425
Comments (30)
sorted by:
26
jgardner 26 points ago +26 / -0

We killed 6 million Jews.

We also started a world war.

And we starved our 50 million of our own people.

See how absurd it is?

Presidrnt Trump has put tens of thousands of pedophiles in prison. That's a lot of commies! I can see why Chomsky is scared

22
junkbot123 22 points ago +22 / -0

The pedophiles are scared.

10
BasedMedicalDoctor 10 points ago +10 / -0

Chomsky is a pedophile. That’s why he’s scared. As jgardner eloquently stated.

20
weltbild 20 points ago +20 / -0

Noams Chomskys lifework is a giant lie by omission

8
knightofday 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fact

15
JimRaynor 15 points ago +15 / -0

Pedophiles are so worried I wonder why

15
Somniac 15 points ago +15 / -0

Compare a Republican President to Hitler, you say? My, how original...

13
bubble_bursts 13 points ago +13 / -0

Chomsky embodies the academia asleep at the wheel that let the toddlers take over and hold the society hostage.

11
pillainp 11 points ago +11 / -0

I beg to differ.

Academia has the pedal to the metal and is desperately pushing for Socialism.

The last time Communism gained the upper hand, teachers were the first to be purged.

Stalin, Lenin and most recently Pol Pot.

Would that the teachers had learned from history rather than teaching a perverted version of it.

3
bubble_bursts 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am assuming you mean to say that pushing for socialism instead of communism is somehow them "doing their job" ?

8
MikeVicksAstrologist 8 points ago +8 / -0

Noam Chomsky is a joke. Some sort of demi human. Pond scum if you will. I respect his opinion as much as I respect the dirt of the bottom of my shoe. Their opinions hold equal weight.

5
operator1214 5 points ago +5 / -0

Political acumen was never his strong suit (because it was just about becoming a leading light on the cocktail speaker circuit)...should have stuck with being the boring linguistics teacher. At least he wouldn't have become such a whore perhaps.

5
Baryonic 5 points ago +5 / -0

This after the left basically tried to destroy Chomsky for signing that Harpers letter about censorship and cancel culture. He is a hack and a liar. These people are evil.

4
harrison_bergeron 4 points ago +4 / -0

Chomsky has lost it completely. He has nothing to say about the CCP carrying out an actual holocaust against Uyghurs as we speak. If Trump is not re-elected, the CCP will gain control of the United States.

4
SharpCookie 4 points ago +4 / -0

Noam made some sense to me back when the powers that be were the Bush mafia and our shadow govt was actually running the world. But now that a man is in office who is actually fixing our major problems, Noam takes the mask off fully to expose that he's a commie.

I realize he's likely always been this, just saying it was harder to tell back when his grievances were more in line and reasonable-seeming with true evil being in office.

1
koditxu 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s such an astute political analyst, he thinks GW Bush and Trump are the same! Actually, a lot my old friends who were all very liberty minded and anti Bush back in the day, have the same problem. They can’t see how Trump is any different from any other GOP Rino, and thus they have become leftists.

2
Smurfection 2 points ago +2 / -0

Noam Chomsky denied, downplayed and excused the Khmer Rouge's genocide in Cambodia. Noam Chomsky to this day, has never apologized for his defense of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge. Under Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge regime, some people were killed for being western educated doctors, suspected of hoarding food and most insensibly for wearing eyeglasses. Yes, Pol Pot thought he could end bad eyesight by simply killing everyone who had bad eyesight to their bad eyesight genes wouldn't continue in the population. Noam Chomsky defended that. He thought it was a good thing. I don't give a flip what Noam Chomsky thinks about anything.

2
BillyBobBarseau 2 points ago +2 / -0

This from the asswipe who supported Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge. Long history of being a scumbag.

2
bagabond 2 points ago +2 / -0

What the hell happened to Chomsky? He now looks totally like the kind of person that would say all the kind of crack pot shit he’s been saying for decades. This dude must be rich as hell. Can’t someone clean him up a bit? He’s not even presentable! BTW he probably called Bill Clinton “Hitler” at some point. Chomsky doesn’t have much of a sense of what might call proportionality.

2
Jaqen 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's always looked like he just awoke from a 3 month hibernation and went straight to the lecture, barely getting dressed let alone brushing his teeth or combing his hair.

It is just how academics roll. Their minds are in the clouds.

1
weldgod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man, he looks like shit all of the sudden. Looks like his supply of 'crome is low.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
koyima 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crazy moron that has offered nothing... Talks about trump , president of the lowest unemployment in noam's kyife

1
jiujiujiu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol! This fucking commie

1
SickPuppy 1 point ago +1 / -0

The House pussies refused to defund them.

1
PartandParcel 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Orange man bad”

1
fdagasfd 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can compare Trump to, say, Hitler, the Wannsee declaration in 1942, called for killing all the Jews, tens of millions of Slavs, not destroying humanized society.

What could this delusional hack possibly be referring to? Trump has advocated for "destroying humanized society"? What, by enforcing America's laws and actually acting against the criminal secession?

Desperate AF.

1
Hayride 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump even got 91 year old Chomsky to decloak. That's impressive.

0
Sporkninja 0 points ago +1 / -1

How?!

0
Gobberwarts 0 points ago +1 / -1

Also Noam Chomsky: I don't see this one quoted much in the MSM..

No less insidious is the cry for 'revolution,' at a time when not even the germs of new institutions exist, let alone the moral and political consciousness that could lead to a basic modification of social life. If there will be a 'revolution' in America today, it will no doubt be a move towards some variety of fascism. We must guard against the kind of revolutionary rhetoric that would have had Karl Marx burn down the British Museum because it was merely part of a repressive society. It would be criminal to overlook the serious flaws and inadequacies in our institutions, or to fail to utilize the substantial degree of freedom that most of us enjoy, within the framework of these flawed institutions, to modify them or even replace them by a better social order. One who pays some attention to history will not be surprised if those who cry most loudly that we must smash and destroy are later found among the administrators of some new system of repression.