2653
Comments (254)
sorted by:
259
schmaga 259 points ago +261 / -2

I was in 3rd grade in 1984 when Ferraro was on the ticket with Mondale and I distinctly remember my teacher telling us that we should tell our parents to vote for Mondale so that we'd have a female VP. It is ever so indelible in the hippocampus. This type of stuff isn't new at all, but now its at least easier to document with the remote learning.

Maybe thats the quickest path to teachers going back to in school learning! Pay attention to and expose what they are actually saying.

124
KekVult 124 points ago +124 / -0

Yeah, or fire their dumbasses

This is ridiculous, and yes I have similar stories.

When I was young, teachers pushed the narrative that girls were smarterbthan boy The fuck?

80
bakuuu 80 points ago +80 / -0

In like 2nd grade I said boys/men are stronger than women. Teacher said women can be just as strong as men. This shit has been around for quite some time.

48
DemRefugee007 48 points ago +50 / -2

I mean, they can be in some cases. They just aren't on average because biology.

75
Gmama2 75 points ago +75 / -0

I am a woman. Those cases are extremely limited. That's why a middle school soccer team can beat the US Woman's olympic team.

Oh wait , now that "women" can have male biology ...

25
Frog_Anne 25 points ago +26 / -1

It's such an odd hill for liberals to die on. Are there really that many women that want to think they're stronger than men? I guess if you live in a sketchy area, or you know a bunch of sleazy men you'd be scared, but weak men aren't at all attractive. Sorry to be rude, and I'm not saying they have to be Olympic-level gym bros to be attractive, just a normal reasonably fit man. I knew a very nice guy once with the softest little hands and a dead fish handshake. Yuck.

19
Wankerton 19 points ago +19 / -0

Women are looking for economically viable men. How funny, The entire education system shits on men so they are less likely to go to college. They have female only scholarships, even though they are the majority. Then women choose critical gender theory to be weaponized against men. Then women spread that weaponization to other women.

And you wonder why men are dropping out.

Ladies you are going to have to give if you want to get.

6
CannonballJunior 6 points ago +7 / -1 (edited)

There are always some exceptions, but - men avoiding non-stem college may be a true blessing in disguise for many. Including a financial/income blessing.

In fact, today's generation of males may be instinctively or rationally more perceptive on the whole than females are - in realizing what a pointless & shitty racket much of college is now.

4
ProdigalPlaneswalker 4 points ago +4 / -0

economically viable

"Don't forget me."

1
Ptannerdactyl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Might be from my computer background but the way I do things is code for the biggest block of data/behavior and then add in exceptions. The exceptions are necessary pieces to digest everything, but they’re not the norm.

The exceptions aren’t used to describe the norm because they’re not the norm. It shouldn’t be a personal insult to say that, that’s just how it is.

6
WillyP702 6 points ago +6 / -0

What I find interesting is.. They claim women can be stronger than men but as soon as a man hits a woman back. he gets the electric chair. haha If women are just as strong as men then why do we all go crazy when a woman is abused?? It's the same reason we go crazy when a child is abuse. THEY ARE NOT THE PHYSICAL STRONGER SPECIES on this planet. They never were. In those limited cases where women are stronger than men. The man is usually out of shape or mentally and emotionally weak. WE have a lot of little boys pretending to men out there that women are stronger than.

27
GorillaWarfare 27 points ago +27 / -0

They just aren't at all because biology. Have a look at competitive powerlifters sometime. In any weight class, the absolute best-of-the-best, top 1% of female lifters would get blown out of the water by middle-to-bottom male competitors and most regular gym bros who've never competed in their lives. MMA? Same scenario.

Literally the only scenario where women "can be" physically stronger than men is if you're comparing female pro athletes to skinny soyboys or fat lardasses who never leave the couch. Statistical outliers don't mean anything. Differences in bone and muscle structure mean that pound for pound males will always be physically stronger than females of similar size.

7
john1234 7 points ago +10 / -3

Females have less muscle mass in relation to intestines. And thus more intestines in relation to body weight

In really, really long ultra-endurance races / sports, it's not about speed, maximum strength, maximum power or even maximum oxygen uptake / VO2 max.

It's all about how much energy you can produce from carbs/fat with your intestines / organs, in relation to how much energy you spend. And women have small muscles, large intestines

And that is why women in relation to men are at their best in really, really long ultra-endurance races

Women are never gonna win men in speed / strength / power etc, but they will be so close in ultra-endurance that the best women will not be beaten by random guys.

12
T__X 12 points ago +14 / -2

They're so close that they go back and forth with men almost every other year in ultra-endurance events like the Boston Marathon or the Iron Man Triathlon or the Ultraman endurance challenge.

Oops, sorry, i meant a woman has never won any of those ever.

9
john1234 9 points ago +10 / -1

In 100+ hour races, the difference is less than 7% with 36-year-olds:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899381/

Some women have already beat men in some ultra-endurance-competitions:

https://www.ft.com/content/0ead55ca-1d85-11e9-a46f-08f9738d6b2b

And some have already claimed women to be faster in general:

https://runrepeat.com/state-of-ultra-running

"Female ultra runners are faster than male ultra runners at distances over 195 miles. The longer the distance the shorter the gender pace gap. In 5Ks men run 17.9% faster than women, at marathon distance the difference is just 11.1%, 100-mile races see the difference shrink to just .25%, and above 195 miles, women are actually 0.6% faster than men."

High/long jumps: 17-19% difference, and those women were doped.

In weightlifting, the max world record difference is 49% for the snatch

If you bother to study it, it becomes very evident that that the longer the race, the smaller the male advantage. And so do the biological reasons behind the phenomenom

3
Wankerton 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think they are talking about 100 mile+ marathon runs. When it's that long any extra muscle weight on the upper body wears you down.

Also women seem to do better at sharp shooting. Maybe due to less muscles and lower blood pressure. Doesn't mean they'd be better snipers. I dont see them likely to crawl through a mile of literal shit over the course of 3 days to get into position. Though one time in Sweden during wwII a female did kill a bunch of Russian invaders.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)
2
ronburgandy 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's why I hated the character of Abby so much in the Last of Us 2. Maybe like 1 % of women on earth are that ripped, and you sure as shit wouldn't be that ripped living on burritos in a zombie apocalypse.

4
IcedCovfefe 4 points ago +4 / -0

When the Williams sisters were at their prime, one of them went up against the like 1000th ranked male tennis player in a private setting. He had drunk a couple of beers before the match and he still wiped the floor with her.

2
arebee 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol fuck off with this ALT RIGHT Propaganda. https://olympics.nbcsports.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2019/09/gettyimages-943604494-e1569425359179.jpg this is a picture of a STRONG, BEAUTIFUL woman that dont need no man and she's a lot stronger than most men that dont work out.

Olympian woman, stronger than most men. Beautiful too. New zealand churns out some strong women. SO WHAT if she has some arm pit hair, male pattern balding and test levels of a 40yo fat male pretending to be a woman, she's as strong as any guy out there!

10
Smurfection 10 points ago +10 / -0

99.9% of healthy men are physically stronger than 99.9% of healthy women. A 70 year old man in good condition can kick the ass of a 20 year old woman in good shape, even if she's trained. I know that we've been fed a steady stream of women-kick-butt entertainment for the last 30 years but the reality is, the vast majority of women can be taken down by a man with little effort and women pose no physical threat to men.

Women's bone density is 70% less than a man's and women have smaller bones too, even proportionately. Not only do men have more muscle than women, gram for gram, men's muscles are also stronger. Women's hands can do a lot of small detailed tasks but men's hands can function like clubs and a woman's can't. If a woman could put the power of a man's punch into her arm and hand, she'd be likely to fracture her wrist.

3
arebee 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder why RONDA ROUSEY the powerhouse female never accepted tank abbotts challenge of a fight.

I mean..tank abbott is old! Rousey was still in her prime too! https://raw-daily.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2-fea-4-640x360.jpg

3
Smurfection 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only people who have not been physically training with members of the opposite sex could possibly believe that even a trained fighter like Ronda Rousey could take on a man.

YouTube did a search and destroy a long time ago, but Andy Kaufmann, back in the day, challenged feminists to find one woman who could beat him in wrestling. So a female Olympic wrestler decided to wrestled Andy Kaufmann, a comedian, in front of a live audience. Andy Kaufmann deliberately did not train for the fight at all. He won. It wasn't close. If you watch the film you can kind of see that he hangs back at first and doesn't really want to go full on, but eventually he does and the fight is over.

We need to stop pretending that women have the same physical strength as men.

1
BidenTouchedMe 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yea if she's power lifting and juicing she might have a chance. Quit making excuses. Men are stronger 99.9% of the time. Faster smarter on the bell curve. Not saying that makes men better. Just that I hate science denial. Women create humans which is the most amazing function a human body can do.

2
arebee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bra, there's some strong lady powerlifters who DEFINITELY don't do steroids, showing up all the guys, like this little lass https://thevaliens.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/becca-swanson1.jpg?w=440&h=196

Tiny, petite AND strong!

1
BidenTouchedMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Number one. She does steroids. Number two. Take joe blow off the street her size who eats junk all day and he destroys her.

-2
DemRefugee007 -2 points ago +1 / -3

I'm not making excuses, you guys are just screeching. You sound like liberals. If the teacher said "can be" it isn't a controversial statement. It really depends on what they said.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Pedeville 4 points ago +4 / -0

They CAN, generally they are not

17
Hail_Milo 17 points ago +18 / -1

The IQ of males and females is really an interesting topic. Men and women have the exact same average IQ. The females just have a significantly steeper curve. This means that much more women are concentrated around the average but for men there's more on each end.

Lots of really dumb dudes, and lots of really brilliant one. I like to call where these curves intersect on the right side the "glass ceiling". I like to call when they intersect on the left the "coal mine ceiling".

Feminists want go put more females into positions typically given to men at least in part due to having a pool 10x larger of mensa level IQs. They don't ever seek to "fix" the low paying grueling jobs where men are also disproportionately represented.

The person who told you that was likely referencing average GPA or something (or pulling it out their ass). I know IQ isn't a perfect measure but it's really the best we got and pretty damn good overall, especially when compared to GPA.

tl;dr: men and women are just as smart as each other's counterpart on average, but females are more concentrated around the average while guys are spread thickly throughout and overrepresented on the low and high ends of the IQ scales relative to females.

4
KekVult 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good write up.

Thank you for the information

3
arebee 3 points ago +3 / -0

howcome all the feminists aren't clamoring to fix the fact 99% of bricklayers are men? What about the other wet trades like concreting, roof tiling and any other awful paying hard as fuck job.

Yes I know you know a guy that makes good money in this work before anyone comments. The majority aren't.

4
Hail_Milo 4 points ago +4 / -0

We all know the answer to that one. It was never about equality.

2
arebee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is the answer because WoEmN R So SmArT they only deserve the gud jobs? help me understand, i am stupid man me no understand

11
PurestEvil 11 points ago +12 / -1

Ironically that is a misconception (and if we base it on IQ likely even false). Girls are merely easier to teach in the education system because it is better aligned to low-testosterone individuals who are obedient rather than inquisitive and pro-active.

But that is not an expression of intelligence, it is an expression of personality. And people who think it is an expression of intelligence, are usually dumb ideologues who just push the virtue signal button wildly.

6
ronin551 6 points ago +7 / -1

It's also because most teachers (K-12) are women who design instruction for girls.

4
WillyP702 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was taught women were smarter than men . I used to hear it from everyone. I always questioned it because I met some pretty dumb girls before. haha

4
PurestEvil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah because they associate "smart" with "obedient." Being silent in the class room and complying with their tests and grade system is what they want. Not thinkers, not mavericks, not Individuals getting out of line.

Playing along the grade system in itself is an expression of submission. But you have no choice. If you do bad because you don't care or hate it, you are considered stupid and they will rail your parents against you. And because in most cases they either don't care, aren't smart or wise enough anyway (they sent you to a public school after all), it works.

2
WillyP702 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are soo right!!!! Av majority of these self righteous pricks associate intelligence with simply agreeing with them and doing exactly what they tell you to do. Little Boys are more likely to rebel.

1
arebee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nowadays it's women are smarter AND stronger, way more responsible too. You ever seen a 40yo woman unkeep a dozen cats? That's a lot of kitty litter! unless of course they're lesbo, then they have a sport car and 3 dogs.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
17
trout007 17 points ago +17 / -0

Holy Crap I remember that election. I was in 3rd grade too and my teacher was an actual communist. She said the Soviet Union was great because teachers were highly respected like doctors and she even vacationed there.

Some things never change.

13
CousinEddie 13 points ago +13 / -0

I grew up in the 80s and multiple teachers throughout my school career not only vacationed in Russia, some spoke Russian.

Education And Communism have been holding hands since the Cold War.

12
maganify 12 points ago +12 / -0

Pull their licenses much like they do to doctors and never let them near a school again.

8
ztrich007 8 points ago +8 / -0

I love being in forums with intelligent older people. Reddit is filled with 9 year-old shills

5
sunwolf87 5 points ago +5 / -0

And have your children record lectures too.

209
GodKingHarambe 209 points ago +209 / -0

“...women don’t fight, they talk it out...”

SPOTTED THE VIRGIN!!!!

110
MAGAMAN4EVA 110 points ago +110 / -0

Yea this guy clearly never had a romantic relationship with a woman. He knows nothing about them.

68
The_Peter 68 points ago +71 / -3

National conflicts would be on monthly cycles composed of 3 weeks of not talking and then 1 week of nuclear warfare followed by another 3 weeks of not talking etc. etc.

19
Er_hast_mich 19 points ago +19 / -0

And after like a year Angela Merkel ends up with an eating disorder and Jacinda Arden starts self-harming.

38
ProdigalSon1997 38 points ago +38 / -0

i think the guy on the computer is a literal cuck and a simp

9
Jack_Burton 9 points ago +9 / -0

He sounds like a pederast

7
LesboPregnancyScare 7 points ago +7 / -0

right? the quote isnt "Hell hath no fury like a man scorned"

Also i believe all the past female rulers, queens and PMs are were actually more eager for war: Margaret Thatcher, Catherine I of Russia,

5
james43552352345 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't forget the females of Communist China that were second in command. They were master propagandists and often manipulated people far worst than men. I think Mao's wife was a complete psychopath.

6
Smurfection 6 points ago +6 / -0

Given his age (he says he was their age about fifty years ago which puts him around 60), I don't think he swings that way.

44
ThisisDog 44 points ago +44 / -0

Think of how many wars Hillary would've started!!

14
GodKingHarambe 14 points ago +14 / -0

“You’ve seen reports, Russia hacked in to a lot of things, China hacked in to a lot of things. Russia even hacked in to the Democratic National Committee. Maybe even some state election systems. So we gotta step up our game. Make sure we are well defended and able to take the fight to those who go after us. As president she will treat cyber attacks just like any attacks. We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses.”

1
Yupyupyup 1 point ago +1 / -0

That bitch would have seriously started WW3.

36
CMUBigGuy 36 points ago +36 / -0

Ask how many wars Trump has started!

19
Kylsix 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yeah he is simping hard

8
censorthisss 8 points ago +8 / -0

70% of non-reciprocal domestic violence is commited by women towards their male partners.

Lesbians have the highest rates of domestic violence out of all types of relationships Gay men have some of the lowest.

Women typically get their male friends to carry out their violent desires for them, and of course the media never talks about female violence so morons like this teacher think that women never fight.

Also, throughout history female leaders have been more likely to start wars. So this guy is full of shit from all angles.

144
Winter_Is_Coming2020 144 points ago +144 / -0

What a DB, the teacher doesn’t even know that Trump is 45?

118
deleted 118 points ago +118 / -0
25
hillarysdildont 25 points ago +26 / -1

Woah slow down with all these facts, the guys clearly not employed to teach kids these objective truths you speak of.

47
Ithrowawaay 47 points ago +47 / -0

Sculpting the minds of tomorrow. What a joke.

23
MaskManDate 23 points ago +23 / -0

Sad thing is, that's exactly what he's doing.

27
GingerMinky 27 points ago +27 / -0

Right? How the fuck is he acting like an authority when he doesn’t even know 45?

13
Smurfection 13 points ago +13 / -0

Public school teachers are not smart. They're the ones that barely got through college.

2
lerm4comptroller 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't count the number of teachers that told long-winded stories about their "dream jobs" that they didn't quite hack it in, but "luckily" they got a teaching degree to "fall back on." Yes, these are quotes.

... Worth mentioning, there was at least one incident of a teacher being outed as a pedo per year at my high school. (The worst was when one married a student--like no she was 16 when they married.)

13
5000wattsx 13 points ago +13 / -0

Even when you consider that you still have to factor in that we only had 44 presidents since Grover Cleveland's terms weren't consecutive.

2
Djt2029 2 points ago +2 / -0

TIL....My presidential history in the 19th century is not great outside Lincoln. Got some reading to do!

1
SantaBrown 1 point ago +1 / -0

My boy cleveland is a legend. Was executioner of New York I believe.

12
jimmycrack 12 points ago +12 / -0

he knows. it's a manipulation tactic, he is acting childish so the children can relate to what he is saying better. I do the same thing (act dumb or uninformed) to leftists and centrists while slipping in pro Trump or anti biden information. it makes it easier to bring people knew ideas if they don't see you as the enemy.

11
Filo76 11 points ago +11 / -0

I’m not sure I’d give this moron the benefit of the doubt. If you are a teacher and don’t at least know how many presidents there have been you really shouldn’t be teaching.

134
TrumpsBigBalls 134 points ago +135 / -1

47 or 48 presidents and this guy is a teacher?!?!?!

34
ProdigalSon1997 34 points ago +34 / -0

schools are trying to make kids stupid. it's horrible. parents & grandparents rise up!

12
Grady_Wilson 12 points ago +12 / -0

And he has no idea how old Trump or Biden is.

But he's an expert on the need for a woman president.

9
Thiskingsteve 9 points ago +9 / -0

I almost died laughing when he said this.

9
GingerMinky 9 points ago +9 / -0

Exactly

6
Er_hast_mich 6 points ago +6 / -0

To be fair, we're watching math class.

1
bobobob 1 point ago +1 / -0

The guy doesn't know how to count?

87
ChuckedBeef 87 points ago +87 / -0

This is so strange, but unfortunately very common. This guy has absolutely no idea who Kamla Harris is, or what she's done during her reign of terror as a CA DA. He thinks all females are the same and all males are the same. Seems like he was bullied as a child and never got over it.

16
_Sully_ 16 points ago +16 / -0

Having a woman president just for shits and giggles is so fuckin stupid. Why are people like this? Why don’t they see that the very notion they are pushing is shallow and not wise?

7
vinnychase 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because they themselves are shallow and unwise

5
hit_backspace 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fire activist educators

74
Martel_West 74 points ago +74 / -0

We've had, I don't know, how many Presidents? Forty-seven, forty-eight? Most of these guys, all men. Almost all of them have gotten us into a war. I'd like to see a woman president. Women don't like to fight, they like to talk their way out of a fight.

Fun fact: female leaders are 27% more likely to start wars than male leaders, on average throughout history.

Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html

I'm surprised to see this "teacher" is still anti-war after all the peace deals and troop withdrawals Trump is working on.

36
MaskManDate 36 points ago +38 / -2

Randostan: "Why are you bombing us?"

Woman President: "You know what you did!"

7
Thrasymachus 7 points ago +7 / -0

🤣 Also, "You shouldn't have to ask."

6
LaPastillaEscarlata 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, look at what the side of beef did in Libya. Gold digging for Gadafi's loot was enough to destabilize the passage between the middle east and Europe.

3
IKEEPMUHFREEDOMTHX 3 points ago +3 / -0

“I told you about my bombing plans last week! Remember?”

2
IKEEPMUHFREEDOMTHX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn’t this blatant sexism as well?

68
Sandman 68 points ago +68 / -0

This needs to stop. Complete bullshit that this CUCK teacher is doing this.

2
IKEEPMUHFREEDOMTHX 2 points ago +2 / -0

I couldn’t make it and shot myself half way through the first video. Could you summarize what he said?

61
aconcernedtroll 61 points ago +61 / -0

Bwahahahaha. The teacher is retarded. Apologies to everyone out there that actually has mental deficiencies that they cannot control. This guy is willingly retarded so I hate to group him with the disabled.

He talks about how amazing it will be for a woman to be president. Just any woman will do. Then makes it super sexist and talks about how women don't like to fight and won't start wars, unlike violent dick swinging men. Which had zero historical basis. European queens went to war significantly more frequently than kings did, not to mention all the warrior queens throughout history.

18
DrCowboyPresident 18 points ago +18 / -0

The sin of Wrath is generally far more common with women.

19
alfredbester 19 points ago +19 / -0

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned

15
commies0ride0free 15 points ago +16 / -1

I am self aware enough to know that if I had been a European queen back in the day I would have definitely engaged in wars, whether I started them or not. War is sometimes necessary, like the crusades. Maybe he thinks women are too pussy to do war, and our lady brains can’t handle it.

Honestly it felt like sexism towards both men and women in this simeans mind- and 47 presidents? What an idiot

6
p1smo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hillary Clinton is the epitome of a war monger. We would be at war in Syria right now and God knows where else if she had won.

2
TrumpsGlassOfWater 2 points ago +2 / -0

Retarded doesn't mean mentally disabled or handicap.

It literally is defined as "to slow down" or "slow".

This dude is fucking RETARDED. Don't apologize for using a word correctly.

44
MrAlwaysRight 44 points ago +44 / -0

“Vote for Biden because he might die and a women that lost the primary by a lot might then be president!”

Wow

11
Keiichi81 11 points ago +11 / -0

Exciting!

37
top_eagle 37 points ago +37 / -0

How many presidents have there been? A million? They've all been men, and they all started wars. Think about it, that is millions of wars we would not have been in if we elected women.

17
supersecretaccount82 17 points ago +17 / -0

Math checks out.

14
Dumdum 14 points ago +14 / -0

That does make sense when you put it like that

6
DeltaTango 6 points ago +6 / -0

Question. Since gender is a social construct, can't we just solve this by having Biden identify as a woman? We don't actually need to elect a woman.

35
VoxVulgaris 35 points ago +35 / -0

This is a Palm Beach Gardens 5th Grade Teacher indoctrinating his class here in FL. PBC School keeps deleting this video. They don’t want this to get around.

20
Staatssicherheit 20 points ago +20 / -0

Name?

25
Shesaidwhat79 25 points ago +25 / -0

Well thank God 5th graders don't vote yet right?

30
PoorKidsJustAsBright 30 points ago +30 / -0

Just give it a few years. Commiefornia is working on 16 year olds now.

https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/05/11/sf-16-17-year-olds-vote-municipal-elections-proposal/

20
TheEmperorProtects 20 points ago +20 / -0

We can’t trust the kids to buy cigarettes or alcohol or firearms! But they should guide the country!

8
VoidWanderer 8 points ago +8 / -0

"You can sign up to die for your country but you cannot drink."

-2
Er_hast_mich -2 points ago +1 / -3

I believe you can drink at 18 on a military ID.

7
VoidWanderer 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'd love to know where since I wasn't allowed to when I was in.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
14
magicmike 14 points ago +14 / -0

The things you learn at that age are often burned into your memories as foundational truths.

The things these kids hear from an authority figure at a young age will shape their decision-making for life

23
aslaniscoming 23 points ago +23 / -0

The teacher doesn't sound sober. Drugs?

15
commies0ride0free 15 points ago +15 / -0

Power

10
DibbleDibbleDibble 10 points ago +10 / -0

Imagine virtually teaching a bunch of elementary schoolers. You'd probably be day-drinking too.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
LaPastillaEscarlata 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hypersoylent

22
EtRpatriot 22 points ago +22 / -0

Dear feds,

You have evidence that, should he be elected, Joe Biden's death was not due to natural causes.

But my question is, will they just "make him disappear" anyways when he fails to get Kamala into the white house?

16
SauronWasFramed 16 points ago +16 / -0

Biden doesn’t have to die. He can resign or be found mentally unfit for office

10
EtRpatriot 10 points ago +10 / -0

We should get that mentally unfit process started early, beat the deadline and all that.

6
DeltaTango 6 points ago +6 / -0

Exactly. Should he win, they're going to sit him down, and say, "Listen Joe. Good job on the victory. We're genuinely surprised you pulled it off. But here's the thing. Now you gotta leave. It's HER TURN. So you can either walk out on your own, or be carried out in a body bag. It's up to you."

3
SauronWasFramed 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s my opinion that’s why they chose her. She was the worst of the socialist women and among the first to drop out.

In other words, she’s too leftist for the democrats. But when he resigns, she’s the new president.

God forbid as long as GEOTUS is on the scene.

5
DeltaTango 5 points ago +5 / -0

It wasn't that she was too socialist. It's that she wasn't anything. The joke in the primary was that she'd adopt the politics of whoever was in front of her at the time, and that turned off everyone.

In front of a Bernie supporter? Sure, she supports universal nationalized single payer healthcare.

In front of a union worker with private healthcare they want to keep? Sure, she'll support the free market system!

That's why they chose her. Because she'll be whatever they want her to be.

2
SauronWasFramed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes better sense. I wasn’t following her to know anything about her. I figured ole joe snuck one past Jill and got a blue pill happy.

17
SnipedYou 17 points ago +17 / -0

Tell me again how Taxation isn't theft? This guy is taking your hard earned tax dollars and has a total disregard of the majority in Florida.

4
james43552352345 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dude is literally taking tax money to make your kids dumber.

16
SauronWasFramed 16 points ago +16 / -0

Sexist teacher is sexist saying women won’t get us into a war. Time for him to go to re-education Camp gulag.

15
Pleepleus 15 points ago +15 / -0

Women dont like to fight? This teacher ever met a female? Seems blatantly sexist.

12
Redpill-notCommieRed 12 points ago +12 / -0

Schools lost at least 10% of students to home learning this year. With these weak online classes schools are going to lose twice as many next year.

7
commies0ride0free 7 points ago +7 / -0

We can only hope!!

11
JerryNadlerBeltFund 11 points ago +11 / -0

Years ago my company hired a speaker who discussed the challenges with teachers. His central argument was to agree that they ARE underpaid for the job they do. Starting pay is too low to attract young talent, so they get these morons. Then these morons stay in the system long enough to collect a pension (20 years, at around 45 years of age), move to a new district and double dip their way to 2 pensions by the time they hit 65. So the old farts taking two paychecks and nobody who could be be making $80k in engineering wants to make $40k.

His solution? End tenure and lifelong, career teachers. Hire experienced, retiring industry professionals who know the real world to teach, and pay them well. Don't know if it would make a dent, but it seems reasonable.

5
Fabius 5 points ago +5 / -0 (edited)

I've got a better idea.

End mandatory public schooling and use the 25% of all local, state, and federal budgets on something important. (or give it back)

Pay for your own kids education where you have oversight. If you want your child to learn that Biden is about to die so we can have a wahmen president, that's your choice.

Government schools are a failure. End them now.

Pay teachers more? What the fuck is wrong with you guys. YOU HAVE NO OVERSIGHT WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT. That the big liberal myth, is that somehow government is accountable to "the people" and corporations aren't, when it's the exact opposite. They constantly fear monger with this fear of monopoly, when the only monopoly that exists is the government. Hey parents, feel like your government school district is "accountable" to you? Feel like you have lots of power over your child's education? Try a private school. If you don't like what they are teaching, you pull your kid out. It's that simple.

You need to be able to choose where your child goes to school, and the only way you can do that is to end mandatory schooling. It's an outdated concept. The internet can allow 1 teacher to teach a million students. You get the best teacher money can buy and it would still be a fraction of the cost of public schooling. Parents grade the papers.

You do the same with colleges. This whole system of licensing (ie. College diplomas) is a proxy for an IQ test. Bring back IQ tests for employers to determine what a prospective employee knows.

2
JerryNadlerBeltFund 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hear you, but read a little further in the post. Nobody is saying to give current teachers a raise. The point was that (especially for STEM-related areas), it would make more sense to hire retirees from the fields. It probably wouldn't cost more than a tenured teacher double-dipping a pension and active salary.

If I were a parent today? I'd be home-schooling, or hiring private tutors to teach a small group of neighborhood kids. Public schools are a disaster, and the private ones are becoming "Woke" at breakneck speed. 1619 project? Diversity Inclusion and Equity officers? What the fuck. Breitbart had a recent story about a high school in LA ($40k/year day school) that went headfirst into DEI bullshit this summer.

4
VoidWanderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

The general BS that is mandated is also part of it. Teachers now teach to tests, not anything that students have to know to succeed in the real world. Common Core especially has been a complete detriment for every student because it's nonsensical in how it has you learn things. That type of "teach exactly what you're told to" is great for people like the one in the video because it requires no actual knowledge on anything you're trying to teach leaving plenty of room for pure ideology. It's terrible for anyone better that can actually teach because it's limits you in so many ways and prevents you from being an actual teacher.

The speaker you mentioned is on the right track in terms of how to fix the problem, it's just being allowed to actually fix the problem that's the sticking point with how slimy many aspects of education have become over the years thanks to infiltration and corruption.

7
JerryNadlerBeltFund 7 points ago +7 / -0

In 2011 I saw a doc "Waiting for Superman" on a flight. I recall a school superintendent (Washington, DC, I believe) was trying to make meaningful reforms. She offered any teacher in the system a six figure salary, but on the condition they would give up tenure. Not a single taker, from what I recall. They all chose job security and lack of accountability over significantly more cash. Another highlight of the movie was the "rubber room" where they send shitty teachers. Since they couldn't fire them, they just put the teachers in an office together where they fucked off all day and got paid.
That was almost 10 years ago. . .I'm sure they've totally fixed it by now, though!

1
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 1 point ago +1 / -0

The union wouldn't even allow them to take a vote on it. Great documentary.

1
ImportantPerson 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would rather teach to a test than have teachers teach whatever they want and have no standards for education. We can absolutely evaluate what the tests are that these teachers are teaching to, but the fundamental aspect of teaching standardized levels of education is perfectly logical.

Teachers should be told what content to teach based on an already approved curriculum. Then teachers use their ability to convey that information to the students which is literally their job.

Somewhere along the line teacher went from educating people about the topic at hand and instead moved to teachers ignoring the curriculum and teaching their beliefs.

1
The_Emperor 1 point ago +2 / -1

Hiring industry pros or retirees would be awesome

11
OutcastSeal 11 points ago +11 / -0

What does this have to do with math, science, or any other subject?

13
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

Social Studies MAYBE. But like 9th grade, not 5th. I remember the indoctrination of having to cut newspaper articles, bring them to class and discuss what was written, without ever questioning the validity of it. And of course only certain papers were allowed. It was called "Current Events".

8
Gabbs1212 8 points ago +8 / -0

I never took in the 'accepted' newspaper articles. My dad used to get "The Conservative Chronicle", and I used the articles from there. As long as i was able to defend my points to a VERY liberal history teacher, I would pass.

Final grade was 105%. He and I are friends now, even though he is ultra dem

6
Er_hast_mich 6 points ago +6 / -0

Remember when being open to differing opinions and was a "liberal value"?

8
7.62swinebuster 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dude's speech enunciation is like some Sesame Street character/creeper trying to disarm kids. This guy has probably been plowed right past and treated flippantly by so many random males in his life that now he feels it's his duty to convince kids how much better women are than men.

8
Raindrops1984 8 points ago +8 / -0

He should have his license pulled. He didn’t even cover his assigned topic. He went on a political rant.

4
Er_hast_mich 4 points ago +4 / -0

How do you know that the assigned topic wasn't "Womyn good, men bad"?

3
Raindrops1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

It probably was, but in the last video he said he was supposed to be talking about 9/11 but would wait until the next class. Seems typical for a brainwashed commie.

2
Fabius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Teachers view their jobs as their own personal soapbox. They have a captive audience of children. It happens everywhere.

When things were smaller, things were different. You knew the town schoolteacher who you left your kids with 8 hours a day. You know your teachers now? Who is spending 8 hours a day with your kids?

7
Zekk 7 points ago +8 / -1

Absolutely sickening.

Suggesting a sitting president dying is a good thing so we get a woman. Imagine saying this and not realizing you're evil.

Also a woman for the sake of a woman teaches the absolute wrong mentality. Competence/virtue not intersectionality points is how we need to align rewards in society.

Furthermore I love his mystical take on women being less war monger like because they are kind and submissive. Yeah, us men wish our women were like that but they aren't anymore because when you give women power they overcompensate similar to small man syndrome. A woman who would actually be good would never willingly seek power.

Queens were bigger warmongers than Kings.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3463364

7
Caroney-Bologna 7 points ago +7 / -0

I can hear the soy...

4
Chickenbaconpoutine 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Right, guisessssss?"

3
Fabius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol.

Come on fellow males! Are you totally super excited about a wahmen president? Wooooo!

7
ZEEOHHSIX 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hold fuck this guy is an idiot. Doesn’t know how many presidents there are and is hoping Biden gets elected so he can die? Also, Trump hasn’t started any wars so his faggoty ass should be Trump’s biggest cheerleader.

3
Fabius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to mention the blatant stereotypes about women not starting wars when Hillary went on a rampage across the world killing tens of thousands of people.

7
theClutchologist 7 points ago +7 / -0

Women don't like to fight

Lol ha

Introduces girlfriend

3
XCorneliusX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hillary Clinton enters the room. Benghazi.

6
oathkeeper4lyfe 6 points ago +6 / -0

I used to live in west palm before moving to dc area.

palm beach gardens only lists one male as a 5th grade teacher. this is assumed that the twitter post is accurate in saying this is a 5th grader on the laptop.

Nurcan Mingle

https://pbge.palmbeachschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=1962561&pageId=5061207

Palm beach gardens elementary

https://pbge.palmbeachschools.org/school_info

4
Reltius 4 points ago +4 / -0

According to the website, these are their 5th grade teachers

Christina McAlister Susan Burton Robert Wenst Linda Silberstein Elizabeth Owers Ashley Jakob Cristeena Beauchamp

So it’s obviously Robert Wenst unless it’s a tranny.

2
Under25BMI 2 points ago +2 / -0

@palmbeachschools.org

all employees use first.last for email domains.

1
TickleTh1sElmo 1 point ago +1 / -0

On his wife's Twitter, she has posts calling Trump a racist, so I think we found our guy.

2
Fabius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why is there no picture? Teachers are public life position. When you become a public school teacher you are a part of the community. You show you face to everyone. You are accountable.

1
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bump.

5
orcwordlaugh 5 points ago +5 / -0

The tool actually makes the argument that a female President is needed because almost all the male Presidents have started wars.

Trump has been getting historic peace deals signed without starting any wars. The cognitive dissonance is strong.

4
righty-tighty 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's basically said he wants Biden to die so we can have a female president and the ways in which he can die, or be shifted out of office, are abundant. WTF. Just wtf.

4
TexSolo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuckin' disgusting.

4
Sir_Doggo 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is absurd. I remember my 5th grade teacher, the most political thing he did was have the inauguration of the president on the classroom TV every 4 years, didn't matter who it was. He started with Reagan and the last inauguration was Trump, he retired last year. Man actually gave a damn about teaching.

4
alienjesus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Women don’t fight? You’ve clearly never met my ex fiancé!

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's the leftist myth that play into women's vanity that they can do no wrong. Women have the same capacity for evil as men. Ask any woman.

4
FretNoise14 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m so sick of remote learning. My kid is getting absolutely robbed of an education because these teachers refuse to go back to work. His teacher spends about 20 minutes a day on a google meet, and the rest is left up to the parents and students. He’s fucking 9.

4
Fabius 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cancel that shit and pay for a service where you have oversight.

The public school system gets paid on number of students. Take them out.

As a bonus it's only about 4 hours of schooling a day, which is plenty. The rest of the time can be spent being a kid.

Think about how long it would really take to teach your kid arithmetic or any other concept.

Half hour of English/reading. Half hour of math. Break. Half hour of science. Half hour of history. Lunch. Half hour of study. Half hour of Music/extracurricular. Kid starts instruction at 9AM, out by 1PM. The rest of the time is spent being a kid. Instead of something simple like this, you spend half an hour teaching your kid that Biden should die so a wahmen can be president. With this simple system, children are more focused and learn more. No kid can sit through 8 hours a day of boring shit. The public school system was implemented to represent life in a factory and condition children to slavery.

Take back control of your children and free them.

4
Smurfection 4 points ago +4 / -0
  1. If you love your children, take them out of public schools.

  2. Men are more physical than women but I don't think know why there's this myth that women have discussions instead of fighting whereas men just start fighting. In my experience, most men try to avoid physical and verbal confrontations and there's a lot of women that most certainly talk themselves into a lot of fights. Just look at the rioting vids...its mostly women who are up in the faces of the cops shouting vile, inflammatory and disgusting things. I'd argue there's even some sexism involved because law enforcement is far more restrained with these crazy screeching women than they are with the male rioters. The point remains though, it's usually the women who are using their mouths to provoke fights, escalate tensions and frankly, the mouths on the women are worse than the men.

4
blackfay 4 points ago +4 / -0

Death to child brain rapists

4
bigleaguetrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

There were teachers just as bad as this 20 years ago when I was in school. They thought Gore won the election because of the popular vote. If you ever dared to call these teachers out on their bullshit they would get very mad at you so most people kept their mouths shut.

2
james43552352345 2 points ago +2 / -0

100% this. When I was in college like 5 years ago there was teachers where people literally had made guides on "how to get an A". The guide literally consisted of the teacher's ideologies and as long as you regurgitated those ideologies you could easily get an A.

3
PinkoPatrol 3 points ago +3 / -0

This shit needs to be shutdown nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

FTFY.

3
EpsteinDidntKillHS 3 points ago +3 / -0

MAKE PROPAGANDA ILLEGAL AGAIN

3
InterloperKO 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seriously, what the fuck

3
hkermit 3 points ago +3 / -0

That teacher has never ever been laid, ever. Not once.

3
TheGreenPede 3 points ago +3 / -0

if you wanna know why so many teachers specifically make are always on the fruity side and lean hard left just stroll thru your local college campus or community college.

3
G_regulator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cool story dickhead, how bout we just have the most qualified person for president, not the white and the geriatric.

3
Lswede 3 points ago +3 / -0

He fails to mention how Hillary would get us into many more wars, and throw away the lives of thousands to push her agenda.

3
Rune_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s also wrong for him to instill that “girls are good” and “boys are violent” He needs to be fired and barred from being around children In any capacity.

3
wonderfreeheromale 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow he brags about how only a women president could stop us from getting into needless wars, meanwhile Trump is the first president in our lifetimes to actually do it in practice.

3
NotoriousCrux 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's very desperate of them to even share their ideals there. They're setting them up for disappointment which is both hilarious and scary

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
ThisisDog 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course its a NY/NJ accent

3
Kerra_Holt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fun Fact: Throughout history female leaders have started more conflicts than male leaders. Also, one of the worst female leaders of all time is none other than https://www.biography.com/political-figure/indira-gandhi Who ruled by DECREE and was convicted of corruption and other political crimes. She also started SEVERAL CONFLICTS during her very short tenure.

3
Midwestknowsbest 3 points ago +3 / -0

Indoctrination in action.