3349
Comments (426)
sorted by:
337
192
theyarelost 192 points ago

I wish Trump would have put it in simpler terms..

The recent Supreme Court decisions, not only on DACA, Sanctuary Cities, Census, and others, tell you only one thing, we need NEW JUSTICES of the Supreme Court. If the Radical Left Democrats assume power, your Second Amendment, Right to Life, Secure Borders, and... ...Religious Liberty, among many other things, are OVER and GONE!

...So I will make an EO to secure all those things and by their precedent will be law!

177
OneOfMany_MAGA 177 points ago

Yeah, apparent executive orders can’t be overturned or changed by future presidents. A blank check for the president to just law down policies that apparently will endure forever.

It’s time to revisit a ton of conservative priorities.

130
yellow_iron 130 points ago

No, it's time to shit our pants in fear because the SC just unwittingly turned the United States into a dictatorship. What happens when Trump is gone?

100
Cheesygorditacrunch2 100 points ago

Don’t worry, we’ll make an EO for that.

35
MAGA_From_Heaven 35 points ago

Trump is in the paint... he's at the foul line.. he's airborne... OMG! His chest is even with the hoop! SLAM DUNK FROM THE FOUL LINE! I LOVE THIS GAME!

32
zestanor 32 points ago

so this was the endgame of 4D chess lol? Trick the SCOTUS into accidentally making him a dictator? Genius.

20
JesusisKing 20 points ago

😳

21
terrichris 21 points ago

Conservatives and Repubs ought to take a torch to farms and rob stores on Main Street to peacefully protest this decision. #CitizenshipMatters

... continue reading thread?
36
I_Love_45-70_Gov 36 points ago

Easy.... EO that current sitting President is now President for life.

EO starting that the Democrat party is now outlawed. All registered Democrats have 24 hours to leave the country.

This new democracy is so easy peasy. Thanks Roberts.

26
FliesTheFlag 26 points ago

Roberts is a piece of shit, but damn did he open the door for all kinds of shit Trump can do now with EOs.

6
Axiom502 6 points ago

Until they rule against them next time

1
mellestal 1 point ago

EO: DHS will now have the duty of building, repairing, and maintaining a 30ft wall along any national border which has substantial illegal crossings. They will also have the duty of deporting every single person caught being illegally in the country regardless of reason. All law enforcement agencies are required to produce anyone illegally in the country to a federal holding facility, ice facility, or the nearest legal border crossing. DHS is also required to maintain facilities for holding in every state.

8
Backinblack 8 points ago

This please

3
ClownTamer 3 points ago

I’d be totally fine with an executive order targeting Google, Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, and the rest for censorship and all that. A real one that just fucked them. Be legit or be broke. Then another that just fucking wrecked the mainstream media. And ban all foreign money and influence in key industries, like media, tech, etc. Then give us all our gun rights back and ban all laws to the contrary. Then kick Soros out and/or freeze his assets for funding terrorism. Then repeal Obamacare. Then make one that’s just a picture of a middle finger and the word “Chyna” and have him sign it.

If he can do all that, he’s welcome to EO his face onto Mount Rushmore. He’d have saved the republic.

3
Sf_2468 3 points ago

Everyone that works for a Soros ngo has to take a woman/xir/man datory helicopter ride.

22
physsijim 22 points ago

Unwittingly, you say? I wonder.... I read a book some years ago that compared Statists with Non-Statists. Statists, in general, prefer the Rex Lex system (King is the Law) as opposed to Non-Statists that prefer the Lex Rex system (Law is King). Which side do you suppose the Left comes down on?

17
A_Deplorable_Basket 17 points ago

Depends entirely whether their king is currently sitting on the throne.

4
I_lurk_u_long_time 4 points ago

They still prefer and think in terms of every single thing that happens being the sole fault and responsibility of Trump. They'd blame him for the weather if they could get away with it, and they've tried before.

1
SkitShowPhrenia 1 point ago

I mean... they do blame him for the weather. All the time. They’re so dumb.

11
America1stAndOnly 11 points ago

We already live in a dictatorship. We were never supposed to have a supreme court to begin with.

14
SadPangolin 14 points ago

Bingo.

The Constitution is a very simple document. You don't need a mob of lawyers to tell you that 'no law' means 'any law we feel like.'

3
Oculument 3 points ago

But the Supreme Court is in the Constitution. All of Article III covers the supreme court and its inferior courts.

6
45fan 6 points ago

But not it's powers. Those are assumed.

The constitution only provides that SCOTUS exists to preside over all inferior courts with the lower courts to be established by law.

1
ClownTamer 1 point ago

The main issue with SCOTUS that started with gay marriage is that they’ve been turned into a legislative branch, which isn’t the point and not within their power. I’m okay with gay marriage, but that’s a slippery slope we’re all now falling down by letting the SCOTUS legalize it and not let the rest of the states legalize it. Many were already doing it already, it was unnecessary and an overstep of their realm of authority.

The left can’t change the laws so they’re changing the meaning of words to change the laws. Pretty soon the 2nd Amendment will mean we only have the right to have limbs. I’d consider giving up my gun rights for actual bear arms though. Those could do some damage.

Banning assault rifles here in CA was so stupid. Almost no crimes are committed with them, if any. They’re using it as a slippery slope to get to all guns.

10
doug2 10 points ago

No, they didn't. They're smarter than that. They covered their bases. They said "of course he has the power to remove it. We dont like his reasoning they didn't consider everything they should."

Kavanaugh pointed out the administration considered exactly what was said to have not been. They just hadn't reviewed the relevant form, and they ignored him.

5
kesquare2 5 points ago

unwittingly....

4
SadPangolin 4 points ago

Nice bow-tie you got there, buddy.

3
preferredfault 3 points ago

By this precedent, he could EO himself to be president for life, then EO the presidency to whoever he wants to take over.

3
WestCoastG 3 points ago

Can you explain this a bit? I'm not understanding why. Thank you.

2
dixond 2 points ago

"unwittingly"

2
NixonsDMTdealer 2 points ago

Who said anything about him leaving?

1
Nov3 1 point ago

WE DO

1
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 1 point ago

It's all over if another Democrat takes office anyway.

28
NPCNN 28 points ago

wasnt DACA an EO????

41
OneOfMany_MAGA 41 points ago

Yes. And by not letting Trump interfere with it, the Supreme Court has basically declared executive orders to be not countermandable by later presidents.

28
NPCNN 28 points ago

So Trump might as well EO like a mad man. This justifies him using EO more often. Its a two way street.

23
Harambe 23 points ago

Are they trying to jebait him into EO spamming before an election? Seems likely.

Our enemies are evil, not stupid.

13
NPCNN 13 points ago

Good point! Thats why nancy said something about doing the same if they get into power afterwards.

I have faith that Trump will truly drain the swamp in his second term. Things are already picking up.

It important that we all vote.

... continue reading thread?
8
doug2 8 points ago

It's far more insidious than that. They didn't rule the EB can not remove old EOs, they said they could. What they did was object to the process they took to do it, and shadilay did it at that. They basically pulled the Twitter trick to ban conservatives. They stopped him while admitting he had absolutely authority to overturn this EO. In the future when a lefty does it they will just not object to the process and they can claim it is legally consistent.

6
Pepedom 6 points ago

That was my thinking too.

The scotus has really fucked the country over. We'd need a constitutional amendment to counteract this. There is no other way.

4
preferredfault 4 points ago (edited)

Doesn't matter at this point. If they want him to EO and he doesn't, they obstruct us anyways. Trump has nothing to lose at this point.

Let's keep in mind, Trump STILL hasn't gotten all of his nominations confirmed. And we're near the election and the end of his first term. It's absolutely unprecedented obstruction.

1
truthzoo 1 point ago

no, they are very stupid. very.

15
KAG_Master 15 points ago

Yup EO gun rights. So when a future president tries to EO and outlaw gun rights, we can be like "Nuh uh bitch"

10
Shroudedf8 10 points ago

One would like to think. However, as evidenced by almost everything the left does, by the time the future pres submits the EO to outlaw gun rights, it'll be interpreted as valid due to reasons.

5
Magatronic 5 points ago

Let’s throw in End the Fed while we’re at it. Game over.

8
doug2 8 points ago

No, they did not. They used the same bullshit as they did on the census. "Yes he has the authority to do this but the process/reasoning was not to our liking."

3
WestPalm 3 points ago

That's why this is such a big deal.

1
deleted 1 point ago (edited)
19
4more 19 points ago

This only applies to democratic executive orders.

16
Rufus_Shinra 16 points ago

What the Supreme Court is really saying is only leftist executive orders will be law, but they will strike down any that don't align with leftism communism or globalism.

4
Anaconda 4 points ago

Bingo

7
JesusisKing 7 points ago

Holy shit Weimar Republic confirmed...

7
Chopblock 7 points ago

Is that a NATIONWIDE CONCEALED CARRY EXECUTIVE ORDER I hear blowing in the wind?

5
Mean_MAGA_Facka 5 points ago

I'll start:

Deferred Action on Home Built Belt Fed Machine Guns

3
OrganicVandal 3 points ago

Free Bitches in 2020!

3
CorrectTheReeeecord 3 points ago

if you are black, female or democrat

2
deleted 2 points ago
38
JackLemon 38 points ago

Nope. What makes you think the federal judiciary and SCOTUS will treat Trump's EOs the same as Obama's? Trump has already had more blocked than all the previous Presidents combined. SCOTUS is lost and the Dimocrat appointees and Roberts have absolutely no regard for the constitution. They believe they can create legislation from the bench.

10
spezisacuckold 10 points ago

They believe know they can create legislation from the bench.

ftfy

5
Rufus_Shinra 5 points ago

Exactly. We need to understand that leftists in the courts will only and always enforce leftist orders and causes. They will call any conservative orders unconstitutional and illegal.

4
Lefty303 4 points ago

Was Trump's an actually EO?

4
JackLemon 4 points ago

What are you referring to, the attempted cancelation of Obama's EO? If so then I believe Trump's response was technically a rescind order. The OP however was talking about future EOs.

12
rossagesausage 12 points ago (edited)

FYI factually incorrect, Trump didn't rescind anything. He let the (illegal) EO expire. Rescinding implies action taken.

6
JackLemon 6 points ago

Thanks for the correction. I wasn't sure. If it expired on its own then the SCOTUS decision is even worse then imagined.

1
chingtok 1 point ago

What did the SCOTUS voted on? To let it not expire?

... continue reading thread?
4
patriotblend 4 points ago

Easy. EO declaring the Supreme Court has no say at all in EOs ever again, and should they ever try again to legislate how the executive branch is to be operated then they will face arrest for treason.

2
Mitschu 2 points ago

"As it is called an Executive Order, not a Judiciary Order, not a Legislative Order, but an Executive Order; the next time the Supreme Court unilaterally blocks a president from exercising his due authority, the majority that voted for it shall be rounded up and immediately executed for treason. America does not have kings, and fuck anyone comfortably sitting on a bench who thinks otherwise. This is, of course, an Executive Order. Your move, Roberts."

1
JackLemon 1 point ago

lol. You forgot the sarcasm tag.

3
powershellder 3 points ago

No, it’s fine how it is.

0
JackLemon 0 points ago

It's fantasy and not grounded in reality.

9
Farage_massage 9 points ago

Right, can he issue an EO saying constitutional carry is now legal?

8
covfefe-time 8 points ago

An armed society is a polite society.

We have seen this proven repeatedly.

Restore our rights now, using common sense and our constitutionally mandated rights.

If they try to say otherwise, then 1776 is already here.

4
Anaconda 4 points ago

No. They will only allow globalist presidents' EOs to stay intact

1
Farage_massage 1 point ago

And yet it won’t happen...This is what pisses me off about conservatives in general - they never try as hard or push back on any of this shit. For example:

WHY IS THERE AN AREA IN DOWNTOWN SEATTLE THE POLICE CANNOT GO?

WHY HASNT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DONE SOMETHING ABOUT IT?

Send an FBI/ATF agent down there to investigate any of the many reported firearms crimes with blues and uniform on, if impeded with, NG the ever living shit out of them.

That Raz twat is on film handing out an AR15 out the trunk of his vehicle to a stranger. THATS A FIREARMS OFFENSE. WHERE THE FUCK ARE LAW ENFORCEMENT?

3
iamherefortheluls 3 points ago

.So I will make an EO to secure all those things and by their precedent will be law!

come on, you know that's not true. time and time again conservatives get a kick to the nuts and turn around and say 'hah that means we get to kick you in the nuts as well' in practice - no, it doesn't. no one is playing by the rules of what's fair. If Trump gets replaced, SCOTUS will find Democratic EO's to be all fine and dandy.

tldr - please stop bullshitting with false hopes.

2
NvJohansson 2 points ago

After his reelection, he will do what ever the fuck he wants and not have to worry about optics.

1
Usernameicanrecall 1 point ago

As a NJ resident, when can I have my concealed carry EO?

72
4cdarth [S] 72 points ago

Thank you mod!

47
ChuckedBeef 47 points ago

Start the process all over again? How about we try a different approach instead?

59
Ghostphaez 59 points ago

Because Liberal activist groups keep suing and Hawaiian judges keep blocking any action he takes, necessitating that the cases be sent to the SC for final arbitration.

47
goodbeerbetterviews2 47 points ago

And the SC either refuses to take the case or sends it back when it could benefit our country. I'm fucking sick of judges.

12
UpTrump 12 points ago

Did obummer have every single thing challenged?

27
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 27 points ago

Lol repubs didnt do shit. One of them yelled "you lie" once and it was the worst thing ever

8
Anaconda 8 points ago

Alito silently mouthed "NO!" to Obama at one SOTU speech and it was the apocalypse. Alito no longer goes to SOTUs

23
Proud_American 23 points ago

We will have to burn it to the ground.

6
Kekintosh2020 6 points ago

BLM intensifies

6
Tenbuckstew 6 points ago

Brass coated lead hors d'oeuvres

2
frankenbox 2 points ago

copper coated?

26
your_MOM 26 points ago

I never thought I’d be happy with the words “gives the president more power”.

But this is the clown world we didn’t notice being formed around us by Democrats, Marxists, and literal demons that need exorcised.

6
JosephRBiden 6 points ago

Look fat here’s the deal. When it comes to demons I can put exercise trump any day of the week and twice on Sunday. I challenge him to a push up contest at the first debate and we’ll see who’s exercising then. When it comes to the thing here’s the deal. You ain’t black

24
Pretense 24 points ago

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a dissenting opinion that the decision to repeal DACA was correct, and that the majority is holding the Trump administration's decision to a higher standard than the order that established DACA in the first place.

"These cases could—and should—have ended with a determination that his legal conclusion was correct," Thomas wrote. "Instead, the majority today concludes that DHS was required to do far more."

He continued: "Without grounding its position in either the APA or precedent, the majority declares that DHS was required to overlook DACA’s obvious legal deficiencies and provide additional policy reasons and justifications before restoring the rule of law. This holding is incorrect, and it will hamstring all future agency attempts to undo actions that exceed statutory authority. I would therefore reverse the judgments below and remand with instructions to dissolve the nationwide injunctions.”

Thomas accused the court's majority of wanting to avoid making waves, even it if meant getting the law wrong.

In a line that Trump retweeted Thursday morning, Thomas said, "Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision."

11
deleted 11 points ago
2
TimeIsARetardedOval 2 points ago (edited)

Yeah, but the corporations want more so they get what they fucking want. Lefties and activist groups are used as PR.

0
deleted 0 points ago
9
Anaconda 9 points ago (edited)

So in other words we are fucked with the current 5 liberal justices plus the no-spine LGBT+ panderer Gorsuch. We need to replace RBG soon ASAP

5
45fan 5 points ago

We need to nuke our law schools from orbit. Just to be sure.

2
IHC10 2 points ago

This is only "politically controversial" topic for illegals and their activists. American citizens want them out and the rule of law restored to this country.

14
ShortCircuits 14 points ago

Start it all over again.

3
DrVSGGEOTUSPhD 3 points ago

Is there some way for Trump to wiggle out of this DACA thing? Try a different route?

175
MrMcGreenGenes 175 points ago

Act early. Act often. Act like you only have 6 months left.

115
deleted 115 points ago
55
SNRNXS 55 points ago

If he loses either his supporters will sit on their ass and do nothing, or 1776 commences again.

41
deleted 41 points ago
25
white_redoubt 25 points ago

dystopian utopia.

Dystopia

13
deleted 13 points ago
5
white_redoubt 5 points ago

I see

32
RatsCatsBats 32 points ago

He won’t lose. If he “loses”, no self respecting supporter here will accept those results. So we will have to split into a MAGA only country with only one party. Imagine how much we can MAGA with no Dem or RINO interference of any kind

16
KeyboardWarrior 16 points ago

MAGA sanctuary cities. Where we respect the U.S Constitution

8
RatsCatsBats 8 points ago

Yes, where us magasexuals can finally be truly open without getting sucker punched by some pasty commies

3
totktonikak 3 points ago

There is an opinion that the main purpose of CHAZ - or however that Wokadishu is called at the moment - is to set a precedent for dismantling autonomies of any kind and maybe put some legislation under that. To use it against something like MAGA sanctuary cities if it comes to that. Losing the upcoming election would be exquisitely bad for the country.

7
SNRNXS 7 points ago

Muh fascist one party state reee

3
RatsCatsBats 3 points ago

At that point their words can’t hurt us, we won’t play their game

6
FuckTheMedia 6 points ago

You are a piece of shit, advocating for us to cede to the evil tyrants. This ENTIRE COUNTRY is MAGA COUNTRY and we will not give up ANY of our land to these treasonous tyrants. They need to move to canada, germany or somewhere else, but this entire piece of land is ours.

6
RatsCatsBats 6 points ago

Lol ok so you’re going to send your kid to school so he can kneel for the anthem and then have a drag queen gyrate for him? We either split up or we enter a bloody hot civil war. We need to defend what we got vigorously and build back America into what it is meant to be. There is no more working with the Left on anything

2
FuckTheMedia 2 points ago

Agreed, there is no more working with them. However, we WILL NOT give up our land. This is OUR COUNTRY and the left is a hostile actor (foreign and domestic). They don't have the will to stand up to us, and I suspect, someday soon, we will stand up to them.

4
RatsCatsBats 4 points ago

You say that like we own all the land right now. Look around you, you can’t even go outside with a MAGA hat. Tell me what the fuck do we own?! Can’t even support the president in public for fear of death or losing our livelihoods so what in the ever loving fuck do we own?! Let’s find where we can build our strongholds and vigorously defend them. There is no more working with the Left in any capacity

-2
FuckTheMedia -2 points ago

so you are literally advocating for being intimidated into giving up our country. noted. you are def. a paid shill. get your thought cancer out of here son.

... continue reading thread?
25
h203h 25 points ago

if he loses (which he won't) BUT IF. there will be a civil war because we know there won't be any deep state lockup's and it is WE THE PEOPLES TURN TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. NO MORE MR NICE GUYS AND GALS

TWO GENDERS TWO TERMS TWO SCOOPS

15
FuckCommies 15 points ago

...ONE IN THE CHAMBER

5
45fan 5 points ago

One in their ass.

13
xBigCoffinHunter 13 points ago

We’re already in a civil war

5
Blacktex8t 5 points ago

This... the cold war before shit gets uber real...

15
CastlesMadeofSand01 15 points ago

Go back? I didn't know they stopped. Check out Gorsuch's decision from a few days ago.

When up for nomination, that guy was 100% unanimously a slam dunk choice based on every conservative I read, no small feat. And he still managed to fuck the rule of law.

11
deleted 11 points ago
6
dixond 6 points ago

while forcing one group to pay for those children forever while they can't have children due to taxes and outsourcing"

This is 100% the truth.

The cratering of the birth rate all across the West is a direct result of the destruction of the value of labour by feminism and the accompanying rise of a welfare state that steals wealth from those that work and gives it to those that don't.

How can any honest hard working couple find the time, money, and desire to raise three children in the West any longer?

4
fullshiningorange 4 points ago

The capital should be in the middle of the country anyway. It was when it was founded and we started with the 13 colonies. It needs to be somewhere like Wichita or Omaha.

2
DeplorableCentipede 2 points ago

You'll just turn Wichita or Omaha blue. The bureaucrats will always vote blue.

103
DickTick 103 points ago

Now that I think about it, you know damn well the Republican judges that helped with this decision knew exactly what the result would be... So did the Democrats...

I'm even more confused than ever now. DACA is small fish compared to many other things.... so if Trump wanted it to be, this could be a fucking huge win and not a loss at all....

68
4cdarth [S] 68 points ago

Remember, he is a 4d chess player. I am thinking he wanted this to happen, setting a precedent that EOs become law, and will probably pump out some EOs that will aid conservatives, and because of the recent ruling, must become law, no argument.

106
V43_of_ii_dim 106 points ago

Yeah, EOs become law is all fine and good until a communist is elected president. Then it’s Gulag time.

41
deleted 41 points ago
18
KeyboardWarrior 18 points ago

What about gay kenyans?

5
DickTick 5 points ago

As long as they're voting for Biden they're good!

19
Wanderlust 19 points ago

Nah, Trump is God Emperor for life. His new Executive Order will say so. It'll be the greatest dynasty ever.

11
V43_of_ii_dim 11 points ago

I can dream...

11
wytxcook1 11 points ago

They're going to get rid of the EC and make presidential election a popular vote.

NY, FL, TX, CA will dictate terms to the entire nation.

15
V43_of_ii_dim 15 points ago

I propose a constitutional amendment to oust CA from the Union so we can fight a war to conquer it again.

4
ProdigalPlaneswalker 4 points ago

I'll be part of your 5th column.

1
deleted 1 point ago
7
WowStrongWinning 7 points ago

This right here is what I’m afraid of. The proper ruling is the Executive Order can be rescinded at any time because it was not written through the legislature.

However now, in order for an Executive Order to be rescinded, a specific policy reason must be given, as to why the Executive Order is being rescinded.

So now, the Supreme Court essentially turned the United States into, for the time being, an elected dictatorship. A president can now write law and well it’s law now.

Can’t wait for us to be the new United States Empire, when we get a new leader that does away elections through decree of Executive Order.

I am done with Executive Orders at all levels, mayor, governor, president. They usurp the legislature and give the executive the power to write law.

2
V43_of_ii_dim 2 points ago

What drives me absolutely batty about this is (correct me if I’m wrong) it seems like the bulk of Trump’s EOs have sought primarily to roll back executive power in this regard. So is the Supreme Court espousing an endless expansion of executive power? That creeps me the fuck out.

6
WowStrongWinning 6 points ago

I’m not a lawyer, but at this point it doesn’t really matter since law seems to be whatever the musings of the Supreme Court are. So I guess I’m not a psychic.

The way I understand it is that whoever the president is needs to not only prove they have the authority to rescind the executive order, but they have now tacked on that the president also has to prove his motive for rescinding as well.

How someone proves their motive is beyond me. It’s completely subjective. So now just issue out Executive Orders and make the next president prove that his motives are supposedly pure in removing them. Good luck.

3
Snake 3 points ago

I'm conflicted in so many different ways. I don't want this power given to the president. I don't want a do-nothing Congress. So how do we / can we solve urgent matters in the United States, and if EOs are policy then why can't a future president roll back EOs?

Perhaps you pedes are right and this was all a setup by Trump. Please correct me, but it sounded like they denied Trump's EO because they just wanted a little more justification for the EO? Maybe that info was intentionally withheld to set future precedents for Democrats that might want to undo Trump's EOs without reason? Maybe Trump does have justification for it and will deport or maybe he empathizes with DACA and may let them stay under the condition that this doesn't happen again (and we get backing that it doesn't)?

Perhaps this was important so Democrats couldn't roll back the following without justification:

  • Trump's two human trafficking executive orders (Epstein / NXIVM / Hollywood / Media / Prince Andrew / deep state)
  • Police reform
  • Section 230 enforcement

These above are some of my favorites... but here's a few more

  • Reinvigorating America's Human Space Exploration Program
  • Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence (Chyyyyna bad)
  • Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses (Fuck I've never even heard about this until I looked up the list... just kinda browsing. We're in the middle of an era where I would not be surprised about anything so I'm glad Trump is making sure Chyyyna and others cannot attack us.)
  • Establishing the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector
3
MAGAholic 3 points ago

This is not 4d chess. Trump did not want this.

This is simply how desperate the left is to stop trump. Thats how deal this is, and how far it goes.

The left wing judicial branch just fucking said a current president cannot let an illegal EO from the previous admin expire.

Imagine if we did this.

My fucking god.

1
Snake 1 point ago

Interesting, but I will not pretend like I know what Trump wants or does not want. He's several steps ahead of myself and most (or all) of us here.

1
LowIqNogger2020 1 point ago

This power isn't granted to every president, only the presidents selected by the chosen people. Every other president will get sued into oblivion by the armies of left wing activist non-profits, they will cherry pick a court to put issue an injunction, and then it will be abolished by the SC.

38
Italians_Invented_2A 38 points ago

If you think the concept of "precedent" is worth a damn in this political battle you're playing checkers, not chess.

5
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 5 points ago

Nb4 "but but they did that to Trump but not the Democrat!!"

Wake up people. Seriously, wake the fuck up.

Also nb4 they steal the election. What are we gonna do? Put on a mask and take a knee?

2
TimeIsARetardedOval 2 points ago

Spitting mad facts. The don't play by any rules, why would they give a shit about "precedent."

18
NotNolan 18 points ago

Hidden near the end of Roberts’ meandering decision is the critical point that President Trump’s statements, even as interpreted by the other side, did not demonstrate that the DACA reversal was motivated by animus.

This is the single most important point in the opinion. Everything else can be fixed with new DHS action.

18
OneOfMany_MAGA 18 points ago

Who gives a shit if they are motivated by animus though? He’s the president. He doesn’t have to defend his motivations. He was elected on the platform of being tough on illegal immigration.

If people don’t like it they can just not re-elect him.

16
Italians_Invented_2A 16 points ago

It's so fucked up that we need SCOTUS to judge if something is racist or not.

I'm so sick of this obsession about "racism"

5
Nellie_the_Beaut 5 points ago

Expect to see a photo op any day now with the entire SCOTUS taking a knee, holding up a #BLM sign.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago

Who does that should be impeached because the courts are supposed to not be political.

4
Nellie_the_Beaut 4 points ago

Oh no - the Democrat socialist/globalists who seem to be running the country now say that black lives matter is absolutely not a political movement! It’s a human rights movement, dontchaknow? And anyone who doesn’t agree is a - well, you know.

3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago

I known, this makes me so angry. They managed to pull this topic outside of the Overton window.

2
Thehumancentipede 2 points ago

What does this mean?

9
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 9 points ago

It means faggot Roberts said that everything about it is constitutional but he didn't like what he thought the reasoning behind it (muh racism) was, so it's apparently unconstitutional (it's not).

And no I'm not joking.

2
ippwndu 2 points ago

Did anyone scrutinize Obama Sin Laden's reasoning for creating DACA? Did e even give one?

5
iminurbas3 5 points ago

It means that legally he can reverse DACA but they don't approve of his supposed motivations (racism). Basically scotus is ruled by the mob and cower before the almighty (and now meaningless) word RACISM.

2
NotNolan 2 points ago

It means the primary argument that will be made against him the next time - and in a host of other legal actions - has already been decided in his favor 5-4.

2
Thehumancentipede 2 points ago

Please explain

2
NotNolan 2 points ago

Most of the arguments against Trump are not based on law, they are based on hurt feelings - in legalese, “official actions motivated by animus.” In other words, the parties arguing that even though Trump’s actions are lawful, they are unconstitutional because of their improper motivations... as evidenced by tweets or interviews.

What Roberts says near the end of today’s DACA opinion is that presidential statements removed in time from the executive action are an insufficient basis for a finding of animus. It is this portion of the holding, and not anything on the administrative intricacies of the DACA issue, that I predict will be the most important in the coming years.

2
Thehumancentipede 2 points ago

Since when does SCOTUS take political reasoning into the process. Isn’t that scary precedent?

5
Toughsky_Shitsky 5 points ago

setting a precedent that EOs become law

So, you think Trump has a strategy to change the Constitution unilaterally to give the President authority to single-handedly write law, avoiding Congress altogether? Kinda Exactly like a dictator?

That would require an amendment that would never pass.

This is your idea of Trump's 4D chess?

r/politics would love you.

3
somethinga9230k 3 points ago

But, has that precedent already been set by previous presidents, such as reg. DACA? If the deep state presidents can do that, and will do that whether Trump does it or not, then what will happen?

6
Toughsky_Shitsky 6 points ago

Sure. Because two wrongs always make a right.

Answer: Drain the fucking swamp. 3 1/2 years .. not one arrest.

Find an AG who cares to do his job.

6
somethinga9230k 6 points ago

Good points, but...

Drain the fucking swamp. 3 1/2 years .. not one arrest.

This seems much, much harder than one might believe. The deep state is very, very deep, among other things and aspects.

Find an AG who cares to do his job.

If you want a non-'deep state' AG that does do his job, then you must completely annihilate (without any mercy or restraint) the organized group of assassins that has murdered, attempted to murder, or "reined in", both high-profile and low-profile victims, such as John F. Kennedy, Reagan (whom was shot a few months into his presidency), Scalise, Scalia, Seth Rich, etc. etc. etc.

6
Toughsky_Shitsky 6 points ago

Comey and McCabe were handed to Barr on a silver platter ... Barr punted.

It only takes courage and will .. the evidence to drain the swamp is there.

5
somethinga9230k 5 points ago

Barr punted.

Is Barr deep state?

It only takes courage and will .. the evidence to drain the swamp is there.

But what if all the people that had courage and will have been assassinated? And what if someone that does have genuine courage, will, ability, etc. succeeds in getting nominated, and ends up being assassinated? Apart from Trump, whom has his own trusted bodyguards and resources and does not rely on the Secret "Assistance" as far as I know.

Again: The organized group of assassins must be completely annihilated, without any mercy or restraint.

... continue reading thread?
4
non-entity 4 points ago

Actually, the problem is you would have to get rid of mitch and all his buddies like burr and graham that will not allow the president to have his choice of AG. AG’s have to be confirmed and the piece of shit repubs are just as bad as dems. They will not let Trump have who he wants. They are complicit in all this shit too. Repubs are dirty in Ukraine. Ever wonder why mitch put burr over the intelligence committee to do nothing but obstruct trump and help mueller?

1
somethinga9230k 1 point ago

That is definitely a problem as well.

2
SadPangolin 2 points ago

Drain the fucking swamp. 3 1/2 years .. not one arrest.

No point arresting them if Hawaiian Judge will declare that they have to be released.

Either they have to be flown to Gitmo in the middle of the night, or the judicial system needs to be decucked first.

2
4cdarth [S] 2 points ago

It's just a idea, it might not be a thing the left sees and approves of, but it does set a basis regarding EOs and laws.

15
Toughsky_Shitsky 15 points ago (edited)

Don't care about the left. Conservatives don't approve of it.

It literally destroys the Constitution. We elect a new President every 4 years. The next lefty President will make a law declaring himself President for life, and boxcar rides for any dissenters.

Read fucking history!

3
SadPangolin 3 points ago

The next lefty President will make a law declaring himself President for life, and boxcar rides for any dissenters.

But he'll do that anyway.

The next Democrat President will be the end of the US. Just look at Biden and his 'we're coming for your AR15' speech. That'll be the start of open warfare.

1
Anaconda 1 point ago

These retards actually think the POTUS can rescind birthright citizenship with EOs 🤣😂🤣😂

5
knightofday 5 points ago

Agreed. Could totally see this being the plan

3
Art-Vandelay41 3 points ago

Earlier on another post I said it looked like the left overplayed their hand. Now I am in agreement with you I think the left just unknowingly played into the President’s plan

8
CTR_Challenger 8 points ago

This DACA decision, while seems bad is actually brilliant even though its insanely unconstitutional. The Supreme Court just gave the President power to create law out of thin air, completely circumventing Congress.

5
MAGAholic 5 points ago

Trump wont be president forever. It can end as early as January and as late as 4 years from now. Its not brilliant by any means.

0
eagle123 0 points ago

From what I see it means that any future presidents trying to roll back Trump's EO's will have to prove that their motives are pure.

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago

In theory. In practice the SCROTUM already bats for the Democrats/Neo-Cons. It could be flagrant they're rolling back Trump's EO from a position of utter corruption and they'll be allowed to do it.

"The truth is, the game was rigged from the start."

2
deleted 2 points ago
3
GrayGhost 3 points ago (edited)

Here's how:

  1. DACA was an EO invented by Shitstain Obama out of thin air.

  2. SCOTUS is upholding it as if it can be neither looked into nor overturned because it was an EO.

  3. This precedent has not been set for EOs in such a way before.

  4. By this logic, Trump can make a law out of thin air (see 1).

  5. No one can undo it (see 2).

Now, do I think this is all true, and set-in-stone? No. I think the Supreme Court just proved that they think sane, armed Americans who still believe in the law are pussies.

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago

I think the Supreme Court just proved that they think sane, armed Americans who still believe in the law are pussies.

I cannot imagine why they would possibly think that...

...

/s

2
Refugee 2 points ago

POTUS was essentially given power to create immigration law without the need of a congressional bill.

99
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 99 points ago

It’s true though. The court effectively ruled that EO’s cannot be rescinded even if they’re not strictly speaking legal. Everyone should make their list of what they want Trump to do. Mine:

  • gun control laws will not be enforced by federal authorities. States are instructed to do the same

  • border is completely closed until further notice to anyone who isn’t a citizen or lawful permanent resident

  • the deportations will continue until morale improves

34
ohwens 34 points ago

Federal Election vote totals from states that do not require Voter ID are not reliable and will be ignored.

6
zestanor 6 points ago

voter fraud isn’t really the problem: election fraud is. Voter ID doesn’t prevent dead people from voting.

1
WinterDog 1 point ago

How does voter id not prevent dead people from voting?

6
zestanor 6 points ago

Voter ID prevents individuals from cheating. It doesn’t prevent ballot forgery.

31
deleted 31 points ago
25
deleted 25 points ago
24
deleted 24 points ago
9
FreeSpeechMaster 9 points ago

Glad to have you hear, Ron Paul!! Was wondering when you'd join us! :)

3
dumnem 3 points ago

While I like drug testing studies were done and the end result is that drug testing resulted in the gov spending more money on drug tests than they saved on benefits

1
deleted 1 point ago
1
almond_activator 1 point ago

Also, people whose lives are going well tend not to use drugs. Take the boot off, and you'll see junkies begin to recover physically as well as fiscally.

1
zestanor 1 point ago

Flat tax? Wouldn’t that just increase the burden on the middle class?

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago

Ask yourself who are the people who make this argument?

Answer: Leftwing fucktards and globalist Neo-Cons.

1
deleted 1 point ago
1
Aquamine-Amarine 1 point ago

For illegals? Yes, I agree. But I benefited from birthright citizenship because when I was born, only my father was a citizen (he got his citizenship years before) and my mother only had a green card at the time of my birth. She did eventually finish the process and got her citizenship years later.

So for pending cases like that, I'm okay with it. There should probably be rules though, like how one parent must already be a citizen.

4
flashersenpai 4 points ago

Birthright citizenship is when someone is born in US territory, not whether one of their parents is a citizen. There is currently no requirement that either parent be a citizen.

12
Yeti2 12 points ago

☝️This

11
Iliterallylovejv 11 points ago

Don’t forget an EO to abolish wage taxes aka theft.

4
trumpORbust 4 points ago

Deportations do improve moral -- but that is not a reason to stop them, they should accelerate

3
cuntard 3 points ago

don’t forget nationwide voter id and finger ink

91
Eatinglue 91 points ago

Trump: “Oh you WANT Presidential executive orders to be iron-clad and irrevocable by subsequent Presidents? Where’s my pen?”

41
JackLemon 41 points ago

That won't work. SCOTUS is now completely political. They will allow leftist EOs but not ones based on the constitution. Like every other institution including academia, media, corporate America, the federal judiciary is lost and so is the Constitution.

6
SpeedyPrius1 6 points ago

How's RBG feeling these days?

2
ippwndu 2 points ago

Weekend at Ruthie's.

3
DeplorableCentipede 3 points ago

Yeah, people in this thread seem to be forgetting that the left operates by a double standard.

6
CerebralPimp 6 points ago

This.

3
Hillary_For_Prison 3 points ago

Lol he should just write an EO declaring the Supreme Court null and void. They can't challenge his order if the SC doesn't exist /s

76
nakedjay 76 points ago

The President can now do whatever the fuck he wants with EO's and without congress.

46
Jikemenkins 46 points ago

Seriously? Not good.

64
SpiritOf76 64 points ago

No it's not, but if that's how they're going to play it Trump ought to use it to our advantage. You can't keep trying to be a gentleman when someone is repeatedly kicking you in the balls.

32
malthrax 32 points ago

First up, write an Executive Order removing John Roberts from the SCOTUS.

7
OGTD1 7 points ago

This guys fucks

21
BathouseBarry 21 points ago

Fuck them. We're playing for keeps. Make them play by their own damn rules.

20
epium 20 points ago

First move: Get rid of Smith Mundt Act to disallow domestic propaganda!

11
Toughsky_Shitsky 11 points ago

That's better known as a Dictatorship.

21
texascpa 21 points ago

Sure, which is why the Supreme Court decision is so wrong.

11
MatthiasBlack 11 points ago

I just had my brain broken trying to explain to a liberal the problems here and their response was "the SCOTUS are the most qualified people. I think they know a bit more about the Constitution and law than you."

I want to scream into the void in frustration.

3
GrayGhost 3 points ago

That's what 'liberals' - read, commies, do. We don't do that.

We fight commies. By any means necessary. They're doing it to us already with bricks and sticks. In the "balls" department, they're winning.

-2
Toughsky_Shitsky -2 points ago

Yep. But the answer is not to abide by it and use it for your own gain, thereby setting another precedent to be abused by the next lefty President.

15
ORD_to_SFO 15 points ago

But, they set the precedent. It's already set. The made the new rules, and if we don't do what's in our best interest, they've proven that they will.

I am on the side of pumping out EOs as fast as possible. If EOs are put into effect, Trump has a better chance of winning the election. If no EOs...well, Trump might not win, and you can rest assured the incoming democrat overlords will be pumping out EOs just like the DACA one, morality, ethics, legality be damned.

I'd like to add, i'm confident any EO that Trump orders would actually be legal. Trumps EO would be an effort to uphold the law & constitution. We wouldn't need EOs if the existing law was already respected & followed. Whether Trump uses EOs or not has no bearing on the fact that democrats have & will use them.

3
Toughsky_Shitsky 3 points ago

No matter who abuses EOs is trashing the Constitution, ending America, and turning on the faucet that waters the Tree of Liberty.

13
ORD_to_SFO 13 points ago

That America is already gone. I believe we can only take steps to preserve what is left, and maybe it will return in time. But if we don't use EOs now, we will never get another chance, and time will not return the America we knew.

3
spezisacuckold 3 points ago (edited)

Look, I completely agree with you. That said, you need to agree with us that fairness only works when both sides act in good faith. The "left" has consistently said "fuck that" and waged an outright crusade against equally applied rules, so it's only "fair" to use their unfair rules against them until they've completely given up, and then you stay eternally vigilant.

1
deleted 1 point ago
2
WinterDog 2 points ago

What makes you think SCOTUS will uphold Trump's EOs like they upheld Obama's? Legal precedent doesn't matter that much when you are literally the highest court in the land, and can do whatever you damn well please.

It's giving a ton of power to the President. We can't complain about it that much because it is giving Trump more power. But what about when Trump's not president anymore? What happens if Biden wins? Or after Trump's second turn, some crazy democrat gets elected?

This is an incredibly dangerous decision by SCOTUS. It is removing power from the Congressional branch. It's all fun and games until someone is elected that decides to wield that power in a way we don't agree with. SCOTUS has too much power. POTUS now has too much power. The checks and balances of our government have finally failed.

I don't know what is going to happen in the next 20 years, but a civil war is looking more and more likely.

2
ORD_to_SFO 2 points ago

I fully expect SCOTUS to challenge everything Trump writes into an EO. I 100% agree that it indicates the checks & balances are broken. What i'm saying, is that even if we behave and follow the rules, we KNOW the left never will. They already passed illegal EOs, and forced bills through congress that illegally penalized americans (0bamacare) and, let's not forget FISA abuse. They do not follow laws. We can be all ethical and never write an EO...and then we'll lose the election, and the incoming lefty will write EOs to have conservatives rounded up... That's the current situation. We're the adults in the room, we need to maintain power or the whole thing goes to hell.

10
Based_and_proud 10 points ago

Great. First EO needs to be related to voter ID. We'll never have another Dem president.

50
Nadlers_Belt 50 points ago

Time to abolish the unconstitutional NFA by executive order then.

10
lasmejoresmaga 10 points ago

ooooh this please

9
Kekintosh2020 9 points ago

ATF shitting their pants

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago

Executive Order: Cast Into a Thousand Pieces and Scattered to the Winds

48
womp_squared 48 points ago

I hope this means a voter ID and nationwide conceal carry EO is on the way

9
covfefe-time 9 points ago

Nothing wrong with common sense measures, now or ever.

4
spezisacuckold 4 points ago

Yep. NOW IS THE TIME FOR ACTION.

5
Kekintosh2020 5 points ago

Think bigger, NFA abolishment ATF defunding if the check is blank.

45
eddieblasphemy 45 points ago

Get that pen out! I wanna see some crazy shit

31
tommichael522 31 points ago (edited)

The Supreme Court set a precedent basically that the Executive Order possibly can't be cancelled by incoming admin without cause. This is my guess. Almost as if the EO remains the law until it can be proven it shouldn't be.

31
tommichael522 31 points ago

Voter ID!!!!!

Discard Mail-in-Ballots

Open carry in every state!!!

Fuck BIG TECH hard! Break-up the motherfuckers!!

29
BasedRedPillZeus 29 points ago

Outstanding! Time to write EO’s to:

  1. End the Fed
  2. Eliminate unconstitutional income tax
  3. End welfare
  4. Bring all troops home
  5. Congressional Term limits
  6. Deport all illegals currently in the country
  7. Break up FANG monopoly
  8. Eliminate Public education
  9. Disband the CIA
6
CharethCutestory 6 points ago

I’ve always been and always will be conservative for life, but there should be minimal welfare. Really minimal, like very short window and near impossible to get. Like a gun in commie blue states.

8
BasedRedPillZeus 8 points ago

Welfare used to be handled by the local communities and churches.

2
TimeIsARetardedOval 2 points ago
  1. Congressional Term limits

Oh baby! Now we're cooking with napalm!

21
ryvrdrgn14 21 points ago

So what does actually mean? o_O;

47
nakedjay 47 points ago

It means it gives the President and future President's crazy amounts of power through their Executive Orders.

20
MAGACAP 20 points ago

Was this really in question?

Looking how Obama operated it was pretty much given

2
ryvrdrgn14 2 points ago

I see. Thanks for clearing that up!

20
ChuckedBeef 20 points ago

How about an EO that abolishes the SCOTUS?

4
trump4eva 4 points ago

Ummm, there are three branches of govt and that won't change.

14
America_No_1 14 points ago

We already have a judicial branch acting as a legislative branch so does separation of power even mean anything anymore?

7
peterstrzoked 7 points ago

There’s 4, and only one of them matters

3
malthrax 3 points ago

He could write an EO removing John Roberts from the bench and appointing someone more reliable.

0
zestanor 0 points ago

This would be a constitutional revolution, since no such power has ever been assumed by the president

19
deleted 19 points ago
5
Kekintosh2020 5 points ago

How do you stop payroll tax

15
sagebrushfire 15 points ago

Trump needs a win...bigly. In February, he could have put up a hammock in the Rose Garden and slept until re-election and now it’s been one shitshow after another. Fucking RINO, globalist cuck Roberts. And no, the worthless DOJ filing charges against a cuck setting a cop car on fire is not a victory. I don’t know what he needs to do but he needs to do it quickly. This is ridiculous.

15
DonAtari 15 points ago

Start writing E.Os Mr President.

15
Yolobaggins 15 points ago

This should never have happened. This allows more power to the president...

13
SirSirloinOfLoin 13 points ago

UNLIMITED POWER!!!

5
4cdarth [S] 5 points ago

Ah, a fellow man of culture I see... I have just one thing to say.... "Hello there."

2
Dragonmoon333 2 points ago

Another Happy Landing

12
Ghostphaez 12 points ago

Tom Cotton response to SC:

https://www.cotton.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=1384

Cotton Scorches SCOTUS on DACA Decision

Washington, D.C. — Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) issued the statement below after the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration could not undo the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

“It cannot be the law that what Barack Obama has unlawfully done, no president may undo. Yet John Roberts again postures as a Solomon who will save our institutions from political controversy and accountability. If the Chief Justice believes his political judgment is so exquisite, I invite him to resign, travel to Iowa, and get elected. I suspect voters will find his strange views no more compelling than do the principled justices on the Court.”

3
flashersenpai 3 points ago

bruh I'm looking forward to hearing from Cruz and Robert Barnes maybe Viva Frei too

12
Jikemenkins 12 points ago

Im confused?

42
pmurTJdlanoD 42 points ago

EO by Obama upheld against withdrawal by GEOTUS. Implying that GEOTUS can write a string of EOs that will hold up into the next presidency and beyond. Not a great Pandora's Box but might as well use the corrupt left's rules against them.

11
jennyfrutex 11 points ago

just like them fiddling with filibuster laws. it always comes back to bite them.

5
thegeebeebee 5 points ago

Dhs memo, not eo

2
ChasingRed 2 points ago

which EO was it?

1
ReardenMetal 1 point ago

DACA

28
deleted 28 points ago
7
Art-Vandelay41 7 points ago

So Trump can basically use this situation as leverage to either rescind Obama’s EO or write as many EO’s as possible

9
deleted 9 points ago
5
Art-Vandelay41 5 points ago

I’m confident Trump will come out on top on this in the short term, but what happens when he’s gone? The Supreme Court fucked this up big time, and I’m worried what this ruling + a Democrat President is capable of

3
Jonny 3 points ago

Is there anywhere left on this earth that isn’t fucked?

4
thegeebeebee 4 points ago

DHS memo, not eo

2
grapenuts 2 points ago

cant be rescinded "without cause". Meaning, all republican EOs will get rescinded no problem but never any democrat ones.

1
deleted 1 point ago
14
Nadlers_Belt 14 points ago

A precedent has set by Obama’s executive order being upheld.

That means the Executive Branch now has way more power than was ever intended by the Constitution.

President Trump and future Presidents can now technically issue any executive order they damn well please, regardless of existing laws and the Constitutional seperation of powers.

12
duvalpede 12 points ago

I have a legal solution - 2A

12
Kozio_ 12 points ago

The concern troll in me wants to be unleashed but I will patiently wait. He's walking on glass no matter the direction he goes thanks to the media and Dems so whatever

10
MrWWonka 10 points ago

Many of us are right there with you. Temper your anger into cold steel. Our time for winning is right around the corner

11
trump4eva 11 points ago

ELI5 please?

25
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 25 points ago

Court says EO’s signed by previous presidents basically can’t be rescinded and become a law unto themselves, effectively bypassing Congress. The left should have been absolutely certain they want to give Trump this power before doing it

13
jennyfrutex 13 points ago

Your average low-info leftist voter just heard something about "dreamers" and "children" and started screeching about how Trump is a racist. They didn't stop to consider the ramifications of treating EO's this way.

17
MSG1000 17 points ago

Dumb fucks on SCOTUS are effectively saying you can’t just revoke EO’s, which means they’re effectively laws and aren’t easily repealable. It will help us short term with Trump, long term fuck us over.

7
covfefe-time 7 points ago

All about the long-game, especially with Traitorous shits that want to see our power supplanted and overturned.

11
barwhack 11 points ago

EOs by a sitting president are now irrevocable by subsequent presidents.

9
DRKMSTR 9 points ago

Since DACA (an executive order) cannot be rescinded by an executive order, it would mean almost all future executive orders by Trump can only be countered by congress, not judges.

2
Work2gethrBiglyOrDie 2 points ago

ELIAOC 👌

10
prawnexodus 10 points ago

What power is he referring to?

39
eddieblasphemy 39 points ago

You can bypass the constitution to make laws and create a protected class of non-citizens

4
covfefe-time 4 points ago

Yeah, try being a wypipo and pull that in any other county on Earth.

Makes you wonder.

3
deleted 3 points ago
8
Spirit_of_Resistance 8 points ago

Too spicy for the cuckservatives here

2
One_Man_Militia 2 points ago

Seriously, break em in easy

3
Spirit_of_Resistance 3 points ago

You can't just mention Israelis without pointing out how good of dancers they are

Look up "dancing Israelis" if you don't believe me!

6
Ladimir_Wewtin 6 points ago

🤔

5
MondayCoupleIsDead 5 points ago

Oy vey!

2
Top-Secret-KGB-Agent 2 points ago

This is all part of their plan to create a totalitarian one world communist government. All it is going to take as a single Demoncrat president to be elected. The only thing we can do now is stock up on guns and ammo and move as far away from Democrat shithole cities as possible.

14
4cdarth [S] 14 points ago

The recent precident the SCOTUS just set up with letting the DACA EO become law. With this precident. Any EO trump now makes becomes law. Atleast, that's how it seems to be interpreted.

12
nakedjay 12 points ago

Executive Orders.

12
MrMcGreenGenes 12 points ago

The power of having a pen and an 0bama phone.

5
peterstrzoked 5 points ago

ring ring ring ring

3
covfefe-time 3 points ago

Man, if only we had some kind of guideline that went in to great detail about separation of power, and the unambiguous principles that we need to abide by.

2
TimeIsARetardedOval 2 points ago

Man, if only the vast majority of people weren't dog shit and would actually follow said guideline.

10
texascpa 10 points ago

He's setting everyone up for his EO's. It's the "hey, Supreme Court says it's fine, so stick it" defense.

10
Yucky 10 points ago

Also, remember, now any president after Trump must go through the long and tedious Administrative Procedures Act process for repealing or modifying every single EO that Trump has issued. For any change that is made to any of Trump's executive policies, conservative lawyers (the few actually left) should sue into oblivion. Every single last letter changed must go through the APA process, and nothing less.

Thank you John Roberts.

5
sply1 5 points ago

You assume the rules of this new system will be fairly applied to all. I'm not sure that will be the case.

8
HolaPendejos 8 points ago

Please keep your seats and tray tables in their upright and locked position

8
Psilocybik 8 points ago

GLOVES OFF DICKS OUT

7
CarGuru9898 7 points ago

I truly hope he issues a ton of EO’s and just drops the fucking hammer. Let the courts take decades to sort it out. Precedent has been set.

3
MondoBurger 3 points ago

Right, especially since we already know there's a full scale insurrection going on and the dems are willing to do anything to win this election. Trump will drop some MOAB executive orders this year.

7
gamingthisandthat 7 points ago

EO INCOMING!!!

6
LLegendary 6 points ago

Take that same power and make it hell for them.

6
Anonymous_user_of_US 6 points ago

He could really red pill people by doing an EO that over turns the NFA and GCA and let SCOTUS say he can't do that, people would see that the Judicial system needs to be torn down and rebuilt.

6
duvalpede 6 points ago

When is the EO outlawing the Democrat party?

You KNOW if the Dems win, they'll issue one banning Republicans.

5
deleted 5 points ago
3
Red_Princess 3 points ago

You're 100% right and I've been saying this for a while.

For a long time, I laughed at people with TDS because -- no matter how powerful the President is, he isn't as powerful as they were making him out to be. He's still bound by separation of powers and states' rights.

The left head-spun everyone into thinking the president is a dictator--and while doing it, I have watched the media, the legislature, and the Supreme Court routinely make decisions that ENHANCE Federal power.

We gave our enemies so much rope that they hung AMERICA.

5
8bit_mixtape 5 points ago

This is it, pedes, were moving on to point of no return.

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago

Hell... it's about damn time. Let's kick this off before the Boomers get to dodge the bullet they helped pull the trigger on. Most of the Silent generation avoided their due.

5
AlphaOmaga 5 points ago

Roberts has been such a disappointment.

5
AllTheWayTrump 5 points ago

RIP America. I hope Trump starts issuing multiple EO's every day.

5
humped2424 5 points ago

We don’t deserve trump at ALL

5
Yeti2 5 points ago

Write tons of EOs, force the SCOTUS to their hypocrisy.

5
Dialectic 5 points ago (edited)

Flood the EOs: Nationally reciprocity, national constitutional carry, national ban on abortion, national castle doctrine, national vehicle castle doctrine

Edit: eo adding term limits to scotus, eo adding term limits to Congress

If it’s just prosecutorial discretion, Then fucking order all prosecutors to follow the constitution and obey these EOs I just listed

5
philandy 5 points ago

That loaded last sentence has so many between the lines on it.

5
FuckCommies 5 points ago

Fuck it. Start throwing EO's. Kid gloves have got to come off.

4
tiwal 4 points ago

EO term limits in the Senate! If they have reached it, they must vacate and have special elections!

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago

"Nothing personal Turtle man."

4
Sgfoo 4 points ago

Executive order voter ID now.

4
BasedJaffa 4 points ago

I will personally donate an entire paycheck to Trump’s re-election campaign if he tweets “UNLIMITED POWER!!!”

3
4cdarth [S] 3 points ago

Yes.

4
2honks 4 points ago

So he can't rescind the EO. But he can completely re-write the rules. He simply releases a new EO to supercede or change the rules to make it nearly impossible to apply to DACA.

4
UpTrump 4 points ago

MR TRUMP, PLEASE USE YOUR POWER. EVERY OTHER PRESIDENT WOULD. DON'T LET IT GO TO WASTE!

4
Illinoyed 4 points ago

It’s over the haters’ heads, that DACA isn’t legislative and SCOTUS is ceding their power of checks and balances

3
Serah123 3 points ago (edited)

What sort of timetable are we looking at to get DACA dismantled once and for all? It seems the president (at least if its Trump) is not able to simply implement an executive order that is, in effect, the reverse of an earlier one.

So the beaurocratic multi-step review and re-review process has to start all over again, like a sort of adminstrative pantomime, that is all for show - all to satisfy Roberts and his leftist comrades on the Court?

In other words, will we likely see some permutation of this: Trump issues pretty much the same EO as before, which includes both an order/instruction to the DOJ and/or Lead Counsel at DHS to look into the legality of DACA, and an order for them to subsequently offer their recommendation about what to do with it. Then, on the opinion of the lawyers that the program is unlawful, unconstitutional, or simply bad policy (or all of the above, whichever it may be), the President decides to end it. Lawsuits again flood the courts until the issue is later brough before the S.C once more - which will treat it as though it were completely new in their eyes - thus bringing us back to this point in 2-3 years time (albeit hopefully with a more consitutionally sound resolution).

Is this what we can expect to happen from here on out?

3
thegeebeebee 3 points ago

So deputize us! We'll clean everything up real quick!

3
iouybiy 3 points ago

We have to win the house and change some aspects of the Administrative Procedures Act to stop this from happening. This case and the Census case boil down to no it is arbitrary and capricious because orange man bad racist and did not have the right thoughts in his heart when writing executive order.

3
Farage_massage 3 points ago

WHY THE FUCK HAS TRUMP NOT DONE SOMETHING SIMILAR BY EO?

If Obama can suspend immigration law, can Trump suspend election law? Can we just push it out to 2030? All these people are technically criminals. They have committed a crime. Let’s go and arrest them all today, without bond and hold them until the SC decides the method we can suspend an EO.

3
xBigCoffinHunter 3 points ago

Holy shit. I did not consider the other side of this decision. POTUS can pretty much EO anything and this decision would uphold it

3
LowIqNogger2020 3 points ago (edited)

It's insane. The SC is literally there to read and interpret the law. THAT'S IT!! The law, ADMITTED BY THE SC, is unconstitutional. The literal argument these people made was "ya the law is unconstitutional, but Trump didn't go through the proper channels, MANDATED BY THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, TO ABOLISH THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW. WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?!?! So now the SC has appointed itself the power that they can strike down any law they don't like if they disagree with the way it was implemented, that is literally fucking insane.

3
OneOfMany_MAGA 3 points ago

President Trump, please make an executive order for voter ID in all national elections and no mail in voting except for extenuating circumstances as reviewed by a board you appoint.

3
JohannKrupps 3 points ago

Donald Trump is the most nimble navigator there is! A very stable wordsmith in these trying times.

We would be lost in mad max world without him.

God bless and godspeed.

3
STIDGIT64 3 points ago

Sorry but Dreamers they are not . they crossed the border illegal regardless of how it happened by parent or other relative it was still illegal.. Until they pay their dues and obtain their paper work or citizenship paper work making them legal they are illegal. Right now they are nothing more than illegal dreamers waiting for citizenship papers be handed to them free of charge. This is not right .,the people who came here legally and paid their dues to obtain their papers .

I do not care what any of you think because unless you have dealt with immigration doing what is right than you will know what I am talking about. It is not only money but the time involved with multiple meetings at their convenience .

You ask how I know well a wife, a daughter and stepdaughter later I think I know .

3
Beat_to_Quarters 3 points ago

I like going on the offensive.

3
Xnyr21 3 points ago

Y'all act like this is a two way street. Trump's EOs will obviously be overturned somehow by the Supreme Court while still protecting democrats ones. This is nothing but bad as all forms of our government have been bought and paid for from the lowest level to the highest.

3
DeplorableLatino 3 points ago

Trump stands alone in the swamp...the man is surrounded by swamp creatures.

3
Toughsky_Shitsky 3 points ago

Well, the best interest of the United States is to fucking end the invasion... that includes ending DACA.

3
novaks47 3 points ago

Just end DACA. The judges can't do shit about it. He wouldn't be the first president to give the court a middle finger. Let the dems piss away all their newfound BLM money in court trying to fight it.

3
NoMoreMao 3 points ago

Fuck that noise. We want a machine gun of EOs. We can start by rescinding SCOTUS judges for life. If they don't like it we march armed on Washington DC.

If they want Civil War let's get this motherfucker started.

3
Imitate214 3 points ago

So the SC has de facto crowned the President a King for 4 years and that his EOs can't be revoked unless they're challenged by the Court itself? Is this what I'm hearing? If so, I guess Congress is useless now.

3
IntergalacticWalrus 3 points ago

What the fuck happened to separation of powers? How can the judiciary tell the executive of a separate but equal branch that they cannot revoke their own executive order?

2
4cdarth [S] 2 points ago

They can't. They really are suppose to rule if its unconstitutional or illegal. Which they failed to do with obama.

2
IntergalacticWalrus 2 points ago

I know he probably won’t ignore their decision. But it seems that legally he has every right to flex the executive as separate and tell them to fuck off.

3
MAGA_____bitches 3 points ago

So Trump can write 500 executive orders today, and they can NEVER be overturned by the Supreme Court or future presidents.

Holy f**** was this 24 -D chess?

Try to go after an executive order that you know the Supreme Court will throw back in order to set a legal precedent for future supreme executive order challenges??

3
rudi_reifenstecher 3 points ago

how can sanctuary cities be legal if federal law overrules state law ?

2
4cdarth [S] 2 points ago

You think dems care about what federal law says about illegals. They only care about the votes

3
AmericaFirstMAGA88 3 points ago

Put out an EO demanding proof of life for RBG

3
Warskullx 3 points ago

This is exactly what I was thinking. DACA was a executive order. Arguing that a President cannot undo a previous President's executive order is silly. The whole ruling is stupid. They argued Trump didn't give a good reason. So he can just make up another reason and try again.

This also sets precedent for the courts to randomly spike down repeals of executive orders. What if Trump put out an executive order tomorrow requiring states to grant concealed carry licenses to everyone who passes a background check? Would that be impossible to undo?

3
FreeSpeechMaster 3 points ago

Is GEOTUS basically saying the radical dems in the Supreme Court (including Roberts) have played themselves?

1
4cdarth [S] 1 point ago

So it would seem. pirates of the carribean theme plays

3
FreeSpeechMaster 3 points ago

"I almost expected it to be made of wood"....

3
Remember-The-Liberty 3 points ago

Repeal the NFA and the nineteenth amendment!

2
minotaurbeach 2 points ago

This Tweet almost made me cry, I was so happy,

2
trump_loving_canuck 2 points ago

Take back the House and get a super majority in the Senate. Impeach and remove everyone but Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh. Scorched Earth.

2
bsbbtnh 2 points ago

I made a post about this, but Trump won, and SCOTUS made the right decision. Trump is pretending he lost so the Dems and media can look like fools.

Obama argued, when putting DACA (and DAPA) in place, that it was 'prosecutorial discretion of the executive'. This means that the President could implement it, or axe it, at any time, for any reason, and nobody could do shit.

Trump rescinded DACA as an administrative rule. But he didn't follow APA procedures. Now why would Trump not do that? Is he stupid?

Of course this led to a lawsuit. Trump argued that DACA was an administrative rule, and that he has to power to rescind it. SCOTUS agreed. DACA is administrative. Trump can rescind it. But they ruled Trump has to follow APA procedures.

Does anybody remember DAPA? Deferred Action for Parents of Americans. Obama also said this was prosecutorial discretion. Texas said no. It went to court, and it was ruled that it was an administrative rule. Obama took it to SCOTUS. The decision was 4-4 split (Scalia had just died...) and the lower court ruling was affirmed. DAPA was administrative, and since Obama didn't use APA rules to implement it, it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

When Trump came into office, he immediately rescinded DAPA without any challenge.

So where are we? SCOTUS could have ruled one of two ways. Either they strike down Trump's argument that DACA is administrative, and thus Trump could end it. Or they agree it is administrative, and thus Trump can end it.

With the administrative ruling, this is more in Trump's favor. Because he can end it through APA rules (which takes time, unfortunately), but he could also rescind it on the basis that DACA is unconstitutional, JUST like he did with DAPA. SCOTUS can't say DACA doesn't have to follow APA rules, when they just ruled that Trump has to. They can't argue DACA doesn't have to follow APA rules when precedent shows DAPA had to. They can't use some bullshit about poor 'dreamers' being affected, because they literally shot down that argument today.

So DACA is unconstitutional. The path is now set-up. Trump offered Democrats DACA in legislation, expanded to some 1.8 million 'dreamers', as well as a path to citizenship, in exchange for the wall. Pelosi said no. Now DACA is coming down and the wall is going up. What does Pelosi have to offer in exchange for her precious dreamers?

Also, another thing that happens. As SCOTUS has ruled DACA is an administrative rule, that means if Trump loses in November or 2024, the next President won't be able to create that program with the wave of a pen. They'll have to follow APA rules to implement it, and as mentioned, that takes time.

The ball is in Trump's court. The media are pretending Trump lost, Democrats will pretend Trump lost, liberals think Trump lost. But Trump won.

1
Red_Princess 1 point ago

If things were fair, then you'd be correct. But laws only apply to conservatives, remember? The real ruling is "EOs from Democrat presidents can't be undone."

2
techadm 2 points ago

Defund Hollywood Elites

2
bigdragonenergy 2 points ago

I trust GEOTUS to not use EO for nefarious purposes now or in the future, but not anyone else. And yeah, Roberts is a humongous pile of shit.

2
Refugee 2 points ago

Trump, start up the EO printer... BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

2
4cdarth [S] 2 points ago

This was your doing... thanks for the idea. https://thedonald.win/p/FzKW5MRw/user-refugee-made-a-comment-rega/c/

2
Refugee 2 points ago

Nice work hahaha

2
4cdarth [S] 2 points ago

ugh... you made me think of a meme idea now.

2
Vailyon 2 points ago

Am I wrong in saying they want him to EO it away? Instead of letting it end like he did? If so why not do it and site what the majority said as precident?

If I'm wrong I'm wrong. Probably not reading most of this right.

2
daty_dato 2 points ago

EO it ILLEGAL to vote by mail.

2
MAGA_4EVER 2 points ago

Fuck civility.

Trump is just the man for this job.

Not only will he 100% start using this new EO rule to our advantage, he won't cower when he does it.

Trump, us supporters still love you. We get it. Write as many EOs as you possibly can that fix this shit before some horrible democrat comes in. And when it's your last day in office, write an EO that says all EOs have to go through congress to be approved. Fuck the Democrats.

2
Sexual_Assault_Rifle 2 points ago

What if I was to tell you the LOSS was planned for? That this was all on purpose to give him MORE power?

Do you honestly think the administration didnt see the possible outcomes before the ruling? I thought he was playing 4D chess? Not this time? Just left it up to chance?

2
Schrodingers_Cat 2 points ago

To borrow a phrase from Andrew Jackson:

"John [Roberts] has made his decision; now let him enforce it. "

2
Fuck_reddit34 2 points ago

Unfortunately the federal government only hops to when there’s a traitorous democrat in office.

2
aussie_maga 2 points ago

Nevertheless, I will only act in the best interests of the United States of America!

My take on this tweet: I don't think Trump is saying he will dish out EOs left and right. Although I kinda wish he gives out an EO on voter ID. But he knows that the partisan hacks in the Supreme Court are going to rule differently when it comes to his EOs.

I think the purpose of this tweet is to state his position on the recent rulings, point out the hypocrisy and inconsistency of the SC. He knows there is not much he can do about against SC so pedes don't expect anything more. He needs his voters to see what kind of shit he is dealing with and that Americans should not sit on their lazy bums and not vote. This fight can only be won in the next term when another SC slot is open.

2
BoilingEnema 2 points ago

This is how to troll

2
Burninator 2 points ago

Next executive order, nation wide consistution carry, please.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago

Sign an XO banning Democrats from voting.

2
Nellie_the_Beaut 2 points ago

Can I get a Hallelujah?

2
Roof_Korean 2 points ago

Civil war is certain thanks to 5 liberal judges

2
RlzJohnnyM 2 points ago

FUCK EM

START WRITING EO LEFT QND RIGHT

2
CJBarnacle 2 points ago

Are you guys sick of all that winning yet?

2
not_a_shill 2 points ago

Oh shit.. He knows.. COME ON UNDO NFA

2
Shayhawk 2 points ago

But he's saying that he WILL act..... very interesting....

2
FalloutSeeker 2 points ago

CBS in the work office says "they dare to dream to come to the US" shutup

2
angryamerican1964 2 points ago

hearing that that this was mainly a paperwork issue and it could resubmitted a different way

any truth to this ?

2
TimeIsNow-Maga 2 points ago

Let’s be honest, rules use to be the thing, not anymore, let’s fight, they will kill us if we don’t do it b4

2
Nov3 2 points ago

10 EO's will have the country tied up for 50 years. Good to be a conservitive.

2
MixedBlacknWhite 2 points ago

I wonder if this was purposeful? (one can hope)

Send it in.. get rejected.. NOW I HAVE THE POWER.

2
ALLTHEWAYMAGA 2 points ago

If DACA get citizenship, it's over for Republicans. No more Texas, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, Utah, Montana, and North Carolina. We might win the midwest, but it won't be enough either way. Fuck ROBERTS

2
stormdraintrooper 2 points ago

I hope this is not a prelude to an event...

2
BillyBobBarseau 2 points ago

YAY! I win. But I'll still act like I lost....you know, to play 77tripleE chess.

This shit is ridiculous!

2
Lefty303 2 points ago

I heard today all he needs to do is write a EO? I guess he could do that if he wins again. Not sure he would do this before the election.

2
spuger 2 points ago

looks like a constitutoinal convention is back on the menu!

2
One_Man_Militia 2 points ago

EO FOR SCOTUS AND CONGRESSIONAL TERM LIMITS NOW! AND RETROACTIVE!

1
deleted 1 point ago
1
Berners4trump 1 point ago

This just proves Trump is the best president we will ever see.

1
deleted 1 point ago
-2
deleted -2 points ago
-10
deleted -10 points ago
2
America_No_1 2 points ago

sick burn man :)