4019
Comments (277)
sorted by:
347
deleted 347 points ago +351 / -4
111
158
slangin_paint 158 points ago +159 / -1

"It's a way of marginalizing a normal person"

66
Houdini 66 points ago +66 / -0

That's a rather acute observation.

37
Chuck_Nutmeat 37 points ago +37 / -0

Norm's a smart cookie.

24
Impressive-Length 24 points ago +24 / -0

The audiobook of Norm MacDonald's autobiography "Based on a True Story" was so hilarious that listening to it was dangerous. If I was eating or drinking, I would laugh so hard, I could choke to death. If I was doing yardwork, I would laugh so hard that I risked injuring myself with a lawnmower or chainsaw. If I was driving, I would laugh so hard that I might swerve off the road.

27
minotaurbeach 27 points ago +31 / -4

Because crossdressing men doing p0rn and gay p0rn call the guy that takes it from the other men- 'sissy'- they are turning it on straight men, and calling them a 'cissy' to feminize all men into an automatic 'Beta' position, lower then them.

Remember that- 'Cis' is a brainwashing technique. It works by Referring to ALL Straight men as a 'type of woman' that takes it from other men, and publicly insults them to their face- Shaming the victim publicly is an old pedophile cult technique.

18
No_Malarkey_Joe 18 points ago +19 / -1

You're partially right but there is a logic to their linguistic word games that's much more insidious. The terms "cis" and "trans" weren't picked randomly, they're Latin. Cis means "on this side of" and trans means "across." The part about the shaming is spot on though.

-10
minotaurbeach -10 points ago +4 / -14

No, 'Cis' means 'cut' or 'Kill' in Latin.

https://membean.com/wrotds/cis-cut

'Cis means across' is called a conditioning phrase, to shut down conversations.

Like, 'Two legs bad, Four legs good' or

as made up by a man using techniques he learned in Scientology pushing transactivism when he left that cult to be a higher-up part of another cult.

13
Kronder12 13 points ago +15 / -2

You are incorrect about Cis in this context. For example, the Romans would refer to the Cis-Alpine and Trans-Alpine territories, designating those that were on the Italian side of the Alp mountains (cis) and Trans (beyond the mountains).

Like many words in English, some words in Latin sound the same but have different meanings. In this context, cis is meant to be the opposite of trans and does not convey the meaning of cut or kill.

4
No_Malarkey_Joe 4 points ago +7 / -3

I'm not sure where you're getting that I'm looking at my Latin book and using this site http://www.latin-dictionary.net/search/latin/Cis)

Cis/trans are prepositions not verbs they don't even have the verb endings (-are, -ere, -ire) to conjugate them.

[To] cut would be seco/secare and [to] kill is neco/necare. (Those are just some of the words you can use for cut and kill, there are others you can use depending on the context)

-11
minotaurbeach -11 points ago +2 / -13

Decision: a ‘cutting off’ Decisive: ‘of a cutting off’ Homicide: ‘killing of a human’ Fratricide: ‘killing of a brother’ Herbicide: ‘killing of a plant’ Caesar: ‘cut’ from his mother’s womb Concise: ‘thoroughly cut’ Incisive: ‘cut into’

You know dude, 'Latin', not woke -boo boo baby-language. This is why education is important.

... continue reading thread?
2
PepisMaximus 2 points ago +3 / -1

'Cis means across' is called a conditioning phrase, to shut down conversations.

No it isn't.

They stole the jargon from mathematics and chemistry.

as others have pointed out, as a prefix it certainly does mean across.

Not just in latin, but also in modern usage in chemistry with chirality and isomers and mathematics

-1
minotaurbeach -1 points ago +2 / -3

Sorry ZOOMER, Trannys are mentally ill and don't have jobs in chemistry, they just try to didle children in the medical community.

:P

Latin, that English is based on, already has a meaning for these roots that go back to Roman times.

Your brainwashed.

BLAM!

http://www.zaneeducation.com/education/literary-arts/latin-roots-as-prefix-and-suffix.php#C

BL-AM!

https://www.biologyjunction.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Scientifc-rootwords-prefixes-and-suffixes.pdf

... continue reading thread?
22
MAGANatsFan 22 points ago +22 / -0

Automatic Norm upvote

20
Brucesky420 20 points ago +20 / -0

Norm: I got a new neighbor and I see the neighbor and say "hey neighbor what do you do for a living"

The neighbor says "Norm, I'm a professor of logic down at the university of science"

Norm asks "What's that?"

The neighbor says "Norm it's hard for me to explain, it's easier for me to just show you what I do. Norm do you have a dog house?

Norm says "I do"

Neighbor says "Well you must have a dog then"

Norm says "I do! "

Neighbor says "well if you have a dog, you must have a child then"

Norm says "Wow! I do have a child!"

The new neighbor says "well if you have a child, logically I can assume you are married"

Norm replies "You're right, I do have a wife!"

The new neighbor says "well logically then, you must be a straight white male"

Norm: "wow that's amazing"

So the next day Norm is down at the end of the street smoking a cigarette, and sees another one of his neighbors and the neighbor says "norm did you meet the new neighbor"

Norm says "Yea I did"

The neighbor asks what he does for a living

Norm says "He's a professor of logic down at the university of science"

The neighbor asks "what the fuck is that"

Norm says "well it's hard for me to explain, but easier for me to show. Do you have a dog house?"

The neighbor says "no"

Norm says "Well then you must be a faggot"

4
BigBoss1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good one. 😂

1
gnomenclature 1 point ago +1 / -0

Love Steve Merchant.

63
viVbiz-bufmu1-qodmem 63 points ago +63 / -0

While at it, can talk about how 13% of the population can openly and continuously use the n-word. While the usage of the word for the rest of the population, (even those from other countries) at any point during the last 30 years will get you in big trouble?

81
deleted 81 points ago +81 / -0
52
anon2309011 52 points ago +52 / -0

Lets come up with a list of more vile words. I'll go first. Taxes.

45
yellownes 45 points ago +45 / -0

Democrat

42
SemperFree 42 points ago +42 / -0

Communist

12
SexualTyrannosaurus 12 points ago +12 / -0

Slack-jawed

11
squanchingonpao 11 points ago +11 / -0

Bill Clinton is a well known rapist

... continue reading thread?
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
11
S0yboybetacuck 11 points ago +11 / -0

Rhubarb.

15
OrganicVandal 15 points ago +15 / -0

Kamala Harris

8
Seanp12 8 points ago +8 / -0

M.A.P.

6
ObiWanJabroni 6 points ago +7 / -1

Moist

5
drsowells1fan 5 points ago +5 / -0

RINOs

4
FireannDireach 4 points ago +4 / -0

Diversity

18
tholins 18 points ago +18 / -0

The concept that nobody is allowed to use it and if they do, they are automatically on the same level of Hitler is a major, major issue.

14
MSG1000 14 points ago +14 / -0

Same with how cunt has to be censored but not dick.

8
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Never understood why either of those trigger anybody.

14
side_o_beef 14 points ago +14 / -0

Because people are cunts

3
MamaLlama4DJT2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kek

3
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dickless cunt for the win!

2
quietam_uxorem 2 points ago +2 / -0

Except when they use it about Sarah Palin

2
OrangeFruitGood 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that's only considered bad in America. Brits use it casually all the time.

2
MSG1000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh, IIRC spaz is considered a bad word over there but not here. Language is weird.

1
Madroxas 1 point ago +1 / -0

In fact its a term of endearment

6
Liberals_Are_Scum 6 points ago +6 / -0

California

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
MapleBaconWaffles 2 points ago +2 / -0

A few months ago I was wondering why the word was so offensive, so I decided to look up what it means. Turns out it's just a mispronunciation of negro, which itself comes from the Latin word for black.

37
ZacPetkanas 37 points ago +37 / -0

And the "logic" of the black community using the word was to rob the word of its power. Yet the more they use it in their music, other entertainment, and daily lives, the more sensitive they are to it when used by a non-black.

It's almost as if they're feigning outrage

17
unicornpoop 17 points ago +17 / -0

I live in the south, in a majority black city. I've spent more time than I would like around blacks. Blacks in my area don't care about the n word. They throw the word around and white kids in the same social circles say it as well. Only virtue signaling elite whites and half black mulattoes trying to identify with the black community (and this is sad to see because they will in no way ever be accepted) take a pretend "offence" to this overused and meaningless word.

Also, there are 10 times more derogatory words that the black community uses for white people, half whites, and blacks that are participating in white culture (like holding down a job, going to college, getting married, and living in the suburbs).

10
TheThreeSeashells 10 points ago +10 / -0

Also, there are 10 times more derogatory words that the black community uses for white people

I've heard them, too. The difference between us and the Left is that I generally laugh at them. Every day I'm amazed at the lack of humor on the Left. The same group that monopolize most of "entertainment." It's probably why there's no comedy on television worth watching anymore and anything they create is just bad "potty" humor and unfunny "Orange Man Bad" comments. (Also why they can't meme.)

7
drsowells1fan 7 points ago +7 / -0

Or suffering from "black white guilt." Because your parents are educated professionals, you went to an Ivy League school, grew up summering on Martha's Vineyard, and truthfully, the only "oppression" you really feel is jealousy from the underclass of the black community, as stoked up by the white, democrat liberal elite..

1
sagebrushfire 1 point ago +1 / -0

(like holding down a job, going to college, getting married, and living in the suburbs).

Yes, complete sell outs! Who would do any of these things?? What idiots!

1
viVbiz-bufmu1-qodmem 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve never heard of this. Up in New England no white person with any sort of manners uses it.

6
tholins 6 points ago +6 / -0

I believe the outrage is real. They aren’t faking anything. They’ve been programmed to be that way.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

This. And I don't like the word either, and I do criticize its usage.

It's just.. that criticism rings hollow when there are large portions of the population that sling it as a sentence enhancer.

11
Private_D_Jackson 11 points ago +11 / -0

Just leave off the ER, and you good bro.

40
Barbs 40 points ago +40 / -0

Yep, they coined “cis” because otherwise the options were “normal” and “trans,” and they didn’t want trans people to feel like they’re abnormal (good luck with that).

So instead we get slapped with a label we never asked for, just so that “trans” people aren’t reminded of their mental illness.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
12
KekistanPM 12 points ago +12 / -0

And the "master" branch in source code control is now the "primary" branch because "master" is offensive to 0.0001% of the population. Hell, a lot of people are now "omg I didn't realize I should be offended by the word 'master' until now!"

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
sackofwisdom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wonder what is going to happen to male/female electrical plugs...

1
FlimboFlongins 1 point ago +1 / -0

What about the Mr./Mrs. Garrison/ Mr. Slave questions?

The Best Satire, Folks.

4
trogdortheburninator 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait, is this an official change in git? I haven't heard of this yet.

My company started a diversity initiative about six weeks ago. Now we've renamed all our blacklists to "badlists" - racism is solved, everybody!

2
The_Chad_612 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope, not touching it. If github tries to rename the default, I'm renaming it back to master.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
Wtf_socialismreally 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don't even care if you're trans. Try to look the part and you'll probably pass if you actually are trans.

Accept that there are only two genders though, and that gender is not "fluid".

I can hear and accept an argument that you truly believe you're a woman born into a dude's body, but if we follow that line of thinking into gender being something that is completely fluid then it falls apart.

They are more destructive to their own causes than any imagined foe they bring up.

8
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 8 points ago +8 / -0

You're trying to make sense of clownworld - they have no "cause", they are just slinging any crap they can find to destroy society. They are communism's useful idiots.

39
fusreedah 39 points ago +39 / -0

"There are only three genders: male, female, and retarded."

-Milo Yiannopolous

16
Spicy_maymay 16 points ago +16 / -0

Gay is abnormal.

Trans is mentally ill. 41%

2
sackofwisdom 2 points ago +2 / -0

And "retard" shouldn't be banned. Some people are born stupid, get over it.

12
FitOfficial 12 points ago +12 / -0

Came here to say this.

I'm not "cis" because that's not a thing.

3
BlackFlag 3 points ago +4 / -1

"cis" is short for sissy. (letter 'c' substituted to make it less obvious). They attack our sexuality to feel better about their own.

9
Long_time_lurker 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's why those words exist. They want normalcy to sound abonormal.

It's the same reason the word "homophobia" exists. We have a natural survival instinct that makes people feel disgust, not fear, when seeing, e.g. two men kissing. It's been tested and it's about the same as looking at a bucket of maggots or such.

They deliberately conflate this disgust with fear to make it seem like normal men are the ones who are less manly.

It's just more commie deconstruction at work.

8
Zelknite 8 points ago +8 / -0

Facts

8
unicornpoop 8 points ago +8 / -0

Mentally stable and mentally unstable.

7
GoldenEagle1776 7 points ago +7 / -0

Make weirdos shunned again.

3
SadPangolin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Make Sanity Great Again!

4
Ryunnsun 4 points ago +4 / -0

There’s only normal and abnormal.

I don't have much problem with people doing whatever the hell they want behind closed doors, but when someone's gone to the extent of mutilating their genitals, parroting another gender and expecting everyone else to not only pretend that they're that other gender, but treat them like they're some kind of protected class immune from scrutiny and insult? That is the definition of mental illness.

4
Meme_Too 4 points ago +4 / -0

I refuse to use or respond to nonsense words that are unilaterally invented by nutcases

2
HockeyMom4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly.

I am so tired of this nonsense.

2
goodatlife123 2 points ago +2 / -0

And abby normal

2
PartandParcel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bingo!

1
MapleBaconWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I don't identify as cisgendered."

"Cis" is a term they're trying to impose on us. I've never "self-identified" as "cis". I hadn't even heard the word until about 6 or 7 years ago.

But "normal" is kind of vague, so I will accept "non-transgendered", or even "does not suffer from gender dysphoria".

129
stonetears_anus 129 points ago +131 / -2

Shatner is hilarious. He's nearly 90 years old and he spends his days telling people to fuck off on Twitter with more quick wit and insight than someone a quarter of his age.

They're currently calling him 'transphobic' because he asked not to be called CIS.

The same people who want you in jail if you don't play along with their self-imposed labels want to label everyone else with impunity.

Wretched hypocrites, the lot!

33
5000wattsx 33 points ago +33 / -0

If these SJWs had their way you would do more time for misgendering someone than you would for assault with a deadly weapon (assuming the person you’re assaulting is wearing a MAGA hat or can otherwise be identified as a Trump supporter).

9
Carry_Your_Name 9 points ago +10 / -1

I didn't see this coming. Judging by the title I thought it was Charlie Kirk. That's a rising star with a bright future.

13
deleted 13 points ago +15 / -2
10
unicornpoop 10 points ago +10 / -0

Maybe not grifters, but they are not America First. Conservatism is a convenient business for them. They are not patriots willing to lose it all to save this country.

11
TheThreeSeashells 11 points ago +11 / -0

Exactly Ana Navarro, Nicole Wallace and Joe Scarborough once played the part of Conservatives for business reasons, too. Same with Bill Kristol. These are the people you have to watch closely.

5
ChrisSuperDude 5 points ago +5 / -0

Joe Walsh is the one that pissed me off the most because I frequently listened to him in 2016 and after the election and then as soon as he discovered he could make big bucks bashing Trump he made a complete 180 with everything. From now on, the only Joe Walsh I listen to is a kick ass guitar player from Toledo.

2
TheThreeSeashells 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought of him, too. It's actually pathetic that there's a lot more of them that I didn't list. Also, there's not a single one that can justifiably defend nor define their hatred of Trump. Is it that they were just Leftists playing a role all along or is it just something as superficial as being angry that the endless cocktail parties they enjoyed under the do-nothing administrations had come to a crashing halt when a grown-up took over? Probably a combination of both.

4
SendThemBackToCanada 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is a huge difference between Ana Navarro and those people with Ben Shapiro.

3
TheThreeSeashells 3 points ago +3 / -0

You're basing that on what you know now. I remember Navarro playing the role of phony Conservative pretty well when she was working for Bush.

I don't hate Ben Shapiro the way a lot of pedes do, but I also don't completely trust that this isn't a act. He spends an awful lot of time around the Left.

5
ChrisSuperDude 5 points ago +5 / -0

My problem with Ben Shapiro isn't that I think he's doing an act. My problem is that he's too concerned with optics and trying to find acceptance with the left instead of standing his ground. Shapiro is too concerned about being called 'racist' or 'sexist' instead of doing with other right wingers do and say "well I might be a racist but at least I don't fuck children unlike you" or "Calling out black crime statistics isn't racist because it's true." Not that the phrase 'Democrats are the true racists' is incorrect but the problem is Ben, Charlie, Crowder, etc. all just parrot that statement thinking it is going to change minds.

... continue reading thread?
7
Carry_Your_Name 7 points ago +9 / -2

But he's one of the few high profile millennial influencers. Maybe he's not a diamond in the rough, but at least a gem. If you wanna have some faith in the future beyond 2024, then have some faith in him.

8
lifeisahologram 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wait wtf hes nearly 90? I just watched his appearance on Mike Tyson's podcast, he does not seem it at all. Not exaggerating at all, but he doesn't even seem 70. Maybe 65.

6
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's always had a sense of humor. That seems to be a common theme for those who stay young.

2
DebbieinDallas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Best Captain Kirk ever!

107
Lu-Bu 107 points ago +108 / -1

Shatner has been dealing with these goofs and freaks for like 60 years at conventions.

45
thisisanacho 45 points ago +45 / -0

Man's got experience.

19
Sunsetmal 19 points ago +20 / -1

Oh Captain my Captain!

61
Reginacalabria 61 points ago +61 / -0

Shatner is a Based Canadian

16
AlohaSnackbar 16 points ago +17 / -1

Horseshit! He was born in Riverside Iowa.

9
LockNload 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not yet.

5
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Will be, time traveller!

3
CommieCucker 3 points ago +4 / -1

The bartender says, "We don't serve time travelers here!"

A time traveler walks into a bar.

2
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm a time traveller. Every mile that I travel at the rate of one mi/hr takes me an hour : )

1
Reginacalabria 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahahaha

54
Staatssicherheit 54 points ago +55 / -1

Set phasers to BTFO.

36
MrAlwaysRight 36 points ago +38 / -2

It's called bigotry of the oppressed. The "oppressed group" gets to be racist and bigoted towards the "oppressor" because nameless individuals did something one time.

It's one of the most dangerous of the types of bigotry/racism. It's the one that is more likely to lead to genocide or mass murder.

People forget that early Nazi Germany had Hitler say the German people were oppressed by Jewish people and others. His first literature work is his struggle. Usually superiority comes later. You can see it in black supremacist now. They're already advanced Nazi stage.

20
siliconia 20 points ago +20 / -0

Back in the day, neo-nazis and skinheads would go to the same types of places we would. Sometimes we'd beat their ass, defend some poor mexican guy from a gang of them, stop them from taking over a coffee shop or whatever. And sometimes, you get one alone and you have a conversation with them, and ask them why they think what they think.

This is every single story that they would tell me. Some black dude beat them up once, so now they hate all black people. It was always about how they felt oppressed. I see the same thing happening now, except it's every niche group.

1
MrAlwaysRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for your insight. What a good story.

4
BeltBuckle 4 points ago +4 / -0

They didn't forget anything, they never knew. These people have consistently demonstrated that they know nothing about WW2 and why it happened, and that's why they talk this way.

That's why they have the gall to come at a 90year old Jewish man and act like he's the oppressor.

2
DebbieinDallas 2 points ago +3 / -1

He killed the Jews but he was half-Jew himself. Total self-hatred. As a child I never understood why people just didnt stand up and kill evil people to stop the evil. But here we are, in 2020 America, and people are bowing and caving to all the tyranny associated with Covid-19. The first capitulation was when we stopped calling it Wuhan Flu.

1
SWORDofLIBERTY 1 point ago +1 / -0

he was not "half jew" lol. this is based off of soviet (aka bullshit commie) made up reports of ancestry. It has no basis in reality, just a funny story some bolshevik came up with and wanted to spread

1
DebbieinDallas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting. I dont generally verify stuff I learned in school 50-60 years ago before there were teachers unions so your statement made me curious and I wanted to educate myself. Lo and behold, I did not know this but apparently a DNA test was done in 2010 on his grand-nephew and it turns out that Hitler may have indeed had jewish ancestry as well as N African. Here is just one article but there were a bunch of others that I will read when I get a chance. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1305414/Hitler-descended-Jews-Africans-DNA-tests-reveal.html

1
SWORDofLIBERTY 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, ancestry dna tests are a giant load of crock. It's not even really based on good science. They've gathered volunteer data from various gene pools and compile it together as an aggregate. This is the reason you get dipshits saying they're "1/108th native cherokee" or dumb shit like that. Problem with that statement? That data is gathered from long after natives raped another and americans raping natives, giving many natives "our blood" and vice versa. So that dna they have that's "native american" is horseshit, and could just as easily been common blood gathered from intermingling in the past.

This is especially dumb with "jewish dna" since jews spent the greater part of the dark ages marrying into positions of power with the locals and basically getting their genes everywhere, so there is a bunch of mixed European genes in "jewish dna" espcially in ashkenzi jews. That's the problem with bargin bin ancestry nonsense.

The problem with your articles premise in general, stems from testing "relatives". First, there's no actual verification of where this test came from, why this "john doe" relative agreed to this, or that he even exists for that matter, which makes so little sense to trust, you might as well trust the MSM's "anonymous sources" at that point. There's nothing trustworthy about this story,

1
DebbieinDallas 1 point ago +1 / -0

You make some good points but I don’t think you read the article. This John Doe relative as you call him didnt volunteer. Hitler’s grand nephew was followed around for a week until he finally dropped a serviette from whence they could obtain the DNA. Now let me ask you something since you seem so smart. Would my DNA be the same as my brothers if we had the same parents?

1
SWORDofLIBERTY 1 point ago +1 / -0

In theory yes it'd be very similar, but there's always certain things you can inherit that your brother won't. And that still doesn't prove this relative even exists, and not just some made up story of them sleuthing some stranger.

1
DebbieinDallas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will you just read the article? There is a pic of the guy with his name. Resistance is futile.

... continue reading thread?
1
Throwawaycuzmeh 1 point ago +2 / -1

The tyranny of the intolerant minority.

It's why whole stores and restaurants use halal meat when only 5% of their customers are Muslim.

31
LoneStarDangler 31 points ago +31 / -0

And to think that I used to say Picard>Kirk.

6
LordSoth 6 points ago +6 / -0

Me too... me too

3
Brucesky420 3 points ago +3 / -0

don't jump on the train just yet, Captain Kirk has said plenty of dumb liberal shit on twitter too

That being said, he should be praised for calling this bullshit out

1
Tenet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hear hear, he's a fairweather friend only.

1
RockyMin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck Picard. That new Star Trek show of his is "woke" and anti-Trump. Kirk will always be the best Star Trek captain.

1
MapleBaconWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Picard > Kirk

Shatner > Stewart

26
JigglesV 26 points ago +26 / -0

“Someone hit me so I can hit you”

25
Reclaimer69 25 points ago +25 / -0

Shatner just might be Canadas true national treasure.

21
Mexicola1976 21 points ago +21 / -0

Norm Macdonald

10
KekistanPM 10 points ago +10 / -0

I loved his Weekend Updates. Trashing OJ during the entire trial, making jokes that are considered "sexist" and "bigoted" today...they seem even funnier than I remember. Maybe it's because now that kind of humor is mostly censored or met with SJW wrath.

7
TheThreeSeashells 7 points ago +7 / -0

Maybe it's because now that kind of humor is mostly censored or met with SJW wrath.

Conservatism has become the "counter-culture." Leftists have become "the man."

5
Seanp12 5 points ago +5 / -0

Canada might be majority cuck, but the uncucked Canadians are based to unparalleled degrees.

2
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 2 points ago +2 / -0

If only they would concentrate in one province and vote for annexation! This decade, I learned anything is possible.

18
pullofthemoon 18 points ago +18 / -0

"She's dead, Jim."

7
RyanT282 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sulu: Dr. McCoy, did you just assume its gender? Oh myyyyy!

8
pullofthemoon 8 points ago +8 / -0

Star Trek 2020: "Xie's dead, Jim."

17
leakmouth 17 points ago +17 / -0

Oh my! (In Sulu’s voice)

15
NewVoatAccountName 15 points ago +15 / -0

Sulu should spend less time worrying about what he's stuffing up his Poop Deck, and more time worrying about the coming collapse of his entire political identity (gay Democrat city socialite).

17
jughaid 17 points ago +17 / -0

Bones....you're needed at the transporter room for burn victim.

15
Snoozebum 15 points ago +15 / -0

He’s dead, Jim

8
jughaid 8 points ago +8 / -0

I should have known when I saw he was wearing a red shirt.

6
unicornpoop 6 points ago +6 / -0

Goddammit, Jim! I'm not the SS Medical Corps!

15
JohnMcCainsTumors 15 points ago +15 / -0

Why even bother entertaining such a stupid fucking discussion? Ignore these retards.

14
Phillysmackdown 14 points ago +14 / -0

Someone please tell me what cis means. This entire alphabet soup shit got a 50 year old like🤷‍♂️

24
Bogey 24 points ago +24 / -0

A male who identifies as a man or a female who identifies as a woman. It was created by trans activists to label nontransexuals. Almost always used in a belittling or dismissive matter by trans activists.

7
Phillysmackdown 7 points ago +8 / -1

So I imagine I would piss them off if I got a shirt saying im a CIS? Beat them at their own game. Call me whatever but don't call me a Democrat

18
MakeAmericaLegendary 18 points ago +18 / -0

Nah, it's not worth subscribing to their labels.

10
RonaldCrump 10 points ago +10 / -0

Not a good idea. The term is often used to dismiss people's views. If you're CIS, you're subservient to transgender people. Their views will always hold more social currency than yours, 'cause they're "oppressed" and you aren't. These people want to radically alter social norms, and CIS is a weapon which they use to do just that. Wearing a shirt that says "I'm CIS" is effectively the same as wearing a shirt that says, "My opinion doesn't matter".

Don't lend any credibility to their radical, discriminatory agenda. Reject their labels. These kinds of people frequently make up or redefine words to satisfy their agenda. Don't let them get away with that.

6
Phillysmackdown 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thks for the response. I'll just tell um to fuck off and there is only 2 genders and I'll follow it up with 2 honks

7
TheThreeSeashells 7 points ago +7 / -0

The best way to piss them off is not to accept their newspeak.

4
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's fun to keep saying "what?" and then dismiss it with a shrug.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
18
HuggableBear 18 points ago +18 / -0

It's a made up term that the trans community had to pull out of a chemistry textbook because they didn't want to call normal people normal.

Certain molecules exist in certain shapes and that's the only way they exist. Other molecules can exist with portions of their structure rotated into different orientations. They are still the same molecule, but they will interact with other molecules in different ways when combined.

Cis- as a chemical prefix refers to the standard (i.e. normal) orientation for a molecule, as opposed to trans- which refers to an abnormal orientation. So rather than just call themselves something new and leave normal people alone, they decided to call us all cisgender.

It's ridiculous because they didn't take the trans- prefix from chemistry, they just took it from plain old latin, where it means "moving from one place to another". But since there is no latin prefix for something that is just standing still (BIG FUCKING CLUE TO THESE IDIOTS IF THEY HAD TWO BRAIN CELLS TO RUB TOGETHER), they had to go looking in other fields for a word that could be used to describe normal people without using the word normal.

1
StarGirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trans is just LARP. I've never seen anyone go from one biological sex to the other at any scientific level.

1
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Latin for the win: I am normal, therefore, I am!

6
salvecitizen 6 points ago +6 / -0

The ancient Romans referred to Cis-Alpine Gaul and Trans-Alpine Gaul, areas where Gauls lived. cis was this side of the mountains (Northern Italy) and trans was across the mountains (France). 'cis' is just a normal man or woman who identifies as their real biological sex (regardless of being straight or gay).

6
1776-or-1984 6 points ago +7 / -1

Cis is a made up term they use instead of "straight" or normal

1
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judging from the litany of euphemisms they've created for retarded, I'd say they're not done with "transitioning" normal.

2
just-a-pleb 2 points ago +2 / -0

It stands for "Comfortable In Skin" CIS, so you know...a bullshit word for normal.

2
OkieRedPiller 2 points ago +4 / -2

Its that kid in school you called a sissy and didn’t realize then how true it was.

I actually have no fucking idea to be honest.

2
StarGirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cis is a word the left coined to use as a weapon against normal people to make normal people to be bad just for being normal.

10
anthemstander 10 points ago +10 / -0

Remember when he went on SNL and told Trekkies to "get a life." Good times.

1
Spez-Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xmagzq

Kirk: "you're almost 30 - have you ever kissed a girl before??"

BEST SNL SKIT EVER!!!

9
TGNX 9 points ago +9 / -0

Kirk's ph is rising.

8
Magastein143 8 points ago +9 / -1

I dont know WTF cis means and I refuse to look it up

9
VinlandThistle 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's commie speak for "normal".

7
Berticus 7 points ago +7 / -0

He should have just said “mental illness” instead of “issues”, because that’s what it is.

No one is “dehumanizing” you. You are human, but you have a mental illness and need to seek help.

7
Industry4 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)

Oh man. It's worth checking out his twitter feed. Lots of libtards crying... He's gone to battle before with these fools. Love Captain Kirk!

5
RyanT282 5 points ago +5 / -0

I remember back in the 90s, Howard Stern (back when he was good) interviewed William Shatner, and Howard was about to start talking to him about being open and anything goes with relationships and women. Stern said, "Bill, you've always been sort of liberal when it comes to..." and Shatner interrupted him and said, "Liberal? I'm not a liberal. I'm a Republican."

5
FutureFreemason 5 points ago +5 / -0

can't wait until the non retarded celebs start speaking out constantly

5
Paul_Revere 5 points ago +5 / -0

When the invented terms "cis," "non-binary" and "trans" appear in a paragraph, I know immediately that there's no point in reading the rest.

5
Wagalar 5 points ago +5 / -0

For real though, we should 100% be dehumanizing trans people until they stop being trans people

5
Jsmitty112 5 points ago +5 / -0

He took a Shatner on her face!

5
BananaWalrusWafer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anyone else reading Bill Shatner's words and hearing it in his voice?

4
S0yboybetacuck 4 points ago +4 / -0

Set phasers to kill.

4
TrumpCard1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mental hospitals need a huge comeback.

4
RealRobag 4 points ago +4 / -0

william shatner: one of the very last kind people from hollywood

1
PaigeAshley 1 point ago +1 / -0

So true!

4
Gold-Eyed-Cat 4 points ago +4 / -0

My Mom LOVES this man. I can see why!

 

Also, we've been watching his new show Unexplained together. He's got an adorable Jack Palance "Believe it, or not." thing going on. He MAKES the show.

2
PaigeAshley 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm 25 and I sincerely LOVE Bill also. 😁 Awesome dude.

4
Jenhbrooklyn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Newspeak, ++Good! These Orwellian retards are digging their own graves.

4
Rxking 4 points ago +4 / -0

If there is one thing the left is good at it’s blaming someone else for their own problems

4
RPchill1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh no! What will George Takei think about this??

3
Shalomtoyou 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably attack the guy who was his meal ticket.

Same way Danielle Radcliffe attacked J.K. Rowling.

4
Bookhockey 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm glad he isn't standing for their shit.

3
Tophat9000 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

Look seriously.. is the left ready to abandon Darwinism?...because Darwinism is based in the premise that a mutation that give a reproductive advantage is what gets passed on genetically

In other words..

Darwinist in a nutshell is:

BREEDER Absolutely WIN...

Non breeders Absolutely lose

Yet transexualisem give no reproduction advantage yet it seems to be spreading

So the left must renounce Darwin theory of Evolution as not inclusive and wrong

1
SadPangolin 1 point ago +1 / -0

It gives a reproduction advantage to those who convince their competitors to cut off their dicks or, if female, destroy their fertility and dress like men.

1
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good point! And instead of cutting off functioning parts, they should be trying to breed functioning hermaphrodites.

3
Snoozebum 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m not trying to determine what words you use

I’m trying to expose you for the ridiculous preposterous incompetent fraud that you are

3
Truglow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Set phasers to kill.

3
bastosmichael 3 points ago +3 / -0

Captain Kirk just red pilled, you know it's when the Trekkies who literally promote a communist utopia tell you that you've gone to far.

1
MapleBaconWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some like to imagine it was communist, but private property abounded.

3
Triptrop702 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m not sure what’s going on here, but usually if I hear someone use the term “Cis” I start to tune them out

3
Bax101 3 points ago +3 / -0

That needs to be the new hashtag for these wimps. #growup

3
Bigpoppatrump420 3 points ago +3 / -0

Human and Mutant

1
dirtysanchez69 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Human and illegal alien.

3
SpecialOfficerDoofy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Non binary doesn't exist, you are one or the other. If you cut off your dick, you are still a male, if you remove your breasts you are still female or a fat dude who once had moobs. I can respect trans people who TRY to present as the other sex, fuck the others that say 'yeah I'm a chick my pronouns are whatever' and they are sporting a fucking beard and just cross dress. Those fuckers are making no effort to present themselves as a female so they deserve none of the respect.

2
DicerningSword 2 points ago +2 / -0

Part inquestition part Crusade part something New...The Left is awakening something primal, the Western Mans long buried survival instinct. The Enemy we face offers no quarter no refuge where we can exist unmolested, Therefore no quarter will be offered in return..

2
Shayhawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have no clue what the person he is replying to is even talking about.

All I hear is "blah blah retard blah blah mental illness blah blah"

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BasedStatue 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck trans. They belong in a padded cell.

2
Fimbulwinter 2 points ago +2 / -0

None of the idiots on the left ever learned the old adage of: two wrong don't make a right.

They are seemingly incapable of understanding this on the simplest of levels.

2
Tenspot20 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bitch got "Kirked" by the Captain!

2
Salt-N-Pepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Front Holes

The final frontier

2
patslimmy1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I still don't know what the fuck these words are and what they mean. Not going to put the time in to find out either.

1
freeperjim 1 point ago +1 / -0

I had to google "cis"...

A normal person who identifies with their biological sex - i.e. born with "XY-chromosomes" and identifies as a male.

I'm proud to be a "cis" - just a normal male without a mental disorder as compared to all trannies who deny the reality of their God given biological sex/gender from womb-to-tomb and never can be changed.

It's not rocket science...

2
TheThreeSeashells 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm glad Shatner understood the post he replied to. Personally, I have no I idea what that thing was going on about.

2
freeperjim 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leftism is truly a violent and severe mental disorder that embraces satan (aka "allah") and truly cannot grasp the reality of History101, Science101, Human Biology101, etc...

2
SemperFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lunatics belong in the Looney bin. We should have never accepted any of this behavior.

2
metokur 2 points ago +2 / -0

These people are just attention whores. Being gay isn't edgy anymore so now you have people saying their non-binary or asexual or some other retarded shit.

1
CJBarnacle 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's all faggotry to me.

2
Les_Deplorables 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shatner panties.

2
Afeazo 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lot of these people put the blame on society and others for their problems, but most of their problems come from within. I think that we currently have a very large mental illness problem in this country (and globally) but instead of treating it like the mental illness it is, we are supporting and almost encouraging it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
jc99ta 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only people I dehumanize are communists

2
PodunkTexas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like a bunch of "Cissies" with their panties in a wad... Thanks to William Shatner for calling it out.

2
Weslowski456 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dont know where the word “cis” came from but it feels like oppression to me

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
GrimmJack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Live long enough and all the people who called themselves Liberals in the 70's, 80's, and 90's will be on your side against Progressive/Marxists.

5
basedtexapede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not only that, but also many of us who called ourselves conservatives in the 90s, woke up one day to find that it is actually we who are among the liberals.

2
shinmeiryustyle 2 points ago +3 / -1

The only good non pozzed captain left, as far as I can tell (jury is out on Archer, I guess).

In the end, Kirk really was the best captain of the Enterprise.

2
KekistanPM 2 points ago +2 / -0

All the leftists be like "wtf I hate Captain Kirk now"

2
Linespaced 2 points ago +2 / -0

I got a headache just reading that Cis screed.. mental midgets, all of them.

2
OrangeFruitGood 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see Shatner is still laying the smackdown on lizard people after 50 years!

2
lunchboxx10 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hes sick of their shit

2
blurgirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

My brain is focused on severing God, earning money to support my daughter and contributing to society. I can't keep up with all this left-ist bs lingo. Good for you to keep track of what this means. Cis, xe, non-binary and all the other alphabet letters, oh my.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sane and insane

1
disgruntled_patriot 1 point ago +2 / -1

Cuckistanada doesn't deserve His Shatnerness

1
CJBarnacle 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't reason with the mentally ill.

1
coffee_grdr 1 point ago +1 / -0

very well put, captain kirk!

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I'm "cis" then you can be a "faggot".

1
ConditionalFeels 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the response to this...because there is none.

1
H_Guderian 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Normal" is not a condition.

They want to make you doubt normality and slide themselves in with all the answers to make sense of the nonsense they invented.

1
Walther 1 point ago +1 / -0

WTF is Cis?

1
DarkMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Their" word for men and women who aren't crazy and identify as what they were born as. AKA biological sex as its been for all of history until now.

Cisgender is a bullshit term they throw around to make themselves feel better and more unique when they identify as their 60+ "genders".

1
IlxTheGreat 1 point ago +1 / -0

God forbid people have to become adults.

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +1 / -0

My Man the Shat Man!

1
MLGS 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish I could summon up 1/1000th of the unbelievably smug self assuredness that transgender people on the internet pull off effortlessly.

1
Akula 1 point ago +1 / -0

To hell with all these ridiculous labels. I am not cis anything. I'm simply a man, male. If you want to call yourself a "trans", sure knock your self out. Just don't label me or try to force me to call you "trans". Thanks - Akula!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
NotoriousCIC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually you leftist fruitcakes, you clowns do not get to tell us what we can do or what we can say. We are not your Gender Studies professor or your DNC politician. You mean absolutely nothing to us and we will not be forced to adhere to your retarded wow vocab or cater to your fragile feelings.

1
QuatroCincoMD 1 point ago +1 / -0

He could have signed that one Denny Crane

1
PaigeAshley 1 point ago +1 / -0

Original Kirk is my Captain <3 love Bill so much.

1
PotentialWizard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck the trans nazis.

1
daflyboys 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're not interesting in parental guidance..... because they don't really know what it is/means.

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

We don't give a fuck what trannies call us.

The opposite is not true, as evidenced by the amount of reeeeeeing my first statement triggered.

1
StarGirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

So people who agree with their biological gender will always be their biological gender, but retarded trans people magically change?

1
Crash_the_Dash 1 point ago +1 / -0

So 99.98% should change how we speak, think, etc to accommodate the emotions of the .01%

1
TheLoCoRaven 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can read those words yet have no idea what any of it means.

1
MAGAnum_PI 1 point ago +1 / -0

Watch out for Tribbely Puffs

1
TenScoops 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kirk rules, Sulu is a cunt

1
PTear 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s my captain! 🖖

0
cjcivicx 0 points ago +0 / -0

Shatter/Woods podcast?

Yes please!

-4
DarkMemeDuck -4 points ago +7 / -11

I still like Shatner, and I think he's right about this, but damn, the way he treated Red Letter Media showed just how much of a raging idiot he is.

They went so far as to make a video about how they aren't trying to pick a fight with him, and how they greatly respect him. He sees 2 stills of it as well as a couple seconds of their other videos, then writes a long winded article about how they are Disney shills, and bullies that are sending their fans after him. Which if anyone has followed their work, you'd know that's exactly the kind of people they lampoon on a regular basis.

The whole thing could have been cleared up if Shat would just spend the time to watch one of their videos, but he's too pig-headed to do that, and too self-important not to keep his mouth shut about things he doesn't have a clue about.

5
DarkMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0 (edited)

Don't know why you're getting downvotted, you're right. I watched that video.

I think people forget most actors aren't very bright, they're just good at memorization (some) and pretending. Shatner is right this time, but he's wrong a lot of other time on his twitter rants. Though to his credit, he isn't as pandering as Takai is.

2
DarkMemeDuck 2 points ago +3 / -1

I figured I would be downvoted, mostly because these posts are echo chambers. No one in here actually has any idea how bat shit insane the Shat really is, because they only see these random screenshots of tweets that they agree with.

Sometimes our community is just as lazy at sourcing the information they are being fed as Reddit is. I'll probably get downvoted for this, too.

1
DarkMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. We need to be spot on with sourcing what we post/meme or we're no better than occupy democrats.

2
WhistleblowerMyAss 2 points ago +2 / -0

It hurt my soul to see Mike disappointed in Shatner. I can only imagine how stoked Mike was when he envisioned a Macaulay Culkin-esque collaboration with Shatner, only to have the possibility destroyed by an asinine misunderstanding. You can tell Mike blames himself.

0
DarkMemeDuck 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah, at the end of the day, Mike is the one who loses the most.

1
Bogey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shatner is 90 and doesn't like spending time parsing minutae. He's pretty stubborn too.

The Boomer Fight video laid it all out well. They didn't really do anything to Shatner but Shatner got that impression and won't drop it.

Everyone needs to listen to Mike and just drop it.

0
DarkMemeDuck 0 points ago +1 / -1

The sad part is I don't think they ever would have tried a collaboration. I don't think it would be as great as everyone says anyway. Their collaborations are usually pretty lame in relation to their normal stuff.

1
Bogey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every collaboration they have tends to follow the same formula of relaxing and watching a film as they drink beers. It works with Culkin because he's a young guy who enjoys hanging out and partying. That won't work with Shatner. Shatner tends to like doing his own thing and he would just be annoyed by watching a bad film.

I have no doubt they'd ever have him on except for maybe a small passing skit as there's nothing they could really do with him. But again, that's not what Shatner does.

I can't think of any of the mains they could really have on that would help except maybe Brent Spiner.