1568
Comments (87)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
fablong 2 points ago +17 / -15

Searching for the SKU #s don't bring up images of children. FAKE NEWS.

13
Awesome 13 points ago +13 / -0 (edited)

Here's what I gathered so far.

I searched the SKUs on Yandex as that was supposed to be the site. Nothing.

Then it was said that you had to start search with a certain string, which searched mostly a certain site that has weird kids pics on it. Just searching that prefix string alone will also bring up weird kids pics on Yandex.

So it is unclear if you have to enter the SKU directly on that weird source site. I didn't want to dig further beyond that.

Here's another post with links further tying Wayfair to the cabal as well. I haven't vetted info so judge for yourself.

https://thedonald.win/p/GIc4FKcb/evidence-that-ghislaine-maxwell-/

-16
fablong -16 points ago +4 / -20

So In other words, if you go to a site that hosts kiddie porn and enter a random string of numbers, you get more kiddie porn?

What does this have to do with Wayfair exactly?

5
Awesome 5 points ago +6 / -1

I haven't dug deep enough, but it could be that those SKUs link to exact images. Wayfair is a platform for many sellers, like Amazon, so someone could be using it as a neutral location for their catalog without being traced by hosting it themselves.

-7
fablong -7 points ago +3 / -10

But you can't just make an anonymous vendor account on any of these platforms. You need a business address, contact phone number, tax ID number, verified bank account, etc.

On the other hand, you can host a website almost completely anonymously from a server in your basement. So the idea of using Wayfair or Amazon makes absolutely no sense.

1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +9 / -8

Yeah, they do. You search for them on specific sites, not just anywhere.

2
MsQleo 2 points ago +6 / -4

Link?

-3
VoterIDMatters -3 points ago +8 / -11

I’m not going to link that kind of shit, shill. Google it yourself

-1
MsQleo -1 points ago +2 / -3

Shill? You’re funny

-8
fablong -8 points ago +6 / -14

Proof?

-5
VoterIDMatters -5 points ago +9 / -14

Do your own research, faggot. There have been a hundred posts and I’m not going to try to help prove to you that there are well-known sites that you type in the sku and find sexually suggestive pics of children. It was all over Twitter and this site yesterday. Don’t deny it just because you don’t know.

-6
fablong -6 points ago +8 / -14

So .... no proof then? You can't post a single example? Gotcha. Real convincing.