3557
posted ago by ldanwill (edited) +3557 / -0

This morning at 9:30 AM ET, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments from activist judge Emmett Sullivan and his team as to why the complete sham of a case against retired lieutenant general and complete patriot Michael T. Flynn should not be allowed to continue.

Despite overwhelming evidence that the entire case was a set up and a motion from the Department of Justice to dismiss, the deep state will not let this innocent man walk free.


Livestream


YouTube

C-Span

This morning at 9:30 AM ET, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments from activist judge Emmett Sullivan and his team as to why the complete sham of a case against retired lieutenant general and complete patriot Michael T. Flynn should not be allowed to continue. Despite overwhelming evidence that the entire case was a set up and a motion from the Department of Justice to dismiss, the deep state will not let this innocent man walk free. --- Livestream --- [YouTube](https://youtu.be/97dE1_3e2Po) [C-Span](https://www.c-span.org/video/?474473-1/michael-flynn-perjury-dismissal-case-rehearing)
Comments (1582)
sorted by:
190
JoshVerdugo13 190 points ago +190 / -0

I've been a lawyer in Los Angeles for 32 years and have argued appeals before state and federal (9th Cir) appellate courts.

I have no idea what these judges are doing.

Some really smart people on TheDonald; not the toothless hillbillies the Left has us out to be. MAGA

66
Biggie_Smalls 66 points ago +66 / -0

I’ll take that as a compliment....even though my responses have been childish and trollish.

50
Mrsattorney 50 points ago +50 / -0

Mine too, and I'm a lawyer, lol.

29
centexawesome 29 points ago +29 / -0

I wanted to be a lawyer but they told me I needed to start brushing my teeth. Forget that noise.

3
murderhornet 3 points ago +3 / -0

I honestly assumed that judges were smart. Not so much. Many had this "weird attitude" vibe. Disrespectful toward Powell.

18
Whoopies_tds 18 points ago +18 / -0

Mine too and I’m not a lawyer but did stay at a Holiday Inn

13
Independenceforever 13 points ago +13 / -0

But there's a method to the apparent "madness".

People are smart enough to perceive the truth if they really want to. I don't buy the act of feigned ignorance.

We resort to unconventional means to break the trance and programming.

Like Jeremiah the prophet, who literally put stocks on his hands and neck and walked around warning people they'd all be slaves if they didn't repent.

It's getting to that point. Welcome to the new middle ages, where all forms of advanced thought must be masked in a symbol for the mob-thinking zombies - lest they put us on house arrest like Galieo - if we're lucky - or stoned and murdered like every critic of impending disaster in history.

1
fuckdemswithcactus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Michael Bluthe has entered the chat

4
2016TrumpMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Childish PhD troll checking in ...

6
Houdini 6 points ago +7 / -1

The best kind of response.

36
Foreign_Aid_is_Theft 36 points ago +36 / -0

How would a judge even compel evidence or enforce warrants without a prosecutor?

24
Whoopies_tds 24 points ago +24 / -0

That’s a racist question

10
liberalfetchmycoffee 10 points ago +10 / -0

and it comes from place of OBVIOUS PRIVILEGE!

7
Persistence 7 points ago +7 / -0

ANTI-SEMITIC

22
1776ThereIsaidIt 22 points ago +23 / -1

I was a lawyer in another life.

17
Nomoralcompass89 17 points ago +17 / -0

I rode horseback and hollered that "the British are coming, Reeee" in a previous life.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
6
Independenceforever 6 points ago +6 / -0

It'd be funny if those fighting the American Revolution of 2020 today are solely the descendants of those who fought the American revolution of 1776.

Likewise the Sons of Tories. What parents truly believe gets passed on. Children listen.

16
GingerMinky 16 points ago +19 / -3

So, I think there are 2 judges being political, getting their dinner party invites. Some are getting headlines, but I don't think they will allow this to continue. You and I know it would go to the SC and they would be thoroughly embarrassed. Do they want to be known for that? No.

20
DasBurt 20 points ago +20 / -0

Do we really KNOW that? We have a majority of compromised, leftist, communist, deep state cronies on the SC. When they do the right thing, it is an aberration.

3
GingerMinky 3 points ago +5 / -2

This is very normal. If you read transcripts, this is how they argue. They make you defend your position.

6
DasBurt 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think there is a difference between making you defend your position and making a political speech then not letting the witness answer the questions posed to them. Same thing the Commies did to Barr.

3
GingerMinky 3 points ago +3 / -0

There was some of that, but for the most part, appeals courts make you argue against your opponent, but it is done through the judges. It's different. It isn't like the court you think you are used to.

1
DasBurt 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was the complete lack of professionalism and lack of allowing the witness to answer that bothered me. It was just another partisan witch hunt.

2
GingerMinky 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d tell you to listen to more hearings. They’re designed to be professionally adversarial. There was some BS, but not as much as I think everyone thinks.

... continue reading thread?
1
The_Sentinel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Catching up to this very late. I totally agree with you.

These bastard Neolib judges were simply fishing. One of them was going on and on about a "hypothetical".

It was all a trap and they were trying to trip Sidney up in order to bury her.

Sidney is just TREMENDOUS!

14
Trump2000 14 points ago +14 / -0

Are they just trying to delay this and drag it out until after the election? Would that work?

16
bill_in_texas 16 points ago +16 / -0

They just did. They said they will pick up this case again on December 9th....after the election. They are doing their part to keep Flynn muzzled. He can not be allowed to speak out on what he knows.

12
LatitudeofMind 12 points ago +12 / -0

Time for civil disobedience on Flynn’s part.

7
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 7 points ago +7 / -0

How did this appeal happen so quickly but the follow up be postponed until next year? Can Sidney fight to get it done this year?

2
B1ueCo11ar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed this is disgusting joke.

9
DickTick 9 points ago +10 / -1

They just did. December 9th.

2
Houdini 2 points ago +2 / -0

Activists feel no shame.

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago +2 / -1

They revel in their shamelessness.

1
IPMang 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends what they're getting in return for the public embarrassment

0
TimeIsARetardedOval 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've been a lawyer in Los Angeles for 32 years and have argued appeals before state and federal (9th Cir) appellate courts.

for 32 years

I can't imagine the amount of booze you've gone through to not have blown your brains away by now :p

1
CelesteD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh boy, can I ask you a legal question, pretty please? Just some quick advice, I promise!

-1
xxxMAGA420xxx -1 points ago +1 / -2

Hijacking top comment to post link to Michael Flynn's legal defense fund.

https://mikeflynndefensefund.org/

He's gonna need more help after the shitshow today.

120
No_Malarkey_Joe 120 points ago +120 / -0

It's absolutely amazing that every single democrat in the government operates off the exact same playbook. It doesn't matter if they're a a congressman, senator, prosecutor, or judge they all ask the same snarky, narrative driven questions and talk over the person they're questioning. It's like they're connected to a hivemind.

40
icehole3 40 points ago +40 / -0

I agree very Borg like.

28
NuclearRocks1 28 points ago +28 / -0

Well said, very good analogy. The judges sound almost the exact same as those congressional borgs. I’m surprised one of them hasn’t actually said I’m reclaiming my time 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Gotta laugh or I’m gonna cry 😢

16
ripturntle 16 points ago +16 / -0

They all get an email every morning from Soros containing their script for the day.

11
MAGApride 11 points ago +12 / -1

The book Demonic by Ann Coulter makes a very compelling case that the Democratic party is a hivemind. Or, as she refers to them, a mob. Amazing book written in 2011 that will, not only help understand how the left thinks with a hivemind, but brings all of these current "protests" and riots into an understandable light.

8
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's how Marxism works. People dance around calling it Marxism but it has a long toxic history. It should be banned in the US.

3
ButteryFumes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you, just checked it out from the library!!

3
denshi 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's right up there with Adios, America as one of her best.

11
rootGoose 11 points ago +11 / -0

I also noticed how slow they spoke - like they didn't have a clear argument and didn't know how to proceed or were trying to convey something else beyond their argument.

Judge Pillard sounded like a teenager at one point when she responded, "EXACTLY!", as if she were being rescued by her opponent from her erroneous point of view.

4
no_step_on_lion 4 points ago +4 / -0

"You must give me yes or no answers so that I can control the narrative!"

3
Independenceforever 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is Bilderberg?

These leaders have been meeting in secret for decades to plan these events.

Carefully orchestrated fake pandemic. MK ULTRA is a helluva drug for the masses.

4
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ever had drinks with a bunch of Marxists who call themselves liberals? They just sit around and see who can be the most smug fascist commie on any topic.

4
No_Malarkey_Joe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes I have, quite recently in fact. At a party full of people who are woke college leftists, it began with some girls reminding themselves about taking their pills and then chanting "yeah kill those kids!" Later we had the obligatory 5 minute "my dad watches Tucker Carlson/Fox News and it's garbage." Which was followed by a 2 minute LARP session on why Trump is 100% implicated in the Epstein/Maxwell pedo ring.

1
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should record it next time then play it on social media to humiliate their stupidity. Invite all of us to comment on how fucking stupid they are.

2
No_Malarkey_Joe 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Too small of a party for something like and have deleted all my social media accounts a couple months ago. Besides they're more of my brother's friends so I'm not planning on associating with them any further.

3
ItHasComeToThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whenever I find myself thinking "Is there a question in here somewhere?"

I am speaking with lefty. They seem to think I emotion replaces logic.

3
Greatest_adventure 3 points ago +3 / -0

That hive mind is bred by global profiteers.

2
doodaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've thought for a few years now that this is what an adolescent in an adult body sounds likes. It's not quite the same as "dumb." So much as 11 year-old level of thinking and behaving. Would it surprise any of us, that we were fooled by an old guy with grey hair, in a yet another position of high power, is mentally incompetent in that he is in arrested development?

All these books about rules for radicals and ideas about how to attack your opponent when you have nothing. what if it could all be understood by imaging how a simple brain would fight, justify, see the world, etc.

3
No_Malarkey_Joe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I alluded to that in a previous comment about the one judge's hypothetical situation sounding like the kind of thing a freshman philosophy 101 student would come up with. It's something I notice a lot of people in my generation do, and I've been trying to catch myself when I do it too. It's that imprecise way of speaking where you're over reliant on hyperbole/exaggeration and use examples but have to attach a couple caveats to make the analogy work (It's like unironically using the "yes...but actually no" meme) There's also the inability to attend to reality. They've got an idea lodged in their head and will refuse to change that notion based on what's actually happening. Like how the protests aren't riots, sure there's some property damage and a few people died, but that's because of undercover right wing agitators or they have to add the caveat "mostly peaceful" so the concept of a modern day Civil Rights movement is preserved.

102
TrueAmericanValues 102 points ago +102 / -0

"If the facts are on your side, pound the facts into the table. If the law is on your side, pound the law into the table. If neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound the table." - Alan Dershowitz

Many of these judges are obviously just pounding the table.

28
dougkeenan 28 points ago +29 / -1

"when on the island pound the under-agers"

8
hashtag6zer0s 8 points ago +10 / -2

Thank you! Dershowitz is a fucking kiddie diddler

2
skumario 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is a puff diddy who can't help himself enough.

15
BrewSwillis 15 points ago +15 / -0

Or if the law and facts aren't on your side, disparage the witness, and destroy her credibly. - Dersh

6
Houdini 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nice quote and absolutely applicable.

3
QPATRIOT1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

"...and if the pizza and hotdogs on the table are under 18 pound them too" - Alan Dershowitz

1
skumario 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL 😂😂😂

84
MAGA_____bitches 84 points ago +85 / -1

I think Michael Flynn is under a gag order until this case is over and they don't want him talking before the election because he is going to spill the beans.

30
Varkhond 30 points ago +30 / -0

They know they are toast and is literally fighting for their lifes.

12
MrBlack 12 points ago +14 / -2

They're relying on the fact that both parties are so full of cess, that short of mass hangings on the Whitehouse lawn, they are going to be able to operate untouched.

16
Trumper007 16 points ago +16 / -0

No he isn't. per Sydney.

2
doodaddy 2 points ago +2 / -0

gag orders seem as unconstitutional as it gets. I wonder if Trump can override it?

77
TrueAmericanValues 77 points ago +77 / -0

It is funny to hear both the prosecution and the defendant arguing to the judges to dismiss the case, and the judges saying - no we won't do it! Clown world.

37
WU_HAN_FRU 37 points ago +37 / -0

Thoroughly and unequivocally against the law.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
meepstone 3 points ago +4 / -1

Democrat privilege

12
Indelible_Hippo 12 points ago +12 / -0

Sounds like an authoritarian communist judicial system to me. If they can do this to a high ranking general, how may no name plebs have they setup.

4
Light_HIV_Effect 4 points ago +4 / -0

Honestly, what would the judges have them do if they decide the prosecution can't drop a case? "No sorry, you have to because it's an election year and we're now a political body". You literally have the judicial branch interfering with the business of the executive branch.

73
TrumpOrTreason 73 points ago +73 / -0

Sideny Powell's point of every single 48a being dropped is perfect. This has NEVER happened, where the Judge won't dismiss when the govt wants to dismiss.

33
JoshVerdugo13 33 points ago +33 / -0

Killer questions.

26
Harambe 26 points ago +26 / -0

She is a weapon, the sword of GOD

28
N900mixalot 28 points ago +28 / -0

They're arguing in favor of setting precedent that will wreck EVERY SINGLE innocence project overturned conviction and will allow anyone to intervene in a criminal proceeding without anything but anecdotal or political evidence.

Just to get Trump and by Trump I mean US.

70
RichterScale 70 points ago +70 / -0

Sydney Powell is an awesome fucking lawyer

17
PosterIsDead 17 points ago +17 / -0

I loved it when she shut down Griffiths over the 'favoritism' question.

14
Shortcakemylove 14 points ago +14 / -0

I would love to see her serve in some capacity in President Trump 's second term.

12
bill_in_texas 12 points ago +12 / -0

Sydney Powell- Attorney General

Tom Fitton- FBI Director

General Flynn: CIA Director

Ric Grenell: acting director for each of those positions, to force Cocaine Mitch to appoint OUR selections for a change, instead of only his swampy cover up artists.

1
Salt-N-Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fittin?

2
Shortcakemylove 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those are all great suggestions!

9
thingaboutarsenal 9 points ago +9 / -0

I wish she did a podcast. I could listen to her for hours.

4
AslanFan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same. That Hillsdale speech she gave was simply amazing!

67
Chopblock 67 points ago +67 / -0

‘Hypothetically, if Judge Sullivan was a priest and General Flynn was an evil orangeman, and disregarding all the actual proceedings, could the District Judge hold a hearing to demand that the parties not be racists?’

‘If my client had-‘

‘RECLAIMING MY TIME!’

25
Restore_Sanity 25 points ago +25 / -0

Now I truly understand what an Abject Disaster Merrill Garland would have been on the Supreme Court.

9
rootGoose 9 points ago +9 / -0

I heard that in Maxine Water's voice.

THANKS, I hate it.

59
Bellababeala 59 points ago +60 / -1

LMFAO Sidney quoted Ginsburg!!!! Leftist “justice” must be reeeeeeing inside!

17
I_LUV_WINNING 17 points ago +17 / -0

It feels like these judges are 80% mean to Hero Sidney - they keep interrupting her, shouting her down, not letting her complete her answers. These judges are imbeciles.

1
sanitaryshave 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dead people don't feel

57
Whoopies_tds 57 points ago +57 / -0

Judges who want to continue prosecuting a person who has been shown to have been set up by the deepstate is VERY telling

19
Titan93 19 points ago +19 / -0

Wonder what they're being blackmailed with

12
faxandu 12 points ago +12 / -0

death

10
stepping_razor123 10 points ago +10 / -0

Epstein Island and Cheese Pizza parties. Pedos the lot of the them.

2
congruent 2 points ago +2 / -0

They way I heard it, as you're rising through the ranks, when you start to have power to influence how things might go, they invite you to yet another party with the movers and shakers.

Except when you get off the plane, you're on an island and there's naked kids and child sacrifice--and cameras--everywhere. And you get to make a choice.

Join the cabal. Partake of the dark pleasures. Be forever controlled.

Leave the island, never gain any more power or influence, and swear to secrecy on pain of death.

Or, death.

I have no evidnece for this scenario.

2
GoldenSpirals 2 points ago +2 / -0

A big fat slice of cheese pizza most likely

13
cjcivicx 13 points ago +13 / -0

“We just want to keep Flynn from talking because Obama is implicated but the now declassified evidence!” - Commie Judges

51
RlzJohnnyM 51 points ago +51 / -0

The judge wants the prosecutors to argue against their own dismissal

BANANA REPUBLIC

48
Houdini 48 points ago +48 / -0

Why do the judges sound so irritable as if they've already decided what they're going to do?

25
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 25 points ago +25 / -0

Last time they sound this exact way, but in the end 2/3 judges sided with Flynn. I think it's just part of the gig to sound like a cunt.

7
solarsavior 7 points ago +7 / -0

I hope so. Not only are the judges ruling for this case, they do bear in mind future cases which may/will cite this case. There is more at stake here than just General Flynn.

14
FreeSpeechMaster 14 points ago +15 / -1

Because their mind's are already made up. The idea of an open and pensive judge does not exist, in real life. They are all advocates. That's literally WHY they go into law.

11
ADAM_SCHITT 11 points ago +11 / -0

Because they have. It's majority dem appointed judges.

10
Mrsattorney 10 points ago +10 / -0

They always do that...Devil's advocate kind of thing.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

some already did. litigators can tell which judges on a panel are on the fence based on how they respond in hearings

8
Constitution_jd 8 points ago +8 / -0

My mentor in law school did a comprehensive study on oral arguments at the Supreme Court level; the finding was that the number and nature of questions are not useful in predicting the outcome of the case, regardless of the subject matter (highly politicized or more apolitical).

Don't read too much into it

1
Houdini 1 point ago +1 / -0

We'll see how they treat Sullivan.

2
MAGANatsFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because they have already decided, and are defending their stance.

43
Whoopies_tds 43 points ago +46 / -3

To the shill in here downvoting posts...get a fucking life

22
cjcivicx 22 points ago +24 / -2

They’re always here... just ignore them and they’ll go back to making s’mores in their mommies basement before long.

10
Wyopepe 10 points ago +10 / -0

Just so you know this works better if you do it by charcoal fire. Make sure to close the door as it makes them more smokey flavored and authentic.

7
dontUseVinegerAsLube 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can confirm, this works really well!

2
Friar_Pede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Best smores I've ever had.

7
MrsSilenceDogood 7 points ago +8 / -1

We need voter ID on the_Donald RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!!!!!

3
skumario 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup, just the usual basement cucks. Ignore.

43
BaronFalcon 43 points ago +45 / -2

Wait, so we are now conducting court remotely which is allowing convenient technical difficulties when your horseshit is falling apart?

15
endr 15 points ago +16 / -1

These cuck judges would argue the constitution doesn't say you can't.

What comes after Jury box?

39
Bellababeala 39 points ago +39 / -0

I’m irate over the behavior of Millett. I looked at her Wikipedia page. Here is why she is so salty:

In February 2016 The New York Times identified her as a potential nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia.

So we have her AND Garland on the bench today. What a farce.

17
MrBlack 17 points ago +17 / -0

They're judging the exact bias their peer is guilty of.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
chuckachookah 6 points ago +7 / -1

We will need to play the hand we have.

They can rig the game.

But, we can turn the table over and punch them in the fucking face.

We can go Might Is Right here. Justice is not being done and it's clear.

39
Labaladeplata 39 points ago +39 / -0

Since Sullivan has made himself a party to the case, Flynn can sue him. Not a lawyer.

15
FreeSpeechMaster 15 points ago +15 / -0

That shoe will drop after this is ruled on. I want them to go after him, his pension, his license, his family....everything.

8
wytxcook1 8 points ago +8 / -0

His attorney argued that he's "technically" not a "party" even though he's listed as a party and these judges should not consider him a party (which some of the judges agreed with).

It's so corrupt.

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago +2 / -1

Absolute horseshit.

38
Click 38 points ago +38 / -0

This bitch judge is so rude, dismissive, and hostile.

Constantly talking over Sidney Powell and not letting her answer the questions.

WTF

12
Billski 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's like Powell is on trial here, fucking unbelievable.

5
LtColVindmansVagina 5 points ago +7 / -2

She's a judge. It's basically what they do

15
SomePedeOnline 15 points ago +16 / -1

No they don't. I've dealt with many in my line of work. The vast majority are professional. This one is just a cunt.

4
LtColVindmansVagina 4 points ago +4 / -0

You've never met a sanctimonious judge? I guess you've had a very fortunate run. I deal with them all the time, too. There are television shows dedicated to sanctimonious judges

8
Click 8 points ago +8 / -0

No it's not. She didn't allow Sidney Powell to answer the questions, constantly talked over her, and was extremely unprofessional and rude.

Of course, she's an Obama appointee.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Millett

38
Houdini 38 points ago +38 / -0

Why are the female judges so bitchy?

16
skumario 16 points ago +16 / -0

Second nature. It's a liberal trait.

10
tufftoffee 10 points ago +11 / -1

Its a feminine trait

6
jiujiujiu 6 points ago +6 / -0

They grew up watching Judge Judy

38
SYFer 38 points ago +38 / -0

Obama and everyone he appointed are a cancer on the nation. It will take years to repair the damage. Trump’s next few terms won’t be enough.

7
TrumpOrTreason 7 points ago +7 / -0

Decades. It will take decades.. Probably 50 years at least

6
weltbild 6 points ago +6 / -0

it might never recover, liberia got the same constitution

4
KekistanPM 4 points ago +4 / -0

Decades at least. Even if we removed the cancerous leadership from all power, they've infected millions of people with their rhetoric and those people are going to boldly preach the false gospel of Marxism.

36
trescommaclub 36 points ago +36 / -0

Charge: This guy robbed a bank! We have him on video.

Prosecution: We actually found that the guy in the video isn't the defendant, we need to dismiss.

Defendant: I agree

Court: "Well hypothetically, what if the defendant was on the video?"

12
StunLikeAnAntelope 12 points ago +12 / -0

Court: "I order the prosecution to carry a case it says it cannot prove.... at least until after election day."

36
The5thEstate 36 points ago +36 / -0

"Attorney for Judge Emmet Sullivan" 🤡🤡

11
PosterIsDead 11 points ago +11 / -0

Gold.

5
Houdini 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can't even defend himself, pussy.

35
Whoopies_tds 35 points ago +35 / -0

First they spy on you, next they set you up, then they throw you in jail because they don’t like you.

America 2020 -

34
cjcivicx 34 points ago +34 / -0

RAO IS RAKING HER OVER THE COALS IN A LAWERLY FASHION!

BEAUTIFUL!

15
OldHickorysFlintlock 15 points ago +15 / -0

Shill alert. Commie fags downvoting today. Be sure to deport them!!

10
Whoopies_tds 10 points ago +10 / -0

Still voting Trump 2020

3
TrumpOrTreason 3 points ago +3 / -0

Still voting Trump. :)

8
cjcivicx 8 points ago +8 / -0

They could all downvote me and it wouldn’t make a dent in my salt pile!

34
endr 34 points ago +34 / -0

Take your mask off you dumb cunt you're at home.

10
JimmyNelson 10 points ago +10 / -0

But but muh virtue signaling!

33
MAGA_____bitches 33 points ago +33 / -0

If a judge is not legally allowed to prosecute a case.....then a judge cannot continue a case that a prosecutor doesn't want to prosecute.

It's so simple, it's stupid.

11
kag-2020- 11 points ago +11 / -0

They just make the rules up as they go in Clown World.

3
jiujiujiu 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s not forcing the prosecution it’s about whether or not they get to file an amicus brief. I think that just means they have a few pages written by outside lawyers arguing why the prosecution shouldn’t have dropped the case and that goes into official record. Written by Andrew Weissman of course.

32
BoughtByBloomberg2 32 points ago +32 / -0

These arguments are hilarious.

"We do not believe that retaining legal council for several more months is irreparable harm to a person. Just wait for this judge to rule on this case after he literally appointed his own prosecutor. He may still dismiss it. What's wrong with you guys? Don't you just want to let the judge make a decision?"

The court already made a ruling. The ruling to ignore the prosecution dropping the case and to seek it's own case. In other words to become it's own prosecutor.

17
technoraptor 17 points ago +17 / -0

Terrifying political maneuvers from the judiciary.

2
walt 2 points ago +2 / -0

When do we start ignoring their rulings?

32
WiscDeplo 32 points ago +32 / -0

I keep hearing these judges trying to reinterpret the justification of past hearings and judgments with a lot of "what if" hypothetical BS.

Quit wasting time and dismiss !!!!!!

14
N900mixalot 14 points ago +14 / -0

the only "what if" I don't see is, "What if people rely on the panel's decision to insert themselves in every criminal court case?"

6
WiscDeplo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bingo!

4
wytxcook1 4 points ago +4 / -0

"What if we set up a secret court to spy on American citizens? What could possibly go wrong?"

Oh...just your garden variety insurrection, treason and election interference.

7
flashersenpai 7 points ago +7 / -0

It seems like a meme to me, but there can be useful questions of what the limiting principle is for a position.

6
WiscDeplo 6 points ago +6 / -0

But they have argued all these points with Sullivan also, and he did the same damn thing.

32
wytxcook1 32 points ago +32 / -0

There's that Democrat bullshit - "it depends on how you interpret the term "party""

They twist language in such ridiculous amounts.

9
Censorddit 9 points ago +9 / -0

Have to have massive mental gymnastics to wrongfully interpret "shall not be INFRINGED"

9
Harambe 9 points ago +9 / -0

pinning them when they try to do it infuriates them. You cant change words to mean what you want them to just because you're losing the argument.

6
shragae 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Whatever the meaning of "is" is." Bill Clinton.

2
Yippy 2 points ago +2 / -0

He wasn’t given the nic “Slick Willy” on accident. 😉

7
special1nterest 7 points ago +7 / -0

It’s the Billyboy Clinton technique

31
Bullet3250 31 points ago +31 / -0

Pray they don't just re-assign another FAR LEFT DC JUDGE - because they really want the MOCKERY TO CONTINUE... there is no objective Truth left in the DC system...

And the testimony Flynn gave in that other trial - against his business partner - the case where the found the partner guilty... that case was overturned!!! He went free - so all of Fynn's 'Assistance' - was for nothing.

Sullivan should be reprimanded - and significantly.

30
chahn1138 30 points ago +30 / -0

Rao is a Trump Judge. I am liking the difference.

30
DZone 30 points ago +30 / -0

OMG - Hypothetically, what if Attorney General met on the tarmac with the guilty party and after that, the charges were dismissed.... we can now go back and charge? Maybe we should take them at their word....

8
The5thEstate 8 points ago +8 / -0

What if, hypothetically, the Dems are innocent and honest? Hypothetically.

3
Houdini 3 points ago +3 / -0

Haaahahahaaaahahhaaaaaaa, hahahaaaahahahahahaaahahahaaa, hahahaaaahahaaaahahahahaaaa

Funny, hypothetically.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
30
AlphaNathan 30 points ago +30 / -0

My gosh it's like BLM on the bench...

30
JKillen 30 points ago +30 / -0

Flynn should just demand Trial by Combat

9
Dingmann01 9 points ago +9 / -0

They would demand a Trial of Seven

5
Yogroobs 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just seven?

1
JKillen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol

29
Mrsattorney 29 points ago +29 / -0

Rao knows what's going on here. Sullivan plans a complete shitshow that will drag on forever. It's so disingenuous for Wilkinson to act like Sullivan just wants some quickie hearing.

29
cjcivicx 29 points ago +29 / -0

”WE DIDN’T GET OUR WAY WITH THREE, SO WE WANT ALL TEN TO RULE TO GET BETTER ODDS!”

-This is their entire argument.

7
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 7 points ago +8 / -1

We knew it when they requested this hearing. It gave them a panel of corrupt judges. It was suggested immediately.

28
ConsrvspkgNJ 28 points ago +28 / -0

Ms. Powell is absolutely brilliant. A Powell for Ginsburg swap on the SCOTUS would be most appropriate. She is winning a literally 9 on 1 fight.

6
skumario 6 points ago +6 / -0

That slanty eyed hoe Millet is literally hissing at Powell. Fuck you nickel wh0re.

7
Watch_TheKarma_Burn 7 points ago +7 / -0

Powell on the SC.... holy smokes its brilliant.

28
Houdini 28 points ago +28 / -0

Haha, backtracking like a coward, the judge made his animosity and bias towards Flynn clear, now they're playing innocent.

28
TrueAmericanValues 28 points ago +29 / -1

As soon as they questioned Wilkinson on her part in all this - call DROPPED. Hmmmm... I hope another judge brings it up..

27
NuclearRocks1 27 points ago +27 / -0

Bazzinga 💥 justice roberts said what ?? 😂😂 “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said in a statement. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."

"That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for."

6
Mrsattorney 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hahahaha!

7
NostalgicFuturist 7 points ago +7 / -0

Of course, it's like Mattis intervening in politics to say the military shouldn't intervene in politics--because Trump took a walk in the park. Roberts shows his partisan RINO ass by denying judges are partisan. Those who have the most to hide talk the loudest.

2
NuclearRocks1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thinking blackmailed

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, strong possibility.

27
Mrsattorney 27 points ago +27 / -0

Finally someone focuses on the defendant's rights.

6
JimmyNelson 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh, yea, that!

4
isitpedanticenough 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is this Rao?

2
wytxcook1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Judge Millet

3
isitpedanticenough 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see that now. Rao is on now

2
Mrsattorney 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes

5
jackasskicker 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, finally and that lawyer bitch is laughing.

27
sodypop 27 points ago +27 / -0

Another whore that speaks with California street hooker vocal fry. Always watch for it; crazy commie women love signaling their insanity this way.

Imagine thinking any real person will take you seriously when you speak like that. Blasey Ford spoke like that, too.

8
Reizan878 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is sound advice for you unmarried pedes.

6
Pleepleus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Other judges ask questions to clarify. This judge asks questions because its LIKE she doesnt get it, or what's in front of her conflicts with her worldview.

26
Bedminster 26 points ago +26 / -0

Wall layed out clearly that this shit needs to stop now and the judges aren't having it. They're trying to twist themselves into pretzels to keep this going by twisting the Foker case into something it's not.

26
BigFreedomBoner 26 points ago +26 / -0

Our Courts are in enemy hands.

HELICOPTER RIDES FOR COMMUNISTS

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
Fluffy_Indigo 2 points ago +3 / -1

Fuck man, imagine how great this country could be if these corrupt communist fucks weren't in the way fudging everything up at every chance they get.

26
Bellababeala 26 points ago +26 / -0

Sidney’s argument is rock solid. Sullivan has shown bias beyond doubt. How will these swamp judges rule against her....I mean we know they will...but man the Judiciary branch has totally collapsed.

13
nozonozo 13 points ago +13 / -0

The country is in desperate need of Judicial reform.

That branch of government got infected with anti-american liberalism long ago.

John Roberts is a poster child for what is wrong.

7
MEGApede 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not necessarily, they fear Sydney. She has a habit of ruining reputation of activist judges.

25
Fuchtard 25 points ago +25 / -0

The Govt has a motion to dismiss, gives 3 reasons why, and the Judge is supposed to be able say "sorry, tell me the REAL reason"? BS

15
DasBurt 15 points ago +15 / -0

"Hey woman! Just admit Orange Man Bad! Now!"

11
Rainman 11 points ago +11 / -0

These "judges" are unbelievable. I think by and large the attorneys are smarter and better versed than the damned judges which is EXTREMELY scary.

4
AbrahamLincoln 4 points ago +4 / -0

Once you make judge you don't need the laws anymore, you can just rule using your feeeeeels.

6
Siteless_Vagrant 6 points ago +6 / -0

They are now going to have hearings about this hearing, and will continue to have hearings until theres a dem in the white house.

25
Pomilui 25 points ago +25 / -0

IF A TRIAL JUDGE THINKS HE'S BEEN HOODWINKED, THEN PROSECUTE THE PROSECUTORS WHO SWORE THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS TRUE!

9
cjcivicx 9 points ago +9 / -0

This x100000

6
CanadianMeathead 6 points ago +6 / -0

Makes too much sense...

24
cjcivicx 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yeah, the custodial restrictions ARE against his rights to speak, you cunt! Flynn is the lynchpin to bring down the man that appointed you!

Judges need to be incarcerated for bullshit like this.

24
Perhelion 24 points ago +24 / -0

“Yeah, okay sure”

WHAT A CUNT.

Let her finish her answer! They’re taking cues from the Democrats in the house 🙄

11
Cmdrpaul 11 points ago +11 / -0

THESE SWAMP RATS ARE NOT USED TO PEOPLE STANDING UP TO THEIR BS!

4
DasBurt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seriously... These commies have NO BUSINESS being in government.

24
1776ThereIsaidIt 24 points ago +24 / -0 (edited)

Here's Garland's chance to prove that he would be an impartial jurist had he made it to SCOTUS and side for dismissal. But he won't, because he''s an Obama hack.

3
Donald_Farage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Narrator: He didn’t. He brought up a hypothetical situation about The President spending money unappropriated by Congress in an emergency (which is exactly what’s going on right now) despite him going to bat for Obama (I’ve got a pen and a phone, that’s all I need). This man is a hypocrite and a traitor.

24
cjcivicx 24 points ago +27 / -3

So basically their argument is:

”WAAAAAAAAAH! JUDGE SULLIVAN WANTED TO RULE ON THE CASE FOR HEADLINES!!!”

7
dontUseVinegerAsLube 7 points ago +7 / -0

Some commie is downvoting comments hahahahahahah

23
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 23 points ago +23 / -0

These judges have crossed the line. They represent politics, not justice.

23
The5thEstate 23 points ago +23 / -0

Did Wilkinson just try to argue against a 9-0 SCOTUS decision?

10
mivvan 10 points ago +10 / -0

He is a total disaster. An Obama judge who was on the first 2-1 panel. He was against Flynn and wrote a dissent against Flynn so he is probably is the most invested in the "destroy Flynn" position out of this whole group

22
The5thEstate 22 points ago +22 / -0

"He'll follow the Court's order" Is she on drugs? Sullivan clearly DOESN'T follow the higher Court's orders.

22
JetJocky 22 points ago +22 / -0

Sullivan has disqualified himself by becoming a party to the case. Remove Judge Sullivan and drop the charges against Gen Flynn. THIS IS NOT THAT DIFFICULT.

7
endr 7 points ago +7 / -0

You're forgetting, these people are STUPID.

3
JetJocky 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn't forget, lol.

22
cjcivicx 22 points ago +22 / -0

Flynn has to retain counsel, which is FURTHER BANKRUPTING HIM! THAT OS IRREPARABLE HARM YOU CUMT WILKINSON!

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
22
N900mixalot 22 points ago +22 / -0

Diversity hire judge's "story" relies on material evidence showing criminal behavior. There's none of that in Flynn's case.

10
philasoma 10 points ago +11 / -1

So true. Powell's response was good IMO. Even w/ that evidence the judge still needs to dismiss the case and refer for prosecution.

It was a horrid hypothetical.

7
N900mixalot 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's embarrassing. You can really tell who knows their stuff and sadly this guy is out of his league.

22
donald_zuramp 22 points ago +22 / -0

Is this real? Garland is dragging the CORONAVIRUS RELIEF EO into this?????

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
Sumarongi 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup. He’s a fucking Karen

4
Mrsattorney 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trying to get Wall to flesh out the legal legwork for him, lol.

21
Timecop1776 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is a preview of state run healthcare

5
KekistanPM 5 points ago +5 / -0

And mail-in ballots

21
Pomilui 21 points ago +21 / -0

"Let's assume." No, let's follow the law.

21
Pleepleus 21 points ago +21 / -0

Not a vested party but judge invoked rule 35 which is for vested parties.... common man

2
Perhelion 2 points ago +2 / -0

God Bless Judge Henderson for that one lol

21
N7fury 21 points ago +21 / -0

Deny the motion and require Flynn to retain counsel force an appeal and continue bankrupting the man. This is criminal folks and an example of how scary things are right now

12
Whoopies_tds 12 points ago +12 / -0

This should scare the shit out of everyone seeing how the judicial system is corrupted and can bring HEAVY BIAS to a case they want to have a certain outcome

21
jackasskicker 21 points ago +21 / -0

Most of the female judges are fucking rude...

4
chahn1138 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, our women are something else!

8
orc_lives_matter 8 points ago +8 / -0

Female privilege. Act like that your whole life as a male; you're gonna get beat up eventually.

5
jackasskicker 5 points ago +5 / -0

So true, it wouldn't take long either. The beating would be right around the corner.

Most of the leftist madness we see these days is cause there is no bullying in schools IMHO.

5
IncredibleMrE1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Never give a Karen power.

21
Cmdrpaul 21 points ago +21 / -0

BRACE YOURSELF: Commie Judge Millett coming

9
JeffEpstein 9 points ago +9 / -0

She is a nasty cunt rag. So very disrespectful. Won't let Powell say any more than "yes" or "no" as she tries to set retard-level traps for Powell to step into. Powell easily steps over the traps and this millet cunt-fuck freaks out.

I think we need to give her a nice hefty dose of Sharia law. Smack her across the face until she shuts her wicked mouth up. SPEAK NOT, YE BEAST OF A WHORE!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
20
Bedminster 20 points ago +20 / -0

OMG!!!!! FUCKING HYPOTHETICAL!!!! How about this, hypothetically speaking if a judge's name was on the flight log for pedo island would we allowed to prosecute it?

20
Error404LifeNotFound 20 points ago +20 / -0

whenever you hear "I just want a quick yes or no", you know they're not really interested in hearing the answer.....

19
ConsrvspkgNJ 19 points ago +19 / -0

Wow...Wilkins came back for a second ass whooping....foolish man.

19
Fuchtard 19 points ago +19 / -0

Pillard, another Obama appointee. Married to the legal director of the ACLU. I'm sure she will be a consummate professional, completely impartial.

3
Salt-N-Pepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pillock

19
DasBurt 19 points ago +19 / -0

This is just as bad as the ridiculous Bullshit AG Barr had to put up with. They just want to stretch this out until next year. Every one of the commies should be in Gitmo.

13
Siteless_Vagrant 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yep. Wilkins already said he wants to hold a hearing on some other bullshit. Every single appointment. law, decision, EO, and everything else Obama did needs to be reviewed. Until the review is done these judges should not be on the bench.

2
DasBurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

agreed.

19
Whoopies_tds 19 points ago +19 / -0

Didn’t Judge Sullivan already accuse Flynn of being a traitor?

4
Long_time_lurker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. In open court, most likely due to some nonsense reported by Madcow the night before that hearing.

3
Monzie 3 points ago +3 / -0

This would seem to implicate him with bias toward Flynn, which makes all of this worse.

2
upvote 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

That's why he keeps this farce going. He should just apologize for the comment and dismiss the case, but he has to dirty up Flynn as much as he can. A dismissal is a tacit admission that he was wrong in his characterization of Flynn as a traitor.

19
endr 19 points ago +19 / -0

Judicial branch was just notified to not fuck around, executive branch has even more evidence/reasoning supporting their case.

19
Whoopies_tds 19 points ago +19 / -0

Wilkinson - General Flynn is a criminal defendant

Me: What law did he break that led to this case/investigation being opened?

6
Siteless_Vagrant 6 points ago +6 / -0

He probably meant it hypothetically.

9
Forgototherpassword 9 points ago +9 / -0

He pissed off Barry Soetero

4
The5thEstate 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hurt my Feelings Act

18
Pomilui 18 points ago +18 / -0

The district court hasn't ruled and doesn't have the authority to probe the meaning

The harm is already in progress

6
Mrsattorney 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is completely beyond her intellectual grasp.

6
DasBurt 6 points ago +6 / -0

"just let us stretch this out a few more months, because Orange Man Bad!"

18
MrBlack 18 points ago +18 / -0

So she's essentially saying "if there were no rules except the ones we want"

These people want to make their own system, totally biased against conservatives.

18
BOBON0101 18 points ago +18 / -0

SHE'S A TRUMP APPOINTEE .. HOPE SHE GOES HARD ON BITCH BETH

8
BluPhant 8 points ago +8 / -0

you said hard on

18
trescommaclub 18 points ago +18 / -0

Let her answer the fucking question holy shit

18
PhantomShield72 18 points ago +18 / -0

What a fucking clown with his bullshit "hypothetical"...

8
Siteless_Vagrant 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wilkins is an Obama appointee that apparently thinks laws are "hypothetical".

5
Restore_Sanity 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s because Wilkins is a hypothetical appellate court justice.

18
nomac 18 points ago +18 / -0

#FLYNNDICATION

18
CatLivesMatter 18 points ago +19 / -1

They keep misstating Sydeys premise she is bringing to the court. Either they are A corrupt, or B incompetent.

Its A.

8
GreenHat 8 points ago +8 / -0

Why not both?

7
Houdini 7 points ago +7 / -0

A & B

18
Monzie 18 points ago +18 / -0

This is all about obfuscation. Make it sound like there's some hidden boogeyman to go after.

18
Reizan878 18 points ago +18 / -0

This fucking cunt judge. "Im aSKiNg a YeS oR No QuEsTiOn!!!"

9
Oback_Barama 9 points ago +9 / -0

A bowl is how you make cookies? YES or NO!?!?

You can't ask a question that requires clarification and then shout about how you will only take a yes or no for an answer.

3
Maxberg 3 points ago +3 / -0

I want you to answer my question the way I want you to!!!

2
richIsBored 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nes or yo? NES OR YO!!!

4
skumario 4 points ago +4 / -0

She is a CUNT.

18
stepping_razor123 18 points ago +18 / -0

things seem to be turning south for the pedos! Judge Sullivan's prosecutor is not doing well. This lunacy may (hopefully) end for Flynn soon.

3
Whoopies_tds 3 points ago +3 / -0

Keep America Great and ethical

17
MisterKag 17 points ago +17 / -0

Hey boys and girls.

Keep in mind in an appellate argument, each party gets peppered with questions critical to their position.

Flynn is up now. The USA and Judge Asshat will follow.

It’s the same thing that went down at the earlier panel argument.

Don’t read too much into it just on one party.

4
Houdini 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you MisterKag.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

good reminder

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
17
chipitin 17 points ago +17 / -0

If we don’t win the senate and White House we will get even more of these judges. That’s what’s at risk

17
starboard 17 points ago +17 / -0

This is like listening to the President’s impeachment in the Senate. Bunch of Democrat morons going up against the likes of Jay, Patrick, Pam and the rest of White House council.

6
NuclearRocks1 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s the evil Hive mind.

17
Whoopies_tds 17 points ago +17 / -0

Take those hypotheticals and shove them up your ass Ms. Wilkinson

17
upvote 17 points ago +17 / -0

Judges don’t want to give up their power by following the DOJs motion to dismiss.

13
MrBlack 13 points ago +13 / -0

Obama's Marxist Shadow government

7
upvote 7 points ago +7 / -0

Imagine how much worse it would be if he had filled all the vacancies before he left office.

4
Reizan878 4 points ago +4 / -0

But it was HER turn. ReEEEE

1
1776ThereIsaidIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

When it comes to the presidency of the United States, it is no one's turn. You step up and you win it even if some other cocksmoker thinks they are first in line.

2
Reizan878 2 points ago +2 / -0

sorry, I dropped my /s. You can have it :)

1
1776ThereIsaidIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, I knew what you meant. The "reeeee" gave it away.

2
Reizan878 2 points ago +2 / -0

had to be sure!!! Lol

3
MrBlack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank God they were so full of hubris he thought he'd just leave some spots for Hilldawg to inject her own cancerous tumors of allies.

4
Restore_Sanity 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jackals. This is why we need POTUS to appoint more non partisan judges and a Republican Congress to stop abdicating the Legislative Branch’s responsibility by allowing these judges to remain on the bench.

17
No_Malarkey_Joe 17 points ago +17 / -0

"I DON'T WANT THE ACTUAL ANSWER! I JUST WANT MY NARRATIVE!"

What a child

17
Whoopies_tds 17 points ago +17 / -0

Wilkinson (via Lawfare): We want to harass and prosecute an innocent man because we don’t like him or Trump.

17
Faraday27 17 points ago +17 / -0

Powell: "There is no precedent for denying it"

17
cjcivicx 17 points ago +17 / -0

Lol! She’s just tried to tell judge Rao “Shut up bitch! You can’t stop us!”

17
cjcivicx 17 points ago +19 / -2

They’ll rule against Sullivan. He’s wasted the courts time with this bullshit.

10
GingerMinky 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yes, because that's the fucking law. Otherwise, all of our procedures are now open to anyone deciding they can do anything because it's political. There will be no rules. They should never have granted this hearing.

4
MrBlack 4 points ago +4 / -0

The new law they've written for themselves is "orange man bad"

2
NuclearRocks1 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a historic day

5
BasedMedicalDoctor 5 points ago +5 / -0

I pray you’re right. What lead you to the conclusion that they’ll rule against Sullivan?

3
cjcivicx 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wilkinson’s entire argument is “we didn’t like the first ruling, so we figured we’d hedge our bets with ten instead of 3.

8
TrumpOrTreason 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fingers crossed. I hope the judges have been paying attention to President Trump and not the media.

6
MrBlack 6 points ago +6 / -0

The judges are the swamp.

2
The5thEstate 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

The thing is, the Appeals Court had conditioned this hearing on two questions:

  1. Sullivan's scope of action

  2. Flynn's verdict.

It could end up with Sullivan being reprimanded, and Flynn getting sentenced.

17
chahn1138 17 points ago +17 / -0

Oh no! But Sullivan IS a Vested Party!

GO GO GO!

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
MrBlack 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just as much as I could imagine a Hillary presidency, not one bit.

16
ldanwill [S] 16 points ago +17 / -1

Merrick Garland the salty cuck sounds like he's on a video stream from his house

16
Whoopies_tds 16 points ago +16 / -0

Someone call 911, Powell just murdered Wilkinson

16
turdinthepunch 16 points ago +16 / -0

All these rioters that are having friendly leftist AGs drop their charges should have to go through the process of a judge deciding that he wants to prosecute them anyway.

3
brainwash 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seriously, who needs a prosecutor to prosecute someone. Let's just let the judge do both.

In fact, let's make this even more streamlined: why even have juries anymore? After all, we shouldn't leave these important decisions in the hands of the plebes. These great legal scholars and arbiters of truth can do it all. /s

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
3
Lurkmoar347 3 points ago +3 / -0

He knows where Obama buried the bodies so to speak.

16
Bedminster 16 points ago +16 / -0

These "judges" know this is an easy dismissal for Flynn but they don't want to dismiss it. It's obvious they don't want to let this go.

9
StabbingRobotRoberto 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, this is a chance for them to "HONK, HONK, HONK" their clown horns in front of a large audience, no way are they going to pass this up.

4
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 4 points ago +4 / -0

Flynn is their biggest nightmare. They want a pardon. They know if they dismiss he can go straight to work for Trump Admin

16
cjcivicx 16 points ago +16 / -0

SIDNEY WITH THE FUCKING DEATHBLOW!

SPECTACULAR ARGUMENT!

16
aangler100 16 points ago +16 / -0

This Judge is reading someone else's question.

16
JetJocky 16 points ago +16 / -0

HAHA even the phone company can't take it any more. They dropped the line.

7
Cadastral 7 points ago +7 / -0

The deep state realized she was messing up their case.

16
Bedminster 16 points ago +16 / -0 (edited)

These "judges" HATE when you invoke the Constitution. It's like Holy water in there face.

5
GodEmporerTrump 5 points ago +6 / -1

I like it when Holly shoots water in my face tbh

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
13
GingerMinky 13 points ago +13 / -0

"This court made him a party"

I said the same thing! Oh shit!

6
stepping_razor123 6 points ago +6 / -0

can you explain the relevance? Not a lawyer very interested.

5
Perhelion 5 points ago +5 / -0

There isn’t much legal precedent reflecting where a Judge becomes a party to a matter because the Judge disagreed with a ruling from the Court of Appeals.

There is ZERO legal precedent reflecting where a Judge outright refuses to grant the Government’s Motion to Dismiss.

2
stepping_razor123 2 points ago +2 / -0

thank you!!!! This is wild.

4
GingerMinky 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are parties in a suit or criminal action. The entity pressing the charge, why? Cause they have an interest in the outcome. The defendant, because they have an interest, and a victim, who has an interest. Who isn't? Anyone that is there to allow each "party" to represent their own interest.

The Judge was made a party when he was granted this en banc. Because the rules that apply are, only parties can petition the court. That's why a victim can't prosecute in a criminal court, because the proper party is the state or federal government. The judge became an invested party once he petitioned that he had power over the executive branch.

the lawyer pointed out, to the judge that SHE (THEY) in fact made the Judge a party by even granting this fucking kangaroo show. Which, they should have known, they do. But she was pointing it out and did so in an "OH SHIT" way.

3
QANON__17 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know what that means.

OH SHIT

2
45forever 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thx for the laugh!

7
GingerMinky 7 points ago +7 / -0

A judge is not a party, ever. And by petitioning the court AND being granted, he is now a party. How can a judge be a party to an action and ALSO be neutral? They can't, because they have an interest. And that attorney just told that fucking judge, them allowing the hearing made the judge a party. She basically said you're an idiot.

16
cjcivicx 16 points ago +16 / -0

Jesus tapdancing Christ! This judge just said that she would keep an INNOCENT person behind bars!

They all need to hang!

16
StarBuds 16 points ago +16 / -0

This Millet bitch is a catty biased judge and it shows in her tone and interruptions.

3
JeffEpstein 3 points ago +3 / -0

She is a nasty raging cuntrag, what a disgusting excuse for a human being.

Her parents clearly never taught her any manners.

2
skumario 2 points ago +2 / -0

CCP implant.

16
The5thEstate 16 points ago +16 / -0 (edited)

"We don't need to meet-up in person, we'll just use ZOOM or something."

Truly a 🤡 timeline.

16
JetJocky 16 points ago +16 / -0

Let Judge Sullivan speak for himself. Get him in there and make him mumble his way through this. The fact that he has a lawyer makes him a party to the case and thereby disqualifies him.

2
N7fury 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was thinking the same thing. How ridiculous is it that this corrupt judge has legal representation. We are very close to being ruled by communists

2
The5thEstate 2 points ago +2 / -0

Per the ever-stunning Robart Barnes (representing the Covington boys v. MSM), judge Sullivan is very dependent on his clerks. So much so, that one can assume with high confidence that Sullivan's judgements are his clerks' judgements.

16
stepping_razor123 16 points ago +16 / -0

Is the lady talking right now Judge Sullivan's lawyer? Because this judge seems to be losing patience with her.

11
wytxcook1 11 points ago +11 / -0

Wilkinson is the judges lawyer, yes. Judge Millet is edging on calling this out for obvious hatchet job this is.

7
JeffEpstein 7 points ago +7 / -0

millet is a filthy cunt rag. Her last name should not be capitalized - there is nothing important about her.

She is despicable and a disgrace to this country.

2
NuclearRocks1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think many do not deserve to be addressed with capitals

8
Whoopies_tds 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes, Wilkinson is Sullivan’s prosecutor

6
TrudopesEyebrow 6 points ago +6 / -0

And her judicial abuse is being paid for by the American tax payer 🤡

4
stepping_razor123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you for all the responses. The little I have heard the judges don't seem super horned up to continue this on despite acting like retards earlier. Could be wrong, not a lawyer.

6
Trumper007 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes and the Judge is an Obama appointee

5
jackasskicker 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes.

16
special1nterest 16 points ago +16 / -0

Sullivan doesn’t have an interest?! FFS she’s having a laugh

6
The5thEstate 6 points ago +6 / -0

This hearing is half-kangaroo court against Flynn.

16
jackasskicker 16 points ago +16 / -0

She pissed off Judge Henderson...

5
cjcivicx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep. She’s boloing this hardcore.

8
Mrsattorney 8 points ago +8 / -0

"I agree, he's not a party..." lmao

16
Whoopies_tds 16 points ago +16 / -0

Was that the fat lady just singing?

16
ravonaf 16 points ago +16 / -0

Powell is my hero. She really belongs on the SC.

7
special1nterest 7 points ago +7 / -0

No director of the FBI - let her clean house

16
Mrsattorney 16 points ago +16 / -0

Flynn is paying for counsel you bitch. His life is held in abeyance, under a cloud of suspicion.

16
The5thEstate 16 points ago +16 / -0

Sidney is on FIRE!! Go get them!

6
special1nterest 6 points ago +6 / -0

I love this woman. No homo

16
NotTheTendies 16 points ago +16 / -0

INTERNAL ERROR NPC CANNOT COMPUTE

16
Donald_Farage 16 points ago +16 / -0

They keep insinuating hypotheticals about defendants bribing DOJ to dismiss charges. They keep suggesting that proposing missing Brady evidence could just be some ruse by a paid off Prosecutor. Are they forgetting that it’s been PROVEN that the government hid massive amounts of exonerating Brady evidence from Flynn’s team? This is such a charade. It’s so easy to tell which judges are patriots and which are power hungry tyrants.

2
SamQuentin1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why would you bribe the DOJ the hide exculpatory evidence? If it’s exculpatory then you don’t need to take such risk to rig the process...

15
JacketlessJimJordan 15 points ago +15 / -0

All of Sullivan's moves have been dictated to him through Kalorama HQ. Name a former president who decided to set up shop and make his home in Washington, DC post-presidency. The only reason I can think that someone might do that is to preside over a Shadow Administration. Perhaps to try to cover up nefarious deeds?

4
MrBlack 4 points ago +4 / -0

^ The country is lost until Obama is locked up, and his appointments thrown out of government.

4
DasBurt 4 points ago +4 / -0

I accidentally read "the only reason" as "the only treason".

15
ConsrvspkgNJ 15 points ago +15 / -0

Case Summary so far. Ms. Powell - if the Government and the defendant agree to the terms and prosecution ends, there is no case. DC Court of Appeals - Shut the fuck up, we have to silence Flynn before he takes out our Fellow Travelers and has them imprisoned. Finally there is transparency in Washington the bad news is all that is being exposed is its pure, brutal corruption.

6
Houdini 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sounds accurate.

15
xelphia 15 points ago +15 / -0

There is nothing American about this nonsense...

I don't even know 1/4 of the words they are saying.

I am glad we are trying to win a kangaroo court the "right" way, but what chance does a normal person have in corrupt courts like this?

4
NuclearRocks1 4 points ago +4 / -0

None

15
Trumper007 15 points ago +15 / -0

Thank you Ms Wilkinson - here is your ass in a brown paper bag.

15
Jackiem605 15 points ago +15 / -0

Sydney Powell wiped the floor with them .now we. pray thes obumma appointed judges follow the law

10
AbsurdOpinion 10 points ago +10 / -0

They pushed the decision until AFTER the election - Dec 9th. Somehow they need FOUR MONTHS to look into this despite the answer being blatantly obvious.

6
skumario 6 points ago +7 / -1

Not a chance. This is going to SC where Roberts would do the needful. /s

3
NuclearRocks1 3 points ago +3 / -0

You mean the guy who said this 😂😂😂😂 “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said in a statement. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them." "That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for."

1
skumario 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, same Pedo guy. 😂😂😂

15
TexSolo 15 points ago +15 / -0

Are judges always this combative?

7
4cdarth 7 points ago +7 / -0

Only when its against someone that is a severe threat against Trump's enemies. Normally a judge should be unbiased.

5
GingerMinky 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, she is a bitch.

15
deleted 15 points ago +16 / -1
2
Perhelion 2 points ago +2 / -0

I could hear this too 🤣

15
cjcivicx 15 points ago +15 / -0

HAHAHAHA! Wilkinson is getting shook!

3
GingerMinky 3 points ago +3 / -0

She can't talk.

15
aangler100 15 points ago +16 / -1

After listening to this, I am now inclined to support 100% male only voting.

0
TheMadManDidItAgain 0 points ago +2 / -2

No trans... You gotta be born with a dick and still have it, and not claim to be a broad.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol to be fair judge Rao and attorney Powell are women.

1
SludgeWarehouse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Problem is, great women like them appear to be vastly outnumbered by women who can't get their shit together but still get to partake in and enjoy societal high power rewards over the rest of us plebs.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much :/

15
jackasskicker 15 points ago +15 / -0

That disconnect was intentional.

15
endr 15 points ago +15 / -0

Courts shouldn't be allowed to hold hearings over teleconference.

Case in point.

15
deleted 15 points ago +16 / -1
15
HiImJBags 15 points ago +15 / -0

So, the District Court with the Flynn case is the appropriate place to ask about Presidential spending, with obvious regards to President Trump's executive order?

Ol' McConnell did good blocking this insane judge.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
15
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 15 points ago +15 / -0

Listen to this vapid cunt speak. She sounds like an angry irate Karen.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
5
aangler100 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know, right?

8
Biggie_Smalls 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's quite embarrassing.

While the right love to debate, the left put radicals into position of power and on a daily basis, bastardize the US Constitution.

15
JetJocky 15 points ago +15 / -0

All I can say is Mitch McConnell needs to crank it up and get the final 78 judges he has on the calendar approved. These Obama judges are insufferable with their hypothetical nonsense so they can ignore their own rules and the USSC ruling.

3
The5thEstate 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mitch is part of the reason the neo-cons have taken hold until now. It would be for the best to scrutinize and carefully watch any judge that he confirms.

1
weltbild 1 point ago +1 / -0

I strongly suspect that the GOP goes for pro business judges and pro conservative is really just optional

3
Crlsniper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ya but all the judges are trump picked and there’s already been 200 to 300 already appointed.

2
JetJocky 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is true about Mitch and they need to be carefully scrutinized. We have confirmed 224 judges so far with 78 more to go and Mitch needs to get it done. Any of them will be better than these Obama fools we are listening to.

15
Monzie 15 points ago +15 / -0

Really??? Pushing for dismissal means you don't want things sped up? WTF

3
Bedminster 3 points ago +3 / -0

correct

15
Cmdrpaul 15 points ago +15 / -0

SWAMP v. PATRIOT

15
TrumpOrTreason 15 points ago +15 / -0

OMG, does the judge have standing?! WTF How can any judge have standing. Fuck me.

6
cjcivicx 6 points ago +6 / -0

Judges are in panic mode about their Godlike powers being removed.They want to be able

to remove Americans they disagree with from society by bankrupting them. Then there’s that whole Obama being implicated and Flynn having all the deets.

15
Nadlers_Belt 15 points ago +15 / -0

These asshole judges are really getting hostile and emotional because they don’t have a leg to stand on.

15
poogz 15 points ago +16 / -1

The legal system of our country is a fucking joke. Perhaps the legal systems of all modern countries are also similar. Laws are written in such mind-boggling jargon that they are left open to interpretation and can be used for or against certain parties. The system is so complicated and baffling that an entire profession exists for the sole purpose of even beginning to make an argument in the defense of the rights of citizens. Those who chose to represent themselves are labeled as ridiculous fools. Those who cannot afford to find a competent attorney primarily end up with a much heftier punishment than those who can. What the fuck kind of bull shit system do we have going on? Going to law school is viewed as one of the best paths for one to take in life along with finance and banking. Usury and semantic manipulation for monetary gain are far too well rewarded in our current state. I'm not saying we need to tear it all down because that is simply impossible. There is obviously a requirement for such evils... but we, the people, need to wake up and realize we live in a shitstorm when it comes to the legal system. You got money, you good. No money, you go to jail. Fucking pathetic. When are we going to stop rewarding people for going out of their way to write laws in a manner that is essentially impossible for the normal population to follow? The reason Trump is so likeable is because he speaks in a way that we can understand. He doesn't try to sound smarter than he is because he fucking oozes confidence. Love him or hate him, everybody has this man on their mind. I wish more people could start seeing the benefits of straight talkers who don't flower up conversation with some fancy words or quotes to pretend they are some scholarly gift to the fucking plebs.

15
Clabber 15 points ago +15 / -0

Sickening what they’ve put Flynn and his family through. Enough already. Meanwhile, the Dems who should be locked up frolick through the daisies.

15
upvote 15 points ago +15 / -0

Compare these moron judges to Biden and realize that he, a potential leader of the free world, has 1/4 the intellect of these dipshits. That should scare the fuck out of you.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
1
MsQleo 1 point ago +1 / -0

who also died an hour after being taken off the scene.

15
JetJocky 15 points ago +15 / -0

How about we stick to the FACTS instead of all these fucking HYPOTHETICALS.

15
Choppermagic 15 points ago +15 / -0

There should be thousands protesting this joke

1
Biggie_Smalls 1 point ago +1 / -0

Protesting doesn't work.

15
Houdini 15 points ago +15 / -0

There's no offended party, nobody is bringing a case against Flynn, how are we even here right now?

Unless their conclusion is to destroy Sullivan and set precedent that this never happens again, this is a complete clown show.

3
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 3 points ago +3 / -0

When you allow Marxism to take hold, it invites clown world. We need to make it illegal like Communism.

2
Houdini 2 points ago +2 / -0

100% agree, cultural Marxism runs contrary to our founding principles.

The two cannot coexist.

2
DNC_Ballot_QATeam 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cultural Marxism was designed specifically to destroy countries within. It's a toxic movement to help corrupt governments, destroy cultures and history.

3
fj9041jg8nqheufhqiun 3 points ago +3 / -0

Obama judges lol

15
Siteless_Vagrant 15 points ago +15 / -0

FUCK your hypothetical. What the fuck is this hypothetical bullshit? Fucking Obama appointees got their legal degrees out of a 3rd world cracker box. Key to Judges: https://i.maga.host/zANWYMS.png

1
USvsFlynn 1 point ago +1 / -0

They ask these questions to poke holes in respondents argument. It is meant to put respondent on their heels and defend their arguments.. It happens in most every case.

15
endr 15 points ago +15 / -0

Fairly telling that most of the judges want to spend most of their time on hypotheticals that paint the executive branch in a criminal light.

I wonder what their motives could be.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
NotTheTendies 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't understand how they could even be hearing about Hypotheticals at this point. That should be tossed out.

14
Maxberg 14 points ago +14 / -0

Booom!

Exactly!

Dismiss!

14
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 14 points ago +14 / -0

So glad Garland is not on our Supreme Court!

5
Block_Helen 5 points ago +5 / -0

No kidding. Thank Cocaine Mitch for standing strong on that one.

2
NuclearRocks1 2 points ago +2 / -0

He isn’t asking questions he make political speeches for nancy & the dims 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Sad but true THE FIX IS IN

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

When will Scalia’s murderers see justice?

1
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven't heard from Skippy for a while. Been laying low.

14
Bedminster 14 points ago +14 / -0

Fuck your hypothetical you god damn faggot!! This is about facts..NEXT!

14
Bellababeala 14 points ago +14 / -0

As disgusted as I have been listening to them dealing with Powell and Wall, it’s going to be even more loathsome listening to them play softball with Sullivan next.

3
weltbild 3 points ago +3 / -0

hypothetically what if a judge had betrayed his oath of office and the constitution what would his breakfast be?

14
Whoopies_tds 14 points ago +14 / -0

Hitler would be proud of these judges

5
stepping_razor123 5 points ago +5 / -0

That is an insult to Hitler

PLEASE NOTE I am not a fan of Hitler, just pointing out that even he would be embarassed by this degenerate shit (I think).

1
jiujiujiu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean Hitler did kill Hitler so he has some merits..

14
Fuchtard 14 points ago +14 / -0

That MF Garland is backhanded slamming Trump's executive orders. Keep politics out of IT!!!!

14
chahn1138 14 points ago +14 / -0

Beware....these "Judges" are HIGHLY OFFENSIVE.

Millett....an Obama TURD cannot seem to let Sidney respond properly. She talks over every other answer!

14
Houdini 14 points ago +14 / -0

Oh my gawd guys! What is going on, like why are even here, like Flynn should be sooo in prison, like how is he not!

14
CatLivesMatter 14 points ago +15 / -1

This bitch judge is one hella overtalking PoS. Asks question, talks over response.

2
GreenHat 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Reclaim my time!!!! A Judge actively participating in suppression of speech.

When the truth hurts, the deniers will attempt anything to keep it from being spoken.

0
CatLivesMatter 0 points ago +1 / -1

What a horrible way to question someone in a professional setting in which there are no time limits on the questioning!

14
Sound_ManCO 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is our tax dollars at work. We are paying these dolts to do this.

6
Siteless_Vagrant 6 points ago +6 / -0

We are paying them ALOT.

6
Mrsattorney 6 points ago +6 / -0

We should all be outraged. This is much ado about nothing because everyone knows this case will eventually be dismissed.

14
Mrsattorney 14 points ago +14 / -0

This line of reasoning is scary because any judge could keep a case going by just throwing out unproven allegations. There is overwhelming evidence that exculpatory material was withheld from Flynn. There is no evidence that the current DOJ has done anything wrong other than unproven allegations from the former corrupt prosecutors.

14
Mrsattorney 14 points ago +14 / -0

What is the government worried about??!!! How about unnecessarily depriving a defendant of swift due process you stupid bitch.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
14
charbatch 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm so disgusted by what these judges are doing that I don't know if I can stomach listening to this.

14
No_Malarkey_Joe 14 points ago +14 / -0

These fucking activitist judges

14
WiscDeplo 14 points ago +14 / -0

Emmett Sullivan is just another traitor manipulating the rule of law!

FREE FLYNN NOW!!

14
Mrsattorney 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm a little concerned that there's no serious questions about removing Sullivan from the case, but maybe that's because they want to just confirm the 3-judge panel.

14
DemsFuckKids 14 points ago +14 / -0

i can't listen to these commies any more

4
stepping_razor123 4 points ago +4 / -0

smart move, I am just reading here and it makes my blood boil. Am not even an American...although never know what the future holds...

14
MrBlack 14 points ago +14 / -0

"feels it was lied to"

Your fucking feelings don't matter, evidence and facts do.

14
endr 14 points ago +14 / -0

I DON'T WANT TO HEAR THE ACTUAL ANSWER I WANT A YES OR NO

2
JeffEpstein 2 points ago +2 / -0

"N---" AHA! I THOUGHT SO! "Y--" WHAT DO YOU MEAN I WANT A SIMPLE YES OR NO! "BU--" NOT WHAT I WANTED!

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
14
ravonaf 14 points ago +14 / -0

Well. They pushed it passed the election, which was what they wanted. Every deep state cunt needs to burn. I'm tired of this.

14
bill_in_texas 14 points ago +14 / -0

We'll pick this up December 9.....AFTER THE ELECTION!

The fix is in!

2
itbj2 2 points ago +2 / -0

What fix. There is no fix. This has been ongoing for 2 years now.

0
chuckachookah 0 points ago +1 / -1

Pede means the election fix is in.

14
AbrahamLincoln 14 points ago +14 / -0

Are they going to reach a decision today or can we expect 10 more weeks of total nonsense again?

10
GreenHat 10 points ago +10 / -0

10 weeks of complete and total nonsense.

9
Mrsattorney 9 points ago +9 / -0

They will take time to deliberate. More nonsense. Expect deepstate judges to drag their feet.

14
Dingmann01 14 points ago +14 / -0

you can hear their decision is already predetermined in their voice and questions

3
DasBurt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just like Sullivan's was.

2
NuclearRocks1 2 points ago +2 / -0

THE FIX IS IN very sad

1
Dingmann01 1 point ago +1 / -0

its like they never saw the FBI docs....

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
8
Houdini 8 points ago +8 / -0

Basically so far:

"Hypothetically Flynn is guilty and belong in jail"

One judge, "but what about Flynn's rights?"

answer: ¯_(ツ)_/¯

14
TrueAmericanValues 14 points ago +14 / -0

Haha, they just basically admitted they WILL indeed seek evidence and try to question Barr for corruption on this. Despicable. (While a main part of their argument is that Sullivan has not requested any of this YET)

14
AZTrumpette1776 14 points ago +14 / -0

YouTube has this labeled for kids so no comments. That is bullshit

4
Ct187 4 points ago +4 / -0

Too many redpills have been happening lately. All the MSM outlets have stopped allowing comments to prevent their narrative from being destroyed.

14
Monzie 14 points ago +14 / -0

Excellent questions right now.

13
Perhelion 13 points ago +13 / -0

That’s because Judge Rao is a TRUMP appointment 😁😁😁🇺🇸

14
Bellababeala 14 points ago +14 / -0

Who the hell is this bitch judge talking???????? Talk about unprofessional and totally biased!!!!! This is ridiculous!

4
chahn1138 4 points ago +4 / -0

THIS!

Ask a Question and SHUT THE FUCK UP AND LISTEN!

2
3
Yogroobs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks like a little boy. Probably is.

2
DasBurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like a typical deep state, commie, leftist cunt to me.

14
AlphaNathan 14 points ago +14 / -0

who did this judge blow to get here? she can't even behave in a professional manner AS A DC JUDGE

7
Whoopies_tds 7 points ago +7 / -0

Big Mike

14
Fuchtard 14 points ago +14 / -0

Sullivan -- "Send it back to my court so I can smear Flynn and Barr with absurd hypotheticals". District Appeals court -- "Hold my beer".

14
_Cabal_ 14 points ago +14 / -0

What the fuck is this faggot talking about? LOL

HOW ARE THESE MORONS JUDGES

4
karmalkorn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Obama diversity hires, of course.

14
Cmdrpaul 14 points ago +14 / -0

Atty Powell is doing a great job. This is hard stuff pedes.

14
N900mixalot 14 points ago +14 / -0

Is this judge at the grocery store? Or at the car wash?

4
Mrsattorney 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wind tunnel, or maybe Biden's basement.

2
N900mixalot 2 points ago +2 / -0

under the hair dryer

8
Cmdrpaul 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bingo hall

13
Mrsattorney 13 points ago +13 / -0

Wilkinson is a weasel. She knows Sullivan will expand the scope.

3
skumario 3 points ago +3 / -0

They all suck Big Mike including that commie cunt Obum.

13
jackasskicker 13 points ago +13 / -0

Why don't they just say fuck constitution and be done at this point?

6
Biggie_Smalls 6 points ago +7 / -1

Soon my friend.......very soon

13
Kekintosh2020 13 points ago +13 / -0

All these judges have some autistic hypothetical questions. They're intellectually dishonest.

13
MrBlack 13 points ago +13 / -0

Ignore reality MUH HYPOTHETICAL!

13
justice4kavanagh 13 points ago +13 / -0

garland is a deep state HACK and a marxist

13
careyanne1000 13 points ago +13 / -0

Notice how the hypothetical question was bribery with the prosecution. That’s what they are trying to say Trump is doing with Barr. They are arguing Barr is dropping the case because Flynn is his friend.

13
pjdizzy2020 13 points ago +13 / -0

Biggest lie so far...... "one quick question".

13
Pomilui 13 points ago +13 / -0

NO! MUH HYPOTHECAL I APOLOGIZE! NO! NO! YOU JUST SAID THAT! REEEE!

6
Siteless_Vagrant 6 points ago +6 / -0

If they'd quit dicking around in the imaginary world they've built for themselves we might be able to get some work out 'em.

13
Bedminster 13 points ago +13 / -0

Bottom line is Sullivan assumed the roll of prosecutor and stepped out of roll of a judge. This is a clown show.

13
Houdini 13 points ago +13 / -0

L M A O, 404 intelligence not found.

4
Perhelion 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m dead. Somebody bury meeeee 🤣☠️

13
Pomilui 13 points ago +13 / -0

ERRHRRRDDRR WHY NOT APPEAL AND TAKE ANOTHER 2 YEARS : COMMIE JUDGE

SIDNEY: SEE ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONSTITUTION - PROMPT TERMINATION OF THESE PROCEDINGS INSTEAD OF TRIAL AFTER TRIAL ENDLESSLY

EVERY 48 RULE HAS BEEN DISMISSED IN THIS COUNTRY SO FAR

13
ConsrvspkgNJ 13 points ago +13 / -0

Wow...Wilkins came back for a second ass whooping....foolish man.

13
endr 13 points ago +13 / -0

Oops sorry I hit alt+f4 someone said it would make my computer faster.

3
Radu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just spam F5 and you’ll be reconnected faster!

13
Click 13 points ago +13 / -0

I fucking hate this bitch Millett. Holy shit is she a political hack and a rude piece of shit. Obama appointee btw.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
45semiautosp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pillard is making it tough, isn't she?

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
brainwash 2 points ago +2 / -0

I turn it on, listen for a bit, then turn it off to allow my blood pressure to go down.

Seems like Millett's angle is she's fishing for procedural reasons to support Sullivan. While these other a-holes are going on about god knows what and muddying the waters, she's going after dumb shit like the timing of filings.

We truly live in clown world.

13
JKillen 13 points ago +13 / -0

Oh god I overslept.

Did they hang the conspirators yet?

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
4
JKillen 4 points ago +4 / -0

😂🙏🚁

2
JKillen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have they brought in the 🐐 goat rodeo clowns yet?

13
flashersenpai 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think we just heard a REEEE folks.

13
JetJocky 13 points ago +13 / -0

Garland is trying to equate spending money with trampling all over the rights of Gen Flynn ? What an idiot. No wonder he didn't get a vote for the USSC.

2
MrBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's trying to question Trump's EO's, no clue why he'd be astroturfing that narrative now though.

13
bill_in_texas 13 points ago +13 / -0

These judges have painted the DoJ as dirty the other way now. They were dirty when trying to frame and railroad Flynn, but now when the current DoJ folks are trying to remedy that criminal behavior, now they are dirty, taking suitcases full of cash from Flynn.

Pretty sure this isn't gong well for Flynn.

6
TheNewRepublic 6 points ago +6 / -0

That’s how projection works.

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

too early to say they haven't had their time with all three parties

13
Wood_Shampoo1 13 points ago +13 / -0

FREE GENERAL FLYNN!

13
aangler100 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is a Lawfare Group plot. They are feeding talking points and questions to more than one Judge in real time.

1
mivvan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link?

1
aangler100 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am the source.

1
mivvan 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only way I would imagine this differently is that the lawfare crowd would write their little articles and the Obama judges would use those as the baseline of what to ask.

But yea in this day and age they could look at twitter or whatever to get their questions in real time.

13
cjcivicx 13 points ago +13 / -0

Who was hoodwinked? Sullivan is the corrupt piece of shit that KNOWS THAT THE EVIDENCE was withheld.

Of course he’s “not through with him yet”, you old wicked witch sounded cunt.

Every one of these judges need to be removed for even entertaining this farce.

13
stepping_razor123 13 points ago +13 / -0

he (Sullivan) doesn't have an interest! haha

13
lasTRUMPcard 13 points ago +13 / -0

Judge Rogers is 81 years old. I wouldn't trust her with a drivers license why should she be a federal judge?

13
Perhelion 13 points ago +13 / -0

Adjourned until December 9th. What a way to make sure nothing comes of this until AFTER the election

6
skumario 6 points ago +6 / -0