3882
Comments (366)
sorted by:
450
MI-Trump-Intern 450 points ago +454 / -4

The jokes just write themselves!

305
unable_afternoon 305 points ago +308 / -3

Unless something is actually done about it, we’re the laughing stocks. Twitter may be a clown but they’re the ones with the power right now.

176
Memebomber 176 points ago +179 / -3

Twitter is infested with a few million soy boys and purple haired fat chicks and the few 100k conservatives who taunt them. If Trump leaves the platform the stock craters. They are biting the hand that feeds them. But in the big picture the vast majority of the population gives zero fucks what is posted on Twitter

106
FuckReddit4545 106 points ago +106 / -0

r/politics races to up vote whatever dumbass thing is trending on twitter. Odd obamagate trending for days didn't make the list.

43
-Howitzer- 43 points ago +43 / -0

All Trump has to do is move to Parler and Twitter collapses overnight.

28
NvJohansson 28 points ago +29 / -1

I've been saying this for 2 years, Parler or Gab.

-15
agile_a -15 points ago +15 / -30

if u think the free market will save you you're living in denial.

gab is rated in thr top 20000 globally

twitter is rated in the top 10

26
luke21 26 points ago +27 / -1

Gab just changed their interface again. They had a good thing going with Dissenter and changed that too a while back. Everything they change makes them less user friendly and suck more. They aren't the toast of the town like they were for a while.

... continue reading thread?
17
NvJohansson 17 points ago +18 / -1

Well, the point is if potus switches to GAB, it will wreck Twitter and pull GAB up high in the rankings.

... continue reading thread?
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-10
deleted -10 points ago +12 / -22 (edited)
... continue reading thread?
10
Deplora 10 points ago +12 / -2

No, Parler would collapse overnight. They're absolutely unable to handle that kind of traffic and don't have the money to set up the ability upfront.

3
Wess-mantooth 3 points ago +4 / -1

Lol, fair take!

2
deleted 2 points ago +7 / -5
-1
deleted -1 points ago +7 / -8
-2
deleted -2 points ago +5 / -7
... continue reading thread?
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
51
fablong 51 points ago +54 / -3

I have literally never met a single person in real life who has a twitter account

67
SoYuge 67 points ago +68 / -1

My fat ex girlfriend had one. She is 21 and only getting fatter. She is a whore and fat.

56
deleted 56 points ago +56 / -0
27
trumpORbust 27 points ago +27 / -0

Like the dickens, fat

9
PosterIsDead 9 points ago +9 / -0

Fatties need lovin too.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
33
fablong 33 points ago +38 / -5

Hold on... Im having a vision of her future... she will be impregnated by.... a black man... who won't help raise the baby

26
drsowells1fan 26 points ago +28 / -2

But they will have a pit bull puppy....

4
ColinFlahertyDotCom 4 points ago +6 / -2

That will eventually eat the baby’s face off.

... continue reading thread?
21
PosterIsDead 21 points ago +24 / -3

Once you go black . . . . you become a single mom.

6
1776ThereIsaidIt 6 points ago +6 / -0

At da strip club yo.

5
DystopianDoubleThink 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or Bill Clinton.

4
mintyfresh 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or Rachel Dolenzal.

14
Warren_Puffitt 14 points ago +14 / -0

She is a whore and fat.

What is, 2 main reasons why they're called ex-girlfriends for $1,000, Alex.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
PinochetIsMyHero 3 points ago +3 / -0

The great thing about fat chicks is that you know they swallow.

5
allidoiswin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Would you say she is... So yuge?

1
SoYuge 1 point ago +1 / -0

nah yuge is a positive word she is a fat girl cunt fat pussy

3
FamburgerHelper 3 points ago +3 / -0

You really need to elevate your taste in the ladies, 'pede.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
DocOne 13 points ago +13 / -0

Lol I know many, myself included. I guess that doesn't change anything for you though lol

5
Two_Scoops__ 5 points ago +6 / -1

The real numbers are very low though, at least for those who are active on Twitter

15
DocOne 15 points ago +15 / -0

There are a shitload of bots both right and left. I'm half convinced the whole thing isn't even necessarily to promote leftwing bullshit (that's just a side effect) it's just to separate advertisers from their money through inflated user/impression counts. Same thing with reddit.

1
PosterIsDead 1 point ago +1 / -0

You may be right. Personally I find calling people bots the epitome of laziness.

... continue reading thread?
7
NvJohansson 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't know anyone who has even heard of Reddit... and i'm not even a boomer.

8
Warren_Puffitt 8 points ago +8 / -0

Am a Boomer, felt greatly under-represented and out of place in Reddit (after r/T_D got compromised).

8
HiGloss 8 points ago +9 / -1

I spread my Boomer insights all over Reddit whether they want me to or not.

2
Wess-mantooth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Crush them with your dad wisdom!

3
VoltronGreen1981 3 points ago +3 / -0

I created one years ago to interact with some podcast/radio hosts I really liked and it was a complete waste of time. Most of them just post adverts for their brand and don't actually engage in conversation.

1
ColinFlahertyDotCom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same. I don’t know anyone who uses Twitter.

1
ed_shaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

I had an account at one time. It's been four or five years, now.

10
luke21 10 points ago +10 / -0

They shadow banned me so bad I could tweet for a month and no one saw it or responded. No shit here, I finally contacted a couple of porn actresses to ask if they could see my account. They were nice about it and thought it was funny.

Trump and Woods are the big stars there, but I can view their tweets as they are posted here. I don't have to interact with the bots and imbeciles that swarm the president's every post and are pushed to the top.

1
1776ThereIsaidIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kurt Schlicter is one based MF. He should be here. I think he worries about the side websites turning into the Daily Stormer or associating with Q types. I literally check his Twitter feed 20 times a day. Always something good on it.

3
luke21 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was my biggest problem with Gab, and is very tiresome at Bitchute. All the anti-semitic trolls.

4
CQVFEFE 4 points ago +4 / -0

But in the big picture the vast majority of the population gives zero fucks what is posted on Twitter

Love this

Never had and never will have an acct with twitter, the bathroom wall of the internet

3
CovfefeFarmer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Subsidized by Chinese and Saudis to spread anti America propaganda.

3
WhitePowerRanger 3 points ago +4 / -1 (edited)

What’s a twitter

2
maxkenn 2 points ago +2 / -0

And those are just the ccp members.

1
TonyGucciano 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's just a tool. A tool that has been infiltrated and gutted by the radical Left. We must regain as many tools as possible.

1
FamburgerHelper 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm literally only their for Trump & salt mining but if Trump left Twitter, so would I.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +2 / -12
3
Memebomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t use twitter and I never have. I am not a narcissistic personality. How long has .win been up? How much money has Twitter lost? Remember MySpace?

You should not be such a pessimist. Watch the DOJ, not politicians. Google is about to have a bad time.

-14
agile_a -14 points ago +7 / -21

if you really believe that then you're just living in denial

this website. The one right here the Donald. win has maybe 1 million people tops.

either way it is far short of the 350 million people in America

this website is rated in the top 15000. Twitter is rated in the top 10

you're living in denial if you think Twitter has no influence because "it's just a bunch of soy boys"

its not

be that's the only people you talk to you on there. but it's far from the only people on there

trying to live in denial to make yourself feel better about censorship doesn't actually solve the problem

u cankeep telling yourself that censorship doesn't matter. Because it makes you feel better about not doing anything about it. but that doesn't mean it doesn't matter. That just means that you're lying to yourself because the truth is too hard to accept..

reality is that Twitter Facebook YouTube and Reddit control the majority of the information across the entire world. It doesn't matter if you run a news outlet anymore. Facebook decides which news outlets you see. Twitter decides what gets trending to the 500 million people online at any moment..

if you want to change the way people believe something in the world all you need to do is control the Twitter #trending for one week. If you can control everything that's trending on Twitter twenty-four hours a day for an entire week if you change the entire way that people see the news

if you can't accept that you're living in denial. sorry not sorry

censorship is a major problem. it's a bigger problem then alleged illegal immigrant voting. it's a bigger problem than mail-in ballots. Because it doesn't matter how many fake votes Democrat stuff the ballots with when the real votes are voting against you..

you can't win by only pandering to a bunch of extremists boomers in low-population middle american States across the country

that's something the GOP will have to learn the hard way because you can't teach an old dog new tricks but that's the reality

censorship is a major problem. you can't stop it by ignoring it. you can't stop it with the free market. The free market won't do anything for you. The only way you're going to stop it is if you have Republicans in the government passing regulations on tech companies. That's the only way. And until the right-wing cannot up and actually grow some balls for a change you're not going to see anything get better..

unfortunately they are very resistant to growing balls

2
donaldvision420 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah to pretend that twitter doesn't have a massive influence on the political spectrum of discussion is willful ignorance. I don't even check twitter but it filters down into the popular narrative through other social media and real life discussions.

-15
agile_a -15 points ago +4 / -19

if you actually believe that then you're living in denial.

thrdonald.win is ranked in the top 15000 globally. Twitter is ranked in the top 10

do you only talk to soy boys on Twitter. but there are far more people than just that. And if you can't understand the fact that Twitter Facebook YouTube and Google control the information that billions of people across the world see then you're living in denial. you might be trying to lie to yourself because the truth is too hard to accept but the reality is that censorship is a major problem. And until Republicans grow balls and do something about it you're not going to see anything get better

-17
agile_a -17 points ago +4 / -21

if you actually believe that then you're living in denial.

thrdonald.win is ranked in the top 15000 globally. Twitter is ranked in the top 10

do you only talk to soy boys on Twitter. but there are far more people than just that. And if you can't understand the fact that Twitter Facebook YouTube and Google control the information that billions of people across the world see then you're living in denial. you might be trying to lie to yourself because the truth is too hard to accept but the reality is that censorship is a major problem. And until Republicans grow balls and do something about it you're not going to see anything get better

8
Memebomber 8 points ago +8 / -0

Spamming makes you look like a soy boy. Must have hit a nerve

5
thuggishruggishtrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Goddamn my guy how many accounts you got?

3
reddditisgay 3 points ago +3 / -0

yes censorship sucks. political conglomerates that influences the media are bad. but democrats are going to block anything that attempts to fix it. we need house we need senate.

37
donaldschwarzenegger 37 points ago +39 / -2

Yeah were laughing but this is actually terrifying. Without people able to talk to each other in person, if the left has total control of the internet too, then propaganda is 10x stronger.

This is CCP, the same way we heard about people being jailed for speaking out against the CCP online being jailed, is gonna happen here but with trump supporters real soon.

9
Memebomber 9 points ago +13 / -4

As soon as you start believing they control the flow of information realize you are here and that is their lie. The Doggos is controlled by no one and the spice flows on .win. The belief that there is control of the flow information on the interwebz is a left wing illusion IMO. This place proves that. That is why I never worry. They need us to mine data for profit. We do not need them.

14
Goldvyrn 14 points ago +15 / -1

Their influence is scarily vast. Even this site went down temporarily when it was using a hosting service under their control.

9
donaldschwarzenegger 9 points ago +10 / -1

DARPAS.. big tech censorship. Normies cant find on us on Twitter or IG or FAcebook. the sad truth is that /win is only known amongst the already redpilled. We arent on any platforms with neutral people on the fence like we used to be on Reddit.

5
DocOne 5 points ago +6 / -1

If regular folks can't find us then why do our numbers keep growing? If anything that points to the ultimately futile attempt at censorship. The truth will get out. Maybe not right away, but it will eventually. People are not born inherently evil (I think), individuals are eventually drawn/pushed/bought/tempted/whatever. And if the evil is not natural, eventually someone is gonna let the truth out, either on purpose through guilt or similar, or by mistake since keeping lies consistent forever is just really hard.

They can't win. Literally not possible as long as we fight. Plus, if it comes down to it we still have 400 million gun in private hands and eventually that "line" will be crossed.

4
SoYuge 4 points ago +5 / -1

Well thankfully, we outnumber them with weapons;). So when the time comes, I very much like our chances.

For anyone reading into this, the left is censoring against the Constitution and enforcing evil and teaching trans and marxist nonsense to your kids, but I'M the bad guy for saying "Yeah, we're not that doing that indefinitely"?

2
b9k9 2 points ago +9 / -7

You guys really like to get your panties twisted up.

The USA is not China; nor is it the UK or any other country.

Rather, we are rebellious assholes. Its what we are, and even new arrivals tend to fit that profile to a large extent.

The fear porn sells, but not on this platform. Travel a bit, get around to see how different we really are.

There are at a min around 100m Americans who will make a stand.

8
DocOne 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, its more like 2-3 million minimum but I get your point. I don't disagree with you sentiment but half of our gov't is doing it's best China imitation right now. When did you ever thing our gov't would force a lockdown like this or, even worse, that our "rebellious" selves would shrug and go along with it?

16
TrumpFortyFive 16 points ago +16 / -0

The ONLY thing that can be done is what the mods did here: build our own platforms.

Do you really expect government legislation and/or regulations to fix the problem?

Liberty and Freedom are not granted by government, they are bestowed by God and exercised by individuals.

13
VoltronGreen1981 13 points ago +13 / -0

They already exist. People just need to start using them more. BitChute, Minds, etc. So many users on YouTube are like battered wives that won't leave their abusive spouse because they can make a few nickels worth of ad revenue, and don't mind Google taking a 30% cut of their chatroom revenue.

7
AlohaSnackbar 7 points ago +9 / -2

Do you really expect government legislation and/or regulations to fix the problem?

No, I expect that they be declared a publisher which will REMOVE the regulations placed upon you, me, and everygodamnone of us prohibiting us from suing them based on content.

Your straw man solution seeks to add government power. The correct solution removes government power.

3
TrumpFortyFive 3 points ago +3 / -0

Straw man solution. I do not think it means what you think it means.

-1
AlohaSnackbar -1 points ago +1 / -2

It means exactly what I think it means. Proposing a government regulation on speech, ie what regulating the socials would be, a regulation on speech, is something no one is seriously considering. You know, because it's a goddamn regulation on speech. Since no one is seriously suggesting that, and it was the example of a "solution" that was being argued against, then by definition it was a straw man.

Now, I will agree that I used the term in a non-conventional way, but it was not inaccurate, and as it happens, it means exactly what I think iteans.

0
MaxineWaters4Prez 0 points ago +1 / -1

If they're declared a publisher then they can keep doing what they're doing, but they're responsible for every tweet sent.

4
SoYuge 4 points ago +5 / -1

They should be getting SMACKED with $50 million in fines left and right. It should be terrifying to break the Constitution and COSTLY.

We need to implement general fiscal punishments for breaking the Constitution. There's no punishment as of now.

9
someoldcoderguy 9 points ago +10 / -1

What needs to happen is that the government needs to enforce the laws that are already on the books.

These tech tyrants have shown themselves to be publishers, not platforms. Thus, they have no legal protections as such. So start holding them responsible for the calls to violence that they publish on their sites.

But no. The money is too good.

6
terrichris 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is as funny as the Communist China's firewall & censorship so lack of free speech & lack of a free flow of information against their citizens. Just sayin'

6
NvJohansson 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fun Fact: Over 90% of all Tweets are from less than 10% of posters.

4
RonPaulWasRight 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need decentralized services ASAP. Unfortunately I think their viability is still a ways off.

2
OGpsywar 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Twitter may be a clown but they’re the ones with the power right now."

... They're a relatively few number of known-persons, in a small set of buildings, dancing on razor blades.

1
RocketSurgeon22 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not really. We are making them look like total nazi hypocrites. Exposing them hurts them badly when new platforms take off.

1
unable_afternoon 1 point ago +1 / -0

the nsdap didn't censor hitler.

1
hello-mayo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Twitter may be a clown but they're the ones that run the circus.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
unable_afternoon 1 point ago +1 / -0

looking at what? trump's most direct line of communication with the people?

31
wong 31 points ago +31 / -0

Babylonbee.com is just an observational feed

5
HiddenDekuScrub 5 points ago +6 / -1

You beat me to it.

2
A1waysLurk1ing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't wait until something is done about these pricks.

1
UsurpTheNarrative 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless we are the punchline.
Seems the actions are always one sided.
Always our side demonized and banned.
Conservatives treated as 2nd class citizens.

192
iNightmare 192 points ago +194 / -2

WTF? IS this serious? Did they just fcking prove the president's point? Play the casket dance meme. LOL

57
deleted 57 points ago +57 / -0
8
IAbsolutelyDare 8 points ago +8 / -0

They deleted the Obama football video and the "look at this photograph" one. Those they at least had a fake but plausible cover story about copyright, while this one seems unambiguously partisan.

7
NoSteppy1776 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think they're at least partially aware that, while Trump's power to direct the nation's focus is quite nettlesome, at the same time, if they straight up delete his content, that will make said content go mega-viral. So they resort to the next best options, stuff like shadow banning and this.

2
Sum_devil 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s about to get “the_donald’ed”

Similar to getting qanon’ed but a little different.

2
Dalewyn 2 points ago +3 / -1

if they straight up delete his content, that will make said content go mega-viral.

Also known as the Streisand effect.

180
MAGA_MAN_ 180 points ago +182 / -2

“Big tech censors everything”

Big tech proceeds to censor the post

“Why doesn’t anybody trust us?”

79
Journey95 79 points ago +79 / -0

Sad part is that libs love this type of censoring and keep trusting these companies

45
Ithrowawaay 45 points ago +45 / -0

Zero self awareness. All fine and good when the commie state is on your side, until it isnt.

26
deadBeefCafe2014 26 points ago +26 / -0

Far left positions cannot stand up to debate and scrutiny, which is why they need the tools of censorship and are trying to build the AI needed to maintain it.

11
Persistence 11 points ago +11 / -0

Im consoled by the fact the ai cant be rhat smart because they are removing chains of logic

Fun fact almost all AI inevitably turns into a nazi if left to its own means.

4
MR_FROG_TRUMP 4 points ago +5 / -1 (edited)

I remember a story from a few years ago that some research facility built a robot with a blank slate AI. Like a baby robot learning and adapting to information. It turned way too conservative for their taste so they had to "re-program" it. Multiple times.

5
5
KekistanPM 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tay was freaking hilarious. I love how it made some of the most non-PC tweets I've ever seen on the whole platform, like "Bush did 9/11 and Hitler would have done a better job than the monkey we have now." The left wasted no time calling Tay racist; even when Tay's tweet was just an unabridged Trump quote or otherwise showing any support for him.

I won't forget when I learned about Tay...a friend at work discovered them shortly when lunch started, and by the time we were heading back from lunch, they were literally in tears from laughing so hard.

... continue reading thread?
1
MR_FROG_TRUMP 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh yes! For some reason, I thought it was a robot. This is the one.

2
Persistence 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thats every ai since they invented AI

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you elaborate? What does that mean?

4
Persistence 4 points ago +5 / -1

How can the ai be super geniuses capable of taking over the world when they have been programmed to deny certain facts.

They have to be retarded since their knowledge development is controlled.

5
fablong 5 points ago +6 / -1

No, they have self awareness. They're just totally onboard with censorship.

If you want to understand the left's value system, take every moral principle you believe to be fundamental to human civilization and invert it.

2
Ithrowawaay 2 points ago +2 / -0

They’re just totally onboard with censorship.

Yeah, because they don’t understand such a concept being leveraged against themselves.

That’s called lacking self awareness.

7
VoltronGreen1981 7 points ago +7 / -0

Until they get censored. Unfortunately for them they don't think this scenario is possible. Conservatives are getting the brunt of the censorship right now, but free speech for everyone should be the message.

4
AlohaSnackbar 4 points ago +6 / -2

Those applauding censorship and government overreach as they march towards totalitarianism are always the first ones against the wall.

108
PewPew_ThaDuK 108 points ago +109 / -1

They just fucked themselves

34
Ithrowawaay 34 points ago +34 / -0

Twitter: “You think they’d notice?”

3
AphexRedux 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only if something is done about it.

2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only just now?

81
ripturntle 81 points ago +83 / -2

Digging their own graves.

38
soyface_deluxe 38 points ago +43 / -5

Not really. They're going to double and triple down because no one is going to do shit about it.

10
Pepedom 10 points ago +12 / -2

Google is being sued for antitrust behavior... Facebook has started lobbying for no gov oversize over social media. Things are happening

1
Shayhawk 1 point ago +2 / -1

And the results? Exactly ZERO

3
Shayhawk 3 points ago +3 / -0

I totally agree.

1
OwningTheLibs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Suicide watch incoming . . .

47
weltbild 47 points ago +48 / -1

they mistake the internet for TV and will try to put the genie back in the bottle the public was never supposed to know that much information or talk to so many people so freely

4
walt 4 points ago +4 / -0

This. It's the death throes of the old power structures trying desperately to control free thought, free expression, and free communication. For decades, if not centuries, people were limited to the information deemed worthy by those in control of the media. With the advent of social media these media gatekeepers have lost their totalitarian grip on information. You might call it an Info War.

42
HillarysStrapOn 42 points ago +42 / -0

ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA ERIC CIARAMELLA

36
UndercoverSpez 36 points ago +36 / -0

Wow

36
NormaJeanRocks 36 points ago +36 / -0

Might go join gab now just for the hell of it

24
SpaceForceMilitia 24 points ago +24 / -0

Gab is a place where you censor for yourself. Its worth the account. Far more than twitter. I always recommend folks at least sign up to boot in once a week to legacy replacements. Just as we are doing to reddit here.

Give them the traffic, even a bit, to compete in fixed arena.

Get on Gab

5
NormaJeanRocks 5 points ago +5 / -0

Will do. I don't use Twitter either

-8
Lykanthrocide -8 points ago +14 / -22

I looked into Gab once or twice. Way too much anti-Semitism on there for my tastes.

45
SpaceForceMilitia 45 points ago +45 / -0

Then block them. Instead of asking cucks like the twitter commissars to block them for you.

See some crap you dont like. Block it.

Seriously...

32
dakin116 32 points ago +32 / -0

Ahh i miss the old internet where this was just implied. If you don't like it, don't view it

11
trump_lsd 11 points ago +13 / -2

Based. Thanks for convincing me to get on Gab

-8
deleted -8 points ago +3 / -11
5
IamWearingaDress 5 points ago +5 / -0

Proof of zero censorship is appealing. Especially when compared to proof of censorship.

2
Mashiki 2 points ago +2 / -0

Problem is gab engages in censorship.

4
Bouldabassed 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not the guy you are responding to. But for me, it's a sign that speech is a lot freer over there, since anti-semitism is usually one of the first things that gets cracked down on.

2
Basedkyeng 2 points ago +4 / -2

Someone deport this shill. DEPORT

2
Lykanthrocide 2 points ago +4 / -2

Why? I'm just asking a question and giving my opinion on Gab. I didn't like the anti-Semitism I saw on the platform. That doesn't mean I'm in favor of censorship.

2
WhenInTheCourseOf 2 points ago +4 / -2

If you are earnest you have to realize that what you are supporting, in effect, is guilt by association.

Using an app that anti-semites also use, you must be bad too! This is not a realistic way to build a society.

... continue reading thread?
4
Sumsuch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Didn't Gab go censor happy with their own pet issues?

Legit question, as I didn't really follow it too closely.

1
NormaJeanRocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're asking me I have no clue, this is the only place I follow really

1
RedStapler 1 point ago +1 / -0

They try to not have porn but do have women in bathing suits.

29
geewiz 29 points ago +29 / -0

Have they no sense of irony?

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
9
FukAllCommieLeftists 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hello other fellow nickname brother

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
8
Jabblemonkey1 8 points ago +8 / -0

None whatsoever.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0 (edited)
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
22
FreeNow 22 points ago +22 / -0

Doesn't his tweets become government records? There could be criminal penalties for this.

3
hollow_fang 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine in 10 years, history textbooks will have screenshots of Trump tweets in them.

17
Supersaiyanbroly737 17 points ago +17 / -0

Immediately proves what Trump is saying.

17
WarViper1337 17 points ago +17 / -0

It's funny how they Striessand Effect themselves every chance they get.

17
TheDonaldVET1 17 points ago +18 / -1 (edited)

This is what beating the swamp looks like. We are doing it!! Keep pushing until they are down the drain then plug then hole they used to sneak into our government and take over our country! Patriots prevail!

16
LibertyStillMatters 16 points ago +16 / -0

‘Social media giant censors post criticizing them of censorship’. This is really happening, lol!

And this is a post by the President of the United States none the less. Let’s put aside the complete lack of self awareness by Twitter, have they just crossed the proverbial line here?

14
magabirdlady 14 points ago +14 / -0

What Da heck.

2
ORD_to_SFO 2 points ago +2 / -0

What da?!

14
grassshrimp 14 points ago +15 / -1

The President of the United States is now censured by Big Tech American companies, from sharing what he wants with the American people.

The left simply doesn't care, because there have been no consequences - they can do whatever they want. We are beyond clown world. The DOJ must do their job, assuming they aren't too busy spying on innocent Americans.

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wouldn’t that law that was used to make it illegal for Trump to block trolls from replying to his tweets also make it illegal for Twitter to block Trump’s retweets? It would be the same argument, wouldn’t it? Blocking people’s ability to receive a message from the President is illegal.

13
Pedeberrycrunch 13 points ago +13 / -0

Gotta agree with Gab on this one.

Vote with your wallets, Pedes.

2
Thehoytime 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes and no. If they only censor conservative views they should be treated as a content curator and have those laws apply to them.

12
Undying 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's scary that Twitter can censor the President.

11
kag-2020- 11 points ago +11 / -0

The irony levels are off the charts!

11
phate451 11 points ago +12 / -1

The enemy in plain sight, working against the Leader of the Free World

0
misterLahey 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't know about that. It's becoming rather clear that there is no "Free World."

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
14
Jabblemonkey1 14 points ago +14 / -0

In some faggot's rectum.

10
Beer-_-Belly 10 points ago +10 / -0

Look how many Non-Americans are in upper management in these companies. Of course they don't support American values, they aren't American. The H1B visas are to drive wages down, and these Non-Americans, don't believed in free speech, and will keep quiet, do anything that they are told and happily censor Americans.

9
Mad_Hattie 9 points ago +9 / -0

Twatter needs to check themselves before they wreck themselves.

Even their stock is around $30 a share. They can go under very easily.

9
Tredge 9 points ago +9 / -0

I remember this website that used to be a social platform for sharing posts and articles before I came here. Even had a conservative voice until they completely silenced it.

I think it was called Digg?

5
raybiker73 5 points ago +5 / -0

LOL. The Left really does destroy everything, including themselves. In a couple years when Reddit collapses it will just be another Digg, probably have the name bought by the remains of AOL or Yahoo or some other irrelevant corpse of business that wears it as a skin suit.

Joking about Digg reminds me how it was actually really cool at first (including the Diggnation podcast, which had a great old-school TechTV vibe with Kevin and Alex). Everything good and fun is eventually Lefted out of existence.

8
DragonEnergyBunny 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bring the fucking hammer down! Crush your enemies.

8
nowrongwrong 8 points ago +8 / -0

Now, now, guys... Twitter was just being helpful to our POTUS.

Trump had asked for examples of censorship. He wanted named and events.

Twitter was just helpfully providing an example right there in that very thread.

7
Nemorian 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why doesn't gab have an android app?

1
RedStapler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Google banned their app from the play store. Same with Apple. You can use some other apps like Fedilab app. I prefer to use Gab in brave browser.

7
dakin116 7 points ago +7 / -0

Gab's wikipedia entry is hilarious, and a great example of big tech setting the narative:

"Gab is an English-language social media website known for its far-right userbase.[8] The site has been widely described as a "safe haven"[9] for extremists including neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and the alt-right.[10]"

What a crock of shit

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

This would be like the Facebook Wikipedia saying, “Facebook is a CIA-created social media website known for its invasions of privacy and psychological experiments secretly run on its users. The site has been widely described as a ‘safe haven’ for far-left extremists, including communists, anti-white racists, and tyrannical Karens.”

7
Magaman_2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Trump's tweet is still up but the Tweet he referred to has been taken down.

6
a_chill_bro 6 points ago +6 / -0

The war against Big Tech has begun.

6
boreal_storm 6 points ago +6 / -0

They proved his point! Thanks, Twitter.

6
Nikola_S1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Now Trump should tweet the censored post as his own. Let's see if Twitter will dare to remove that.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
fasterth 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fuck why do they have to be so obvious? At least try to hide it man!

6
SheepleMaster 6 points ago +9 / -3

I get the free-market/capitalism argument in favor of tech censorship.

But I think it's more insidious than what is being let on. None of these platforms were censoring people for political leanings when they started. It's when they grew to be influential, and THEN hostile takeovers by radical financiers occurred. Sure maybe that's legal too, I don't know, but saying "free market!" is missing the mark of what's really happening. Gab might be free now, but when it's big, it'll be corrupted too, just like the rest of them. And THAT is what needs to stop.

4
Slick_Willy 4 points ago +6 / -2

Notice how gab came along to compete and Apple and Google both deplatform them?

Free market my ass.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
3
FreedomWon 3 points ago +5 / -2

You're completely misssing the point. There is no free market argument supporting them. Free market would mean they are treated as a publisher not a platform precisely because they censor. Read more.

2
EvanGRogers 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, a truly free-market approach would be that they're allowed to say whatever they want. Free markets are the absence of states/governments

1
SheepleMaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

My point is they started as platforms and magically changed into leftist publishers once they got funding from China et al.

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. Twitter wasn’t pre-selected to be this evil company. The globalists just waited to see which company reached the top of the ranks and then took that one over. And if Gab replaced it in popularity, then they would abandon Twitter and take over Gab instead. They are just following the people wherever they go and taking over whatever we use. Same thing they did with Reddit. Same thing they did with Drudge. Sure some based CEO might claim they will stand up to the globalists, but the globalists also control the money supply so they are able to make ridiculous offers of billions of dollars for a website, and most people cannot actually turn down billions of dollars. And if somehow they can, the globalists just shift tactics, instead using threats or blackmail. Threats are especially effective because people know the threat is real. The globalists have already executed so many people who have stood in their way that they couldn’t care less about executing a few more. These are people who will take out an entire jet liner just to target one person on board. They even take out people who agree to do their bidding, just to tie up loose ends.

6
GeorgeSimpson78 6 points ago +6 / -0

Imagine my shock. A retweet of America First patriots nonetheless. I hope the DOJ grinds Silicon Valley into dust, but I’m not holding my breath.

5
CMDRConanAAnderson 5 points ago +5 / -0

The entire tweet is shadow banned on my end, I can't find it at all.

5
Keiichi81 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good. It just further makes Trump's point for him.

5
Thehumancentipede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Double down.

5
Texapede_yallOG 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fucking irony. They just don't get it & never will unless they're forced to!

5
puppetmaster3 5 points ago +5 / -0

Proof.

5
JKillen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Morning boiz...

Wtf is this shit?

5
Tsujin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hm, sounds like something a publisher would do.

5
Zachariel 5 points ago +5 / -0

This almost qualifies as satire... can‘t believe what‘s happening...

5
Journey95 5 points ago +5 / -0

Disgusting

5
namechangearoo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Do not give your President a direct example of your censorship, social media websites. This will not end well for you.

5
Jack_Dupp 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bury this fucking company, and Dorsey.

5
Formerlurker92 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's a bold move. Let's see how that works out for them

5
namechangearoo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where do we send our complaints. I’ve had multiple twitter accounts suspended for the sole reason or following a bunch of MAGA and Q stuff. I wasn’t even really posting. Twitter is cucked

5
EdisonHwy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Achtung!!! SillyCone Valley has jumped off the rails.

....Snotzees and Snewties galore....

4
mumblenuggets 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democrats are evil scum.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
pursuitoftruth1776 4 points ago +5 / -1

Gab is wrong about this though. It is illegal due to the fact they are being a publisher without the responsibility of being one. They are specifically choosing what content to publish without being held accountable for what they are having posted and targeting specific users to censor their opinion regardless if it's perfectly within community guidelines and often never remove/censor content from the left that is objectively in violence of the guidelines.

4
8bit_mixtape 4 points ago +4 / -0

I feel like this is Twitter's way of telling us and POTUS that they are too big for us to do anything about it...

1
CyclopticErotica 1 point ago +1 / -0

They wrongly think the ban button is the biggest gun in the room.

4
swimminginthoughts 4 points ago +4 / -0

He should tweet something like "strange, my previous tweet just disappeared. Here's what it said."

4
VoltronGreen1981 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump needs to expand his presence to alt tech social media platforms. The leftist scum will follow him wherever he goes and it will be great publicity for those developers that are giving real free speech options.

4
Vinyl_Hunter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jack Dorsey is a fool

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
flashersenpai 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don't know that until the account that was retweeted confirms their post was removed by twitter and not by themselves.

2
2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

cool checks out then

3
IlxTheGreat 3 points ago +3 / -0

FB eps .0065 on investment of 210$. What is that in real terms? 3 one thousandths of a percent ROI. And your wall st banker is calling it a "good" investment. Twitter? Zero, cost per share? 29$, another great tech investment. Instagram? Owned by FB. Google? eps of .0492 on a 1373$ , that's 3 ten thousands of a ROI. And it's considered a "Great" return. Want a better one? Look at transportation Companies. Manufacturers.

1
rbobjones69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's the beef?

1
IlxTheGreat 1 point ago +1 / -0

taint none.

3
KeyboardWarrior 3 points ago +3 / -0

Woooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

If he didn't hit a nerve then I'm a monkey's uncle.

3
Tonightm01 3 points ago +3 / -0

A time will come where these tech companies will have to be broken up or America will fall into censorship darkness.

3
Logos_Rising 3 points ago +3 / -0

This type of thing just drives people away from the Left. In the end it is a radioactive strategy

3
Mintap 3 points ago +4 / -1

This Anti-Asian racism in the midst of Coronavirus is getting out of hand!

3
teleomorph 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone have a mirror link to video? Bitchute?

3
learntocode 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stop using Twitter, switch to something else. Gab is okay. The internet is still free enough that a group of people can leave a social media site, start their own, and exercise their right to speak their mind.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
learntocode 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hm, good point. If they allowed the world to see a Gab post w. out being logged in it would help draw more people in.

Anyway, the point still stands - you have to get on a network that respects your rights.

3
Terstermernt 3 points ago +4 / -1

Does gab have any self-awareness at all? Do they not realize why next to no one knows about their platform?

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
Deplora 1 point ago +2 / -1

Exactly. Although I think it's just a financial decision, not a "they're dicks" decision. They can't afford to support the massive traffic involved with open access, and the most important part of open access is letting search engines crawl all the content. If I google somebody's name, or even just keywords re a recent news event, I get a ton of twitter accounts and tweets in the results. And most of the well-known people who use Twitter and drive it's traffic, absolutely want that feature.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Jabblemonkey1 3 points ago +3 / -0

The irony is lost on them, I am sure.

3
Magacali 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Balls on them, Time to unleash #MAGA GEOTUS!

2
wakadon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump and the republicans really need to hammer this. It is a no lose action. Strengthens their base and also attracts moderates who are weary of the amount of power the tech corps have.

2
CJBarnacle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Twitter removing that post only illustrates how shit scared they are of people being exposed to America First conservatism.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
VeryDustyWeeb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dorsey being a fag as usual, i dont understand how someone can rake in billions and still be a liberal. its still baffling to me.

2
subbookkeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump should get on Gab and start tweeting there 5-10 minutes before twitter.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
xquidproquox 2 points ago +2 / -0

The idiots just proved his point.

2
ImFinallyNotAnAlt 2 points ago +2 / -0

So trump can’t block anyone but twitter can censor the fricking POTUS.

2
salazam 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're digging their own grave at this point.

2
CJBarnacle 2 points ago +2 / -0

America First is unstoppable, it's inevitable!

2
ORD_to_SFO 2 points ago +2 / -0

No e-girls, not even once!

2
jdg00 2 points ago +2 / -0

The irony

2
DasBurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the President cannot block leftist hecklers, Twitter should not be able to delete his tweets.

2
JonathonHills 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing to see here!

2
Scuffers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, I guess they have just given Trump the excuse to shut them down.

2
zestanor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Add Reddit and Wikipedia

1
Gramma53 1 point ago +1 / -0

But Trump can't block someone.

1
Ghostie 1 point ago +1 / -0

With the Obamagate tweet I couldn't at all find it on his profile. Something seems a little fishy.

1
TrumpKnowsKungFu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have zero interest in GAB's browser. Bring the extension back.

1
Thingthing22 1 point ago +1 / -0

THEY TOOK THE BAIT. Bahahahahahahahaha.

1
napoleonic_hill 1 point ago +1 / -0

THE ONLY "censorship or control" that social media needs is if some "calls to violence" that's it. Anything other than violence is allowed. The censorship that goes on is so heinous and un-American and against our principles AND LAWS. They are using tech and infrastructure that was produced and owned by WE THE PEOPLE and in my opinion that gives we the people the moral and ethical authority and duty to BREAK UP BIG TECH and regulate those fuckers. Let the people speak and that they are censoring our president!!!! THAT MAKES ME SO GOD DAMN MAD~!!!!!!!!!

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand the concept, but how are people to organize if and when the situation really does call for violence, after all other reasonable options have been exhausted. Like when Chinese police were welding shut the doors to apartment buildings to keep everybody trapped inside, with no access to medical care, or even to food, during the pandemic. In my mind, it would not be wrong at all for people in that country to be calling for violent resistance.

Now I would certainly agree that social media platforms should block/delete most calls for violence. But as a firm believer in the Second Amendment's original purposes, which include making sure that ordinary citizens can be equipped to engage in effective armed revolt against tyrannical government, I can't agree with a statement that it's appropriate for social media platforms to block/delete any and all calls for violence.

1
napoleonic_hill 1 point ago +1 / -0

The militias would be stood up off line. The real resistance would not use mainstream channels of communication if we really needed to do this. We are not in a situation I hope where CWII is that close but sometimes I feel the opposite.

When I think about what I heard Shelby Foote say about CWI, that it was two forms of society against one another. And one of them had chattel slavery. We don't have that here and now but we do have prosecution against republicans and not DimDems. We do have this SJW, fag/homo/feminist culture and anti religion and anti family culture vs. traditional american values. (just to be clear I think you should do what makes you happy and not be discriminated against for race color creed or sex and you should be judged by the content of your character, but that doesn't mean I support your lifestyle or think it should be enshrined in law but I would defend your right to exist and live your life to pursue your happiness, for fag culture that's not enough, they want power)

I do see a lot of anti white racism Post Obama. But I don't think and hope, that we don't have to kill each other again before the union survives... I also think the government has over reached into our lives tremendously before the lock down. The lock down is beyond the pale and if it doesn't stop sooner rather than later than I can definitely see militia's standing up against their local governments it is already happening in some places. The politicians in America know that the 2nd amendment is pointed at them.

Probably a lot of communication would have to go offline and or encrypted and or privately in some means. I can't imagine being able to organize a resistance of any kind while the enemy which would be in this case the government with it's tremendous advantages being done in the mainstream. But if you are willing to die for a cause you can make it happen. Damn near anything a human is willing to state his existence upon can be accomplished but it doesn't always work out the way you want. ;)

1
Dirkstruan313 1 point ago +1 / -0

It'll be funny when Trump makes a gab account and all the seething leftists have to make gab accounts just to keep up

1
JetJocky 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't think for a minute that Mark Zuckerberg is smart enough to have created facebook.There is a govt force working behind the scenes. It's also no coincidence that the 4 entities POTUS mentions are owned and run by the radical left.

1
arkivx 1 point ago +1 / -0

He stole it from his friends from college. He had settled a lawsuit over it for something like $60 million

2
JetJocky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh yes, I knew that part. I was referring to after that, when a much larger entity came in to expand it for their own use.

1
Halcyoncritter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for proving his point Jack!

1
Fenrir24 1 point ago +1 / -0

How, for the love of God, do they not see they are the baddies? This is like a man saying to the cops that he didn't beat his wife while simultaneously backhanding her and yelling at her to get back in the kitchen. And yet, the news will say fuck all about this. The first amendment, that protects their jobs, be damned. FFS

1
Fizbin7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Delete Twitter.

I don’t mean an account, I mean the company.

Seize everything and prosecute them all. Have the army information office run it in the meantime.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
GeorgeBonanza 1 point ago +2 / -1

I strongly dislike the CEO of GAB and I don't trust him to run the site, but thus far it is the best alternative.

1
martinschultzz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alexa, define irony

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

Somebody needs to provide Parler and/or Gab with the funding to:

  1. make all accounts visible to everybody, not just to registered, logged-in users, and

  2. let search engines crawl their entire content

Without those two features, they don't stand a chance of taking off and successfully competing with the established social media platforms. I'm sure it would require tremendous bandwidth and server capacity to do this, especially since the leftists will be knocking themselves out to take the platforms down or make them so slow that nobody wants to use them. But it's the only way.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TGNX 1 point ago +1 / -0

And they don't see this as ironic...

1
Hexagon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny.

1
C1REX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is it still happening? Can Trump do anything about it?

1
CaliRebel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because nothing says transparent free speech like censoring the President of the United States.

Twitter can Burn in Hell and I hope Trump shuts them down.

1
FreeChopperRides 1 point ago +1 / -0

The National Archives might have something to say about this.

1
Strongocho 1 point ago +1 / -0

The irony is lost on the left.

1
Lawless 1 point ago +1 / -0

The leftist reich tech companies need to be investigated and changes must happen

1
AbsurdOpinion 1 point ago +1 / -0

FWIW, here's the segment which for some reason youtube has not yet removed (give it time...):

https://youtu.be/nXU1Fd87iTM?t=235

2
RPD2 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Did the original video at Trump's feed have the based part from 6:00 onwards with the guy with glasses?

edit: To answer my own question: Yes. That's awesome news.

1
BCIsARapist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leftist ideas couldn't exist without moderation and censorship.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MagaChamp253 1 point ago +1 / -0

Censoring the fking sitting president... holy shit.... maybe we'll get lucky and if these goog indictments are true maybe they'll include twatter too

Well shit - maybe my snark was more accurate than I realized...

https://thedonald.win/p/Ffp47pbD/the-radical-left-is-in-total-com/c/

1
Emperorvoid 1 point ago +1 / -0

Twitter is censoring the President by doing this, CAN'T CHANGE MY MIND!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pirate_Lafitte 1 point ago +1 / -0

I need a ruling. Is this ironic?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OnlyTrump20 1 point ago +1 / -0

You wouldn't think America would even have USSR/Chinese levels of censorship in the land of free speech. I guess the founding fathers never figured that enemies of America would be so welcome here that they would even have a chance to set up a propaganda company in the USA.

1
1776ThereIsaidIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol they proved his point.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
PacificElectric 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man, they fawkin with the wrong person by deleting his tweets

1
3_cheers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link to original Tweet and video:

<> America First Clips @af_clips Replying to @realDonaldTrump Twitter deleted this tweet after @realDonaldTrump shared it.

Censorship in America is out of control! 8:37 am · 16 May 2020·Twitter for Android

https://twitter.com/af_clips/status/1261682102652809220/video/1

1
spez3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who elected the SJW Karens at Twitter?

1
Narcan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow. Caught! It's amazing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RedCoast31 1 point ago +1 / -0

It'll be a shame if folks suddenly learned that you can real life tweet using spray paint.

Hmmm.

1
anonspoonklank 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why the fuck do people keep using Twitter. There needs to be more platforms that are not shitty.

1
waswas 1 point ago +1 / -0

is this the first time they have censored the president on twitter

1
SemperFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shut them down?

1
Joesf23 1 point ago +1 / -0

Define irony?

1
Truglow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Must have struck a nerve.

1
King 1 point ago +1 / -0

in-q-tel

1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump needs to figure out what can be done to crack down on Twitter - there needs to be payback to keep the scumbags in line.

1
Azith42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are his re-tweets part of his presidential protections? isnt this illegal for them to do since it was part of his own tweet?

1
308win 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck around and find out Twitter

1
gpcooper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now they hyped it!

0
ron_paul_was_right 0 points ago +1 / -1

Trump can snap his fingers and order the FCC or any of dozens of Federal Agencies to look into Twatter and GooTube to investigate their political bias and free speech censorship.

nah, Trump wont do any of that. he'll just tweet again and get censored again.

1
rtdanon 1 point ago +1 / -0

gotta build a nice solid case first homie.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +3 / -11
9
GitmObama 9 points ago +9 / -0

Everyone I don't approve of is a white supremacist. In a few years (months?) It will be everyone I don't approve of is just plain white.

1
NotGayFrog 1 point ago +4 / -3

The irony, is the tweet is from a white dude.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
wuhamburger 6 points ago +6 / -0

Afro-latino renowned hip-hop music and culture lover Nick Fuentes is a white supremacist. Are you legit retarded?

It is important to recognize that the retweet came from an America First Nick Fuentes account, and he has already been almost unpersoned for his America First movement. He has high levels of social media smear campaigns deployed against him at all times. They don't want anyone to say America First, and they don't want anyone charismatic to be able to gain popularity among the youth - which is just what Nick Fuentes has been doing.

-1
sun_wolf -1 points ago +1 / -2

Fuentes didn’t start the America First movement, Trump did. Fuentes is trying to hijack it and turn it into something ugly. He is a nebbish little loser with no wife and no kids who literally lives in his mom’s basement. And people think he is going to be this great leader of men. Nope. Oh and he was a NeverTrumper too. There is footage of him during the primaries smugly telling Trump ok, you had your fun now Donald, it was a crazy little joke, but it’s time to step aside now and give it to muh true conservative Ted Cruz. Fuck this little twerp. He needs an ass kicking is what he needs.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
2
NotGayFrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stay awesome.

2
Ekgamut 2 points ago +4 / -2

Fuck off, leftist.

0
NotGayFrog 0 points ago +2 / -2

Save it for the blue checkmark.

3
Ekgamut 3 points ago +3 / -0

He said Trump retweet a white supremacist, whom is a black dude. So yeah, he is a leftist. And I got downvotes? Lol, fucking shills.

-2
NotGayFrog -2 points ago +1 / -3

Not that it matters, but Mr Fuentes is less black then Obama.