2685
Comments (182)
sorted by:
145
EPic 145 points ago +145 / -0

It's amazing what a bunch of dirt farmers with no military training did being armed with just a rifle.

America is filled with Military trained vets & half the guns on the planet.

107
Bullet3250 107 points ago +107 / -0

Every solider in the US takes an Oath to the Constitution...

not the UN

and certainly not some Leftist Democrat commie weenie....

While you may leave the Service - that Oath does not expire.

52
NotMadeInChina 52 points ago +53 / -1

Problem is a lot of them have twisted ideas of what the constitution says, or they just blindly follow orders without a second thought.

I’m alarmed at how many Biden signs I see around here at households that are flying Marines flags or other branches of the military.

31
RabidZoo 31 points ago +31 / -0

You see Biden signs?! Lol...you from Cali??

22
NotMadeInChina 22 points ago +22 / -0

Lol not far off ... commiesota and I spend a fair amount of time in the “inner suburbs” where I spot most of those signs.

Luckily in my area in the “outer” suburbs there’s a lot more Trump signs appearing !!

22
Modus_Pwninz 22 points ago +22 / -0

I'm in MN and have yet to see a single Biden anything...Granted I left the suburbs entirely and moved North.

This is Trump country up here. Trump signs everywhere.

10
NotMadeInChina 10 points ago +10 / -0

Oh totally. Every time I go north of town on the interstate there’s more and more Trump signs. Red wave coming I’m sure of it !!

The signs I’ve seen are over in Eagan, Inver Grove Heights area. Saw some when I was down in Eden Prairie the other day too, including a couple of new ones for me “fire the liar” and “republicans against Trump”. These people are so totally brainwashed.

We’ve been talking about heading to SD once this is all over, but I love northern MN so much.

7
MN_RED_2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not too far north I hope.. Duluth is a staging ground for the commies and activists.

5
wanderingUlysses 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh no! I am considering moving up to that Vulcan city! I am gonna explore it in a week or so with my buddy who has family in the area and advised me to move to Twig or Hermingtown. I thought the same, that I should move into greater area instead of Duluth proper. I am just scoping out the area! I also wanna look into Montana and Alaska!

3
monk_of_trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Those assholes standing on the bridge to canal park every god damn day last summer were blocking the whole sidewalk every time I went running. I started wearing a trump shirt, and american flag shorts and bandana every time I went running just to piss them off lol.

... continue reading thread?
3
Uncle___Rico 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've seen a lot of them popping up in my childhood neighborhood in Bloomington. Sad to see, since it was a fairly conservative neighborhood when I grew up there. Seen a few Biden signs where I live now in Coon Rapids, but most of the time I see Trump signs and flags.

3
crash7863 3 points ago +3 / -0

Plymouth here. Seen Trump signs all summer. One asshole finally put up a Biden sign. Property values have been plummeting since. There goes the fucking neighborhood.

9
ippwndu 9 points ago +9 / -0

I’m from Cali and I don’t see any damn Biden signs or bumper stickers. I see more BLM signs on houses than Biden signs.

I don’t see any Trump signs around me either, but that changes when you get away from the city.

8
BigIronBigIron 8 points ago +9 / -1

Anyone else see lots of BLM signs in the white gentrified yuppie neighborhoods that kicked out all the black folk, and zero BLM signs in the actual black neighborhoods?

3
PsychoPhil 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see Biden signs. South central PA (around Gettysburg/Hanover area). in 2016 it was red as hell. Right now I'm seeing Biden signs everywhere. Maybe three to one Biden/Harris (or is it Harris/Biden?).

3
SigAR 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was driving down the street the other day and saw around 5 or six houses with Trump signs then, VFW had Biden and other demo signs.

I saw no homes with Biden signs...so I guess demons own that VFW

4
TheRealBuddyB 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dude wtf that makes me sad. The VFW, really?
Man I'm in Texas, a divided area of Texas, but our local VFW looks like its trapped in a state of perma-Trump rally.

I live in an area with lots of retirees, so there are tons of older Vets around here. When I go to a store where you see a lot of them- like Lowes or Tractor Supply -there's red hats everywhere. Those ol boys DGAF.

11
Meatbank84 11 points ago +11 / -0

More than likely union workers. That’s one area the dems have by the balls.

26
Modus_Pwninz 26 points ago +26 / -0

"I like the union, I make a good wage! I'll vote Democrat. They support the unions!"

Job gets outsourced to China or replaced by H1B, now completely unemployed

"Wait no what."

14
Meatbank84 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yup this and most of them are uneducated voters are they get hit by dem propaganda by their union leaders and staff.

7
BigIronBigIron 7 points ago +7 / -0

We don't need to allow outsourcing or H1B's. That's a choice we make as a country. Which of our lawmakers are responsible for this choice?

6
ScreamingEagles 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mike Lee (Utah) and Dan Crenshaw both are for H1B visa outsourcing.

I'm sure there are other Rinos to add to the list.

5
TheRealBuddyB 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah this is one area where the RINOs are just as guilty as the Left, unfortunately.

7
justsomefuckingdude 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yep. I'll never understand how the labor/union types think the pro-wallstreet, pro-China, pro-illegals, open border party of the rich elite and celebrities that considers them blue collar worthless trash that should be replaced has their best economic interests at heart.

2
ScreamingEagles 2 points ago +3 / -1

Times and parties changed, many Union members view of the Dems stayed in the past of the 1960 and 70's.

They are blind to the pro-Outsourcing, Pro-NAFTA Clinton era to the present.

3
ScreamingEagles 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is my Dad, sadly. A political party cannot be pro-union labor AND pro-Open Borders at the same time.

Up until Trump, all parties were for Open Borders (GOP, Dems, libertarian and green) with varying degrees of pro-worker policies.

2
fehfeh 2 points ago +2 / -0

I drove through mid northern Wisconsin today (Oshkosh, Juneau, Ocononowoc, Fond du Lac and Appleton) and saw quite a bit of Biden Harris signs. Especially Oshkosh. A 2/3 ratio. A bit concerning. But out of the cities, the ratio of Trump to Biden signs was 10 to 1.

6
ObjectiveReality 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

Not just that, many don't actually care about an oath.

They aren't raised to view that as a taboo.

They've never had to rely on someone's word for anything important, have them fulfill it, and realize what it means... and what it means to give it and not keep it. Everyone just lies, so they lie, and everyone expects that everyone is lying, in their minds.

So an oath? That's just something you say to get the job, and only something you keep because there might be a punishment if you break it. For many, principle is a foreign concept.

5
WeShldBeAble2OwnRPGs 5 points ago +5 / -0

Normally the only flag to accompany a Biden sign near me is a rainbow flag.

4
SiBear117 4 points ago +4 / -0

A whole bunch of trash got into the military during the Obama years. He poisoned all of our institutions.

2
arentbaby 2 points ago +3 / -1

there's a reason there has been such a push to fill out the military with a plurality of nonwhites. blacks and latinos in general do not care about the constitution, it's not a product of their ancestors so why would they? a multicultural military is far easier to control without question

1
Rhayne 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yeah, I've seen a few military vets lately saying that they served for our freedom. Even if that freedom means kneeling or burning the flag.

I'm like..... WHAT!? O.O

YOU OUTTA YOUR FUCKING MIND?

Ahem, "Thank you for your service though". Lol

23
PhilosoGuido 23 points ago +23 / -0

As a career military officer, I guarantee that a majority of servicemen would reject any unconstitutional orders to seize citizens' firearms or attack those who refuse to give up them up. I imagine you'd have mass resignations and subversion from within the ranks. "No sir, we didn't find any weapons there. They were all lost in boating accidents." This is one reason that Obama tried to place loyal partisan leftist hacks throughout the DoD.

17
Bullet3250 17 points ago +17 / -0

When Obama removed all those Officers/Generals.. I had the Chill of Stalin purging his military staff ...back before WWII broke out...

Obama followed that practice - https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/197-military-officers-purged-by-obama/

11
VoidWanderer 11 points ago +11 / -0

Maybe it's different on the commissioned side, but the enlisted side in the Army had far too many NCO's that didn't really care and were more concerned with promotion and doing anything to squeeze onto that ever smaller list than doing what was right.

7
christianknight 7 points ago +8 / -1

That was before. There are communists in the ranks.

6
AbrahamLincoln 6 points ago +7 / -1

Army has helicopters, I'm sure they can figure this one out.

3
Bullet3250 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for your service!

10
DeltaTango 10 points ago +10 / -0

Democrats: "A bunch of hillbilly's with guns can't stop the might of the US military!"

Also Democrats: "We need to leave Afghanistan because the US military can't defeat a bunch of hillbilly's with guns!"

5
EPic 5 points ago +5 / -0

To be fair the hillbillies with guns in Afghanistan have ended every empire that went to fight them.

5
80960KA 5 points ago +5 / -0

To be fair, so has America.

1
EPic 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a different comparison tho.

America comes in and quickly wrecks everything in sight to make nations submit

Afghanistan makes empires ask "why won't you die ! ?" and crawl in a fetal position to cry. Russia literally tried to kill every woman & child and poisoned water supplies to ensure there was not a new generation.......and still lost.

3
80960KA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was referring to the British, one of the only empires that ever even tried. Japan took a swing but ultimately didn't have the force projection ability to do more than bomb a distant territory and send a few paper balloons.

2
Caferrell 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also had some cannons.

47
Sunsetmal [S] 47 points ago +48 / -1

We have an entire generation of war fighters who studied, trained and executed irregular warfare and counter guerilla tactics...and the libtards think they have a chance?

Looking forward to it.

43
CovfefeAnon 43 points ago +43 / -0

The UN agenda is clear. Molon Labe

23
DeusVultIntensifies 23 points ago +23 / -0

Deus Vult!

7
Salacious_B_Trump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Username checks out!

7
Modus_Pwninz 7 points ago +7 / -0

They want us to have sawed-off barrels? Very based for the UN lol

2
KillaryBillary 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's like that nazi gun that shot around corners

3
LoneStarDangler 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's like a 14" barrel

43
Kaarous 43 points ago +43 / -0

Can't speak for the cops, but the military will be competing against us for who can get the most blue colored scalps.

38
minotaurbeach 38 points ago +39 / -1

The UN is a European org and doesn't benefit us in any way. It is set up to cannabalize the economy of strong nations and make them poor and dependent. The Nazi party grew in a similar way, with their brown shirts in the role of Antifa.

It is another Nazi movement.

3
somethinga9230k 3 points ago +4 / -1

The Nazi party grew in a similar way, with their brown shirts in the role of Antifa.

Didn't the "brown shirts" literally fight Antifa terrorists in Germany in the early 1930s?

3
minotaurbeach 3 points ago +4 / -1

Brown shirts were the National Socialist Worker's party. They were the same people marching for Marxism in the beginning.

Fascists and Sozialfascists are twins ! (Stalin)

Even Stalin knew they were the Same Marxist people. It is like BLM and Antifa today.

http://ciml.250x.com/archive/events/english/austria_1934/austria_february_1934.html

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

Brown shirts were the National Socialist Worker's party. They were the same people marching for Marxism in the beginning.

Fascists and Sozialfascists are twins ! (Stalin)

Even Stalin knew they were the Same Marxist people. It is like BLM and Antifa today.

http://ciml.250x.com/archive/events/english/austria_1934/austria_february_1934.html

But why would the "brown shirts" then violently fight Antifa terrorists in the streets, defend those attacked by Antifa, and later put Antifa in concentration camps?

And doesn't "Sozialfascists" denote "social democrats" as "fascists" instead of "marxists"? A definition invented and used by communists as far as I can tell. And wasn't Stalin and the communists in the Soviet Union extremely much against fascists?

And is that site you link to a communist site??: https://archive.li/rfHVd

3
Phil_Selway 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nazis: national socialists had brown shirts Soviets: international socialists had Antifa

Socialists hate each other.

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

But like I asked the other commenter:

Why then would the Nazis ally with the fascists of Italy and Imperial Japan in the "Anti-Comintern Pact" (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Comintern_Pact ) against the genocidal communists?

1
Phil_Selway 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see your point here. Those three were allies or had common enemies, and none of them were internationalists.

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why would a socialist faction ally with non-socialists in a pact against communism? And wage total war against communists (communists that had already by that point in time committed intentional, organized and planned genocides against millions)?

... continue reading thread?
2
operator1214 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ever seen two gangs in a turf war? Just because they're fighting each other doesn't mean they aren't both criminals and up to no good. ;)

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yet why would the Nazis then ally with the fascists of Italy and Imperial Japan in the "Anti-Comintern Pact" (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Comintern_Pact ) against the genocidal communists?

1
operator1214 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fascists were of the same stripe -- Benito had been a communist in his earlier years -- and Germany needed a foothold in the Med (Italy wanted a guarantee that Germany/Austria would not come storming over the Brenner Pass). As for the Japanese? To tie down the British and the Americans. Neither of Nazi Germany's alliances (correction: none, none of its alliances, for he had been allied with both Finland and USSR, who were not part of the Axis) were anything other than for convenience, a standard communist (and criminal) trait.

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

So the Nazis, who literally fought terrorist and murderous Antifa in the streets, and also joined in a "Anti-Comintern Pact", with many people specifically deciding to support them due to their anti-communist stances and views, and whom waged total war against communists and the Soviet Union (whom had committed planned, intentional and organized genocides upon genocides upon genocides against millions of ethnic Europeans)... were communists themselves?

... continue reading thread?
1
minotaurbeach 1 point ago +2 / -1

https://thedonald.win/p/HXjynJR4/

Same group. Nazis already brainwashed you.

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is that photoshopped? Do you have any sources reg. that?

And why do you distract from my questions? And why did you link to what seems like a communist website?

And why would the Nazis wage total war against the communists of the Soviet Union (the communists whom had committed genocides upon genocides upon genocides against ethnic Europeans long before WW2)?

1
minotaurbeach 1 point ago +2 / -1

they were both socialist groups.

-1
somethinga9230k -1 points ago +1 / -2

Again, since you evade:

Is that photoshopped? Do you have any trustworthy sources reg. that?

And why do you distract from my questions? And why did you link to what seems like a communist website?

And why would the Nazis wage total war against the communists of the Soviet Union (the communists whom had committed genocides upon genocides upon genocides against ethnic Europeans long before WW2)?

35
Reddinatored 35 points ago +35 / -0

They keep thinking the military would just en masse support them.

42
NotMadeInChina 42 points ago +43 / -1

We shouldn’t make the mistake of assuming the military would en masse support us.

34
Chickendoodles 34 points ago +34 / -0

Nor should we make the mistake that combat experience is all it would take to win. We dont have the media on our side, the information war is just as important

20
UserGen1776 20 points ago +20 / -0

I don't think the media would be standing, at least not in the way it exists today. They need power, food, supplies, broadcast locations etc. If it gets to the point where they have to hide in a bunker what they say isn't going to matter.

10
Murica420 10 points ago +10 / -0

Exactly and all the tech companies etc ain’t gonna be on our side. If something like this did go down they’d likely do something like shutting down internet cell phones etc for any conservatives. Use the cell phones to figure out where we are etc. Loosing the ability to communicate would be a massive disadvantage.

18
Ithrowawaay 18 points ago +18 / -0

All we’d have to do is cut the power and water in metro areas and watch them eat themselves alive.

But if it got to that point, level the cell towers, level the playing field.

11
WeShldBeAble2OwnRPGs 11 points ago +11 / -0

Right... I always say this when these conversations pop up. The Left absolutely needs infrastructure to run smoothly in order to keep their large machine running. All that would need to be done is for critical points in the lefts infrastructure to be disrupted (roads, rails, power, water, comms, etc) and they would collapse. I do not view a potential Civil War as two 'militaries' duking it out, but rather small, but many, guerilla units choking to death the government machine through infrastructure attacks. Central command or comms wouldn't even necessarily be needed for this.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
quodvox 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't assume everyone in tech is a Leftist. I think there will be plenty of scenarios of:

"Oops, the filter didn't seem to catch all of the Nazis, xir. Must be a bug in the code. I'll try harder next time"

11
vinnychase 11 points ago +11 / -0

The military is getting "diversified" hard. There are more and more people with un-American ideals in the armed forces everyday. Sadly

4
80960KA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most likely it'll split, like in pretty much every civil war ever.

4
Reddinatored 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would at least draw a point of argument being that military indifference towards pro 2A Americans would lead to the same result if the left made a confiscation effort. They would NEED the military to accomplish their ends. Pro 2A types would only need the military to stay out of the matter.

2
ImFinallyNotAnAlt 2 points ago +2 / -0

The brass will not. The troops will, the ones who aren’t using the military for the wrong reasons. The us military has been demoralized and they’re on limited time. There were literally gangs in some units when I was in; couldn’t put their stupid affiliations away to do something better. Bit of a joke in some units.

5
InjectorEater 5 points ago +5 / -0 (edited)

They don't think of the military as people. To them, it's a uniform blob of camo that follows orders and nothing else.

31
Choppermagic 31 points ago +31 / -0

A kid named Kyle already showed them how dangerous patriots can be

2
monk_of_trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone needs to make a version of "roland the headless thompson gunner" about kyle.

27
KeepTheFaith 27 points ago +27 / -0

I 100% advocate for violence against foreign invaders..

12
anon572759 12 points ago +12 / -0

Foreign and domestic.

8
KeepTheFaith 8 points ago +8 / -0

Soft bellies like the "we don't advocate for violence" nonsense.

Small doses...

3
zakat 3 points ago +3 / -0

And that is the reason why the UN will never act against the US.

It's not there to fight the local population of their member states or fight on one side in civil war. It's goal is international peace keeping - if there was a war they might go in and make sure that peace negotiations are done properly.

They are not an invasion army and any retarded left who thinks the UN will do something in the US has no fucking clue.

3
LiberTerrarium 3 points ago +3 / -0

They also aren't aware of how many crimes on locals the peacekeeping "ble helmets" commit. Many of the UN forces are from developing nations. Imagine loosing a bunch of third worlders in the US with automatic weapons.

What the leftists who dream of UN armed intervention don't realize is that blue helmets would be like if antifa/BLM had automatic weapons and knew they faced absolutely no consequences for their conduct.

3
chewsoap 3 points ago +3 / -0

Am I the only one who would shoot on sight anyone wearing a blue helmet?

3
LiberTerrarium 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, in fact almost everywhere the blue helmets have been deployed shot back.

Edit: Shot first. On sight.

21
MissPede 21 points ago +22 / -1

Fight the whole police and military with my little rifle? No, no no no, I’m gonna a fight them off with my big rifle!

19
LibsAreBabyKillers 19 points ago +21 / -2

I hope everyone here saying they're ready for war aren't all fat. Being fat is never tactical. No matter how much shit you bought.

7
vinnychase 7 points ago +7 / -0

Agreed. War is not won by fat men. If you can't run the Mogadishu mile then get the fuck up and start training.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
19
Paul_Revere 19 points ago +19 / -0

If it's just "a little rifle," why are you so afraid of it, faggot?

15
rentfREEEE_since2016 15 points ago +15 / -0

There’s a reason the first thing the CIA does when they're staging a coup is Send guns. Liberals are so fucking smooth brain.

10
christianknight 10 points ago +11 / -1

Libs might get those guns. CIA aint on the side of liberty.

11
rentfREEEE_since2016 11 points ago +11 / -0

Oh I’m not endorsing it. I’m just saying that guns WORK. When I hear someone say “you can’t take down a governments with small arms” ... dumb.

4
JesusisKing 4 points ago +4 / -0

100% Fact they are leftist and would view themselves as the figurehead of the progressive future

0
LibsAreBabyKillers 0 points ago +1 / -1

CIA iZ bAaAaAaD

1
christianknight 1 point ago +2 / -1

Hello glowie

0
80960KA 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes. Always has been, always will be. OSS should have been dissolved after WWII.

0
LibsAreBabyKillers 0 points ago +1 / -1

........ The OSS was dissolved after World War II.

0
80960KA 0 points ago +1 / -1

In name only. The organization it became is called...the CIA.

0
LibsAreBabyKillers 0 points ago +1 / -1

They're 2 completely different entities. The OSS did many jobs that have been split into different agencies. You're obviously somebody that doesn't know shit about intelligence agencies other than ThAyRE BaYuD.

0
80960KA 0 points ago +1 / -1

hurr durr spooks good even with decades of evidence to the contrary

Cram it Romney voter.

... continue reading thread?
12
glow-operator-2-0 12 points ago +12 / -0

Blue helmets make great targets.

3
Scotty1954 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, and my old eyes need a nice bright target;)

2
Scotty1954 2 points ago +2 / -0

tho I can still hit a beer can at 50 yards with hard iron sights!

2
glow-operator-2-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know it.

1
Ktt8404 1 point ago +1 / -0

And hard to hide a bright blue Headshot beacon.

1
glow-operator-2-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

👍🇺🇸

8
TimTruckdashian 8 points ago +8 / -0

They have no idea. I hope they don't pick this fight. It would be so bad.

They have been so comfortable for so long, because of capitalism and men willing to fight for freedom, yet they want to fight those providing that comfort.

6
TheRealBuddyB 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

I don't think the Left understands how piss poor of an idea involving the UN in their gun-grab would be.

Seriously let's break this down to simplicity: if a bunch of guys in US military garb or LEO gear showed up to my house, as a Patriotic American I would probably experience an internal struggle when it came to fighting them, I might even make the fatal mistake of asking them wtf they're here for first.

But if the mutherfuckers are wearing UN helmets it would be insta-war. I wouldn't even think twice about it. I would just fly into a raging fury and begin raining down bullets upon then before anyone had a chance to speak. Sure, it would probably just be a kamikaze situation for me, but they would have to go through the same damn thing when they went to the next house, and the next, etc.

Now expand that scenario to a national level.

3
chewsoap 3 points ago +3 / -0

Precisely what I was thinking. Glad I scrolled down and didn't waste time retyping pretty much exactly this.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
justsomefuckingdude 6 points ago +6 / -0

The UN

LMAO are they trying to get us hyped up?

5
Licensetomeme 5 points ago +5 / -0

I hate that dumbass argument from the left. Even the most psychopathic politicians the left have don't want to goscorched Earth. If they try it, they're gonna have to round everybody, and I mean everybody, up. Because the army that is the American people would not fly a banner. Why would they make it easier to identify them if they're being prosecuted?

And even if they somehow managed to look through every nook and cranny to find every single guntoting American, who do these morons think are gonna have to be doing the arrests? The very same Americans who enlisted to defend American values.....

But let's say everything goes their way. When the dust settles, what will be left to rule.....? A shattered economy, a destroyed population, nothing to be gained, only lost. And even shortlived, these pathetic politicians would never risk life and limb against the pride and fury of the American people. These are the same mayors that flake to a few picket signs in front of their lawn. What would become of their palaces if the people are wakened? They fear you. They just don't want you to know it. That's why they pit you against their drones.

5
thisguy883 5 points ago +5 / -0

The UN would be an invading force.

I would have NO PROBLEM killing any one of those fuckers. They aren't American.

4
80960KA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Please, bring in the UN.

It's much easier to pull the trigger against a foreign occupying force than it is against fellow Americans.

4
ArticleISection10 4 points ago +4 / -0

if shit gets zombie survival bad they will fleee the cities and beg this people they talked down to to feed and protect them

4
The_Bloofy_Bullshark 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know, blue helmets make for amazing target practice. Just putting that out there...

4
APlaceInTheSun 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nobody is going to come door to door to take away our guns. It would be impractical because each confiscation could turn into a standoff situation and nobody wants that job with such a high mortality rate. Instead they will tax/restrict ammo and pass laws holding gun manufacturers liable for firearm deaths. This will result in many shutting down or refusing to sell into the US market.

1
Mynamesprivate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Death by slow strangulation to sum it up.

4
Censorddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

The largest, most powerful standing army is the American militia.

N O T H I N G stands a chance.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
anon572759 3 points ago +3 / -0

I love Swedish Operator meme.

3
Dallasguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

The UN is a big reason 9mm has gotten so popular. When they invade we will have plenty of it to scavenge.

3
turdinthepunch 3 points ago +3 / -0

The legally armed citizenry of the United States of America is the largest fighting force on the face of the planet. And that is before defections.

3
bundyfly 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blue helmets stand out in any setting...

3
Scotty1954 3 points ago +3 / -0

So I hope they wear those bright baby blue helmets;)

3
bothloveocean 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’d ask if they’ve seen the movie, but The Patriot would scare the piss out of a sissy leftist.

3
spicy_deluxe 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've always wanted a collection of blue helmets with a hole in them.

1
DeepWinter 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm thinkin' Return of the Jedi ending, but instead of Stormtrooper helmets... ;)

3
MindsetRoulette 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember when video of a hillbilly firing range was mistaken for Syria war footage? I member

3
TurdFerguson 3 points ago +3 / -0

The whole of.....LOL. How about just the traitorous managers.

2
A300killdozer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck the un if the try to come to the USA the will all go back in body bags and not one of there weapons will ever be found . We won’t keep there helmets because the will be full of holes

2
dingdongbob 2 points ago +2 / -0

The military is afraid of using excessive force in real wars today. They sure as shit won't bomb the fuck out of their own citizens. That is how you strengthen the guerilla army. A very bad idea when the members of the enemy army can be in your ranks.

1
Mynamesprivate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thing is, though, is the left are used to calling us traitors, nazis, racists, etc. The dehumanization of us has been going on for awhile.

2
5moreyears 2 points ago +2 / -0

Blue helmets = Easy targets

2
DeltaTango 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're overestimating the "whole of the police and military" going along with an un-Constitutional law like that. Many police and sheriffs have already said they won't enforce such clearly illegal provisions. I'm sure most in the military feel the same way, granted they're not domestic law enforcement.

2
dagoat4l 2 points ago +2 / -0

I got a feels many police and military will not side with a communist take over. If the UN comes in they will take an ole school ass whipping. UN will not want that fight.

2
fingis_dartan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cold. Dead. Hands.

2
ex67v 2 points ago +2 / -0

Molon Labe

2
FeistyTary 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are goddamn right we will, cold dead hands

2
starsabove 2 points ago +2 / -0

Heh . . . in all honesty, the left attempting to bring in the UN to attack Americans solves the biggest morality hurdle there is. Nobody wants to take up arms against their neighbors. Nobody has any qualms whatsoever taking up arms against an invading army.

2
TrappedInCalifornia 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, what does the UN actually have power over? Isn't the organization itself powerless to do anything past sending threatening letters and asking members to enforce it's rules?

2
GrizWallerOGV 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's adorable how they assume even most let alone the whole of law enforcement and military would go along with an illegitimate government in an actual serious conflict.

2
TrumpCard1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

First to go is smug commie cuck.

2
Navlivesmatter69 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fun fact... A majority of the military owns and loves gun rights...

1
123breadman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many here in CA-San Diego hate guns and vote democrat. This one army dude who is pretty successful, says that the guns laws here make no sense, but he feels they are necessary.

I don't know why people say SD is conservative, it's all liberals. Inland CA has more conservatives, but it's still pretty blue.

2
BigChad 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't believe our military and our police would actually enforce orders like that.

Even if they believed it was the right thing to do, it's actually retarded from a safety point of view.

1
ImFinallyNotAnAlt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Always hated that argument, it shows they have no idea what they’re talking about.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
chewsoap 1 point ago +2 / -1

Do you even own a gun bro?

1
randomvirus 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, officer. I lost them in a boating accident.