3034
Comments (366)
sorted by:
237
213
AlphaNathan 213 points ago +214 / -1

I admit. I am human. I fault. I occasionally doubt President Trump.

This man will NEVER stop fighting for us. God bless you, Mr. Trump.

100
de9ebkmd7 100 points ago +101 / -1

Well said. We have been losing a lot lately but Trump is relentless. He never stops fighting.

74
DonttrustChina 74 points ago +75 / -1 (edited)

They're overplaying their hand. They WANT to provoke an overreaction from Trump and then scream tyrant.

40
BonerDonor 40 points ago +41 / -1

The trouble is that sitting back too long is also detrimental. Sure, we all get what's going on but the average person might just see chaos and think Trump is unwilling or incapable of stopping it

33
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 33 points ago +34 / -1

THIS. If he were to start arresting ANTIFA now, the media would scream "FaScIsT!!"....but they call him that anyway and he hasn't done anything about the mobs. No matter what he does, he's not getting their approval...about half the country would be grateful if he did.

29
DickTick 29 points ago +30 / -1

It's starting to seem as though we have a ton of people around here that don't pay any attention at all whatsoever...

There have been numerous great articles about how Barr and Trump banded together over a half-dozen federal agencies that each have their own task forces and do not need permission to go into any city or state and start arresting people if federal crimes have been committed..... and that's exactly what they have been doing. We are well over a hundred felony charges on different individuals so far and that number is growing daily...

just because people choose to ignore what's going on, or not do research into it themselves, doesn't actually mean it's not going on anyway...... That's not Trump's problem or his fault...

He did that specifically so he wouldn't be at the mercy of governors as far as the national guard goes and so the media wouldn't be able to say he used armed military against "protesters"

14
Chickendoodles 14 points ago +15 / -1

For real, A girl right by where I live in philly was just charged with federal arson charges, 80 years.

... continue reading thread?
9
ghubbz36 9 points ago +10 / -1
5
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 5 points ago +5 / -0

How many antifa members have been charged federally in the riots? A handful? It seems like they are quick to lock up proud boys or cops who kill joggers, but where are the Antifa arrests on a FEDERAL level? There are the lawyers who threw the Molotov cocktail and that's all I can even remember. I come here everyday and shit like that would be posted. The DAs are letting Antifa be bailed out with nothing being done to them. That's the VAST majority that I see.

... continue reading thread?
3
slimcoat 3 points ago +3 / -0

We are well over a hundred felony charges on different individuals so far and that number is growing daily...

Source?

... continue reading thread?
1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks upvote. Most here only read post. No research at all.

1
Yeti2 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is true, arrests are happening.

7
sun_wolf 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don’t know if it’s true that he has done “nothing” about the mobs. Unless the corporate media is refusing to show them, the riots... seem to have stopped, haven’t they? Compared to that first weekend? Certainly I haven’t seen the same level of destruction that we initially saw. It actually feels a lot like ISIS, where they just kind of... disappeared. No big news. No big fanfare. Just gradually everyone stopped talking about them and they were kind of forgotten. But does that just happen on its own, or is that President Trump quietly taking care of business behind the scenes?

6
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 6 points ago +6 / -0

Things have died down but that's expected with the natural progression of time. But Antifa still has that area of Seattle taken over and Barr is talking about MuH BoOgAlO boys. Like wtf? Antifa should be a terrorist organization (idk if he went through with it or not) and every time they show up and start trouble should be a FEDERAL offense, they should be hogtied and taken away and serve YEARS in federal prison. The DAs are on the hook for Soros. It's time to make Antifa wonder if spending 5 years without their cell phone and being somebodys butt buddy is worth it.

... continue reading thread?
4
WeShldBeAble2OwnRPGs 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was in downtown Philly last weekend and didn't see a single protestor, no damage, etc. Might not have been in the right spot bc I wasn't in the ghetto, but did not personally witness anything

... continue reading thread?
3
doug2 3 points ago +3 / -0

ISIS was no mystery disappearance Trump talked about it the whole way and it was all Trump.

3
ProudWhiteMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have been arresting antifa, however the judicial system has been releasing them as quick s they are arrested. Remember that fact because we are playing by the rules, they arent.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone gets released. They are bonding out as most people do eventually. They are still being charged. You can read the jail dockets on line do some research for ducks sake.

2
6-_-j 2 points ago +2 / -0

His actions are not designed to get approval from the left for being fair and measured, they are designed to provide demonstrative evidence that he is fair and measured.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes and that will be what is remembered when elite are accountable.

10
DickTick 10 points ago +10 / -0

You would have to be absolutely blind to think he's just sitting back.....

Just because he's finally starting to get a grasp on some federal agencies, that don't leak like Obama's administration, doesn't mean there isn't a shitload going on behind the scenes...

6
MAGA_From_Heaven 6 points ago +6 / -0

The October Surprise will be juicy, Junior. REAL Juicy.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Well you aren't the guy at the wheel. If trump is waiting there is a tacticL reason. I love the back seat drivers

1
BonerDonor 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's a smart dude for sure, but in the end we're all human and we're all prone to misjudge a situation now and then.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
GrayGhost 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're about to provoke an overreaction from the American People, who cannot be impeached.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well the left does that already only they use mask.

21
Bloodylouver 21 points ago +21 / -0

No he doesn’t, that’s one of the many reasons I Lvoe him.

1
ColoradoTrumper45 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what winning against the left looks and sounds like.

The louder and more honest about what they want, the harder they lose. November is going to be GLORIOUS!

23
EPic 23 points ago +23 / -0

Trump will drag every last American, kicking and screaming if he has to, to make sure they MAGA.

2
sagebrushfire 2 points ago +2 / -0

At this point I’m ready to wrap up half of this country with a pretty, red bow and dump them in Venezuela with a sign: “Fresh communists, comes with all the shit for brains you need to be good members of the proletariat.”

1
EPic 1 point ago +1 / -0

There really need to be some kind of government program to give people money to travel to some shithole countries so they can appreciate America more.

23
humped2424 23 points ago +24 / -1

We don’t deserve trump even if I die tomorrow I know trump has fought for us

6
idindudat 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't lose faith in him, but I've lost faith in the people around him.

2
coup13 2 points ago +2 / -0

He won't stop fighting for America and the dream the founding fathers had.

He's fighting for ever patriot who loves this country

2
aussie_maga 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some people here try to sugarcoat everything as Trump is playing 8D chess etc. These recent rulings are a loss. He knows it, we know it.

Although we joke about it, Trump is not a super genius expecting every move. His one best personality attribute (normally a bad one) is that he is a sore loser.

This means he won't stop till he wins. He only loses when his voters give up on him.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what, we have been mostly losing for 50 years. Why fix the second before the election? Too may people k on what is at stake now. Want it fixed, make sure he is reelected. We have won so much h so far and we only lose if we be one faint hearted. We are stronger than that. Also, I still have all my guns so we will be fine.

40
deleted 40 points ago +41 / -1
18
Art-Vandelay41 18 points ago +18 / -0

No, don’t give me hope

19
deleted 19 points ago +20 / -1
14
The_Litehaus_Abides 14 points ago +14 / -0 (edited)

I know Fitton lurks here because he loved the_donald on reddit. I wish he would just bite the damn bullet, come out and start posting here.

I'll bet the mods already have his username on hold for him.

3
IcculusBased9 3 points ago +3 / -0

Again?

11
EPic 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fitton would be on the court for like half a century at the very least.

3
JackLemon 3 points ago +7 / -4

lol. I love Tom, but he's totally unqualified. The man isn't even a lawyer. Remember just like with the administration, POTUS doesn't actually choose who will be confirmed, the Turtle and the Turtle alone does. If the Turtle says no, then that's the end of it. He wouldn't even consider Fitton for a nanosecond.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
1
JackLemon 1 point ago +4 / -3

Without adding a sarcasm tag it's Impossible to tell given some of the whacko proposals that have been posted here. Just look at the many who were serious about Flynn being nominated as FBI Director.

2
kesquare2 2 points ago +3 / -1

We've had our disagreements in the past, but you are on point with this.

There are MANY that think Fitton should be a SCOTUS judge or AG and that Flynn should be FBI Director.

Its like picking senior class superlatives to too many on here.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a general of his accomplishments, especially his intel background can not run the fbi then he should not have been a general. His main job would be to purge it. He is a perfect fit for that.

0
JackLemon 0 points ago +1 / -1

I disagree. He has zero experience in law enforcement. None. Being a General has nothing to do with it and is no more qualifying for being FBI Director than would putting a doctor or engineer in that role. Besides, there is no way the Turtle would even consider it. It might give him a good laugh though.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
iminurbas3 -2 points ago +2 / -4

He's not a lawyer let alone a judge...

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
1
BakeRatDotWin 1 point ago +2 / -1

being a judge, or even a lawyer, is not a requirement for SCOTUS

3
Wanderlust 3 points ago +4 / -1

Wouldn't want any filthy common sense Patriots filling a Royal position like that.

1
malthrax 1 point ago +1 / -0

there are too damned many lawyers in D.C. as it is.

208
Harambe 208 points ago +209 / -1

Let's just clone Justice Thomas

109
thedogsofdoom 109 points ago +109 / -0

I consider Thomas to be the greatest justice in our history. Won’t stop the left from calling me racist.

53
SwampMonsterJesus 53 points ago +54 / -1

John Jay, Scalia, John Marshall, and Thomas are the best justices in history, imo.

32
DoctorWhoDat 32 points ago +32 / -0

Supreme Court all star bench

15
SwampMonsterJesus 15 points ago +15 / -0

If we could just clone all of them to be on the court, I'd be so fucking happy.

40
NeilNewsNetwork 40 points ago +40 / -0

Between Scalia and Thomas, think of all the good they have done, and how much worse America would be without them.

Scalia is gone, but I wake up grateful every day that we still have Thomas. He is one of the greatest impediments to the tyranny of the left.

28
Sumarongi 28 points ago +28 / -0

Scalia. First justice to die of Covid

11
NeilNewsNetwork 11 points ago +11 / -0

F

10
womp-womp-twice 10 points ago +10 / -0

F

6
iminurbas3 6 points ago +7 / -1

F

7
rooftoptendie 7 points ago +8 / -1

first justice to die of arkansacide.

8
BakeRatDotWin 8 points ago +8 / -0

what? just because he was found dead with a pillow over his head and the medical examiner phoned in the "natural causes" ruling without seeing the body and then the body was cremated against the family's wishes? c'mon...

5
ngratz 5 points ago +5 / -0

How can they decide to do that against a family’s wishes?

6
PeabodyJFranklin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, first off, you just do it.

Then you say "oops", and apologize for the miscommunication.

1
BakeRatDotWin 1 point ago +1 / -0

they are the Deep State. they can do whatever they want. only one man can stand against them.

2
covfefe-time 2 points ago +2 / -0

And who lead the charge to try to destroy him, and is now being held up as some gatekeeper of the black man?

Some things never change.

3
NeilNewsNetwork 3 points ago +3 / -0

hey Fat! You're not Black if youre a Republican SCOTUS

14
JackLemon 14 points ago +15 / -1

He is without any doubt. Thomas has never let us down. He is by far the most conservative Justice ever and a true constitutional originalist. Gorsuch has already failed and I am not sold on Kavanaugh.

4
Snake 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you support Justice Thomas you ain't black

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
37
FuckPlebbit 37 points ago +37 / -0

And find a way to clone Scalia so we can get the scathing opinions again.

Thomas is more right wing but Scalia was far more brutal.

19
Ebbie8708 19 points ago +19 / -0

Thomas is the right choice. In this SJWs political mob climate, watching heads literally explode that Trump picked a black man to be on the seat for at least 30 years would be worth it.

7
scorpio_2049 7 points ago +7 / -0

But we can’t like a black justice. We’re rayciss.

4
womp-womp-twice 4 points ago +4 / -0

worst rayciss eva. wypipo!!

9
meteorknife 9 points ago +9 / -0

Is Scalia's son as conservative as he was?

4
Imitate214 4 points ago +4 / -0

Which one? I know of a Father Scalia who is a priest in the Diocese of Arlington.

3
zestanor 3 points ago +3 / -0

His family is staunchly religious-conservative

2
BadManOrange 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Dude had 9 children, 5 of which were boys. Eugene is Trump's Secretary of Labor. Another is a lawyer. Another is a priest. There's one that is a career military man (garrison commander of Fort Benning) and the fifth is apparently a writer. All four girls are just listed as having families.

Very devout Catholic family. Odds are short of a rebellious child, very conservative across the board.

6
Toughsky_Shitsky 6 points ago +7 / -1

This is the answer.

1
richIsBored 1 point ago +1 / -0

That works. We can say he's already been approved.

131
PinkoPatrol 131 points ago +132 / -1

He knows something...

104
high_iq_big_pepe 104 points ago +107 / -3

Ginsburg has been dead for a long time.

81
SwampMonsterJesus 81 points ago +83 / -2

Yeah, she hasn't updated her OnlyFans in awhile.

45
Wheredidiputit 45 points ago +45 / -0

lol gross ha ha

14
SwampMonsterJesus 14 points ago +14 / -0

Still better than Hillary Clintonm's one.

9
Sumarongi 9 points ago +9 / -0

🤢

8
SwampMonsterJesus 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just wait for Ilhan Omar's. It's just beheading videos.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
... continue reading thread?
1
spezisapedo 1 point ago +1 / -0

i cant buy a new smith and wesson because of her hole.

6
empathise 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not my proudest fap...

3
SwampMonsterJesus 3 points ago +3 / -0

You know, I try to make funny comments and the Ginsberg OnlyFans joke is one of my favorites. But somehow, you just made me puke. I can blame the beer I was drinking, but it was all you.

3
Redditcanblowme 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was about to eat my lunch.

2
1776-or-1984 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yuck lmfaoo

2
BaldEagles 2 points ago +2 / -0

bruh

4
SwampMonsterJesus 4 points ago +4 / -0

I love making this joke for some reason.

1
Crimson_Identity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha, I chuckled.

Thanks.

21
deleted 21 points ago +23 / -2
17
deleted 17 points ago +19 / -2
13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
10
JeremiahKassin 10 points ago +11 / -1

No. The first thing you'll hear if Biden wins is the first shot in the Second American Revolution.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
13
MobileDev4Trump 13 points ago +13 / -0

She sold her soul to the same demon that keeps Marina Abramović alive probably offered it baby parts from PP as part of the deal.

5
saveMySpeech 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or he knows that Obama spied on Roberts and is therefore blackmailing him.

3
mrspaulrevere 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bingo we have a winner!

24
Toughsky_Shitsky 24 points ago +32 / -8

Trump is just energizing his base with this list of conservative justices. He doesn't "know something" unusual.

Trump is campaigning.

5
NoBrakes2020 5 points ago +8 / -3

He never tips his hand. 4d

18
AmericaFirstMAGA88 18 points ago +21 / -3 (edited)

RBG has been dead for over a year. Just need to expose it

15
MSG1000 15 points ago +15 / -0

Hope he lets the rest of us know soon.

14
jennyfrutex 14 points ago +15 / -1

RBG will never die. She'll just vanish with a bang and the odor of brimstone.

5
saveMySpeech 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe he knows that Obama spied on Roberts and is therefore blackmailing him.

3
Workhorse101 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes its called an election in November. Presidents are known to name their pick list as it can swing votes.

Not that it fucking matters who he picks after 2 crushing defeats in the Supreme court this week.

120
barron_height_watch 120 points ago +120 / -0

I hope he picks some very pissed-off 35 year olds who are genetically tested to make sure they lack the Roberts-Gorsuch "cuck gene."

49
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 49 points ago +52 / -3

This board wants Barrett cause when STRONK WAHMEN ignoring that she'll drift left like all female leaders.

31
RenaissanceOfHope 31 points ago +31 / -0

Barrett could be weak on immigration because of her family & the Vatican.

Immigration is basically the most important issue besides fighting Globalists that want to take us over.

14
barron_height_watch 14 points ago +15 / -1

Good God no, white male to replace RBG for maximum leftist meltdown.

2
RenaissanceOfHope 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need Don Willett!

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
1
Imitate214 1 point ago +2 / -1

the Vatican

Conservative Catholics haven't listened to a word Pope Francis has said since he became Pope, partly because he hasn't said anything ex cathedra, which is the dogma that if a Pope says eomthing "from the chair" and follows a certain formula, it's required to be believed. The last time this happened was in 1950 when Pope Pius XII defined the dogma of the Assumption of Mary (Mary was assumed body and soul into Heaven).

The Catechism is not dogma, it is doctrine. The recent change to the Catechism wrt death penalty is at odds with the teachings of older Popes and Saints. Unless the Pope declares ex cathedra and follows a speific formula to define the abolition of the death penalty as dogma, we can safely ignore what Pope Francis has to say about it.

1
OnlyAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

What happens when the Anti-Pope and his cabal of Vatican cardinals declare something ex-cathedra? What are you going to do?

1
Imitate214 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, it would depend on what they try to do. If they do something like declare Mary Co-Redemptrix, I could live with it and accept it. If they declare that homosexuality isn't a sin, they'd be heretics.

1
4Christ 1 point ago +2 / -1

As a conservative evangelical, this makes me sad. Who gives the pope the authority to speak infallibly? The word of God clearly states that Jesus is the (only) "way, the truth and the life" (John 14:6). No man, however sanctified, can speak infallibly. I hope conservative Catholics realize that contradictory sources of truth (ie, the word of God, the catechism, and the pope speaking infallibly) can't be reconciled and that only one can be fully believed (I'd recommend the one that states clearly "All scripture is inspired by God" 2 Timothy 3:16). There are many resources online that show contradictions between the Bible and the catechism (ie, what saves us?), I'd recommend checking some out and trying to figure out for yourself how to reconcile the contradictions between things you hold as sources of truth.

0
americathegr888 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yeah fuck that if it's Barrett we are sooooo fucked.

6
RenaissanceOfHope 6 points ago +6 / -0

If it’s Barrett we need to fight as hard as the left fought Kavanaugh. I don’t care if she’s pro life or a Trump appointment, a weak on immigration justice is a problem!

2
Scungette 2 points ago +2 / -0

No more women, please.

0
americathegr888 0 points ago +3 / -3

I'd be fine with a woman but only if she's to the right of Pinochet.

19
rooftoptendie 19 points ago +19 / -0

i don't want Barrett. I don't trust her, and I think some of the enthusiasm on this board for her seems less than organic.

16
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 16 points ago +16 / -0

Nah it's just dudes simping out. Same as they did with Tulsi, who is just another Democrat.

6
rooftoptendie 6 points ago +6 / -0

I used to simp-out for Tulsi until I found out one too many things about her, and now all the magic is gone. I think it's out of my system finally.

4
ScrewReddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's about abortion. There are many single-issue proponents when it comes to SCOTUS nominees.

18
LavonAffair 18 points ago +20 / -2

Women have a proclivity for bias of feelings over facts

1
666evo 1 point ago +2 / -1

The one with African kids?

She's already liberal.

21
jennyfrutex 21 points ago +21 / -0

would be absolutely glorious

6
America1stAndOnly 6 points ago +7 / -1

I fit that criteria. I have no law experience, but I look at the constitution and go "Yeah, people can say what they want. People can own whatever weapons they want. It's plain as day here in the constitution." But no, all these other judges overanalyze and let their feelings control them. It's simple shit if you don't overthink it and realize that it was designed to be simple for a reason.

3
mrspaulrevere 3 points ago +4 / -1

No one with a wife. No women. Women will pull left due to their friends not liking them on Fakebook anymore. I believe Gorsuch is cucked because of what the wife and kids went through during his confirmation, the wife is crying "Oh no not again!" if he starts to drift right. The same could very likely happen to Kavanaugh.

3
DeplorableCentipede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thomas has a wife. Scalia had a wife. Don't know what you're blabbering about.

82
Italians_Invented_2A 82 points ago +82 / -0

We need to ensure it's someone who will vote to remove birthright citizenship.

28
yellow_iron 28 points ago +29 / -1

Honestly something that big may require a constitutional amendment. And to be honest, I don't want any of these politicians changing the constitution right now.

28
Hugh 28 points ago +28 / -0

After that transgender ruling a few days ago, nothing needs a new amendment anymore. You just need five justices that will make up a meaning for an existing amendment.

9
ForeverPatriot1776 9 points ago +9 / -0

Bingo. One re-interpretation of "subject to the jurisdiction of" and we win.

4
spezisacuckold 4 points ago +5 / -1

Winner winner chicken tendie dinner.

Politics is unfortunately fought in the courts.

2
philandy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like the word "the" now meaning "not the."

5
Italians_Invented_2A 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's been discussed on here that the Constitution does not establish birthright citizenship. It's just a thing the deep state started doing without asking anyone.

There's a clause in the constitution that is clear to anyone with a brain, however it can be misread on purpose by activist judges. That's why we need to be sure.

1
GarbageMcTrash 1 point ago +1 / -0

The ORIGINAL Constitution does not establish birthright citizenship but the 14th amendment certainly does.

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside"

So to overturn this we need another amendment. Just like how the 18th amendment (prohibition of alcohol) was overturned by the 21st amendment

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

The key words are: and subject to the jurisdiction thereof

An illegal alien isn't. For example, they wouldn't be drafted if there was a war.

Moreover, the discussions of Founding Fathers make it clear what they meant, and a "constitutionalist" judge is meant to interpret the constitution as what it was trying to say at the time.

Truly, only a left wing activist could interpret the words you quoted as "anyone can come in here illegally, shit a child, and have the right to stay"

3
Imitate214 3 points ago +3 / -0

How would gaining citizenship work without birthright citizenship?

7
Italians_Invented_2A 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)

Like it works in Italy and many other countries. By blood. It's called jus sanguinis.

I would also remove any path to citizenship: marriage, green card, etc. Citizenship by blood only.

This way you can even get legal immigrants, but they won't colonize the country because they won't be able to vote.

3
plasmaburnz 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree. There should be no form of naturalization at all. At most, they should allow foreigners to live here. If an American marries them/their kid, that child will be a citizen. If voting is so important to them, stay in their own country. Importing mercenary voters should not be an electoral strategy.

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely. And I think this and I'm a foreigner. If I ever come live in America I don't think I should be entitled to vote. But I can still campaign for Trump and try to convince others.

0
philandy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Blood rights are also evil. You really need limits on "the good old boys."

6
Italians_Invented_2A 6 points ago +6 / -0

Eh? The Founding Fathers did not establish birthright citizenship, in the US it's just the deep state that started doing it.

1
philandy 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'll have to end 14A before any of that can happen, and I'd much prefer to end the USC first.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 14A clearly refers to freed slaves, and not the children of foreigners.

No change in the constitution is necessary.

63
findthewarmspot 63 points ago +64 / -1

Do NOT include Mike Lee.

52
thedogsofdoom 52 points ago +52 / -0

Or Andrew Napolitano

17
CantThinkOfUserName 17 points ago +17 / -0

Napolitano turned into a resistor after Trump wouldn't consider him for the court when Gorsuch was appointed. He's 70 years old why would Trump pick a justice who might last 10-15 years max.

11
thedogsofdoom 11 points ago +11 / -0

Oh, he never would. Just stating the obvious. Napolitano is a loser and Trump generally tries to avoid people like him.

13
Grief 13 points ago +13 / -0

I don't k ow what they have on him but he absolutely hates Trump now.

11
BigCovfefe 11 points ago +11 / -0

Napolitano is an ambulance chaser.

6
jormungandr 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just here to say, for the record, fuck Mike Lee

-5
americathegr888 -5 points ago +1 / -6

Or Barrett.

59
deleted 59 points ago +59 / -0
43
ChuckedBeef 43 points ago +43 / -0

He needs an extra one to make up for Gorsuch

3
AccipiterQ 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

Has Gorsuch been that bad?

edit: I'm an idiot. I was thinking Kavanaugh.

4
JesusisKing 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tucker was right, the Mob now rules. Thanks Twitter.

16
RenaissanceOfHope 16 points ago +16 / -0

He needs 9 appointments.

5
amopheldupsidedown 5 points ago +5 / -0

10, to make up for Gorsuch

0
RenaissanceOfHope 0 points ago +2 / -2

Gorsuch is a good justice who opposed DACA.

4
Sesquame 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gorsuch murdered textualism

1
amopheldupsidedown 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the Title 7 case ruling sucks. In fact, the whole 1964ish bill sucks balls. Anybody should be able to hire or fire for any reason they want. The real effect the ruling will have is to increase litigation and keep people from having jobs they otherwise would have been hired for.

2
RenaissanceOfHope 2 points ago +2 / -0

I support LGBTQ rights to the core of my heart. I would much rather have the burden of proof for discrimination be high and innocent before proven guilty (while banning quotas) with protections over the insanity that we have now...

Most Americans are not bigots at all. The problem is we have these laws because of a few a**holes that make us look bad and then these laws are very tricky to navigate.

I just don’t know what solution we can come up with but this quota and lawsuit system is not working.

1
amopheldupsidedown 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't support alphabet people rights at all. But I would like people to realize the effects of these laws. If given the choice between two identical candidates to hire, except one has the potential or likelihood of a lawsuit, you are going to pick the low risk one. If you have received a lawsuit, no matter how frivolous, you will never consider a similar candidate again.

Nobody quits their job and is sued because the owner is any of those protected classes, and it works just fine. I am for abolishing the entire law --> more working, less suing. More work for everyone except lawyers.

1
RenaissanceOfHope 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would actually be interested in polling people and asking them how things would change if federal anti-discrimination laws were repealed. I hate discrimination but we have it right now with immutable characteristics factoring into hiring decisions.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

I support LG rights (and by extension, B), but Ts are mentally ill degenerates.

And anyone who comes after the T is an attention-whoring bandwagoning liberal faggot who isn't oppressed at all, but is just pretending they are.

15
IcculusBased9 15 points ago +15 / -0

Thomas may retire to insure young conservative blood on the court for another 30 - 40 years if Trump gets re-elected.

8
1776-or-1984 8 points ago +8 / -0

I will take his spot. I rule that ICE funding is 1000x'ed. All these American cops need jobs.

2
plasmaburnz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, could you rule that the 10th Amendment is once again in effect and 80% of the Federal government is unconstitutional.

3
ReligionOfPoop 3 points ago +3 / -0

This had never even occurred to me and I think Thomas would do that.

He really is a beautiful eloquent man. It would make me sad to see him go, but the fact he would "do it" for that reason might actually bring a tear to my eye.

2
niacin 2 points ago +3 / -1

There's a Christian prophecy that's going around to this effect. They say 5 justices in Trump's time. Something like, "1 will die, 1 will retire and 3 will have to be removed from scandal that they have been caught in".

My mom keeps telling me about it. Mark Taylor is the supposed prophet, if you care.

49
Freedom4545 49 points ago +50 / -1

Dont include anyone, Just pick the most Conservative person you find period. The left does this with thier extremeo crazys they put on the court time for us to do the same.

53
OnlyAmerica 53 points ago +54 / -1

No we need an extreme Constitutionalist. Can't believe I had to say that.

31
America_No_1 31 points ago +31 / -0

you two are saying the same thing

14
DeploraBen 14 points ago +14 / -0

Basically. There are liberal judges, and there are judges who can read.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
5
mrspaulrevere 5 points ago +6 / -1

"Neil" is a weak name. So is "Brett." Don't trust either of them.

1
1776-or-1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

No not that, completely disagree, we need an insanely constitutionalist judge instead. Someone to the far right of Dr Carson, even!

4
philandy 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder if Ron Paul would accept.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +4 / -12 (edited)
18
Captnyestrday 18 points ago +18 / -0

Not playing as extreme as they do is exactly why we are in such a shit hole. Maybe even past the point of no return.

It's not time to play, it is years too late. But if we don't show up and beat them, well... you don't have to wield a sword to die on one.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
11
1776-or-1984 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thankyou. Conservative need to shake out their Bibles, strap on their Crusader bloodlust helmets, and stop playing the "lose as little as possible" game. Conquerservative, not cuckservative!

7
Journey95 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah we were too soft and compromised. That needs to end

4
Captnyestrday 4 points ago +4 / -0

It will end. Sooner or later, even if that means we have to give out free helicopter rides after we take a fully fallen country back.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)
2
Captnyestrday 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't either. I hate the idea of just picking based on their ability to fight our enemy rather than the full content of their ability to do the job. Maybe those are one in the same now.

I hate the tweet. It smells like Everything Bill-ControlledOposition-Barr says. Just find the right person and pick them. Whatever, I love trump but still somehow underestimate his strategies.

1
Slapstick86 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uh, extremely law abiding by following the Constitution, vs progressive, who seek to create their own laws.

0
BrakeRemovalMechanic 0 points ago +1 / -1

What do you call the current results?

36
bubadmt 36 points ago +37 / -1

He's a time traveler and he knows RBG will soon be gone, probably before the election. He's always been right on the money with his prediction tweets before so I have faith. Sounds crazy, but check the record (No Biden).

10
Italians_Invented_2A 10 points ago +14 / -4

I hope she doesn't. Replacing RBG would really energize the Demonrats. We need to make it pass under the radar.

17
LibsOnSuicideWatch 17 points ago +17 / -0

I don't know. The biggest issue I've seen the left talking about right now is RBG. There are tweets going around saying "You aren't just voting for the next president. You're voting for RBG's replacement." If she croaks before the election, and Trump replaces her before the election, that would demoralize them heavily.

The only good thing about the recent SCotUS rulings, as shit as they are, is that the left doesn't have an issue to raise with Trump. He's been quiet the past year or so and not doing anything major such as completely stopping all future attempts at gun control, killing Obamacare, etc. The left will have less and less ammo to go after him with during the election. Once the economy rebounds, if it does before November, he will have his primary ammo against Biden back.

Only time will tell with this stuff...

6
UpTrump 6 points ago +7 / -1

If RGB was pronounced dead today, he wouldn't be able to get a replacement. The Dems would draw it out to 2021

5
your_MOM 5 points ago +5 / -0

This might be the biggest event of 2020 outside of Covid, or maybe even eclipsing it: the absolute war for her replacement.

4
flashersenpai 4 points ago +4 / -0

holy shit dude RBG replacement this summer would be world war REEEE

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obviously if Trump could replace her before his first term ends in January it would be the best for us. But she'd need to go now, it could take a few months to pass through the senate and I'm sure some RINO won't vote for the replacement if it's too close to the election (or after).

I don't think it's a good strategy for Trump to keep a low profile. They hate him regardless. I think he should go all out, give us everything we want with EO, and the base will be super energized.

Trump has accomplished much less than we thought he would. I don't think this is "concerned trolling". We had great hopes but it turned out the swamp is not easy to clean. So many leaning Trump people might not vote, that's my fear.

1
LibsOnSuicideWatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump has accomplished much less than we thought he would.

Indeed. The swamp has been holding him back, but if he can get a 2nd term, I believe the gloves will truly, finally come off.

I don't think it's a good strategy for Trump to keep a low profile.

Not saying it's good, but what I believe is happening. If he was trying to kill Obamacare, kill all future attempts at gun control, wage a war against illegal immigrants, etc. then the left would be up in flames right now at him the way they are at police. The Democrats could say, "He took away your safety by repealing gun control forever, he took away your health care, etc." Now they have to go on him and the economy, which the coronavirus has fucked with. But if it can get back up, he'll have something to fight back with.

I will vote Trump no matter what. I hope the rest of the conservatives do as well. Biden does not energize. He's a decrepit, old pedophile who says, "Back to the way it used to be." He does not energize. He'll need shitlibs coming out by pure hatred, and while that is very doable, I think having someone energetic like Trump has a better shot.

Regardless, I'm keeping my fingers crossed and praying that Trump wins. It won't be as easy for him to win as I thought it would be a few years ago. =(

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're absolutely correct. However I would just add:

then the left would be up in flames right now at him the way they are at police.

I think they are already doing this. They are rioting against Trump, they just don't say it openly to appear "non partisan". But when they keep saying that white people should not be silent and be "antiracist" and fight against racism... What do they truly mean? Vote against Trump, that's what they mean.

2
LibsOnSuicideWatch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indeed. I grow anxious every day that Trump could lose. The SCotUS is voting pro-liberal and making Trump's orders follow law but Obama's do nothing and stay existing, Trump has been hindered for 4 years and ultimately not accomplished much, and Democrats might be able to hide Biden until the election so that the American people (and liberals) don't see how his mental state is.

The swamp is using everything in its power to stop him, and I fear that they could ultimately win so that Trump and 4 years were but a brief reprieve from globalism and evil winning. Similar to Republicans during the Obama regime, we just have a string of losses. That's what I'm afraid of. Trump absolutely must win, and he must fight back against the swamp. He must kill Obamacare, gun control, transgenderism, and save religious rights from being destroyed.

Maybe I'm just being a bit too negative (I've been told my whole life I'm a negative Ned, although I'm working on changing that), but I really am worried. If I'm dying, I will go out and vote for Trump on election day, but after everything we went through during Bush and Obama, I'm starting to remember the constant string of seemingly never-ending losing we had (I was a Ron Paul supporter back in those days).

15
FuckCommies 15 points ago +16 / -1

I'm not fucking scared and you shouldn't be either. Grow a backbone and carry a firearm. We are at war and have a republic to save.

2
rooftoptendie 2 points ago +2 / -0

<3 <3 <3

3
amopheldupsidedown 3 points ago +3 / -0

I read that as "Balls balls balls"

2
rooftoptendie 2 points ago +2 / -0

that works too!

4
Swallwell_Gas_Co 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don’t give them any ideas.

3
JacksonsGhost 3 points ago +4 / -1

True! And also, RGB is probably hoping for a democrat winner, so she is holding out. But the joke is on her :)

2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol dude she's waiting for the 2020 election. She's gonna step down at the right time.

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe she thinks she can last until 2025...

1
6-_-j 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would tend to think it would highly demoralize them instead. But one never knows...

28
RedditStillSucks 28 points ago +28 / -0

He should pick me. Id just write "Fuck off commies" in all my opinions though

13
pmurTJdlanoD 13 points ago +13 / -0

"Fuck off commies" should be the next Executive Order.

11
RiverFenix 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'll do it for free and work day and night to interpret the law AS WRITTEN

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
27
your_MOM 27 points ago +27 / -0

Kavanaugh scared the hell out of Gorsuch and Roberts. This next pick better have either no family, a will, or both.

10
RenaissanceOfHope 10 points ago +10 / -0

No family is probably the answer.

6
zestanor 6 points ago +6 / -0

celibate justices lol

I mean they basically are the priests of the American state religion whose ruling are infallible dogma

1
RenaissanceOfHope 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s the American state religion?

19
OnlyAmerica 19 points ago +19 / -0

He's triggering them REEEEEEs. 😆

16
Paradyme 16 points ago +16 / -0

Comments on this Twitter post from...”Mrs Krassenstein”

LOL

3
ReligionOfPoop 3 points ago +3 / -0

I find it odd how these people cycle in and out.

It seems like sometimes when trump bitches about Twitter, i see "cat turd" more and other familiar names.

6 months ago it was the gay Brothers, Krassensteins, that doctor, the meth head hippy who always goes "dude why u poop your pants so hard today????" And that really fucking homosexual looking fat bald man.

I really don't know their names unless I see them but anyway, i see the gay Brothers got their wife in on it.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

the meth head hippy who always goes "dude why u poop your pants so hard today????"

The meth head hippy is Jeff Tierdich, but he doesn't write like that. The poop talk is Jeff Guterman.

15
TotalSchism 15 points ago +15 / -0

Fuck John Roberts and all the other Liberal "Justices"

14
superjason03 14 points ago +14 / -0

Anything the heritage foundation supports we should all be against, fuck them and AEI and any of these so called conservative outlets, they are nothing more than chicken shit fronts for John Roberts types. They are not us, they will never be us, they are just as bad as the Mitt Romneys and the Mike Lee's of the world. Burn it all down.

1
Nellie_the_Beaut 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Heritage Foundation and The Federalist Society are about as “conservative” as the Lincoln Project and the Log Cabin Republicans. Infiltrated fronts subversively working to undermine and destroy Conservatism, promote globalism and bring about the New World Order.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

Federalist Society has been the recommending group as I understand.

14
IAmAnElephante 14 points ago +18 / -4

I do not want him to play anymore games. I have been very disappointed with his performance on these riots/statue destroying/etc. He seems to be grandstanding a bunch here b.c he knows wrong move could put more fuel on the flames, but honestly he needs to focus on preservation and expansion of rights, knowledge, and get a new party movement going. FUCK both the DEMs and REPs I can not trust any of them anymore.

1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, 4th Amendment are under attack at such levels that if he doesn't attempt any preservation now, its all over folks. The supreme court can not be expanded, he should have chosen Amy Barett to begin with and then an extreme version of her next once RBG is done.

CHAZ should have been taken apart the first day it went up. Allowing a rogue group come in and occupy a city where people pay taxes and rent for, held at gunpoint, fleeced for entry, rapes, etc. Unfucking called for and unamerican to the highest degree. Not clapping back at DEMS for bowing (absolute most disgusting thing I have ever seen) and having African garb as to apease to the mob and pandering and imho being more racist. Not having people arrested for taking down statues of both good and bad history to me is the last straw for me to ever vote Republican again. Dems I knew were rotten, but Republicans arent any better.

Im so fucking fired up watching history be edited, deleted, erased, and we can depend on nothing to help save it. Bring in a militia to defend it, you get called extremist. Try to have a conversation about power vs civilians, get called racist. Time is up for "pandering" & "compromising"

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
MAGA_From_Heaven 3 points ago +3 / -0

What good are false idols if we don't have a fucking country left!?

1
Captnyestrday 1 point ago +1 / -0

This sentiment needs to be realized by every Pede on this board. As well as all the normal freedom loving Americans that are so close to losing everything.

We've tolerated them, reasoned with them, allowed them to grow strong and infiltrate EVERY American institution. They take everything as we compromise on anything. We've lost Education, Entertainment, Government, Military(what 1/2?) and every large Corp.

We've been "reasonable" to the point we may as well just hand them the gun and self deny that "they would never go 'that' far" as they pull the godamn trigger. They cannot be reasoned with and will never EVER tolerate us as we have them. History does not mince words on this same outcome.

I feel you, man. I really do. I'm done being polite about it and so should EVERYONE else. That BS is why we are here and we are late to the party. If we don't all show up, the silent majority will cease to exist and noone will ever know it had.

1
6-_-j 1 point ago +1 / -0

Eh, I think you've posted some Chicken Little level hysteria imo, but we still need warnings such as yours.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

I challenge anyone to name a way to save this country that doesn't resort in us suspending the civil rights of liberals and filling mass graves with them.

I literally do not see any other way out. They have made it incredibly clear that they have zero interest in sharing the country with us. Even the slightest fucking scent of conservatism, they set their sights on and destroy it like they're a fucking Inquisition.

They can call me 'fascist', but I probably won't be able to hear them over the screaming from the flamethrowers.

I don't see any way that doesn't involve going full Thomas Jefferson - wiping them out to the last man, and rebuilding a new constitution. The trick is, how do we do it without losing everything as a nation in the process.

1
IAmAnElephante 1 point ago +1 / -0

states succeeding is the real start where a civil war would break out imho. THe virtual signally and cultural bullshit happening is planting people on their teams to the point states will get sick of it and succeed. There will be blood eventually, right now its politics game and setting up the foundation for actions

0
americathegr888 0 points ago +3 / -3

he should have chosen Amy Barett

Fuck no. She's weak on immigration.

Unless you meant "shouldn't" in which case I agree.

-2
Aambrick -2 points ago +1 / -3

I think you missed something. Do you notice the fact that we have a couple thousand here constantly at almost all the time, and have a base of a couple hundred thousand? I consider that to be a start to the new party.

It will take a long time to get as huge as Dems/Dixies and Reps. We are basically the very first of a new party. It is keeping and growing the party that is the problem. Lion Party is what some have taken to calling it since there is no official name. Others have called it the Trump Party so yeah.

11
Tomm 11 points ago +12 / -1 (edited)

Yeah how did that work out for us. We need justices that will unashamedly rule with conservative bias from the bench. How come the left never missed on a judicial pick?

9
Yucky 9 points ago +9 / -0

This. Conservatives have been OBSESSED with textualism and originalism. They claim they just want to properly apply the law as written. However, as we have seen, the left simply wants to rewrite the law. As Sean Davis recently tweeted, the conservative legal movement is dead. Josh Hawley gave a similar speech on the senate floor.

So with that, we need to be up front and honest: the role of a judge is not to apply the law as written, rather, his job is to rewrite the law in the conservative image, and nothing less.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
8
JackLemon 8 points ago +9 / -1

Throw out the list. It came from a globalist oriented organization. Gorsuch has already proven he isn't a constitutional originalist as advertised. I predicted it given he came from leftist academia. I am suspicious of Kavanaugh as well because he lived in the swamp too long.

The correct solution is to go to the most conservative Justice in the history of the court Clarence Thomas and ask him for his list of candidates who are most like him. And for God's sake and ours don't pick a woman next no matter what.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
8
jasper_db1 8 points ago +8 / -0

When Trump wins a second term, I hope Thomas steps down to let Trump appoint a younger conservative justice to the bench.

-4
thedogsofdoom -4 points ago +3 / -7

I think he will. And while a persons qualifications should be the main consideration, I wouldn’t mind seeing a black judge appointed to take the seat.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
thedogsofdoom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just want to see the left squirm because a based and respected black conservative judge is nominated. As I stated, the most most qualified person should be nominated.

1
IthoughtIwalked 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally agree, but you also have to admit that trolling them with a woman or black man at least cancels out one of their go-to insults (sexist / racist) that we know they'll hurl at him. It's just entertaining to watch their brains fizzle for a bit.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
7
RockyMin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hmmm, could POTUS know something about a possible opening on the SC soon? Has he spoken with RBG's doctors?

5
saveMySpeech 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe he knows that Obama spied on Roberts and is therefore blackmailing him.

7
CastlesMadeofSand01 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hopefully he stops listening to the pussyass Federalist society. After what happened with Gorsuch, let's stop fucking around with "textualist", "originalist" horseshit.

Find some conservatives willing to fight instead of spineless wusses looking to virtue signal.

6
SoldierofKek 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let's take back the house and impeach John Roberts. Then we can remove his sorry ass.

3
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dems impeach. Repubs don't act.

1
IthoughtIwalked 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sad but true.

And someone needs to do a parody video of the Lovin' Spoonful's song using your username lol

5
SCOTUS 5 points ago +5 / -0

SCOTUS nominations are the most important decisions POTUS can make. Can you imagine another Scalia back on the Court instead of one of the liberal justices?!

4
GenericInsult 4 points ago +4 / -0

He knows RBG's days are numbered.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
3
Basileus 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Courts have arrogated legislative and executive power. No single justice makes any difference whatsoever when the system is corrupted

3
nomac 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glad to see POTUS not taking this one sitting down.

3
Beat_to_Quarters 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dont make a list, that just gives the liberals something to narrow down their search and destroy opposition research.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Beat_to_Quarters 1 point ago +1 / -0

He should keep it internal. Making it public gives the opposition a head start on their smear campaign.

3
Captntrouble 3 points ago +3 / -0

RBG health and wellness check??

Any further look into what happened with Scalia??

Why did Kennedy REALLY step down??

maybe Trump should consider adding to the bench like the Dems wanted, and stack them with this list? what'll happen if the Dems can cheat their way to the Office in November?? very important election

3
EPic 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, once you break that precedent, every administration is just going to add 30% more judges and it will be a clown show.

2
Captntrouble 2 points ago +2 / -0

you're not wrong at all, and it was partly in jest , but you can't deny they are throwing out precedent and rule of law at an exponentially growing rate. The game is changing. I often think about what's going on currently, and how any actions and laws passed now will actually hurt any long term ability to keep the Republic free....scary. but again, you're not wrong

1
EPic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tree of Liberty is thirsty.

Long time since its been watered.

1
Captntrouble 1 point ago +1 / -0

Daniel Day Lewis' movie about oil comes to mind....

2
IthoughtIwalked 2 points ago +2 / -0

"So the point of the Supreme Court is to interpret the law as written?"

"Yes"

"Okay, then let's have half of them do that, and the other half can interpret the laws how they feel they should apply."

Seriously, wtf happened. This Court needs swung wildly to the conservative side. I don't necessarily care if a Democrat gets elected president (in an honest election) if I know that they will be forced to play by the rules in our Constitution. But in the current set up, another Dem presidency will be a true tragedy for this great nation.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
mrspaulrevere 2 points ago +2 / -0

White supremacist rapist child molester every one of them.

2
SharkTeamTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Today, the court is 4-4 with Roberts as a deep state controlled swing vote.

Once RBG passes, and Trump nominates her successor, then the court will be 5-3 and Roberts' vote won't matter as decisions of 6-3 or 5-4 are exactly the same. The deep state's control over Roberts will be effectively nullified.

THIS is why the left is going bat shit insane trying to prevent Trump's reelection. THIS is the entire reason behind the impeachment, the pandemic quarantine and the Democrat/Antifa riots. The left MUST prevent Trump's reelection, and they WILL go to ANY extreme to prevent it. AND WE MUST DEFEAT THEM AND REELECT PRESIDENT TRUMP! It is nothing short of the survival of the Nation, and indeed the World, that is at stake.

TRUMP 2020!

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone forgets that Stephen Breyer is almost as old as RBG and, being male, far beyond life expectancy.

2
jatergator 2 points ago +2 / -0

Add this to the list of why a landslide is incoming. The voter turn out is going to be massive!

2
magaorg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ted Cruz

1
MooCow1980 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think he'd be great.

1
IAmAnElephante 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck no, he killed the prominence of a 3rd party. He's still a teetering RINO

2
Zytos 2 points ago +2 / -0

Come on Ted just do it for the good of the country.

2
Dole 2 points ago +2 / -0

just pack the court, it’s constitutional

2
winsome 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uncle Thomas The Left

1
NO_RINOs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good. We need to know which judges are on his short list. Verify they are not closeted globalists (e.g. Council on Foreign Relations membership), independently wealthy, have nothing in personal lives to be blackmailed over and a long-term record of rulings based on the law!

No legislating from the bench. That’s congress’s job.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BaldEagles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe he'll propose adding more Justices. The left will surely have a meltdown. Then they cant try it if/when they come back to power.

Force them to pick a side now. Lol.

1
Choomguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally trolling for reeeeee! With this tweet, love it!

1
TOPDAWG22 1 point ago +2 / -1

He sold now say conservative judges he should just say fair judges who be leave in the law.

1
Rugar22 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the comments include a bunch of fakers stickied to the top like always.

1
letrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who should of stuck to the list to begin with

1
MAGA_____bitches 1 point ago +1 / -0

"IF GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY"

THAT MEANS YOU RBG

1
ignorant_slob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Need some good replacements for Breyer and Ginsberg.

1
cheryltuntt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ted Cruz SCOTUS .

2
cheryltuntt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Matt Gaetz SCOTUS ?

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

then neither can run for pres

1
KeyboardWarrior45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Put me at the top list. I’ll make libtards cry for the next 40-50 years. And since I’m Asian, I think it’s no big deal to be called a racist by Commies. Lmao

1
MaxineWaters4Prez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, who died?

1
KAGAnoRINO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only those MORE conservative than Thomas. #ThomasorBetter

1
DatNewbChemist 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’ll likely have to pick whoever will pass Senate so it’s incredibly important that we gain a HUGE lead in the Senate.

If we get a strong lead, he has more freedom to put in justices that aren’t so activist. Otherwise he has to try and appeal to the activist Dems that see courts as tools of legislating and choose someone more moderate.

What does this mean for us? Support your fucking Senators! We need to give House and Senate Republican candidates war chests to fight with and funding to use - period.

1
techadm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Until there is law and order in this country, the SCOTUS is about as useless as Congress.

1
458Ready 1 point ago +2 / -1

It is almost like Trump knows there will be a vacancy (or TWO, maybe THREE)!

1
Whoopies_tds 1 point ago +1 / -0

So a list of soon to be high school rapists from 40 years ago

1
scott31337 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does he know something about RBG we do not? Weird timing.

1
donotclickjim 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one with any association with D.C., a blue state, or from the same pedigree as the other liberal judges. Anyone who considers themselves a strict Consitutionalist and believed the Founding Fathers knew what they were doing when the set out to limit the authority of the government. Expecting them to understand basic biology is now a must too.

1
Canuck4Trump2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe run your choices by Mark Levin, Mr. President..... He seems to have some good insights and instincts on these matters !!!

1
litsy 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point I think a trad cat is who curses at the mere mention of vatican ii is probably our best bet.

1
Holodomor 1 point ago +1 / -0

All of whom almost raped Blasey Ford

1
AbrahamLincoln 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her hippocampus must be so indeliable by now.

1
Labyrinth9000 1 point ago +1 / -0

MAKE SURE TO CHECK THEIR HISTORY. NO DEEP STATE CONNECTIONS!

1
malthrax 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would like to ask that every potential SCOTUS nominee on that list be personally vetted by Justice Clarence Thomas before any further consideration is given to any of them.

1
Jerseydeplorable 1 point ago +1 / -0

While disappointed in this ruling, I look at this another way. This along with the refusal to hear Second Amendment cases can be used to motivate people to vote and vote for GEOTUS.

1
Space_Force 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe this is just Robert's petty way of saying "See, I told you, there are no Bush judges, Clinton Judges, Obama judges!"

He does have a solid track record of siding with the left, especially on big cases.

He also went to Epstein's Pedo Island.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TrumpOrTreason 1 point ago +1 / -0

Screw any recommendations.. he should go on his instinct.

I say fuck it, and put in his niece or granddaughter that just got her law degree.

1
VoxVulgaris 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they're on the list, you can be sure the Left is digging up dirt on them even now.

1
monk_of_trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberals, probably: REEEEEEEEE HES THREATENING THE LIFE OF RBGINSBORG!

1
Pedeville 1 point ago +1 / -0

when ‘conservative’ judge actually means someone who follows the constitution, aka what a judge is supposed to om the supreme court

1
factsmatter_nj 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about the legislative branch actually doing something instead of waiting for a random Justice at the end of the line years later. DACA is three years in the ruling and it is still not resolved.... sanctuary cities everywhere, no votes for the wall funding, failure to rescind Obamacare, failure to reduce spending, Facebook/Google/Twitter out of control.... get Mitch to actually do something. Get votes on the topics so GOP can run on records not hopes and dreams.

3
Spikeball 3 points ago +3 / -0

Senate is hamstrung without the House, especially as long as it includes traitors like Lisa Murkowski

Sadly, if we remain a democracy structured as we currently are, our ideology won't win. We have to fundamentally change the way the nation is governed if we want to even hope for a future that's anything but further and further Left.

1
here2red 1 point ago +1 / -0

is he planning to shoot the Notorious RBG??? LOL

But seriously he needs to get people to vet better

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
drsowells1fan 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Amy Coney Barrett is a talented jurist, but she would fold like a damp pair of yoga pants if her children were threatened by the Deep State. As a mother, I know I would.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please avoid the liberal judges this time

0
MAGA_Skull 0 points ago +1 / -1

what does it matter if everybody on the list is a bunch of faggots

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

kek

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
iminurbas3 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ask Justice Thomas who he likes. That list should be perfect.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
12
Italians_Invented_2A 12 points ago +12 / -0

No thanks, we don't need another liberal judge on immigration.

3
JackLemon 3 points ago +4 / -1

She should be the last consideration. Another catholic who will likely turn into a liberal like so many of them do.

-1
thedogsofdoom -1 points ago +1 / -2

There isn’t a better pick to replace Cryptkeeper Ginsberg

3
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 3 points ago +4 / -1

Lol she will go left. Stop falling for identity politics. Pass.

0
Joebobbillyray 0 points ago +1 / -1

His pick sucked, just like Bolton and Wray. He needs to select the outright most conservative women he can for the court when a spot opens next term. We all need that term and we need a good a pick. And its not Just Trump picking bad. GOP picks overall have sucked, none more than Roberts.

-7
Americanism -7 points ago +3 / -10

Amy Coney Barrett LETS GOOOOOOOOOOO

10
DonAtari 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, he needs to throw away the old list. Only judges chosen by POTUS, not a list from the swamp!

1
Americanism 1 point ago +3 / -2

Great, a good opportunity to vet here. Do you best and find out what globalist activities she's been involved with or supported. So far I do not see anything. Also, if you have done your own vetting on a judge make a suggestion. Else, stfu

0
DonAtari 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol. That is why Gorsuch was such a fuck up.

1
Americanism 1 point ago +2 / -1

You offer nothing. Easy block, idiot

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +3 / -2

👌E X A C T L Y. The list was composed by a globalist organization that falsely advertised the leftist academic Gorsuch as a constitutional originalist. That list is now PROVEN to be garbage.

2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +3 / -1

cuz wahhmen

-1
Americanism -1 points ago +1 / -2

You guys are being dumb. You can actually READ about her rulings. I understand you're incels posting as chads but you have to learn to get over your deficiencies. She's vocally opposed to abortion, is catholic, and has a long track record of conservative view points. She's also a mother with 7 children to the same man. She's a pretty strong candidate compared to what we currently have and any list. Also, there are only X number of judges in the US, if you can form a better list just do it. end your retardation

1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol rejecting identity politics is apparently "being an incel posing as a chad". Let me be clear. I don't want or trust a female as president or lifetime judge when the battle of our nation's existence is on the line. Sign me up when everything is fine and dandy. Not when the left is working overtime pressuring every single person to submit to them.

That's not me pretending to be a Chad, you little simp. That's me being a bigot. So fuck off. Look at these "conservatives". "Replace RBG with a stronk conservative wahmen to really own the libz lol!!" Gimme a break. The country is collapsing.

1
Americanism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Making a huge deal over a qualified man or woman having the job is Identity Politics. I never suggested because shes a woman she should hold the position. I'm arguing that her positions on conservative issues are better suited than 3/4 of the current judges. You are an incel, and you should probably join the military or train martial arts, somewhere you can be around women doing the same activity and then you'll realize it's not that different. They are lesser physically but we're not talking front line combat. This is a position we want held by someone with proven moral values and consistent conservative principals and ACB has shown that. While you are just a moron with no real world experience crying in the dark about "NO GIRLS ALLOWED." Have a nice life Spanky

1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol okay simp. I know you'll feel real proud watching a stronk wahman get the job. You might even cry a little because you're so progressive. Did you get a tingle when Obama became POTUS because "we finally ended racism"?

Name one legit strong conservative female. You understand my stance on this wasn't crazy not too long ago? Leftism creeps everywhere. Road to hell is paved with good intentions. "ACB" will be a John Roberts.

Amy Coney Barrett LETS GOOOOOOOOOOO

The cringe is unbearable. Fag. Your whole argument is "you haven't had sex". I'm an adult. That shit was thrown around in middle school. True or false, you have googled "Amy barrett sexy pics" at least once.

1
kesquare2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope you realize not wanting someone in a position because of being a woman is identity politics right?

She's immensely qualified and a constitutionalist.

1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Recognizing the differences, strengths, and weaknesses of the opposite sex isn't identity politics. That's literally retarded.

1
kesquare2 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you think a woman is not able to make decisions based on the constitution it makes me wonder what you think about female Trump supporters.

2
JackLemon 2 points ago +4 / -2

The last thing the court needs is another catholic. They are grossly over represented on the court and are more likely to be leftist than conservative. Too much is at stake to take anyone who isn't a protestant born and educated in the south and serving in one of the southern Federal districts.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1 (edited)