2309
Comments (175)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
69
Tantalus 69 points ago +69 / -0

Also, definitely works for that document, thought maybe it was trolling but dug that specific one up myself and verified!

14
spanglevision 14 points ago +14 / -0

what's the file name of that document?

29
spanglevision 29 points ago +29 / -0

gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.143.0.pdf

verified this video myself. interesting that they would attempt to redact via a digital redaction method and not protect the information. by choice or by accident? the truth is out there.

6
thepurge2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

Confirmed on my end too.

2
Tipster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Another confirmation here. What an oversight, if that's what it was, haha.