1568
Comments (87)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
Awesome 4 points ago +5 / -1

Stop shilling with a strawman argument. Who said the focus is exclusive? Why can't multiple things be looked into at the same time if there is a possible chance of this being a pedophile ring? Can you conclusively say that is not the case? Where did you get your magical investigatory powers from?

-8
fablong -8 points ago +2 / -10

What you idiots are doing is called forum sliding. It's shifting focus and attention away from important issues to an idiotic wild-goose chase based, literally, on nothing more than a website selling a few items for the wrong price.

If you can't see for yourself how that is a MASSIVE distraction and utter waste of time, I can't help you.

4
Awesome 4 points ago +5 / -1

Thankfully you are not responsible for investigating crimes, otherwise no cases or criminals would ever get uncovered through investigative work. This is a battle on multiple fronts to bring justice and freedom back to the world, I really hope you are just stubborn and not a shill.

-7
fablong -7 points ago +3 / -10

Yeah, good luck, Mr. Internet Detective. I'm sure your sleuthing will be invaluable in bringing down all the evil home goods vendors out there. Maybe you should check out Lowes next.

3
Awesome 3 points ago +4 / -1

Lol yeah. Good thing no investigations could ever be accomplished on the internet. Better tell the Chans to pack it up because none of their work was real!