Comments (338)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
gamingthisandthat 264 points ago +265 / -1

Again master framer " you are all weak, do something" basically saying all of this is on local officials (democratic officials). This will also give him leverage when they ask for "bailouts" - why should i give you anything when you didnt handle this correctly?

Narcan 137 points ago +138 / -1

I agree. I would imagine that bailouts are not coming. It's a glorious thing. Why help states that don't help themselves?

deleted 83 points ago +83 / -0
weltbild 64 points ago +64 / -0

the governors pretending they can't get shit under control with their militarized police force is the kicker, btw another thing the left lost the militarized police force won't stop arson and looting

NewUser1758 64 points ago +67 / -3

The police aren't going out to stop the rioters from burning everything down, they are going out to stop US from shooting the rioters ourselves.

The police are ineffective worthless cowards.

weltbild 29 points ago +29 / -0

anarcho tyranny

Sargentpilcher 27 points ago +29 / -2

Exactly. I'm an anarchy capitalist, and all the people calling this anarchy are completely wrong. If this were anarchy, looters would be dead.

SoYuge 13 points ago +13 / -0

I wish they'd come to the suburbs like they were talking about.

White people don't chimp out until we're absolutely sure we have to. We are approaching that though, make them feel cornered and find out.

Libertas_Vel_Mors 12 points ago +12 / -0

They actually did that in Portland, strolling through the SE neighborhoods. They were strangely peaceful, didn't set anything on fire, didn't damage so much as a blade of perfectly manicured grass.

...then they went back downtown and tried to tear the fuck out of it.

BaconIsNotHaram 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m back and forth on this, but I don’t think those ANTIFAGS would rumble in the suburbs. That’s where they usually live under their parents roofs. They wouldn’t want to bring the war zone to their front lawn

CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +5 / -1

They have that planned today in WI. Not exactly 'the burbs,' more like urban sprawl / working poor neighborhoods. Kinda on edge to see how that goes ...

KS-76- 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Except for the Antifa fools. Leftism = Mental Disorder

FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right, in a libertarian stateless society, people would have their own security forces, and of course militias. There's almost nobody who can say "no, you can't shoot looters who approach your store with baseball bats" or "no you can't form a group to tackle, hunt, and capture these trouble-makers."

In many ways, you see AnCap societies protecting neighborhoods, we just don't have jurisdiction to go out and shut down those stupid riots elsewhere.

deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 9 points ago +10 / -1 (edited)

If it's a crowd of thousands it will take more than a "shred of resistance." In some places they have proven to be quite well organized, which suggests to me that the antifas on the streets are middle managers with higher ups planning and funding.

Militias were wiped out years ago.

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you imagine a city of 1-million people, and 2.5k of them are protesting, you might have 500 looters. Even with that many protesters, that's only 0.25% of the population as protesters, or 0.05% as rioters. If even 0.5% of people were reserve riot-patrol, that would quickly shut down any riot before it could go anywhere.

Normal police would do their normal protester baby-sitting while we more carefully coordinate more lightning-tactics to nab rioters.

I think it could work, but probably not on short notice. My only worry would be people who try to infiltrate the group.

FuckRioters 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm definitely joining one, once this is over. Not sure how we'd make one on such short notice.

DocOne 4 points ago +4 / -0

they are going out to stop US from shooting the rioters ourselves.

Not here they wont

I_no_asshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

The feckless governors and mayors won’t bring in the extra support to help their police force. Why on earth would the local police go into battle if they’re going to get slaughtered by design?

buckinghampi 28 points ago +28 / -0

The commies fighting cops: "destroy all cops!" cops fight back for their lives The commies: "why would the cops do this!"

sth1d 25 points ago +25 / -0

Honestly the last thing I would send into that mess is a K9. It's a situation for water cannons and tear gas, not K9s. Would much rather not see any of those dogs get hurt over this.

Mukato 9 points ago +10 / -1

Send a pack of hundreds of canines, maybe a few bears...

MortyArk 18 points ago +18 / -0

I would pay good money to watch them drop a Grizzly bear with body armor on those rioters.

chelthing 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wojtek has entered the chat

1776_Say_Can_You_See 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Exit, pursued by a bear."

DocOne 5 points ago +5 / -0


CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +5 / -1

Think GoT with the undead bear, lol

Mint 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do they make body armor for bears???

CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't think dogs would be getting hurt.

I do think non-lethal means could get this under control, and the NG (as well as cops) should have the ability to defend themselves with lethal force if it comes to that.

sth1d 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did see a video where there were about 10 dogs together. That's a much better idea. People might decide to gang up on 1 dog, but nobody's going to mess with 10 plus their handlers.

CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wow. I didn't realize any K-9s were actually there. Kept on a leash and used only as a deterrent, I'm ok with this. Are they turning them loose to maul people?

TD_Covfefe_Crusader 19 points ago +19 / -0

That has been the standard riot response since the 1992 L.A. Riots. That was when they decided to use soft de-escalation instead of suppression by any means necessary, which used to be the standard response.

Block_Helen 19 points ago +19 / -0

instead of suppression by any means necessary, which used to be the standard response.

"Looters will be shot on sight."

TD_Covfefe_Crusader 22 points ago +22 / -0

Exactly, and once a riot was declared they would give an order to disperse, and those that didn't comply were forcibly dispersed and arrested using any means necessary, including lethal force. I attended a LE academy in the 1980s and this is what we were taught regarding riot response.

FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

The public needs to be educated that there are no peaceful protests, when there are people among you rioting. You need to either take down the agitators yourself or clear the area.

deleted 19 points ago +22 / -3
Troll 2 points ago +7 / -5

In the end we find out that cops were zilch useful the entire time. Who knew?

deleted 5 points ago +8 / -3
FuckRioters 2 points ago +2 / -0

Libertarians, AnCaps, and Militias knew.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Evei 11 points ago +12 / -1

the governors and their minions are trying to force the president to use extreme measures so that they can then turn on him and claim he is terrorist dictator.

Meanwhile, the Chinese are probably seriously considering just walking in and taking over. It's who the dems work for anyway.

FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +3 / -1

Meanwhile, the Chinese are probably seriously considering just walking in and taking over

No. Don't be silly. The Chinese would have to project power over thousands of miles of ocean against a fully intact US Navy. They do not have this capability. The US can't be conquered by an external enemy: the geography doesn't allow it. It can only be conquered from within.

elephant_nuts 13 points ago +13 / -0

I wish. I don’t want a single tax dollar of mine going to rebuild these hell holes, but I imagine we’ll pay for it anyway.

Thearchduke 6 points ago +8 / -2

Bailouts will come, as usual.

T2R0U2M0P 2 points ago +2 / -0

As is tradition

top_eagle 3 points ago +3 / -0

The danger is that it forces lefties to leave the state and settle in red land.

CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +3 / -1

That's when the shoot on sight orders commence?

NYRepublican72 36 points ago +36 / -0

He knew these pathetic weak cucks would leak it too.

Lla26 11 points ago +11 / -0

Oh he knew.

Amaroq64 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Everyone please approve of me with how I was bullied so I don't have to face Trump alone!"

But it just makes them look pathetic

Cyer6 2 points ago +2 / -0

I expect the dem Govs to cry about what Trump said to them, and they did. But that R Gov from Massachusetts is an even bigger cuck. What an asshat.

magarefugee 30 points ago +30 / -0

Trump is a true leader that abides by proper leadership principles. He has expressed his INTENT, and now it's to the "subordinates" to carry out that intent. Trump is not micromanaging, he's not telling them HOW to do their jobs, he's simply giving them the rope they need to win, or the rope they need to hang themselves. The Dems will surely hang themselves.

1683commenceagain 26 points ago +26 / -0

Democrats are telling police forces to stand down so they can call President Trump a dictator if he comes in to save American lives.

Don't believe Democrats could be that callous? Just look to the pantyfa mayor of Portland.

HockeyMom4Trump 16 points ago +16 / -0

Minneapolis should get nothing. Mayor Frey ordered our police to abandon our 3rd precinct. Disgraceful.

careyanne1000 6 points ago +6 / -0

I saw that happen. So sorry. I haven’t seen anything like that before. That was the move that stared it all over the country. I told my mom the next morning it would spread. When she asked why I said they took a police precinct, they know all over no one will stop them and here we are.

CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yup that is unprecedented. They just ran like chickens.

Show fear to a guard dog and watch what happens. You might as well be commanding it to attack.