4328
Comments (237)
sorted by:
249
19American62Woman 249 points ago +250 / -1

I’m sure that we do

122
HillarysStrapOn 122 points ago +122 / -0

And hang his ass sooner than later

65
Ishaye 65 points ago +65 / -0

And his offspring.

31
Jeb4HOABoard 31 points ago +31 / -0

See, I'd rather him not be touched while all his offspring perish. That way he just kills himself knowing it was all for not. But I'm vindictive like that.

23
Elseebee 23 points ago +23 / -0

Naah. He'd eat them raw if he could see the US dismantled.

16
Robert 16 points ago +16 / -0

Should...should we pull a Cartman? Chili con carne?

12
OGpsywar 12 points ago +12 / -0

Glue them together, face to face, and chuck them into the same slow-feeding meat grinder.

Spinkle in some cash seized from their freshly-depowered DAs.

Then donate the resultant slurry to Hungary for a museum display.

Elegant.

Poignant.

Final.

4
PurestEvil 4 points ago +4 / -0

We'd be happy for the result, but let's not have it in a museum. Hungary has long banned Soros and his machinations.

4
OGpsywar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Here sits George Soros,
Part of an 'elite' group.
Thought he would rule,
But now he's just soup.

2
ClearEyed 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like it. Here's another scenario I like: chain Soros, his kids and his cronies together and toss them into the middle of the ocean. Initially the group should be able to stay above water by working together, but sooner or later someone will succumb to hypothermia or exhaustion and the rest will have to work harder to stay afloat. One by one they will become anchors and the weak will doom the strong.

5
EricCharliemella 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just the right kind of crazy... I like

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
28
SpitAndGlory 28 points ago +28 / -0

Ban this retard now. Do not click that link.

9
SlumberBalu 9 points ago +9 / -0

LAW AND ORDER WERE UPHOLD!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
6
TheRealPizzaPope 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah I’m smarter than that.

-18
deleted -18 points ago +0 / -18
6
Indianapede 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s gone, so I even want to know?

3
4
HockeyMom4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks for the link. Newt with the truth!

45
Leatherwood 45 points ago +45 / -0

We need to make Soros pay for all of the damages before the insurance companies start expecting the American people to pay via government bailout.

20
yarg 20 points ago +20 / -0

Just send the bill to MoveOn. They ordered it.

10
HockeyMom4Trump 10 points ago +10 / -0

I have been hearing so much about BLM (every time I see BLM I think bowel movement, but I digress) that I forgot about MoveOn

6
HillarysBeaverMunch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bowel Liquid Movement.

5
Dsnazzy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Burn Loot Murder

25
CleanYourRoom 25 points ago +25 / -0

...and just like that, the conspiracy theory was confirmed.

11
MAGAPEDE_2A 11 points ago +11 / -0

To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?

8
ArticleISection10 8 points ago +8 / -0

And thanks for confirming it lady - shes probably in trouble for "making it a thing". Much like Cramer is in trouble for calling Nancy Crazy Nancy

6
grndmrshlgando 6 points ago +6 / -0

"ok lady, remember the first rule: never, EVER, talk about or bring up...the thing...ok?"

"ok. newt don't talk about the thing. nope, the thing didn't happen that you're talking about now nope it didn't happen nope it didn't happen lets move on no it didn't happen the thing isn't real.....no he's not paying me I promise"

3
ChrisBC 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now more than ever, as a matter of fact.

123
Alpha 123 points ago +124 / -1

BLM got 1 billion in donations

Damages are 1 billion

Time to freeze all their assets

31
unclebobinator 31 points ago +31 / -0

With our DOJ and federal institutions still filled with swamp rats don't hold your breath.

We received ba lot of judicial appointees thanks to the turtle, but that means dick it leftist prosecutors and DAs and FBI agents, etc refuse to bring these cases to them.

6
18
unclebobinator 18 points ago +19 / -1

If anyone had any doubts about Faux News being controlled opposition then those doubts should absolutely disregarded after seeing this. Appalling.

2
Ballind 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's bizarre is the claims in the first two weeks hit 2b. We're now, what, 100 in, and they've only paid half of the claims from that stretch? Or are they lying about attribution.

1
Peashout 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its CNN, so all lies, all day.

1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

But then where will Biden’s campaign donations come from?

1
Furaffinitydotnet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it actually a "donation" if BLM isn't a registered charity and the big, blue "donate" button redirects your url to the ActBlue website?

94
Redpillhope 94 points ago +95 / -1

George Soros put himself into this. Pretending he didn’t is strange indeed.

38
unclebobinator 38 points ago +38 / -0

You mean the opportunist who actually colluded with the Nazis is a bad guy? 🤔

20
Mashiki 20 points ago +20 / -0

"It was the best time of my life." - George Soros on 60 minutes.

11
unclebobinator 11 points ago +11 / -0

So far. He's probably in hog heaven now that he's completely fucked the world and groomed his son to be his successor. God help our nation, and the other nations under siege by this literal demon from hell and his little hell spawn.

24
serengetidesert1973 24 points ago +24 / -0

They responded like they knew him personally. Amazing.

8
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 8 points ago +8 / -0

They do. Harf is an 0bama flunky. Any question about Fox News being part of the misleadia should have been dispelled when they hired people like her and Donna Brazile.

61
RumDrummer 61 points ago +65 / -4

It’s funny when someone tells me to watch something other than Fox news, I get to tell them I don’t believe Fox is any better than CNN.

24
WishdoctorsSong 24 points ago +25 / -1

Funny thing is you don't even need to watch anything other than CNN to know that CNN is utterly full of shit. They change their narrative constantly based on whatever they're told. You can watch them flip in real time from we've always been at war with Eurasia to we've always been at war with Eastasia.

12
Hades440 12 points ago +12 / -0

The best one I've seen was when I had to spend a few hours in an airport and it was when Trump was accused of making racist tweets about that guy from Baltimore, and in the 3 hours they went on and on and kept telling us he had made racist tweets, they showed the actual tweet 0 times.

Couldn't let us read his words and come to our own conclusions. Much more important that they protect us from firsthand knowledge and just tell us how to react.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
Pgledger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I noticed the 1984 reference ;-)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
Mrsattorney 10 points ago +13 / -3

Fox's daytime programming is terrible. Their primetime lineup is conservative 7 nights a week. There is no comparison between Fox and CNN.

26
Grief 26 points ago +28 / -2

Tucker is the only one that meets that definition. Hannity tick tocks too much and praises RINOs every chance he gets. Honestly... He has "breaking news" all the time that was reported 2 days earlier on this website. Pretty sure no one watches Laura now.

Don't forget Fox was pushing the Trump Hates the Troops hoax for a solid week. They're just as bad as CNN.

16
Mrsattorney 16 points ago +16 / -0

I watch Laura every night. She has been on top of many issues like HCQ, re-opening businesses, and re-opening schools. Fox's primetime lineup also includes Jesse Watters, Judge Jeanine, Greg Gutfeld, Mark Levin, and Steve Hilton. Fox Business has Maria Bartiromo and Lou Dobbs who are also very based. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thewrap.com/laura-ingraham-ratings/amp/

8
Grief 8 points ago +8 / -0

Tell your boss at Fox to swap Hannity and Laura and her ratings will pass Hannity's

5
MakeAmericaVapeAgain 5 points ago +5 / -0

agreed. hannity reminds me of jay leno’s tonight show: popular but stale.

5
HockeyMom4Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hannity has lots of Jay’s mannerisms, too. Maybe they are related.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
pray4peace4 2 points ago +3 / -1

Agreed. Yes Fox has some creeps that need to go, but they have some outstanding people. Mark Levin is outstanding! He's the opposite of motormouth Hannity, & is a pleasure to see his thoughtful guidance of his guests. Laura is great most of the time, but I really hate it when she gets those idiot leftist screamers on. Trump wouldn't be President today had it not been for Fox showcasing him every day before the election in 2016.

4
BadManOrange 4 points ago +4 / -0

Laura's on really late in the Eastern market, but she's better than Hannity.

3
bubadmt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let me stop you right there to tell you about my martial arts training and the fake dirty dossier. Did you also know I back the boys in blue and have family in law enforcement? -Some TV show somewhere

1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +3 / -2

Fox was Trump's first obstacle in 2016.

3
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fox has run the same game for years. They bait in conservatives with conservative opinion shows and then try to blue pill them with Fake News like the rest of the misleadia. It’s surprisingly effective.

They have finally pushed far Left enough that more people have noticed, but this is nothing new for them.

1
RumDrummer 1 point ago +2 / -1

There's no comparison? Did you watch the video here?

0
xzars_folly 0 points ago +2 / -2

Come on pede, head out of the sand man. Fawx is controlled opposition. The MSM is completely liberal but for one station which is owned by Murdoch family who are all personally massive globalist liberals in their own lives?

Do the math here. I know they have Tucker, but this is because Tucker has fucked them over. He started out a pro-RINO softballer like Hannity, gained enough following to avoid being fired, and has pivoted to actually asking the hard questions. Mark my words they will eventually fire him.

The prupose of Fawx Nooze is to get you thinking along paths they control, to control you to become the "anti-Democrat blue-pilling enemy" they want, rather than the MAGA-red piller you need to be.

5
gendale 5 points ago +5 / -0

they really don’t understand that MAGA isn’t really traditional conservatives. as if we got brainwashed by Fox, please, i got brainwashed when i watched 14 seasons of the apprentice after trump won and i loved every second of it

2
xzars_folly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yah Fox is controlled opposition to brainswash conservatives into becoming RINO's that still serve the Globalist agenda, not MAGA's

3
grndmrshlgando 3 points ago +3 / -0

so we have zero reliable media. well, except for one america. this is dangerous as fuck

2
Worldtraveler0405 2 points ago +2 / -0

Except Tucker Carlson maybe. But I don't watch any more of Foxie news.

39
CovefefeREEEE 39 points ago +40 / -1

Her name is Harf.

Rhymes with barf.

26
atpratt6 26 points ago +26 / -0

It was Melissa Francis who said it first, then Harf agreed. No explanation or reason, just FoxNews + Soros = "Verboten"

5
MakeAmericaVapeAgain 5 points ago +5 / -0

yeah, that very day i was watching and thinking, ‘eh foxnews morning isn’t as bad as foxnews weekend, these girls try to stay slightly right’, but then newt mentions soros and my mind changes.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
35
MAGALauncher 35 points ago +35 / -0

George Soros is a wrinkled old faggot and if you like him fuck you!

26
AbrahamLincoln 26 points ago +27 / -1

So Fox is officially dead, is it?

27
Grond999 27 points ago +28 / -1

YES. At the top. Tucker still survives.

8
FOOLISHPROPHETX 8 points ago +8 / -0

Our only champion

4
MacheteSanta 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't forget the pedes on the better business network side. Stuart Varney, Hilton, Charles Payne, Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo

2
FOOLISHPROPHETX 2 points ago +3 / -1

Very True!

7
unclebobinator 7 points ago +7 / -0

🔫 Always has been

4
AIDS1255 4 points ago +4 / -0

Has been for a long time

1
xzars_folly 1 point ago +2 / -1

Everything but Tucker is controlled opposition designed to make you into the kind of Conservative the democrats use to blue-pill normies. They work to take yoru mind of MAGA, and onto the small issues that traditionally dominated the "Uniparty" politics of the 2000's.

And Tucker has honestly fucked the Network. They thought he was another Hannity, a softballer who didn't upset the RINO cart... And he turned on the old guard GOP and the RINO's with a fury. And now he is the only reason they have ratings, they can't fire him.

24
RonBohr 24 points ago +24 / -0

"I'm George Soros and I paid for that."

21
Irishnorm 21 points ago +21 / -0

Translation: “I’m not sure we need to bring my boss into this”

19
Jutts 19 points ago +19 / -0

Call that pastey-face out. I can’t stand when she’s on. Liberal NPC. Actually, I’m done with FOX.

11
atpratt6 11 points ago +11 / -0

It was Melissa Francis who said it first, Harf just agreed. They are all actors playing a role...

8
Jutts 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, she really let it out of the bag who pulls her strings. I’m done with Fox News. Canceled Netflix last Friday and doing the same with Fox today. Sorry Tucker and Gutfeld. Too many undercover globalists on their staff.

5
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tucker's show is on YouTube the next day, every day. Just search for "Tucker" + the date.

2
HockeyMom4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everyone can cancel cable and just watch this instead. Boom. Saved a fortune.

2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +3 / -1

But you'll also lose 15 minutes of commercials. :*(

2
VoxVulgaris 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt she's a NPC. She's probably part of Obama's extended shadow government.

4
xzars_folly 4 points ago +4 / -0

Somebody needs to do the research...

I bet there is some Open Society Foundation, or Media Matters in her resume.

That is usually how Soros works, he hires on young(er) people starting out into his "charities" and there they get all kinds of training to be agents and useful puppets, then he sends them off with glowing letters of recommendations so they can infiltrate news rooms, businesses, and political organizations. If they run for office, he funds their campaign and pressures his other puppets to support the new agent to ensure they land in office despite opposition.

Soro's power isn't the fact he can have people killed or something. He would never be so clumsy. His power if the fact he uses his billions to build up massive networks of traitors who have infiltrated every facet of our society and they all collaborate to advance each other's careers so Soros-loyal people are in control.

3
Jutts 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whatever. She’s like a liberal bot that automatically has an opposite answer to anything conservative. Just looking at her face tells me that I don’t want any part of that. Run.

4
Sticky 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly what she is. I know her comments before she speaks. Just a DNC mouthpiece.

1
Jutts 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll give her this; she’s good at it.

15
DJTFortyFive2020 15 points ago +15 / -0

Reverse speak: we absolutely need to bring Soros into this. Shine some light into that dark corner.

5
synd1050 5 points ago +5 / -0

Stop noticing 🛑 things.

14
Shakakka99 14 points ago +14 / -0

I love how Soros can inject himself INTO FUCKING EVERYTHING...

... but let's not bring him up, okay?

11
GeauxFrogs 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ya, when someone just arrogantly says “we don’t need to discuss this” with no explanation... it definitely needs to be discussed.

11
Doubld 11 points ago +11 / -0

The billionaires behind the left are more than Soros. Include Tom Steyer and Bloomberg.

8
RiverFenix 8 points ago +12 / -4

Rothschilds are worth more than 250,000,000,000,000 (That's 250 Trillion) based solely on their documented assets and properties.

Imagine how much money they REALLY have.

POWER.

3
russianbot4673 3 points ago +5 / -2

can i see a list of these documented assets and properties which are worth 250 trillion?

2
RiverFenix 2 points ago +3 / -1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cl1-gbGz458

You can basically skip through large portions of the history lesson but SGT Report does a decent job guesstimating the net worth post 1800.

The point about money is; money doesn't fucking mean anything if you realize it's a holding medium for the actual valuable things in life. Money is a hot potato you should be trying to use to get the things you need. Hording money is only worthwhile if you're 'saving up' to make a very large investment of some sort.

2
russianbot4673 2 points ago +4 / -2

i'd like links to actual documents not some youtube docu made by some random guy with the obligatory creepy background music and assumptions about 200 years worth of compound interest

also i'd like to point out that your second paragraph is entirely contradictory to the whole idea of the video here. you say saving money doesn't mean anything but the whole crux of the idea that they have a bazillion gatrillion dollars is that they saved money and collected interest on it for 200 years? which is it? if saving money allows you to rule the world, how does that 'mean nothing'?

2
mrspaulrevere 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think he means that because of future inflation, it's better to acquire things you will likely need rather than hold money in a bank account. It's a balance. Yes your stuff could be wiped out in a fire, for example, so you'll need the bank account money to rebuild.

1
russianbot4673 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's not at all my point. i don't care what he was saying. he linked a video that claimed the rothschilds got so much money from sitting on it for 200yrs and collecting interest. it contradicts the statement of don't save money. if they came to rule the world conclusively by saving money and collecting interest on it, how do you say saving money has zero point? it apparently allowed some family to rule the world. seems like more than a small point to me? not that i believe the video because the guy in it is clearly making a huge assumption.

1
RiverFenix 1 point ago +1 / -0

i don't care what he was saying.

he linked a video that claimed

You're bouncing all over the place. You jumped in to demand documentation on how the Rothschilds could possibly have 250 Trillion. I showed you an easy entry into figuring it out on your own. The video isn't the be-all/end-all on 'documentation' related to that family. It's a quick and easy inflection point - take it or leave it (which you clearly chose to 'leave it' over the 'creepy music' and untrustworthiness of the independent journalist.)

It's pretty amazing that I find you ranting about me in this thread when it's you who has an issue with my open source information. GO QUANTIFY THEIR WEALTH YOURSELF AND REPORT BACK HOW WRONG I WAS AT 250 TRILLION.

1
RiverFenix 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. You want me to provide 'documents' to your standard. Your ever moving goalposts and knowing I can't possibly provide these 'documents' leaves me to wonder why you bothered asking for evidence in the first place

  2. you totally misunderstand me and the way the Rothschilds made their money. He sold off all his stocks, (for money), and then used that money to buy stocks at a fraction of the price. Did he horde the money? No, he reinvested it after deceiving people into selling off their stocks.

  3. If you think he just SAT on his money for 200 years you're foolish. The interest alone would be enough to re-invest in other things and create multiple income streams. Did he hold onto the wealth of those income streams? WHO THE FUCK KNOWS, WHY DON'T YOU ASK HIM.

Instead of being a jerk, you could at least attempt to understand what I'm saying.

It's not my problem you refuse information because it was provided by someone with 'creep music' in the background. Get a hold of yourself

-1
russianbot4673 -1 points ago +1 / -2

i'm not shifting goalposts and i'm not being a jerk. i asked for documents and you linked a youtube documentary with creepy music. that's not documents. i'd like something like an article where i can feel more able to trust it. i'd say you're being a fucking jerk here. i asked for something simple and simply and politely pointed out you didn't provide it and linked to something else.

and in the video the guy specifically says they put that money away and collected interest on it. in the fucking video YOU LINKED.

1
RiverFenix 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do I need to provide some standard of proof acceptable to you.

I can guarantee you if I found a legitimate article stating exactly my premise you would claim it's not a reputable enough source. If you want to have specifically a NEW YORK TIMES article that states what I'm telling you - you're more delusional than most people.

I'm just a random person, and the guy who runs SGT Report is just a random person and there is always room to be wrong - but you're not even attempting to quantify how or why I'm wrong you're just saying I have to bend over backwards to prove it to you.

As with any information I or anyone else provides, it's up to you to confirm/debunk on your own time. My personal opinion isn't up for debate.

My personal Opinion is that the people who literally print money have more money than you can quantify through any fucking article. Use your head man, fuck.

-3
lilree -3 points ago +1 / -4 (edited)

I don't even agree with him in his claim that he presented documented assets, but you're still a smoothbrain.

If you had the attention span to watch the 7 minute video, you'd be able to effectively refute his argument rather than focusing on the 'creepy background music' like the ad-hominem crayola gourmand that you are. I bet you wear a mask when you drive.

edit: nvm. I'm in the wrong. I suck cocks

2
russianbot4673 2 points ago +2 / -0

go fuck yourself retard. i'd put my IQ against yours any day. i can point out the whole creepy music phenomenon if i want. i did point out that i requested the alleged 'documentation' and instead got a stereotypical, unprofessional youtube docu. anyone with any brain understands that point right off. there's a glut of unprofessional docus out there and to make up for lack of info they just add in creepy music and shit like that. go fuck yourself if you can't understand or see patterns in the world around you. yes on occasion even a 'nobody' aka non-professional person with any known credentials can make a youtube docu, even one with added creepy music for emotional manipulation, and still have done some good research and facts. ITS FUCKING RARE and in the minority. i have an IQ level where i can see such patterns. and i can point it out because i fucking feel like it.

and it's all besides the main, key underlying point. i didn't ASK for some shitty youtube video, i asked for the claimed documentation. get fucked.

1
RiverFenix 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Mute the fucking video and use your eyes.

  2. Do you think the Rothschilds have drawn an easy to read flow chart for all their holding companies and those assets, derivatives, family estates, cars, boats etc..

I really don't think there IS a 'documented list' of all their assets. A Document by nature can be ANYTHING, like a receipt for a haircut. 'Documented' could be someone writing something in their journal 200 years ago. The fact that Napoleon was defeated, that Nathan Rothschild was able to crash the London stock market and in quick succession x20 his wealth - if documented.

The premise that earning 8% interest on 10m, is documented. As are many subsequent generations/decades of wealth accumulation.

Not sure why you even bothered arguing about the 250 trillion USD number as it's 'low' in my estimation for actual Wealth.

1
lilree 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Like Swedish online IQ tests, pattern recognition is a tool. Emotional rants are for fools.

You sure like to talk about how high IQ you are, but when you get your feathers ruffled, you regress to basic, low cultured mud-slinging like "fuck" and "retard". This is not a suitable manner for such a great mind to conduct and express itself. I'd like to propose some creative and amusing alternatives:

Pinhead. Yo-yo. Ignoramus.

While perhaps not as satisfying as "fuck" or "retard", greater minds aren't as focused on self-gratification (a popular theme in those who lack restraint) as much as they are with clear communication. I'm sure you understand this, but the word "fuck" is such a general purpose word that it has become equal in communicative substance to flatulence. If you ever feel like using your intelligence (in lieu of emotion) when you insult someone, I would encourage, in the least, the combination of an adjective and a noun.

Just look at your reply to gauge how effectively it served me - even though I was in the wrong!

1
IncredibleMrE1 1 point ago +1 / -0

And Tom Steyer is the one in the walnut sauce email.

10
EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'd pay to go to (((his))) execution.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
spez_this 8 points ago +8 / -0

Newt's comeback: "OK, so it's verboten." Followed by dead silence.

Perfect.

1
HumanSomewhere 1 point ago +1 / -0

a massive redpill

8
LordofNorthMesquite 8 points ago +8 / -0

Limbaugh said something a while ago that has stuck with me. If an organization isn’t expressly conservative it will fall to liberalism. I think you have to look no further than drudge or fox to see this in action.

6
hillarysdildont 6 points ago +6 / -0

Here’s a thought - press charges and as he gathers his forces to come to his defense, have a RICO case prepared on everyone tangential to him.

I am told we have this broken justice system so let’s have the system carry out one more injustice on not only this bag of bones and bad breath, but everyone who comes to his defense.

Edit: or an easier way could be (what Im told is prevalent) that it appeared Soros was reaching for a gun in his waistband.. ooops!

2
LittleBlackKat 2 points ago +2 / -0

We would need a DOJ that wasn't complicit in the coup for something like this to happen. AG Barr is uninterested in pursuing justice...he just wants to pursue Trump supporters.

2
hillarysdildont 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed, perhaps a special counsel made of proven patriots, but here is another approach, a viscous 3rd party not subject to our principled beliefs in that it would employ their tactics against them excluding the clear violent law breaking occurring. It would need to be organized globally so we could root out his institutions across nations. It would have to be ideologically opposed to everything he pushed. Sounds expensive but worth it since our money won’t be worth shit if the commies take power.

6
JohnMcCainsTumors 6 points ago +6 / -0

Marie harf is such a pile of shit

6
CastlesMadeofSand01 6 points ago +6 / -0

Those you can't discuss are those that own you.

BTW, who is this lady that says Soros can't be discussed? As we all knew, Fox News is scum and is infiltrated with elitist shitbags from the left.

5
America202020 5 points ago +5 / -0

George Soros is a psychopath with way too much power and influence. He wants America in tatters. He is a traitorist scumbag and death is too good for him. He should be thrown in a dungeon to be tortured for the rest of his miserable life.

5
ObamaSucks 5 points ago +5 / -0

Marie Harf is a lefty cuck talking head. Everything she says is just drivel.

5
MondayCoupleIsDead 5 points ago +5 / -0

Was this idiot hosting? How the fuck did she have ANY say about who's talked about?

4
freedom_bigly 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nasty women.

4
PotentialWizard 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maria Barf has a smug "I know something you don't" look on her face. Maybe Paul Ryan gave her some assurances?

3
Sticky 3 points ago +3 / -0

She knows Paul Ryan doesn't have testicles.

4
IncredibleMrE1 4 points ago +4 / -0

God I hate Marie Harf

3
xkgb 3 points ago +3 / -0

DAs backed by Soros, other liberal activists join fray in clash with police

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/da-soros-justice

3
Rommsey 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every time a passive aggressive person wants to dismiss a point they talk like this. "I'm not so sure..."

It's utter contempt for the other members present when talking like this.

3
InTheArmsOfThePepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is she a real blonde?

Lololololol

3
Grief 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fox really tells you who they support by all the Clinton people they've brought in.

3
BigKahunaBurger 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s always a good time to drag his crusty ass into the conversation

3
Registered 3 points ago +3 / -0

Former CIA and State Department Liar. She needs Pelosi to hook her up with a new hairstyle.

3
Walrus_Tooth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well,if he'd stay out of it we wouldn't have too

3
VoxVulgaris 3 points ago +3 / -0

Considering that she's probably on his payroll. . . .

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
OhLollyLollyPop 2 points ago +2 / -0

FireMarieHarf

3
LittleBlackKat 3 points ago +3 / -0

The looks on their faces was hysterical. Total NPC glitchfest.

Fucking Soros tools.

3
SoldierofKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah we do bitch! Yeah we fucking do.

3
Mrbiddlebaddle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Harf commie radical

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
horseface_aint_black 3 points ago +3 / -0

There was clearly a memo.

3
Purple_Drank 3 points ago +3 / -0

How is this dude still vertical??

3
dodirtgethurt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alexander Soros , Dont forget whose the future soyros next in line to deal with the family wishes once george meets satan in hell.

3
Pirate_Lafitte 3 points ago +3 / -0

He is probably the biggest reason we have DAs that won't charge rioters with crimes

3
ravonaf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not only does he need to be brought into this. He isn't even the top of the food chain. It's the people who are so powerful the average person doesn't even know their name. Soros is middle management. He's like a fund manager. His job is to doll out money to those who are part of various globalist schemes. That's it.

2
HillarysBeaverMunch 2 points ago +2 / -0

People need to know this.

The enemies at the top are smart enough to hide their presence. They've been hiding their presence for over 100 years as they work to destroy us, and no, we can't name them because that would be rude.

3
RevDrEBuzzMiller 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good old Harfy, check her bank accounts.

3
DonaldWashington 3 points ago +3 / -0

Miss Piggy

3
Bedminster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fox has as many leftist talking heads as CNN. For fuck sakes they hire Donna Brazil!! Seriously?! She is a direct line to the DNC, so for the first debate hosted by none other than Chris Wallace Donna will funnel the questions right to Biden's people just like she did for Clinton. Fox is NOT a friend to Trump. They pretend to be and stab him on the back. At least CNN makes no bones about out right hating him.

3
YourTendiesWillBurn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Muh "antisemitic tropes"!

My God don't they know this man is a Philanthropist of Peace?!?