Comments (87)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Awesome 4 points ago +5 / -1

Stop shilling with a strawman argument. Who said the focus is exclusive? Why can't multiple things be looked into at the same time if there is a possible chance of this being a pedophile ring? Can you conclusively say that is not the case? Where did you get your magical investigatory powers from?

fablong -8 points ago +2 / -10

What you idiots are doing is called forum sliding. It's shifting focus and attention away from important issues to an idiotic wild-goose chase based, literally, on nothing more than a website selling a few items for the wrong price.

If you can't see for yourself how that is a MASSIVE distraction and utter waste of time, I can't help you.

Awesome 4 points ago +5 / -1

Thankfully you are not responsible for investigating crimes, otherwise no cases or criminals would ever get uncovered through investigative work. This is a battle on multiple fronts to bring justice and freedom back to the world, I really hope you are just stubborn and not a shill.

fablong -7 points ago +3 / -10

Yeah, good luck, Mr. Internet Detective. I'm sure your sleuthing will be invaluable in bringing down all the evil home goods vendors out there. Maybe you should check out Lowes next.

Awesome 3 points ago +4 / -1

Lol yeah. Good thing no investigations could ever be accomplished on the internet. Better tell the Chans to pack it up because none of their work was real!