if"

  • Barack Obama
1
making_upvotes 1 point ago +1 / -0

If.... If is good.

5
GeneralTsoTofu 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've been saying this from the start. They care MUCH more about keeping the House and taking the Senate than the Presidency.

They'll have complete impeachment power and could do pretty much anything they wanted.

1
victory2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if they take the Senate, they aren't getting 66 votes there to convict on Impeachment.

5
JackLemon 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's time to kick Hawaii out of the union. They should never have been made a state. We would own the Senate if not for that pissante protectorate filled with anti-American foreigners.

1
MinutemanFrog77 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Take the trash out, keep your house.

5
TexSolo 5 points ago +6 / -1

She is a danger to the United States. That crazy bitch needs to be hung from a yard arm.

3
anon1011101 3 points ago +3 / -0

Strongly agree!

4
HockeyMom4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Liberals aren’t winners. They never win. They’ve never won. So they have to cheat or change the rules of the game.

4
Walleyevision 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are a lot of idiots in congress. She’s certainly a front runner.

4
aveydey 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hirono is hands down the dumbest person in the Senate, quite possibly the dumbest person to ever be a Senator in our country's ~250 year history.

4
TheBigKahuna 4 points ago +4 / -0

If Republicans get the House, Senate, and Presidency (only House is a slight "if"), they should start pushing through Constitutional Amendments to repeal the 17th amendment, fix the currency, shut down the inflation machine, set specific rules for voting requirements (like ID for Christ's sake!), end modern-day Prohibition to shut down rampant crime and attacks on our civil liberties, etc.

3
PinkoPatrol 3 points ago +3 / -0

Try it, bitch.

3
R37arded 3 points ago +3 / -0

"To make the court more objective" lmao they think we're retarded

4
sustainable_saltmine 4 points ago +4 / -0

aka "to allow our activist judges to legislate from the bench"

3
chahn1138 3 points ago +3 / -0

See what she did there? She WARNED you!

"If the dems take back the Senate...."

We must stop that from happening!

3
Pres_Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

On a side note, if any women deserves to get punched in the face its this one.

3
BestTimeToBAlive 3 points ago +3 / -0

F’n retarded.

They can’t win bc they’ve shitty radical policies.

They can’t make laws bc no one will pass them.

So instead, let’s change around everything so we can win.

Must suck to be a Libtard. So. Much. Losing.

3
YuugeNews 3 points ago +3 / -0

I make it a point of pride to ignore the stupidest woman in America.

3
shockfactor 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not encouraging violence but if they do this, there will be senators dragged out and killed in the streets.

I may not be the senators who vote on this, it may be a few years later, but this is a one way ticket to sectarian violence.

3
ServerTowerofBabel 3 points ago +3 / -0

We know what you want, Pinko.

3
JamesBond007 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is why they can never be given power again.

3
KnoxHarrington 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who is dumber? Sen. Hirono or Sen. Whitehouse? I genuinely can't decide.