3732
Comments (256)
sorted by:
300
4cdarth 300 points ago +300 / -0

This past week has been avoiding political controversies but legally correct decisions. Looks at how they ignored blatant violations of 2nd ammendment, and instead legislated from the desk to amend the civil rights act, something that should of been done in house/senate.

155
weltbild 155 points ago +155 / -0

They have declared themselves popes with the power to canonize non constitutional Eos at discretion not judges.

The US is a theocracy ruled by the popes of woke.

144
-Howitzer- 144 points ago +145 / -1

This ENTIRE week has sucked ass.

72
Cray_cray_ 72 points ago +73 / -1

👏 WORST 👏 WEEK 👏 EVER

55
1776forever1776 55 points ago +56 / -1

Worst week ever, so far..

36
RedPaladin 36 points ago +37 / -1

The Jumanji dice havent rolled yet

18
BubbaTrumpShrimp 18 points ago +18 / -0

WORSE YEAR EVER FTFY

24
Shreddit 24 points ago +24 / -0

"The Supreme Court sucks ass."

FTFY

6
Magastein143 6 points ago +6 / -0

Agreed, at least we have a rally Saturday!

114
hit_backspace 114 points ago +114 / -0

Political correctness is now eroding the supreme court. What the fuck is going on?

67
Bloodylouver 67 points ago +67 / -0

We should riot and protest Until we get what we want. Would love to take over the Supreme Court

23
Shreddit 23 points ago +23 / -0

Constitution Lives Matter! Defund the Supremes! No justice, no peace!

21
ProphetOfKek 21 points ago +23 / -2

We’d get mowed down by Esper and Barr for being Boog Boys if we did that. Guarantee they’d break out the mini guns.

17
Kottonballs 17 points ago +18 / -1

A mini gun against an armed populace is nothing. Japan's fear of invading the US and our warn in Vietnam should have taught you everything you need to know.

7
ProphetOfKek 7 points ago +8 / -1

I agree, I was just pointing out the hypocrisy of the government.

2
Kottonballs 2 points ago +3 / -1

I figured you did, sorry if that came off wrong. I wanted everyone to think about it more than a response to what you said.

2
EpicPede 2 points ago +3 / -1

Mini guns require gunners. They aren't unstoppable

6
TrumpsThrowaway 6 points ago +7 / -1

We wouldn't end up with a shitty garden or a warlord in our autonomous zone at least

5
HighIQIndividual 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'd be there in a heartbeat. Blackface and all.

8
Journey95 8 points ago +8 / -0

Leftists have taken over every part of our country, this is the result

7
jcd_007 7 points ago +8 / -1

Roberts seems to be cowed by media pressure.

18
Juanye 18 points ago +19 / -1

Dude Roberts is compromised. They got vids of him for sure.

9
Block_Helen 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, it's his kids. Illegally adopted from Ireland which amounts to a child trafficking charge. It's all practically in the open.

2
DocOne 2 points ago +3 / -1

We need to get it in the open. By any means necessary. Force a resignation.

2
powershellder 2 points ago +3 / -1

Exactly. It’s all out in the open.

Many people would forgive it as something that’s technically illegal, but forgivable.

I think there’s something much worse there

5
GodSaveTheWest 5 points ago +6 / -1

My man that has been happening for a while, RBG is an activist judge.

4
J_Comey_is_a_Weasel 4 points ago +5 / -1

RBG is dead

3
GodSaveTheWest 3 points ago +4 / -1

irrelevant so longs as "RBG" is still making supreme court decisions.

3
Rufus_Shinra 3 points ago +4 / -1

Let's me honest, leftist, or more accurately communism, has infected every major instituin in the US. From the FBI to schools, the Pentagon, many courts and judges, television, movies, social media, science, academia, etc... The list goes on.

There are very few places where people care about the laws or Constition anymore, mostly just the common voting conservatives. I only see one path forward, but it's a rough on.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
41
UsurpTheNarrative 41 points ago +43 / -2

The reason the other side can walk all over you is because you stand alone. I do not mean your alone in your view or political affiliation, what I mean is our side uses the legal system that Democrats control. And so its perplexing why our side keeps acting surprised when the legal system, logic, and reason fail time and time again.

SPOILER: Republicans lose everything in the end because they will not organize in strong armed groups to put the fear of holy god into the hearts of the godless. Our punishment for not standing up to them will be quite severe.

Remember when the riots outside the white house happened and potus said maybe tomorrow night is MAGA night? Nobody got the message. There was no counter protest or large uniformed militia group there to get between the rioters and the secret service.

My point is that Democrats understand that organizing and taking to the streets is working for them because they know our side will not take to the streets to push back.

And the few who do will easily be labelled as white supremacists.

That is how I know we may well lose in the end, and ultimately suffer all the Democrat policies being enacted after Trump's time is over.

23
Journey95 23 points ago +23 / -0

Sadly true, this is how leftists took over our country. We just let them do whatever they want because it was more convenient.

I think we still have it too easy so no one wants to actually do anything serious against these degenerates.

13
DickTick 13 points ago +17 / -4

There's one key factor that everyone seems to completely miss and that is that most politically active Democrats are jobless... Republicans actually have fucking jobs and careers and families we have to take care of... Even if it was a normal time and the normal year we still wouldn't be able to take time off of work and turn off of our bills to go do what you're asking.... it's not a matter of me deciding that the political future is more important and I should be taking time off of my job to protest... as if most of our jobs would even allow that. I have fucking children to feed and, unfortunately, fighting for their political future doesn't fill their stomachs, or put clothes on their back, or send them to school, or put a roof over their heads.......

But this is not a regular year... most of us are just now finally getting back to work full-time and trying to catch back up on bills so that we don't start losing shit.. so when exactly are we supposed to do what you're asking?

I can't help that the majority of politically active Democrats are either homeless, poor, trust fund babies, or government fund babies.... What the hell am I supposed to do about that?

15
Mad_Maddy 15 points ago +18 / -3

"Wars are not fought only by childless men."

  • The Patriot.
3
WowStrongWinning 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yeah he didn’t start fighting until they killed his son.

That’s the thing, when you have nothing to live for or your family is in danger that’s when the fighting begins.

I’m against DACA, I think it should be abolished, I think they should be classified as illegal aliens and not get special rights. However, DACA kids aren’t going to take everything from me, they’re not going to physically harm my family. So there is no motivation to fight over this.

The closet we’re getting is more at the state and local level by tyrannical governors who are taking the livelihoods away from people. It’s the tech companies censoring speech and silencing people. Those personally effect us a lot more than DACA.

3
Aambrick 3 points ago +4 / -1

Read up about Soviet Russia and what it did to the children. You think that your children are safe, but the reality is they are in the worse area to be at. Same with College people at the ages of 18-26 which is more of a re-enforcement of the schooling system which is to take your child and make them their soldiers.

You think I am crazy, but that is what Communist Russia did, and what the left wing activists in schools are doing.

4
NuclearOption 4 points ago +8 / -4

You mean your worldy possessions and your comfortable lifestyle? You are enamored with these things that mean nothing when it is taken from you. The only job you have in this life is love thy father and spread the word of God. You're too comfortable and more of a sheep than you realize. You fight with your soul, not your checkbook. You fight for a righteous cause and abolish the lunatics. You fight because it is all there is left to do. But instead you will work and feed those kids that will be traded into the cabal as your wife gets fucked by a communists, because muh family and time.

5
DickTick 5 points ago +7 / -2

Uhh... No.. I don't.

I mean fucking surviving...

I'm not wealthy at all whatsoever.

If you put anything at all before your children, you don't deserve them.

4
farquhar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well said!

5
UpTrump 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yep, our side is too passive. The ds will install communism or socialism, it's just a matter of time

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago +2 / -1

Our punishment for not standing up to them will be quite severe.

I wonder who our Solzhenitsyn will be. Perhaps we won't even have that, our fates simply lost in a dark age without end.

-1
Rufus_Shinra -1 points ago +1 / -2

True, but to be fair conservatives do not have leadership on the ground, as in a leader has not yet risen to unite and lead them. There is no one to rally a group of patriots and get them to where they need to be to protest, etc....When someone like this does arise, and it will happen, God help the leftists.

Only the people can stop these lawless and corrupt politicians and leftist judges now. They can act without consequence and know it, they can literally do whatever they want, this includes the leftist mayors of cities who should run out of town on a rail.

22
leftists_are_trash 22 points ago +24 / -2 (edited)

amend the civil rights act, something that should of been done in house/senate.

No, fuck the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was wide-reaching enough that it should have required a constitutional amendment. CRA-1964 dissolved the constitutionally-protected notion of freedom of association and suddenly, your business could be shut down if you decided you didn't want to bake gay cakes. It is the epitome of federal overreach.

The intervening time has just created generations of retarded cucks who believe that private enterprise can be dictated who to serve by the government and that it's always been that way - but in reality, for the majority of this country's existence, a business owner could choose who they served and hired and fired for any reason they saw fit.

18
South_Florida_Guy 18 points ago +18 / -0

Also those 2A cases were being described in headlines and articles as "looking to expand gun rights" or "looking to expand the rights of gun owners" which is totally bullshit gaslighting reverse psychology. The 2A itself is what lays out ALL gun rights to ALL Americans which SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Any so called "gun control" law made since then has ERODED or taken away those rights. These cases that have come recently have only looked to RECLAIM the rights we already have from God and encoded in the 2A, not EXPAND a fucking thing we didn't or shouldn't already have from birth.

11
covfefe-time 11 points ago +11 / -0

Now they keep us scared and helpless in states where our freedom has been unlawfully stripped.

High crime states where we are attacked and murderer at will by criminals who have no fear of consequence.

And having an opinion of the wrong variety will destroy your life under threat of force and violence against you.

Welcome to hell.

5
Block_Helen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly, there's no such thing as expanding gun rights. Gun rights exist as written, they can only be restricted/infringed, not expanded.

It's like expanding the right to life. No can do. Can only restrict it.

0
WowStrongWinning 0 points ago +1 / -1

Great job in making sure that the correct argument is being framed. The left does a great job of controlling the argument by using particular vocabulary.

That’s why abortion will someday be illegal. Conservatives did right in getting the jump on libs by having the phrase “pro-life”.

13
idindudat 13 points ago +14 / -1

Why the fuck so we have SCOTUS again? They are as useless as Congress

20
4cdarth 20 points ago +20 / -0

Well. They are supposed to make sure laws and actions taken by Congress and president are not unconstitutional... and so far they have failed at that job.

14
idindudat 14 points ago +14 / -0

"you had one fucking job"

7
MAGARondonmonson 7 points ago +7 / -0

These sissy fools move tom DC and become liberals we need to disband the Supreme Court and bar them living in DC. The move to DC and prostitute themselves out.

5
Whoopies_tds 5 points ago +6 / -1

bUT tHe HOuse IS bUSy iMpEAchIng BlumF fOR tHrEaTenIng to HoLd bacK $1B uNleSS tHe buRisMa pROseCuTor wAS fireD

196
goodbeerbetterviews2 196 points ago +197 / -1

Blows my mind that we can effectively allow illegal things to occur so we don't hurt minority feelings.

108
americathegr888 108 points ago +112 / -4

They all need deported. Tired of their shit.

37
minotaurbeach 37 points ago +37 / -0

These 700.000[more like 5 million] are non-citizens taking jobs from the most impoverished Americans, and this may be a contributing factor to homelessness in California. It is so bad in LA county, that some Union stores will dismiss your application, and not even call you- if it does not have a Hispanic name. White and black employees are all stereotyped as 'drug addicts' and 'not having real families'. They smile to the 'American customers' -while sabotaging the careers of poor Americans they work with-

Labor Unions are so bad, they don't help you if you are white or black in a shop full of illegals that want you gone. Maybe they are getting DNC money- because the Union's policy is to put illegals first-

some how, they can hire someone in a Union job that has been in the country for less than a month- someone is funding this- and it degraded our food processing industry, and this is a security risk that could endanger the American food supply if someone wanted to poison a bunch of 'white people'.

I don't want ALL of our food supply at the mercy of cheap labor from illegals.

11
deleted 11 points ago +15 / -4
4
pmurTJdlanoD 4 points ago +5 / -1

Source? That is fucked.

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3 (edited)
3
pmurTJdlanoD 3 points ago +5 / -2

It's not the first time I'd heard it, just wanted to see it in print. Thanks for the source.

KInd of disheartening to have such a snake having so much of Trump's attention.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
129
GreenHat 129 points ago +129 / -0

DHS should void it again. DJT should start cooking up more EOs.

106
americathegr888 106 points ago +108 / -2

They need to just start ignoring the courts and deporting them anyway.

95
NewUser1758 95 points ago +96 / -1

Yep, CO-EQUAL branches of government, the supreme court can go fuck themselves when they make blatantly unconstitutional and illegal decisions.

65
duvalpede 65 points ago +65 / -0

"then let them enforce it."

26
Belgarath 26 points ago +27 / -1

Pres A. Jackson has entered the chat.

2
EpicPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

the hero we need right now

47
N7fury 47 points ago +47 / -0

Yeah, when the SUPREME COURT is acting unconstitutionally, we have a fucking serious problem.

40
RiverFenix 40 points ago +40 / -0

If the courts wanna play politics, what's stopping the politicians from playing Magistrate.

This is how you get Supreme Justices tried by Military Tribunal. Because fuck you I guess.

30
yurimodin 30 points ago +30 / -0

Andrew Jackson style >:D

21
walt 21 points ago +22 / -1

John Roberts has made his decision; now let him enforce it.

4
SlipperyFire 4 points ago +4 / -0

At one point I would have disagreed with you and said that even though it sucks we should do this all the proper way. Now? Fuck it, if they want to kick the rule of law to the curb then so should we. Why should our side play a game that they keep cheating at?

2
americathegr888 2 points ago +4 / -2

Same. I came to the conclusion that we should ignore the law because our adversaries already are. Which means if we are unwilling to do the same, we automatically lose.

I like obeying the law and having principles, but I like not living in a North Korea style communist hellscape even more.

14
weltbild 14 points ago +17 / -3

the left won they moved it past the election

11
bubadmt 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes, draft up a new order with slight changes. DACA patchfix version 1.0.1 and make a slight legal change and put it out again. Rinse and repeat until something drastic happens and it's put on the back burner.

10
Brucesky420 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is the proper response. Make the Supreme Court live up to their bullshit or put a stop to it. It's win/win for Trump if he does this.

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
100
texascpa 100 points ago +100 / -0

Justice Thomas may be the only Justice we can count on.

48
babyface 48 points ago +48 / -0

Justice Thomas is truly a blessing.

This guy went through heck in his confirmation hearings because of partisan Democrats (is there any other kind?) and now, he continues to fight the good fight even when outnumbered by liberal morons on the court.

He could comfortably retire, maybe do some book deals, but he keeps show up writing cogent and logical opinions.

Gotta be a bit infuriating working with the droolers at SC

4
Block_Helen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Partisan Democrats led by.....Joe Biden.

I'm convinced now that's why PBS agreed to air the Thomas documentary even though it showed him in a positive light. Because the guy sitting at the table across the room staring Thomas down was Biden. And that reminds the libs who worship PBS exactly what's at stake in the November election with Ginsburg at death's door.

Biden didn't succeed in 1991, but he will succeed in 2021 - that was the message.

24
RiverFenix 24 points ago +24 / -0

Anita fiasco really lit a fire under the man.

75
Shakakka99 75 points ago +76 / -1

WE PUT YOU FUCKS AT THE TOP SO YOU COULD MAKE THOSE DECISIONS!!!

Not so you could weasel out of them like little fucking cowards, to save face.

69
Raindrops1984 69 points ago +70 / -1

http://spookdblog.blogspot.com/2018/11/chief-justice-roberts-blackmailed.html

Roberts human trafficked his own kids. Pass it on.

17
idindudat 17 points ago +17 / -0

He's definitely a closet pedo and the Dems have proof.

12
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 12 points ago +12 / -0

What do you think the FBI did with all the blackmail in Epstein's safe? Did we think they were going to investigate those crimes that occurred or use it for their own political means?

10
Raindrops1984 10 points ago +10 / -0

I wish that some God-fearing patriot in the Bureau would pull a V for Vendetta and release the whole festering pile of it live. I don’t want to see it (left the Pizzagate community because even those relatively tame images gave me horrific nightmares) but I want them to be brought to justice. Those babies need to be avenged.

54
Anti_Immigration 54 points ago +54 / -0

The court has been activist since RBG and probably before, and with the murder of Scalia they just solidified it.

38
Mrdarkshine 38 points ago +38 / -0

Roe v. Wade was the final nail. Now the courts are just part of the legislative branch, except the laws they write can't be repealed or overturned by the courts, because we have no courts.

13
NotoriousCIC 13 points ago +14 / -1

It's amazing that these judges can ignore what's clearly written but then interpret things to give us abortion and gay marriage.

13
spezisacuckold 13 points ago +13 / -0

100%. 5 people make the laws in this country. The Legislative and Executive branches are just sideshows.

8
Italians_Invented_2A 8 points ago +8 / -0

Where the hell in the constitution does it talk about abortion? That's insane

3
covfefe-time 3 points ago +4 / -1

If baby murder is legal, then what is not legal?

Paying for our own subjugation and destruction at this point.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not just legal, it's protected as a constitutional right.

Without Roe v Wade the decision would be left to the individual States.

Currently even if there's a State in which the 99% is against abortion, it's still legal because that's what the constitution supposedly said.

50
PotentialWizard 50 points ago +50 / -0

The worst thing the Supremes can do is become PC.

12
Got_Hot_Snakes 12 points ago +13 / -1

Well, I think they just did

11
idonthaveahobby 11 points ago +11 / -0

Lazy judging by nitwits. They are supposed to read the text first. Then, if it is unclear look at intent. Not look at intent behind and decide if text is ok. This change in basic judging under Trump is dangerous. We are only a hair away from guilty until proven innocent. Bless Justice Thomas for his wisdom and reason.

43
IncredibleMrE1 43 points ago +43 / -0

Just come up with a list of 20 individual EO's ending DACA, each with its own distinct reason. SCOTUS ends up rejecting all of them? Proof that they are not making decisions based on law. Impeach.

9
CitizenPlain 9 points ago +9 / -0

You could create a nice parodox loop of EOs based on this ruling. That would be fun.

8
IncredibleMrE1 8 points ago +8 / -0

They want to engage in Lawfare from the bench, we can do it better from the WH. Two can play this game.

37
deleted 37 points ago +39 / -2
19
weltbild 19 points ago +25 / -6

gorsuch cucked out twice so nope

you can't win this it is the charlie brown scenario

36
deleted 36 points ago +38 / -2
-19
kesquare2 -19 points ago +5 / -24

Thats the attitude! Maybe you can make a right wing antifa.

14
deleted 14 points ago +18 / -4
13
WhersMyFuckngJetpack 13 points ago +13 / -0

Don't worry. Patriots will soon be going to prison for being patriots.

5
Slapstick86 5 points ago +5 / -0

Already are. They just find something else to charge them with.

9
BlackPillBot 9 points ago +10 / -1

Nope, you’ll be begging for prison when they come to put you in their reed camp or kill you. For anyone who doesn’t think this is coming in our lifetime, you better start paying attention.

1
TimeIsARetardedOval 1 point ago +2 / -1

They haven't payed attention yet, they sure as fuck won't start now.

2
BlackPillBot 2 points ago +2 / -0

😞

6
Journey95 6 points ago +6 / -0

We will be going to prison if this keeps going. We will lose our jobs, be publicly shamed and silenced etc.

Fact is the only way we can win is by force, thats the only advantage we have over them

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
Rufus_Shinra 1 point ago +2 / -1

If the Dems get complete control of the government again they will work tirelessly to silence all conservative voices online, they will use the gov agencies to destroy you.

8
whocaresguy420 8 points ago +9 / -1

Itd be a shame if he would pass away with a pillow over his face like Scalia

7
Kekintosh2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Something something wetworks vineyard

4
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've got a movie script I want to pitch you Mr Podesta!

12
VictoriousOnceMore88 12 points ago +12 / -0

Gorsuch is no friend of ours and betrayed our President. He, Roberts and Ginsberg need to be gone permanently.

5
womp-womp-twice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well RBG is most probably already gone, hopefully they will somewhen let the public know

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're going to drag it to 2024

31
Captntrouble 31 points ago +32 / -1

SCOTUS tells legislative branch "Do your fucking job'.

Since democratic policies suck on their own merit, they attempt to work through the judiciary because it's easier to buy 5 judges than than 2/3 majority. Can't tell if this is a warning or a permission slip. much confusion

18
weltbild 18 points ago +18 / -0

this is moving it past the election

roberts choose to canonize obamas EO he is now the pope of a theocracy

7
Brucesky420 7 points ago +7 / -0

Easy way to find out, start spitting out Executive Orders

30
Biggie_Smalls 30 points ago +30 / -0

Roberts has serious dirt in his closet.

INVESTIGATE NOW

10
KeyboardWarrior 10 points ago +10 / -0

They're good at Investigating. That's their only Trick.

26
Mrdarkshine 26 points ago +27 / -1

Our republic is dead. We have been taken over from within, without a shot being fired.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
4
Kekintosh2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Comp'd

Say, whatever happened in Vegas?

7
Bloodylouver 7 points ago +7 / -0

Banana Republic!

2
Rufus_Shinra 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. I see America as the equivalent of an occupied country. The war is over and the leftist communist won, but in the election of Trump the freedom fighters won back a small piece of territory. However, the rest of the country is still in control of the enemy. So it's basically conservatives own a small strategic position in their own occupied country.

1
Journey95 1 point ago +2 / -1

Communists won at the end

0
BitcoinTrump 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't quit it's not even the election yet

22
Light_HIV_Effect 22 points ago +22 / -0

"Avoid politically controversial but legally correct decision."

Sounds like Justice Roberts entire fucking legacy.

22
Hillary4Prison2020 22 points ago +22 / -0

So much for an independent judiciary? This is shocking and so far against the Constitution (just finished reading the Federalist Papers... Hamilton/Jay/Madison rolling in their graves)

20
NewUser1758 20 points ago +21 / -1

It's not even politically controversial, almost nobody agrees with illegal immigration.

7
NotoriousCIC 7 points ago +7 / -0

The left does because it's importing more votes for them.

2
NewUser1758 2 points ago +3 / -1

The average normie on the street doesn't want people taking their jobs, the far left is a tiny percentage of people.

5
Journey95 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yet they have a ridiculous amount of influence

3
sply1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Corporations and the rich do. They agree with illegal immigration and they are the ones being served by the Government. The electorate has no leverage anymore I guess.

0
TimeIsARetardedOval 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is the correct answer. Lefty tossers are just PR for the normies. The Corpos are sticking the knife in the useful idiots of the 90s era rightwingers. The idiots will still bat for them thinking they'd never sellout to the crypto-commies.

Dumb fucks.

19
donald_zuramp 19 points ago +19 / -0

Welp, looks like the Deep State has gone and "activated" Justice Roberts. He's no longer a "wildcard" he's now 100% going to be siding with the left wing of the bench.

Absolutely fucking absurd that the Executive Branch's purview now, according to SCOTUS, no longer includes rolling back previous Executive Orders. Once a President signs an EO it becomes the housepet of the Supreme Court and they and ONLY THEY get to decide if and when it is taken to the vet and put down.

Yes clearly this is what the founding fathers wanted: an Executive Branch scribbling out unlawful edicts that are then codified into law by an activist Supreme Court. What a fucking disgrace.

BUT MUH DRUMPFFFF IS GON BE A FASCIST DICTATURRRRRRR

This is fascism. This is literally fascism. A rogue president writing unconstitutional laws and a corrupt court upholding them. It's all gone to shit. The state of our government is like a hoarded house = only after you've done a bit of cleaning do you begin to see the horrifying extent of the damage done to its structural integrity.

9
womp-womp-twice 9 points ago +9 / -0

The state of our government is like a hoarded house = only after you've done a bit of cleaning do you begin to see the horrifying extent of the damage done to its structural integrity.

I always thought of 45's presidency like that since he ran for office. He just removed the kabuki theater curtain from DC, and now everbody's masks are quickly slipping and the ugly truth beneath is showing.

Which reminds me of this one:

The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

6
donald_zuramp 6 points ago +6 / -0

He just removed the kabuki theater curtain from DC, and now everbody's masks are quickly slipping and the ugly truth beneath is showing.

Yup. The more we drain the swamp the deeper we find that it is. The bottom never comes, it seems to go down, down, down forever.

Like a hoarded house, every pile of garbage you clean up reveals a multitude of new problems - now you can see the mold, the rot, the rat feces and cockroaches, when before all you saw was the pile of trash.

18
BeauBidenBrainTumor 18 points ago +19 / -1

Clarence Thomas should be Chief Justice. Roberts should be cleaning toilets.

-15
Evan_Evan_Evan -15 points ago +3 / -18

Yeah! We need more POC as heads of the Supreme Court!! Down with whitey!!

10
DrLexLuthor 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is actually racist, we aren't against black people we are against anyone being treated based on the color of their skin.

Justice Thomas is by far the best justice we have on the court. He is arguably the only non corrupt justice. It has nothing to do with his race. You're just as bad as the SJWs who want whites fired for being white.

1
Evan_Evan_Evan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was actually being facetious but didn’t want to put /f on it. Didn’t feel sarcasm was the correct tone. lol

Good for you guys calling out possible racism though.

2
BeauBidenBrainTumor 2 points ago +3 / -1

Did we find one minority promotion over a white counterpart which BLM would not support? Trump should make it happen.

15
the_mcgee 15 points ago +15 / -0

Nailed it. The court has gone soft.

12
45stoppin_powa 12 points ago +12 / -0 (edited)

Wasn't DACA an EO? The SCOTUS can't claim that EO's cannot be reversed by the Executive. It's pure madness otherwise: the Executive could essentially write laws without the legislature at all. That's fucking bonkers. The executive doesn't need any argument to reverse an EO: it's the executives sole discretion to issue or reverse EO's. The SCOTUS can weigh on the legality of the EO and block it if it is not legal, but cannot require a explanation to have one withdrawn. This is madness.

11
NotoriousCIC 11 points ago +11 / -0 (edited)

I think it's becoming rather clear that a nation that isn't homogeneous is going to fall. We went from a biracial country where 99 percent of the population was white and black until Ted Kennedy's bill.

You cannot import people who do not assimilate and do not adhere to a collective set of ideals and expect to thrive. What you get is tribalism, people divided, and government with more and more power to control (which is the design).

4
Rufus_Shinra 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, from the Democrats point if view it makes perfect sense to import millions of people who will always vote for them and who don't even know what the US Constitution is let alone why it needs to be protected.

9
preferredfault 9 points ago +9 / -0

What this dissent basically says is "We should have ruled in favor of Trump, but we didn't". What is trying to be avoided, is certification that DACA was illegal in the first place. It's not just to protect Obama, it's to keep the door open for future EO's that violate the constitution in favor of immigration. They're treating it as if DACA was created through legislation, when it wasn't.

9
jlange94 9 points ago +9 / -0

As always, Thomas is spot on. Yet a retard named John Roberts keeps fucking common sense and any sort of precedent.

8
KeyboardWarrior 8 points ago +9 / -1

🤡🌎 <--- This One.

🤡🌎

🤡🌎

🤡🌎

8
Bloodylouver 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wish he would call a presser and explain why this is fucked up. Twitter and tweets are getting old.

8
redstampede 8 points ago +8 / -0

Clarence Thomas is a national treasure. I wish the other justices were all copies of him, but younger.

8
residue69 8 points ago +8 / -0

In another case about the 2A:

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wrote a dissent in the court’s denial of a New Jersey resident’s appeal seeking the right to carry a gun in public for self-defense. Rather than take on the constitutional issue, Thomas wrote, “the Court simply looks the other way.”

7
KeyboardWarrior 7 points ago +8 / -1

🤡🌎

🤡🌎

🤡🌎

🤡🌎

7
OhGonzo 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)

You are fucking there to make correct legal decisions. That is literally the explicit purpose of the Supreme Court.

I'm finally starting to realize every person of this government needs to be pulled out like a weed and replaced.

6
IAbsolutelyDare 6 points ago +6 / -0

Anyone have a link to Brother Thomas's decision? He's always a great read.

6
msean3231 6 points ago +6 / -0

We’ve been there before, it’s specialty for Justice Roberts

6
nomac 6 points ago +6 / -0

The Establishment is trying to do as much damage as it can before the election.

6
maga7373 6 points ago +8 / -2

Well, there goes the Jury box. Anybody remember what box is next?

5
VetforTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

The judges are incapable of doing their jobs. There is no more law in America. You are free to do S your conscience directs. Use your freedom wisely

5
SnipedYou 5 points ago +5 / -0

Any hope of entering a phase of listening and compromise was just thrown out the window.

5
CaptainChrisPBacon 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Deep State Deep Statin'.They are pulling out all the stops trying to stop Trump. In reality all they are doing is continuing to expose themselves as Anti American Communist that they are The question is will it motivate the ones who never votes to go to the polls and show that the silent majority is no longer silent.

5
Nadlers_Belt 5 points ago +5 / -0

LISTEN TO BLACK VOICES!

4
Block_Helen 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought this statement from Thomas was in regards to the gay/trans decision, but so much bullshit coming from all directions right now, I can't keep up.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Block_Helen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cool, thank you. Am a bit hung over today - the infuriating events of yesterday inspired a bit of overindulging last night.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Block_Helen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, exactly. Like OJ murdering Nicole Simpson - if I can't have her, nobody can have her.

4
minotaurbeach 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democrats in Office mean a sexoffender in every woman's public toilet, and a home invasion in every neighborhood when illegal aliens want more than just our jobs, our retirement and our welfare.

4
Thingthing22 4 points ago +4 / -0

EXACTLY. Roberts is being a big pussy because he doesn't want another controversy to hurt his fee fees. Old school Republican take up the ass and ask questions later type mentality. FUCK Roberts.

3
gummibarenaked 3 points ago +3 / -0

Justice Thomas always had a knack for cutting through the BS.

3
BurnDownCNN 3 points ago +4 / -1

We are seeing what happens to a nation run by cowards who refuse to make the difficult decisions needed in a successful country. True statesmen like the founders had the backbone to make this country what it is and set us up for greatness. Our current leaders, excluding a very few, are not fit for this responsibility.

3
Zero_Six_Two 3 points ago +3 / -0

geotus needs to flood the country with EOs. Fuck em.

3
Shreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

And... the Supreme Court has officially become a political legislative institution, an unconstitutional side-load to the Congressional swamp when they can't sidestep the veto. The Founding Fathers must be rolling and raging in their graves.

2
VikingHalo45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uniparty captain "Justice" Roberts didn't want the Hispanics to riot too.

2
SoldierofKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ignore the court. Just ignore it! If they won't interpret the law correctly ignore them

2
BitcoinTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

So he's making a political decision rather than a legal decision? Wow

2
50dollarbonus 2 points ago +2 / -0

The point that won the day is the DACA people voluntarily signed up in exchange for certain protections and right to work. DHS still had to honor those commitments. The program has to be wound down the right way. But it must be wound down or else they all got to skip the visa line and everyone wanting to skip earning a visa the right way will be coming here on vacation and never going home.

2
RagnarD 2 points ago +2 / -0

The reason the judges on the Supreme Court have a lifelong appointment is to insulate them from the consequences of politically controversial rulings.

2
iIndianaJones 2 points ago +2 / -0

UNBELIEVABLE!

2
TaggartCiscontinenta 2 points ago +2 / -0

God bless you, Justice Thomas. Gotta have the strongest backbone out there besides GEOTUS.

2
HighIQIndividual 2 points ago +2 / -0

Putting illegals before legal citizens. Why are we even paying taxes? To keep these people here? Get them the fuck out of here!

2
hmflagler2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can read from the text his hot rage over this

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Georgiamom 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a United States immigration policy that allows some individuals with unlawful presence in the United States after being brought to the country as children to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and become eligible for a work permit in the U.S. To be eligible for the program, recipients cannot have felonies or serious misdemeanors on their records. Unlike the proposed DREAM Act, DACA does not provide a path to citizenship for recipients.[1][2] The policy, an executive branch memorandum, was announced by President Barack Obama on June 15, 2012. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began accepting applications for the program on August 15, 2012.

In November 2014, President Obama announced his intention to expand DACA to cover additional undocumented immigrants. Multiple states immediately sued to prevent the expansion, which was ultimately blocked by an evenly divided Supreme Court. Under President Trump, the Department of Homeland Security rescinded the expansion in June 2017, while it continued to review the existence of DACA as a whole. In September 2017, the Trump Administration announced a plan to phase out DACA. The government deferred implementation of this plan for six months to allow Congress time to pass the DREAM Act or some other legislative protection for undocumented immigrants. Congress failed to act and the time extension expired on March 5, 2018, but the phase-out of DACA has been put on hold by several courts. On August 31, 2018, District Court Judge Andrew Hanen ruled that DACA is likely unconstitutional. However, he let the program remain in place as litigation proceeds.[3][4] As of April 2020, the cancellation of the program is on hold by court order; a Supreme Court decision on the matter is expected by summer 2020.[5]" from wikipedia

Once again Congress failed to act. I agree with Justice Thomas.

2
kudupoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "Timidity" lies with this trator.

2
Crimson_Identity 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't see how we avoid armed conflict in the future.

I love America, and the last thing we need is a civil war, during which time China would stomp us out, or possibly even attack us while we are distracted.

I believe in preservation of the union, but how, my fellow pedes? How?

-2
Belgarath -2 points ago +1 / -3

We may have to start over on a smaller scale. With a more limited franchise.

2
charbatch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Beautifully written and so true. Thomas is by far my favorite justice in my lifetime

2
jcd_007 2 points ago +2 / -0

God Bless Justice Thomas. One of this nation’s best legal minds and a staunch defender of the Constitution. We need more jurists like him.

2
DarkRiver 2 points ago +2 / -0

THE ROT IS REALLY DEEP. IT WILL TAKE SEVERAL YEARS TO FIX THIS SHIT. MAGA

2
LArnix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah they are trying to demoralize us, it worked for a few moments on me. I just took a walk texted my wife and now more than ever need to speak up!

2
hmflagler2 2 points ago +2 / -0

This country was dead at Roe V Wade legally and morally. We are just in purgatory.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
nomoreprinkles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Two for flinching

1
speedychef 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think he meant to say politically correct .

1
Abarth 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there a way we can get rid of Roberts?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)
1
philandy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree as they are not avoiding anything.

1
coup13 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the flaw with our constitution unfortunately. The founding fathers never foresaw that those serving would be against the constitution so there are no protections against that.

You've got towns, cities, states, and congress passing unconstitutional laws. You've got judges and courts making rulings based not on law, but on their personal opinions.

How this can be fixed, I have no idea

2
MAGA_From_Heaven 2 points ago +2 / -0

The 1A and 2A are there to defend the 9A and 10A from being trampled by the Federal Government.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MAGA_From_Heaven 1 point ago +1 / -0

Norm MacDonald: "HAH!?"

0
Scroon 0 points ago +2 / -2

I agree, although It's not really a flaw in the rule book if the people playing refuse to follow the rules. You basically get into a might makes right situation, and I'd argue that's why they included the 1A and 2A...might through the pen and sword.

Funny how the Left is actively eliminating both.

1
hillaryforprison 1 point ago +1 / -0

But supreme court is ok with hacking innocent babies to death, denying their right to life? Is that a "legally correct decision"?

1
Indianapede 1 point ago +1 / -0

So he’s a cuck?

1
coiffeuse2 1 point ago +1 / -0

They gave LGBT rights without ever ratifying the ERA, women still do not have equal rights. LGBT have more rights than I do. How fucked up is that.

1
chingtok 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does Ginsberg really vote?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
redditbsbsbs 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want to see how the election turns out first

1
ParticleCannon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Watch how quickly BLM rages at illegals for stealing liberating the It's An Election Year And We Have Neither A Candidate Nor A Platform spotlight

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then the court is not neutral and should be cleaned out and new judges assigned

1
chuckachookah 1 point ago +2 / -1

Translation: You fucking pussies. This isn't going to end well for anyone.

1
vegeta_ban 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why can’t we have 8 more of him :(

1
Veylis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Irreversible Executive Orders are on the menu boys !

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BartoshJr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clarence Thomas is my favorite justice on the Court, and once again, he's very much on the money with his opinion here.

In my view, the majority decision with this particular case attempts to further blur the line in terms of each branch's respective role within the government. A couple days ago with the gay rights case, we saw another example of the judiciary essentially legislating from the bench. Now today, the Court effectively rules that an Executive Order carries the same weight as legislation voted on by Congress and cannot be overturned by a future president. This is a sad time for anyone who values the separation of powers, and the Founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MAGA_Aoyoc 1 point ago +1 / -0

WHEN WILL THOSE IN POWER, USE IT TO FING CONTROL THESE MANIAC ASSHOLES?!?!?

STOP THE FING PANDERING AND DO SOMETHING

1
ConsiderThisBoot 1 point ago +1 / -0

The FBI is warning against white supremacy because they know how dangerous it can be. The slow, cold, calculated anger of the white man will cause untold devastation. Because once we are moved to motion, there is no stopping us. They know this and are searching for ways to prevent it.

1
ShampocalypseWOW 1 point ago +1 / -0

Welp, that's it then. We have no rule of law anymore.

1
jakethewhale007 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want Scalia back

1
Anq1 1 point ago +1 / -0

TL;DR me here. What does this mean exactly, and what are the options to fix it?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
FullAutoFlintlock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rage

1
xdrunkagainx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good, They're paving the way for a CONCEALED CARRY EXECUTIVE ORDER!!

1
yang_wenli_89 1 point ago +1 / -0

Several of the "conservative" judges on the court are of the cuckservative variety. We need judges who are not merely content with the progressively-liberal status quo.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
whythefucknot 0 points ago +1 / -1

huh. Well, at least we figured out why the riots went nationwide. SCOTUS would be in session.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
-1
GitmObama -1 points ago +2 / -3

Downvote away but it's as if Hilliary won in 2016 or President Kushner is in charge. This is how you demoralize a voter base. Why waste time voting when this happens without pushback from the man behind the curtain?

5
CaptainChrisPBacon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Winners do not give up ever. And Trump base is as energized as ever.All this does it make people join the movement.

4
VictoriousOnceMore88 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have yet to understand why Kushner is still allowed to make such important decisions and ones especially for policy that go directly against the wishes of our voting base that is a major reason why Donald John Trump became President.

I wish President Trump would kick Ivanka and Kushner to the curb and write every EO you can imagine of what we need as our base since we cannot depend on the judiciary.

3
BitcoinTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

You sound like you're demoralized... Stop quitting!

1
GitmObama 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am at Atlanta cop level of fury. Burn it down.

3
BitcoinTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Me too... But what we are seeing is the unveiling of corrupt local governments and DAs. Everyone's tolerance is different but hitting rock bottom may be necessary for some. This isn't over yet, I think that something big will happen to level the playing field in our favor... Probably more rioting and violence until then though and probably drawn out dramatic events until the elections. Insanity.

1
Captain-D 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you explain the “Kushner” thing to me? This is a recurring narrative on r/conspiracy as well. He is a son in law — an advisor, yes, but what’s with attributing him that much power, as is alleged?

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

The one who cucked out this time was not one of Trump's judges.

-7
deleted -7 points ago +7 / -14
12
NewUser1758 12 points ago +14 / -2

Trump should make executive orders ruling their decisions unconstitutional, there are 3 co-equal branches of government for a fucking reason.

8
Hillary4Prison2020 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hilldawg’s appointments would be approving unlimited lockdown measures nationwide had she won. Not to mention the cultural destruction that would be upheld as codified in law (erosion of freedom of speech, right to bear arms, etc etc)

Maybe there could have been a better nominee than Gorsuch but SCOTUS judges should never have an ideology test to win appointment. Considering voting for Biden is insanity given what’s at stake. This is what the left wants - to demotivate us.

If anything these rulings are helpful to debunk crazies that were saying a vote for Trump is a vote for judges that will tear down all the rights and protections that lefties covet so much

4
Captain-D 4 points ago +4 / -0

A lot of these comments on posts have the new-person-handshake thing I noticed. I’d assume this place is watched heavily and shills are creating new accounts to capitalize on the negative momentum.

8
wytxcook1 8 points ago +8 / -0

The court’s four conservative justices dissented. Justice Clarence Thomas, in a dissent joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, wrote that DACA was illegal from the moment it was created under the Obama administration in 2012.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a separate dissent that he was satisfied that the administration acted appropriately in trying to end the program.

Trump's two appointments ruled correctly on this issue.

5
RiverFenix 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wonder who wrote RBG's decision

2
NotoriousCIC 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love that someone who isn't even able to walk or talk on her own can make decisions like this.

1
Evan_Evan_Evan 1 point ago +1 / -0

^ underrated comment

1
Kekintosh2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

BLM

4
shiftycoyote 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is one of the stupidest and weakest things I’ve heard all year.

TRUMP DIDN’T APPOINT ROBERTS YOU SHILL. YOU THINK HE HAS CONTROL OVER THAT?

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
DanWang 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which won't happen before the election.