4765
Comments (300)
sorted by:
236
ColludingWithAmerica 236 points ago +237 / -1

Give me a hardline pro 2A justice, I beg of thee

211
ModsBanPaleos 211 points ago +212 / -1

NATIONWIDE CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY

105
Everquest4Life 105 points ago +105 / -0

Whew Lad! Slow down, I can only get so erect.

33
roscoeSteele 33 points ago +33 / -0

lol i already came when i heard the news - i'm tagging you in

24
Mammoth_Actuary 24 points ago +33 / -9 (edited)

TO THE TRUMP TEAM:

NOMINATE A LATINO JUDGE.

IF THE DEMS ATTACK HIM, THEY WILL ALIENATE LATINOS.

4D CHESS

Edit: And the whole objective is to fail. After the Dems attack the Latino judge, Trump should pull his nomination and say he "failed". The Latino judge can make a speech about how the Dems viciously attacked him and he will gain the sympathy of the Latino community.

34
WarpedSage 34 points ago +34 / -0

Cruz is hispanic, cuban heritage. He is actually the first Hispanic Senator from Texas. Might go the extra mile in Florida too.

6
CaptainAHab 6 points ago +6 / -0

Too bad Lion Ted already came out and said he appreciates it, but doesn’t want the position. It’s a hell of an honor, but I don’t blame him if it’s not what you want to be doing for the foreseeable future.

3
Based_Trumpster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course he said that. But he doesn't mean it; he'd accept the nomination in a heartbeat.

-8
Mammoth_Actuary -8 points ago +8 / -16

We should nominate an illegal immigrant or a Dreamer. Remember: It's just a fake nomination. Get the Dems to attack him and then pull his nomination.

23
The_New_Pope 23 points ago +24 / -1

You're thinking like a Democrat. That shit doesn't fly on our side.

12
Antifederalist 12 points ago +13 / -1

Fuck identity politics.

2
DoubleEagle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like a redditor found you.

7
Sup34 7 points ago +7 / -0

I respectfully disagree.

Dems abandoned the Latinos once they showed they aren’t monolithic - anecdotal proof?

  1. Issue last election was that trump would shut out illegals. Dems promised the world to Illegals - thinking American Latinos would support - soon realized Americans want legal Immigration, not illegal

Dems threw out Latino Americans then and focused on making illegals eligible to vote.

  1. Dems then redoubled efforts on blacks and racism instead of Latinos and xenophobia.

My advice: go with the best candidate. In this case, Judge Amy - whose “faith is strong” - make Dems prove their Satanic leanings even more.

1
Mammoth_Actuary 1 point ago +6 / -5

Should be male

3
Sup34 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure - if he thinks it’s the best candidate. I think it’s Judge Amy - imo best qualified and seemingly strongest conservative able to get confirmed

0
DoubleEagle 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is Miss "Look at my two Haitian children" going to support our borders?

Under the best of circumstances, women tend to be vulnerable to "look at this poor dead child, their only crime was reaching for the American dream", which is good, because women should be caring.

Amy goes beyond that and has adopted foreign children. She looks fine on paper, but being guided only by her conscience... I'm not sure we'd be happy with the results.

2
Sup34 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah - but Roberts, Gorsuch, or Kavanaugh have been so awesome? Each faltered on some conservative issue because the law is nuanced.

Appointments are a game of odds and chances - it’s politics disguised as justice.

And, my friend, legal immigration is much, much different than illegal immigration.

I also can’t subscribe to the “women are caring” schtick any more than “men should be rugged.”

It comes in all shades - look at Trump vs Bush. W was out there “yeehaw-ing” and clearing brush - yet, we saw where that went...but still 1000x better than Gore (but Trump is 10000x than W). Like I said, it’s all odds and chances.

3
freedomconnoisseur 3 points ago +4 / -1

Pick the most qualified conservative. Don't care about gender, skin color or nationality. The Best Person. Do not get cute and nominate John Roberts part 2.

3
ModsBanPaleos 3 points ago +4 / -1

Young white Christian male. Thats the best candidate

1
DoubleEagle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Roberts is probably fine, except for all the Epstein blackmail.

Making him either a pedo or a fucking moron. Actually, none of that is fine.

We need to demand he resign.

2
Taupkek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Judge Barbara Lagoa is on Trumps new list. Hispanic woman, approved by the same people that gave us Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. Tough to play the race or sex card with her. I dont know much about her history, does anyone else?

7
WhatWouldTrumpDoMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Everquest and I were standing in the same puddle. Tag hit me; mission accomplished.

6
HillarysStrapOn 6 points ago +6 / -0

That’s why I believe in the power of StrapOn

2
YouGotbbQd 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just busted a nut. Like literally ruptured a testicle!

2
Awakened 2 points ago +2 / -0

Try harder.

1
RonSwanson1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

if your erection lasts for more than 6 hours, please contact your doctor.

20
concealedaces 20 points ago +20 / -0

Repeal the nfa.

19
powershellder 19 points ago +19 / -0

Abolish the ATF

15
concealedaces 15 points ago +16 / -1

End the Fed..... Eliminate the income tax.... Then we may be free enough to pursue a little happiness

18
BonerDonor 18 points ago +18 / -0

ALL LAWS AND REGULATIONS RESTRICTING FIREARM OWNERSHIP AND USE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL

6
stevehuffmansbull 6 points ago +6 / -0

COUNTRY WIDE CASTLE DOCTRINE

4
womp-womp-twice 4 points ago +4 / -0

nationwide carry (concealed and open)!

5
ModsBanPaleos 5 points ago +6 / -1

Amen pede just as God intended. Protect yourself

5
enigucm 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have to admit: if you asked me 2-3 years ago if I would agree with your comment, I wouldn't believe it. I leaned Trump, but wasn't a "2A" kind of person, in all honesty. However, this year has taught me just how important the 2A is, and how INSANE some of the states laws are. The fact that people can be disturbing your peace, threatening your life, destroying your property, and -- depending on what state you're in -- YOU would be the one in trouble for simply "brandishing a weapon" in order to protect yourself. Absolutely insane to me.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
LordPurringtonII 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every citizen above age 8 is mandated to carry. This will be the only legal restriction.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
5
Anzac21 5 points ago +5 / -0

If we’re forced to live with abortion, then we should pass laws to arm the unborn so they can fight back in utero. I want to see abortion doctors being routinely shot and killed by the unborn

2
womp-womp-twice 2 points ago +2 / -0

unconventional problems require unconventional solutions

1
LordPurringtonII 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stand your womb!

1
I_heart_blastbeasts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure are a lot of infringements on that "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." Is what I always say.

8
ShmellyTunaMelt1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Crime Rates Drop to 0

8
almond_activator 8 points ago +8 / -0

FUCK THE ATF

FUCK THE NFA

1
womp-womp-twice 1 point ago +1 / -0

make the ATF the name of a convenience store chain selling Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms!

46
Everquest4Life 46 points ago +46 / -0

Texas needs a great senator, but hell, think of the power he would bring to the SCOTUS. He is also in favor of congressional term limits. Drain the Swamp!

Cruz’s redemption arc is becoming the stuff of legend.

30
UpTrump 30 points ago +30 / -0

I will HAPPILY trade a senate seat for supreme court justice FOR LIFE

11
Liberal_Tear_Addict 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes.

10
The_Litehaus_Abides 10 points ago +10 / -0

The President was talking about nominating Cruz to the supreme Court at the rally tonight and he is in a GOOD mood!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
15
Sphien 15 points ago +15 / -0

I always say one of the greatest transformations was Lying Ted to Lyon Ted

10
Aoikaze2000 10 points ago +10 / -0

*Lion

12
free-money- 12 points ago +12 / -0

No no, you don't get it, he's from France now

or something

1
Aoikaze2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's my senator, so if I say it's Lion, it's Lion dammit.

1
YouGotbbQd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Le Lion Teddy

4
Dallasguy 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'll run for his spot. He's a sniveling leftist compared to me. 😆

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
Based_Trumpster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty sure the gov appoints an interim senator to serve until the next election.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
1
Flipbarryfromreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well said ab his redemption arc!!!!!!

25
Hedonismbot 25 points ago +25 / -0

It's a sad state of affairs that liberty hangs on the balance of a few justices in robes.

I say it's time to overturn Marbury v. Madison, nooooo way should the courts have as much power to legislate as they do under the auspices of "review".

8
bubble_bursts 8 points ago +8 / -0

That works both ways. Overall being able to strike down unconstitutional laws is probably one of the key reasons why constitution is still relevant.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
18
Modus_Pwninz 18 points ago +18 / -0

Yeah we need this probably more than anything. Lefties will gun-grab as soon as they can. They get a RAGER over just thinking about banned guns. Authoritarians hate guns; really dampers the ol' power structure.

The only reason can be malicious intent. My gun rarely ever even moves; my CAR is about a million times more dangerous in theory.

4
thepilotofmoya 4 points ago +4 / -0

And just sitting in park, it's more dangerous than a gun. A car can pop out of gear. A gun can't just go off if it's sitting stationary.

9
KiTA 9 points ago +10 / -1

Just give me one that realizes 2A should be strict scrutiny, like literally every other Amendment is (+ abortion because degenerates and mind pretzels).

Because if the SCOTUS ever correctly recognizes that 2A is strict scrutiny, suddenly every single gun control law since 1960 becomes unconstitutional overnight.

Well, they are already, but...

2
womp-womp-twice 2 points ago +2 / -0

suddenly every single gun control law since 1960 becomes unconstitutional overnight

The NFA of 1934 would like to have a word with you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act

2
KiTA 2 points ago +2 / -0

1934 then!

121
ElizabethWarren1024 121 points ago +122 / -1

Clarence faced Ted Cruz.

Im ded

34
reddeadpill 34 points ago +34 / -0

I’m crying.

I love this place so much!

15
Brucesky420 15 points ago +15 / -0

Sadly Ted said he doesn't want the nom. Said he's honored he was considered but wants to keep fighting for his country in the Senate. And even though I think he'd make a supreme Justice, I do like him as my senator, and in a world where there's not as many people who fight with Trump I'm scared his replacement in the senate would be dogshit.

I think there's other nominee's that would fight for our constitution just as hard while allowing to keep Ted in the senate

11
UpTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

If Ted is nominated, do we lose a vote in the senate during the nomination hearings?

10
Servine 10 points ago +10 / -0

The governor would need to appoint one in time for the hearings

8
everylastjuan 8 points ago +8 / -0

He would have to resign first from the Senate, which would be a risk.

5
Insanity_Trials 5 points ago +5 / -0

And he wouldn't be able to run for president in 24/28. Though, a supreme court seat guarentee might be better than a possible presidency. The amount of power wielded isnt that far off

3
MagnanimousDonkey 3 points ago +3 / -0

It doesn't top frail Ted Bader Cruzberg with frilly jabot.

3
sentient-potato 3 points ago +3 / -0

Honorable mention goes to Mini Ted.

46
BIG_TUNA 46 points ago +46 / -0

Black Ted! Yes plz!

29
T2R0U2M0P 29 points ago +29 / -0

Mods with the lightning stickies!! Love it. Today is a great day for America!!!

8
Shwoogin 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's always hilarious when there is a serious shit hit the fan scenario.

1
stevehuffmansbull 1 point ago +1 / -0

Constitution day yesterday and now this. It's been 4 years of pure victory!

23
Shwoogin 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's a tie between Ted Thomas and Ted Sotomayor lol.

5
jennyfrutex 5 points ago +5 / -0

How do I pick? They're all so sexy.

5
Kinolee 5 points ago +5 / -0

TedBG hot hot hot

21
16
Hedonism_Bot 16 points ago +17 / -1

Good, because I want him to run for president in 2024.

13
AmericanJawa 13 points ago +13 / -0

And then he can score a triple crown by taking a Supreme Court seat after 8 years as President.

8
jiminycricket1940 8 points ago +10 / -2

Tough shit. He’s getting it :)

And rand should be the senate majority leader.

And Jim jordon should be the speaker of the house.

-1
wumao -1 points ago +2 / -3

Jim Jordan is all talk, no action. Sorry to burst your bubble. Him and Trey Gowdy make great Facebook videos but nothing more.

-3
wumao -3 points ago +1 / -4

Jim Jordan is all talk, no action. Sorry to burst your bubble. Him and Trey Gowdy make great Facebook videos but nothing more.

These individuals are what virtue signaling on the right sounds like.

3
bubble_bursts 3 points ago +3 / -0

Senator vs Scotus, I think there isn't even a question. He will take it.

15
Mr_Dr_Jullian_Dunbar [S] 15 points ago +16 / -1

Maybe we can actually go pick up a full auto and some claymores at the local hardware store with a 'tax stamp'. You know, for squirrel hunting.

11
LesboPregnancyScare 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hey, Clarance Thomas can hold his own thank you!

The dems hated him so much, a black conservative, gasp, that they tried to pull a Christine Ford on him, only her name was Anita Hill.

4
mrd92 4 points ago +4 / -0

Antifa Hill

10
RamboXLV 10 points ago +10 / -0

But will the Senate have the votes?

Multiple Senators have said on record they wouldn't vote during an election year. We can already count Romney out. Collins & Murkowski will be a problem too. Not feeling too good about the pick getting through before the election. Hopefully, Trump will tell these Senators who are up for reelection, vote yes or you won't get his endorsement. No Trump endorsement, good luck winning in November.

3
ailurus 3 points ago +3 / -0

At this point, actively sabotaging senate races is a bad idea. If it was still primary season I could see it, but giving Schumer control of the senate in 2020 is catastrophic, even with Trump in the white house.

3
RamboXLV 3 points ago +3 / -0

When can still have the majority if Collins loses. Murkowski will most likely win even without Trump's endorsement, but the GOP will make sure she doesn't win again. We'll flip Alabama's Senate seat and I'm still predicting James wins Michigan and we we should hold in Arizona/Georgia & NC. We could end up with 53-47 majority again. So it all comes down to if Collins wants to keep her seat or not. We probably won't need her for her vote or her seat. It's totally up to her. She was indecisive with Kavanaugh but ultimately voted yes. She also has to consider, the election is going to be contested regardless who wins. We need the SC at full capacity for them to make a vote in case of a 4-4 tie.

9
Labyrinth9000 9 points ago +9 / -0

PRO 2ND AMENDMENT SC JUDGE PLEASE! ALSO, ABOLISH GUN FREE ZONES!

8
eagleoneeye 8 points ago +8 / -0

Where the arrests coming so someone had to die . just asking for a friend BABIES REJOICE!!!

7
hollow_fang 7 points ago +7 / -0

DAHNALD!

7
Raindrops1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

DAHNALD! I’ve got the legal briefs, Dahnald! Get to the choppa!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
Diotima 7 points ago +7 / -0

dont get excited we know Murkowsky, Collins, and Romney fuck us and vow to vote no.

10
stjdalen 10 points ago +10 / -0

Then Pence will have to break the tie

6
BourbonDave 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why are they still in the party at this point.

5
PhilosoGuido 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because they know it's easier to commit sabotage from the inside.

5
PeytonManThing 5 points ago +5 / -0

We still need to win this election to save the republic

5
thepilotofmoya 5 points ago +5 / -0

And we'll need this judge to ensure the election isn't given to the Democrats.

1
TrumpsAmericaForever 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS!

2
TrumpsAmericaForever 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hoping Collins will do the right thing in the end, she has before. But yeh the other two... hopeless demoncrats with a Fake R attached to their name.

6
Fredo_Cuomo 6 points ago +15 / -9

Ummm yes, hallo??? I was promised 1 Amy Comey Barret pls

34
Modus_Pwninz 34 points ago +40 / -6

No women.

Not to be all sexist, but I am tired of their emotional decision-making that helped dig us this fucking hole. We do not need a SCOTUS Justice who votes to ban guns because she saw a dead kid on TV one morning.

Male. Strongly pro-2A. Strong Constitutionalist. This is what we need.

If it is going to be a woman, I'd be okay with it so long as she doesn't have a history of making statements like "as a mother..." or "being a woman has..." We don't need anymore pussification of law.

18
jennyfrutex 18 points ago +22 / -4

As a woman, I can say this with perfect clarity: I do not give a flying fuck if it's a woman. I don't need it to be a woman. I just want a damn good justice with integrity, principles, and a firm foundation in the United States Constitution. Being a woman/mother/daughter/whatever has nothing to do with it.

Give me the most qualified candidate. Man or woman, I don't care. Give us a good justice. And if that's a man, that's a man. Won't bother me - or anyone with a brain - a bit.

1
Nancy_Pelosi 1 point ago +8 / -7

As a woman

Your statement is perfectly fine without this part.

6
Financial_mom 6 points ago +8 / -2

It's fine with it too.

5
Tartarian-King 5 points ago +5 / -0

Literally responded starting "as a woman" to a post that points out how that mindset is whats been fucking us for so long

You cant make these things up lol

2
toomanyNI 2 points ago +4 / -2

No its not; women confirming that it doesn't matter the gender of the nominee is useful information. Further, there is a notion that Trump supporters are all white supremacist Nazi men. This is useful in the same way that black Americans back people like John James.

0
Tartarian-King 0 points ago +1 / -1

nazis where big in women, so your comment makes no sense.

Nazi ideology started with convincing women to convince their children

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
4
tholins 4 points ago +5 / -1

The best thing about a female SCOTUS nominee is that they couldn’t accuse her of being a rapist.

6
Modus_Pwninz 6 points ago +7 / -1

Lol, I hear ya'...but a girl raped me when I was younger because she knew I was a virgin and wouldn't take no for an answer. Told me she would say I raped her if I didnt allow her to take my virginity. Women are capable of rape and they use mental games > overt power when they do it usually.

It's hard to try to explain being raped by a female as a male, literally no one ever believes you so I never told anyone, this is actually the first time I've ever said anything to anyone about it. Never even told my wife or friends...Nobody gets how it even happens. They are all thinking the same thing - "but dick hard how?" The body betrays us often!

Anyway, they'll attack her abortion stance or some shit. Being anti-abortion as a female is worse than rape to lefties, lol.

2
tholins 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know women can be rapists, but that’s not a truth the Left typically likes to acknowledge.

2
NecturusMaculosus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ones penis need not be erect to elicit orgasm. Women can be evil as well....

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

The best thing about a female SCOTUS nominee is that they couldn’t accuse her of being a rapist.

You assume too much.

2
tholins 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sadly you’re probably right.

2
tombombadil 2 points ago +3 / -1

Does ACB have a history of that? I don't think she does. She seems very based.

0
Modus_Pwninz 0 points ago +2 / -2

I don't know, but if she seems rational and fact-based...like I said, I'd be good with it. I am just suspect of women in such a position because of tbeir tendency to make the wrong choice because of emotional appeals.

1
Ask_If_Im_A_Cactus 1 point ago +2 / -1

“As a woman, and a judge, I recognize the importance of being able to protect myself and my family with a firearm. A great equalizer.”

7
habanero 7 points ago +7 / -0

Amy Comey Barret

I think you've made a hilarious (yet scary) typo there.

2
RealFletchYoung 2 points ago +4 / -2

No relation, she’s the top pick for sure

4
Staatssicherheit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why?

1
habanero 1 point ago +1 / -0

The name is Amy Coney Barrett: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett

0
Wtf_socialismreally 0 points ago +1 / -1

In my head, I was like... "Has there been a female SCOTUS pick before?"

Yeah I guess I memory holed that faster than any of the times MSM has memory holed anything positive Trump / negative their agenda.

-2
americanzoomer -2 points ago +1 / -3

NEEDS to be her

6
PeytonManThing 6 points ago +6 / -0

Women can’t be trusted to not go liberal. It’s in their nature to be more liberal

3
thepilotofmoya 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not fair to the women who aren't bound to their emotions, but they have to prove to the Western world they can be trusted not to destabilize every organization they get their hands on.

2
Tartarian-King 2 points ago +2 / -0

And yet they do, every time.

BlM is literally operated by women.

1
tombombadil 1 point ago +6 / -5

She is definitely the best pick strategy wise. Let them attack a devout Catholic mother of 7. Trump would gain close to 1 million votes just from Catholics alone. Us Catholics came out big for Trump in 2016, but there is still a significant amount that don't vote or are still voting Democrat because they still think it is the party of Kennedy.

They smeared ACB for her faith when she was appointed as a federal judge. It was a huge redpill for a lot of my fellow Catholics. They will totally do it again and this time it will be watched by the entire country. Bring. it. on.

1
Harcerz 1 point ago +4 / -3

Very pro-life Catholic woman with seven children and a distinguished career on SCOTUS - that must be one of the worst nightmares for feminists!

6
MAGAguitar 6 points ago +6 / -0

He mentioned Ted in tonight’s rally

5
Grief 5 points ago +5 / -0

I thought you left in Kagan hahahaha

5
Pray4USA 5 points ago +5 / -0

President Trump said 100 senators will vote for Cruz. They all want him out of the senate. Lol. He loves Ted Cruz and said he’s a great guy!! Let’s go!! 🇺🇸

5
Wiggleworm 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tom Cotton.

3
Wishiwastrumpswife 3 points ago +4 / -1

Judge Jeanine!

3
de9ebkmd7 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can we get bearded Cruz though? Bearded Cruz has +5 charisma, +7 intellect and +9 maga ballz.

3
Juneofthewild 3 points ago +4 / -1

My favorite and definite pick is the one on the right

3
xAnswerTo1984is1776 3 points ago +4 / -1

GET IT DONE!

3
PapaPepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd love a justice Cruz, but we might lose his seat if he isn't in Texas. Beta came close to stealing it.

3
HolographicTacoSalad 3 points ago +3 / -0

DAHNALD

HAND ME THE NOMINATION, DAHNALD

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
meals23 3 points ago +3 / -0

GIVE ME THE ROBE AND GAVEL DAHNALD

3
SEV3Npoint 3 points ago +3 / -0

Should've slipped a Kevin Malone in there from The Office

3
The_Kuru 3 points ago +4 / -1

Personally, I'd nominate Michelle Bachmann. And I'm not even religious and she is fundamentally religious. I just never saw her compromise principles when she was my rep, which is something I'd like in a scotus justice.

1
garmentofpraise 1 point ago +2 / -1

Love her. She would be perfect.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
xkgb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lion Ted.

2
Shampagnepapi 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m scared if Ted is out of Texas, they’ll steal his seat.

It’ll be easy to steal it against some random candidate

2
de9ebkmd7 2 points ago +2 / -0

I nominate me for Supreme Court Justice. My platform is as follows

  • Abortion is murder
  • All gun laws infringe the 2A
  • The only good commies are dead commies
2
cjcivicx 2 points ago +3 / -1

Awwww! Not Clarence! He's got the best smile of the bunch!

2
randomvirus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm disappointed for lady justices you didn't use the ted cruz drag performer lol

2
habanero 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't wait to find out who Lion Ted "ran trains" on in college.

2
Doolimite 2 points ago +2 / -0

Father killed Kennedy and now son kills Ginsberg lol

2
Omgwtfbbq 2 points ago +2 / -0

We should do it. Those fucks would do it if the situation was reversed.

2
TheDonaldVET1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Black Cruz.....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👌

2
OutcastSeal 2 points ago +2 / -0

lmao

2
h4ck3l 2 points ago +2 / -0

Senate better be in session early Monday morning.

2
Light_HIV_Effect 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any supreme court cases that were being decided that won't get spoiled by John Roberts and RBG now?

2
RichterScale 2 points ago +2 / -0

I died

1
jennyfrutex 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a work of art.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Rich11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Needs to be a woman Larsen, Eid

1
Snarfbot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could you imagine??

1
Patriot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gun laws are one thing but the self defense laws are the real problem. I dont necessarily need a firearm in order to defend myself with deadly force. But ill be honest, i dont know if getting manhandled by state goons and threatened with ass rape by bubba in prison is worth shooting someone unless its literally kill or be killed. And i mean literally.

1
Coslin 1 point ago +1 / -0

EL OH F'ING EL!

1
OfficerNasty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now that's a blast from the past. Another one of my OC's.