2179
Comments (151)
sorted by:
134
I_Love_45-70_Gov 134 points ago

Are these the docs from Commiefornia who have tested and treated over 5000 patients, and who said Fauci can stuff it because he has neither practiced medicine nor treated any patients in over 20 years?

52
Winterds001 52 points ago

correct.

34
I_Love_45-70_Gov 34 points ago

Cool. Thanks.

Was listening to either Michael Berry, or Dan Bongino yesterday and caught a few soundbites of these docs dismantling Dr. Fauci.

I loved how they said they are actually treating patients while Fauci hasn't practiced medicine in over 20 years, much less treated one single patient with Yelloman Fever. Talk about anecdotal evidence vs. the real deal.

38
ailurus 38 points ago

It freaked me out several weeks ago when I found out that Fauci has literally been head of NIAID for my entire life. Even if he was the absolute best doctor in the world when he took over NIAID, I find it all but impossible to believe that anyone could stay on top of all the changes in medicine over the last almost 4 decades well enough to maintain that position.

14
cheesecakelove 14 points ago

I deal with guys like him all the time. Guys that were once practicing, but have become directors and board members. They like to throw around that title of M.D. even though they haven’t actually seen a patient in 20 years.

When you stop practicing you lose track of what’s new in the field and get rusty. I’m sure he’s not up to date on the latest literature like the front line docs in this post.

12
bluntedaffect 12 points ago

Come on... I'm sure he know exactly what kind of stick to bite while he bleeds the devil from you.

4
Destineed369 4 points ago

Not only that, but he was in the same position for like 25 years, and when an actual pandemic happened, was 100% unprepared in every way possible. Complete incompetance. The truth of the matter is we got fucking lucky. The virus didnt pan out to be anything more than flu for the vast majority of those that contract it. If it had been worse, imagine how bad things would have gotten with these assholes telling everybody what to do.

WE GOT LUCKY

28
NancyGhouloski 28 points ago

If I built bridges for a chunk of my life then stopped for 20 years- I'd probably not even be called a retired bridge builder at that point.

30
SludgeWarehouse 30 points ago

True, but if you sucked one dick you would forever be known as a cocksucker.

11
harrison_bergeron 11 points ago

Ain't that just the way?

10
createaccount 10 points ago

thanks for sharing your experience with us. 😁

6
1
createaccount 1 point ago

haha cos it just sounded like a dickaholics anonymous meet

16
Jumbis 16 points ago

I saw this video posted to reddit and as you would expect it got downvoted because it would disrupt the circle jerk. The comments were funny though; everyone was saying those guys work at an urgent care and they're not epidemiologists, or that there model or numbers were flowed somehow. Let's all listen to the professionals until they say something I don't agree with, basically.

5
Wyndthough 5 points ago

Why are we even surprised anymore when they move the goal posts?

2
dakin116 2 points ago

Haha, i got the exact same responses. It's impressive how programmed people are

2
DemigoD 2 points ago

https://www.acep.org/corona/COVID-19/covid-19-articles/acep-aaem-joint-statement-on-physician-misinformation/

Acep, which is the really big American emergency medicine group, just issued a formal condemnation of that video. Acep rarely makes statements of that sort

22
The_BIGGEST_FUCK_YOU 22 points ago

Did they refute any of it or just waggle their finger?

25
Negativekarmabait 25 points ago

Finger wag. So value/credibility of the repudiation is entirely based on an appeal to authority.

6
ChaplainTappman 6 points ago

Which is a classic logical falacy

13
BuckyKatt60 13 points ago

They can waggle their finger all they want. A NYC ER doc has basically said the same thing as these two- https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/nyc-er-doctor-worked-coronavirus-front-line-say-time-start-opening/

1
ChocktawRidge 1 point ago

You know where they can stick that finger!

-5
DemigoD -5 points ago

I mean... you can read the link I posted, it's like 2 paragraphs long

Basically said that he does not represent the views of emergency medicine in general and that his musings are not evidence based

17
Rage 17 points ago

Well, he provided numbers, which is the only 'evidence' we have, so in the absence of 'evidence' repudiating his points, I don't see what legs this association has to stand on.

2
559throw 2 points ago

bUh mUh pEeR rEvIeW!

The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) jointly and emphatically condemn the recent opinions released by Dr. Daniel Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi. These reckless and untested musings do not speak for medical societies and are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19. As owners of local urgent care clinics, it appears these two individuals are releasing biased, non-peer reviewed data to advance their personal financial interests without regard for the public’s health. COVID-19 misinformation is widespread and dangerous. Members of ACEP and AAEM are first-hand witnesses to the human toll that COVID-19 is taking on our communities. ACEP and AAEM strongly advise against using any statements of Drs. Erickson and Massihi as a basis for policy and decision making.

12
Rage 12 points ago

Yeah, this was so blatantly bad, it's worth tearing down:

"The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) jointly and emphatically condemn the recent opinions released by Dr. Daniel Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi."

Ok, that's fine, opinions are like assholes and all that.

"These reckless and untested musings do not speak for medical societies and are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19.

Reckless and untested musings, which are "inconsistent" (not incorrect or wrong mind you). This statement would have more value than the paper it's printed on if they provided tested musings and data showing what would be considered consistent "current science and epidemiology." For an organization that claims authority and to be the gatekeepers of what is sound science, how about you provide that info in your refutation? Wouldn't that be part of a peer reviewing process?

"As owners of local urgent care clinics, it appears these two individuals are releasing biased, non-peer reviewed data to advance their personal financial interests without regard for the public’s health."

Oh, god forbid that doctors, who own medical clinics would offer their opinion. We should only listen to the opinions of doctors that are employees, not business owners. It's a plain old ad hominem attempting to discredit the point through the accusation of ulterior motives. The ulterior motive being, that they want more Covid patients I guess? The association never elaborates on what economic motives the doctors could have for putting themselves in the public light like this. Seems like way more risk than reward in my opinion.

"COVID-19 misinformation is widespread and dangerous"

In fact, you could be reading some now! It could be infecting you right this moment!

"Members of ACEP and AAEM are first-hand witnesses to the human toll that COVID-19 is taking on our communities. ACEP and AAEM strongly advise against using any statements of Drs. Erickson and Massihi as a basis for policy and decision making."

They are first hand witnesses! They've seent it! Don't you understand the human toll it's taking on our communities? Yes, we do understand the human toll, because these doctors just repeated it from the data that is being reported by the 'authorities.'

Put "The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM)" as another on the list to be investigated for foreign collusion, election meddling, and political corruption.

4
Wyndthough 4 points ago

Well done! Sound dismantling of their counter "argument" but with all the fallacies and lack of any actual points I am not sure we could call it that.

... continue reading thread?
8
newchina 8 points ago

The fact they used the word “musings” shows a FAKE argument. They refute no claims, only attack their character.

3
Rage 3 points ago

Right? Typical leftist sanctimony.

1
The_BIGGEST_FUCK_YOU 1 point ago

I can read it and I did. I knew the answer before I asked it. The point of a question isn't always to get a literal answer.

1
DemigoD 1 point ago

Yeah I sorta considered that after I replied to you lol, kinda makes me the ass here. My bad

The whole thing is fucked because I have a pretty high regard for the abem so it's hard for me to believe they are a political entiety

19
Libertysheimdall1 19 points ago

Every modern day "association" is a political organization. Treat that statement with an incredible grain of salt.

I haven't seen the video and take no side on who is correct, but be really careful about any trade association. It's like dealing with a union.

4
I_Love_45-70_Gov 4 points ago

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are a thing too, but.....

These huge/respected organizations have their own agendas.

I'll take the word of doctors -- in the trenches and who are risking their entire careers to put this fucking globalist monster to rest -- over an establishment org any day.

4
Southern_Belle 4 points ago

I don't believe ACEP-AAEM. There's money involved. Note how they say, "As owners of local urgent care clinics...."

So they've got a reason to be closed-minded.

Inconsistent with current science? These guys have DATA.

Anyway, for your reading pleasure:

**ACEP-AAEM Joint Statement on Physician Misinformation ** The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) jointly and emphatically condemn the recent opinions released by Dr. Daniel Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi. These reckless and untested musings do not speak for medical societies and are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19. As owners of local urgent care clinics, it appears these two individuals are releasing biased, non-peer reviewed data to advance their personal financial interests without regard for the public’s health.

COVID-19 misinformation is widespread and dangerous. Members of ACEP and AAEM are first-hand witnesses to the human toll that COVID-19 is taking on our communities. ACEP and AAEM strongly advise against using any statements of Drs. Erickson and Massihi as a basis for policy and decision making.

3
deleted 3 points ago
2
SAW2TH 2 points ago

So another puppet of Big Pharma sounds off to try to silence two escapees from the plantation? Imagine my shock.

1
deleted 1 point ago
2
phate451 2 points ago

Fauci has a patent on Corona 19. He can fuck himself with some random Chyna dick.

73
CuzImAtWork 73 points ago

Holy shit you're right!

They even removed the copy off ABC's channel.

Some 1984 shit going on for sure.

45
HockeyMom4Trump 45 points ago

Agree? This whole thing with Covid is extremely fishy. I don’t understand how we have a fairly solid treatment plan and they want to suppress it. Any opinion that comes forward with good news, they shut down.

What the heck is really going on?

33
Juanye 33 points ago

It’s a psy op

5
Eyes2SeeAndEars2Hear 5 points ago

^ Juanye has eyes to see.

7
SirSeizureSalad 7 points ago

It's still on a couple channels though, for now.

https://youtu.be/ndL0uSmKTQU

4
CuzImAtWork 4 points ago

Right, but I'm talking about the original posting from ABC, it was their interview, and they're the ones who originally posted it on youtube.

I'm sure there'll be thousands of sites that will rip and reup it, but youtube yanked the original off a media broadcasters' official youtube page. That's fuckin' bonkers imho.

3
deleted 3 points ago
2
SirSeizureSalad 2 points ago

Fucking animals.

1
remember1776 1 point ago

Cocksuckers.

55
I_Luv_Elise_Stefanik 55 points ago

Suppress all speech not approved by the Politburo. Make it "disappear". Twitter, YouTube, Google, Facebook, Reddit. All the same, all wiping anything not approved Groupthink as dictated by the Communist Left, which includes all Dems, and many RINOs. Where is the fight against this? The NPCs blindly follow their shit and participate in the echo chamber. It's time that globalist companies like these were not treated as just "private companies and untouchable by US law" because of that status. They are purposely working to undermine the Government. They are partisan, which would be OK, if they weren't acting as the gatekeepers of information flowing to the people. They are Publishers, and editorialists, and need to be treated as such in the United States.

10
Wyndthough 10 points ago

The fight against this is right here my fellow pedes. We get the information out any way we can. We start the discussions here. We bring them to our families. We share links with our friends. We argue with people in public. Someone isn't going to do this for us. We have to do it for ourselves.

3
justwinning 3 points ago

Big tech should be legally treated as public forums and public utilities which is what they've essentially become, then it becomes illegal for them to be politically biased and censor free speech, insuring citizens still have their first amendment rights in the digital age.

3
Fauxcahantos 3 points ago

Yup and not a damn thing anyone here can do about it. They are going to shut this site down too. Again, we won't do anything about it. We need a long term strategy other than complaining to each other on here.

2
ChaplainTappman 2 points ago

They can't do a darn thing to this site short of changing some fundamentals of FCC, IEEE, and some other IT acronyms that service the internet.

3
Overkillengine 3 points ago

That's why they keep pushing "Net Neutrality". Gives them the proxy power to force ISP's to do the censoring for them due to threat of revocation of license to operate.

40
-Howitzer- 40 points ago

Unbelievable corruption.

19
wong 19 points ago

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!

37
Anyslogan2 37 points ago

I hope the Streisand Effect blows back on them like a hurricane. At some point, even the most brainwashed liberal has to question this level of censorship and paranoia. If these doctors and other’s opinions are so ‘baseless’ then why the aggressive censorship?

15
Seruna_Kanus 15 points ago

Don't hold your breath. The furthest brainwashed will easily swallow "the video was removed for public safety."

6
Miztivin 6 points ago

The only need for censorship is when you cant win the argument with fact and reason.

2
BuckyKatt60 2 points ago

Exactly. If you have contravening facts then present them. when you have to literally censor the opposing view point and try to hide or shut it down, it doesn’t speak well of the validity of your position.

29
Blackoompaloompa 29 points ago

I work in an ICU and am struggling to get full time hours right now due to lack of patients.

6
OliverWillis 6 points ago

What's the deal, did every other issue people have stop happening?

14
Tonightm01 14 points ago

ICU's would deal with people that had surgery for all kinds of things. You only get surgery now if you are dying. I don't even mean just in a lot of pain I mean physically dying.

Not heart surgery is happening unless you are dying. Cancer isn't being removed from people's bodies.

Pretty scary.

7
OliverWillis 7 points ago

Dang... Yea that's crazy, not in a good way. Lotta obvious things I could comment on regarding that.

I heard a hospital near where I live laid off 50 people yesterday for similar reasons (lack of patients), which seemed odd all things considered. One of my coworkers has a friend who was part of the 50.

6
SirSeizureSalad 6 points ago

A lot of them are going to be sued into oblivion. I was waiting 5 months for an MRI that was scheduled the other day. I figured, well, let me call just to make sure before I drive all the way over there, even though I have a letter from them confirming it in my hand.

I call, they're like oh shoot, we meant to call you, we cancelled your MRI. And it's just cancelled for the foreseeable future, who knows how many weeks or months.

2
thisguy883 2 points ago

Same.

I need another MRI for a kidney stone.

Was told it was canceled and I will need to schedule another appointment in June.

Thanks Military Health System!

3
oxygen 3 points ago

Un fucking believable. What about, say, an emergency tendon repair surgery from a laceration? Not life-threatening, but without immediate surgery within a few days, that person would never be able to use that limb/finger/etc. again properly?

3
Blackoompaloompa 3 points ago

Basically if you don't absolutely need to be there we tell you to go home. We're not doing elective surgeries, there's a few other factors that tie into us not being busy but basically its bullshit. Last shift I worked we had 0 patients in the entire hospital with it. My whole town is shut down and the hospital doesn't even have any patients needing hospitalization because of Covid. It seriously makes 0 sense.

25
MostEffectualTopKek 25 points ago

Please do not attempt to think for for yourselves people, trust the media, Govts and big tech

10
I_Love_45-70_Gov 10 points ago

This message has been approved "double-plus good" by Ministry of Truth.

21
Trumpdidit 21 points ago

It was a PERFECT phone call.

3
BlackPeople 3 points ago

LOLOL

20
d_bokk 20 points ago

Normies got to see the censorship live on Laura Ingraham's show what we've been talking about for years.

6
Fauxcahantos 6 points ago

Too bad not a single republican congressman cares enough about free speech or anything to help us. They all RINO's and I'm going to vote out every incumbent. I don't care if dem/reb. It's doesn't matter. We just need to clean house.

2
Skabliggum2 2 points ago

I didn't catch her show. How was she censoring the doctors?

10
d_bokk 10 points ago

She didn't. She interviewed the doctors early in the show, then before the show ended Youtube had already deleted the video.

4
Skabliggum2 4 points ago

Thanks, I couldn't see her doing that so I had to ask. I've been sending this video out to family and friends all day. My only concern is some are blindly ignoring Dr Erikson because he owns an urgent care facility, so they think he's biased and only wants the shutdown to end in order to help his business. It's sad they ignore the facts, figures and references provided.

3
Southern_Belle 3 points ago

No, the other owners of urgent care businesses are sticking with party ideology.

Truly the dark ages of medicine and science.

19
DarthFuckinVader 19 points ago

Based AF Doctors!

5
magarefugee 5 points ago

Spitting logical fire... this is a great video.

17
zippy2 17 points ago

Youtube nuking this video is concerning. That is a problem.

Another problem, however, with extrapolating this data and assigning it on the mass scale is the sample size was never random. These are people who rushed to get the test or who believed they were infected. Naturally a large percentage of those people will test positive. It doesnt work to assume the % is a representation of the larger population.

It's the same logic when polling Democrats unlikely to vote, extrapolating that to mean Hillary will win in a landslide.

8
Shroudedf8 8 points ago

You make good points. This video definitely should not have been removed. If anything, it stimulates intelligent conversation. The doctors also are probably mostly correct.

If one looks at their example of Sweden and Norway, Sweden is currently at 20k cases with 2900 deaths. Norway is at 7.6k with 206 deaths. The doctors mentioned that the difference between the number of deaths is statistically insignificant. But, the total cases seems to be on a relative increase in Sweden, where there is no lockdown versus Norway, where there is a lockdown. Is that statistically similar as well? I'm not sure. It seems to favor some form of lockdown. Not that I am in favor of these draconian attacks on our civil liberties.

The more I listen to these guys, the more I question the reasoning behind censoring this video. It's mind-boggling actually.

7
ImportantPerson 7 points ago

It's not that simple though. The point of the number of positive cases is to show how prevalent the infection is IN COMPARISON TO the number of deaths. The number of cases continues to increase at a vastly faster rate than the number of deaths. We KNOW the number of deaths. There aren't deaths happening which COVID was involved which aren't being allocated to the death total. However, because of the amount of people showing no or minor symptoms that won't get reported as a case, it makes it so that the mortality rate is ABSOLUTELY LESS than what is being reported.

3
zippy2 3 points ago

I understand now. Thank you.

11
oxygen 11 points ago

Alternate mirror in case of problems:

https://banned.video/watch?id=5ea4994ea881fd00808e95ad

10
Poizike 10 points ago

Big tech is the enemy of the people along with the media.

10
mrpuck 10 points ago

This should be sent to all who will listen. This was a great video.

10
mintyfresh 10 points ago

I just redpilled a buddy of mine (who's been an ICU nurse and now does home care) with this. His only correction to the vid is that babies' immune systems are partially bootstrapped in utero with mom antibodies during the 3rd trimester.

Next, we're going shooting weekly. 👍

8
FirosAhoge 8 points ago

Man, I really need to give up on youtube, it's ridiculous. Hopefully bitchute can over take because the censorship gets worse and worse by the day

8
lavebug 8 points ago

Here is a reply from Nancy Calaway (she does not provide any data, sources or facts just regurgitate same article):

Thank you for contacting ACEP.

Both ACEP and AAEM believe strongly that practicing emergency physicians have valuable insight into the COVID-19 pandemic, but specialists in Immunology, Infectious Disease, and Epidemiology, including Dr. Fauci, are the most qualified at interpreting this data and making representations.

The data cited by Drs. Erickson and Massihi is dangerously misapplied and extrapolated to the state of California at large, resulting in inaccurate and misleading conclusions regarding the mortality of COVID-19. Their data is flawed and represents extreme selection bias.

It would certainly not qualify as “scientific data” that should be applied to wider epidemiological or public health considerations.

Thanks!

  • Nancy
14
magarefugee 14 points ago

The data cited by Drs. Erickson and Massihi is dangerously misapplied

What she really means:

The data cited by Drs. Erickson and Massihi is dangerously counter to the narrative.

3
chesterfields 3 points ago

This is 100%

5
LikeAWombatScorned 5 points ago

Questions for Nancy:

  • What makes those "experts" more qualified to interpret the data? Weren't these "experts" the ones who predicted an order of magnitude more deaths in the US that we've had?
  • What specifically was wrong with the interpretation by the emergency physicians, and why exactly was it wrong?
  • How was the data misapplied and extrapolated? What specifically about the data makes it unsuitable as a valid statistical sample for California?
  • Explain how the conclusions are inaccurate
  • Explain how the data is misleading
  • Explain how the data is flawed
  • Explain how the data represents extreme selection bias
8
OneOfMany_MAGA 8 points ago

I think these guys are reasonable for the most part but the main speaker keeps saying that because 19.6% (or whatever) of COVID tests are positive, that can be extrapolated to mean that 19.6% of the general population has COVID.

That’s not really a valid extrapolation because at least in my state, to get tested you need to have significant symptoms such as shortness of breath/hypoxia, along with fever and cough; and you have to have negative flu and rhinovirus tests before they will give a COVID test.

That’s a very selected population that is not reflective of the general population. Everyone in America does not have those symptoms, signs, and alternative testing. Those symptoms make you much more likely to have COVID. These docs are smart enough to know this so why are they using this extrapolation?

Their extrapolation would only be valid if the testing was being done on randomly chosen individuals.

A better measure of the virus penetrance is antibody testing of random population. Those results are starting to come out now and show a high prevalence in NY state - possibly up to 20% - but lower prevalence in other locales.

11
Win4Don 11 points ago

I believe they are saying we would be better served by using the current data. The models "the experts" intially presented were way way off so why continue to use them in our decision making process. The extrapolation is probably not completely accurate but it will get you in the ball park. The antibody tests have already proven the virus is far more widespread. These guys seem more believable and leveled had than Dr. Fauxci.

5
mintyfresh 5 points ago

There's also the possibility that this is the second wave of the virus, and that the first wave happened before everything shut down.

6
Southern_Belle 6 points ago

A friend of mine told me she had "something" in January.

Coughing, very ill. Took a while to get over (she's older).

But she did and she's fine now.

Hasn't been tested. But sounds like it could have been the Wuhan Flu.

7
warlord1 7 points ago

Bunch of entitled soy bois veto two physicians with the combined experience of 40 years. We’re at the zenith of the implications of Big Tech

6
Bud10 6 points ago

If I remember correctly YouTube said they were only allowing Covid-19 content that was approved by the WHO guidelines or something like that. We all know who the WHO works for.

6
Swellingsuperman 6 points ago

Trump has to play a highlight clip of this video on his next briefing.

2
Skabliggum2 2 points ago

Hell, play the whole thing then fire Fauxi at the end.

6
Hayride 6 points ago

There's a reason we were told to save everything offline.

5
lavebug 5 points ago

Nancy Calaway, Director of Communications. She will be happy to answer any questions you might have. Her email is [email protected]. And Phone is 1-800-798-1822, ext 3224

She is the author of this article https://www.acep.org/corona/COVID-19/covid-19-articles/acep-aaem-joint-statement-on-physician-misinformation/

3
midgetpornrocks 3 points ago

Pepe pics incoming!

4
IlxTheGreat 4 points ago

so, I heard that claim about the testing in Germany. They're testing 300k/wk. It's going to take 3 YEARS to test their population for COVID 19. They'll have gone thru 3 flu seasons. US is testing 575k/wk per CDC as of Apr 12 week. I'm guessing it's gone up.

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago

Test kit manufacturers making bank.

Also WHO and CDC make a royalty for each test given . So corrupt

4
Rage 4 points ago

After watching this... Was this all a plan to try to eliminate the flu from 2020 to buy elderly politicians like Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Joe Biden another year to escape death by pneumonia?

2
LostValkyrie 2 points ago

I do think you’re on to something. “Senior” and “senator” both have the same root word if you get my meaning.

4
nachosamplerREBORN 4 points ago

intern/screeners are now censoring medical doctors on medical topics.

4
WindsOfWinter 4 points ago

The fact that it's censored means you know it's truth.

4
Supersaiyanbroly737 4 points ago

I don't agree with these doctors. Coming from a statistics background, I can see that their interpretation of the data isn't high quality. And logically, I don't trust the anti-body tests with a false positive rate of 10%. Add the uncertainty that a positive test is really only for the China Virus, not just other coronavirus.

But to silence them by deleting the video is fascism. Just refute them, if you can, with facts and logic.

3
brsmith77 [S] 3 points ago

Exactly, If you don't agree with them debate them. The only reason to censor something is that you fear it and cannot dispute it.

And the main drive of what they were saying about how this is not the way to deal with a virus, is very hard to refute.

4
daomino 4 points ago

Any link for the blocked video on youtube?

1
2
daomino 2 points ago

That's not a youtube link. Any link to to the video on youtube that is banned?

1
oxygen 1 point ago

Of course it's not a youtube link. Youtube banned it, and keeps banning it. Why do you care if it's a youtube link? I just gave you the full video.

2
daomino 2 points ago

I care because I want to verify that that claim is real. We don't do fake news here.

1
3
daomino 3 points ago

Monopolistic far-left Big Tech became the enemy of free speech and free public debates.

1
oxygen 1 point ago

I understand your initial question now. My apologies. Below article has a screenshot of the now-removed video, or I thought it did. One of the links I had did. It's out there and well known.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/breaking-california-doctors-go-ingraham-angle-challenge-official-covid-policy-youtube-takes-videos/

3
daomino 3 points ago

Thanks Oxygen!

4
CT_MAGA 4 points ago

This is just incredible.

3
dakin116 3 points ago

Good to see that these Doctors haven't cucked on this with all the negative pressure out there

3
kalokagathia 3 points ago

YouTube will take down any content contradicting the narrative of the WHO, whose largest donor is now the Gates Foundation.

All information is being funneled through a sieve being held by someone who is essentially the personification of a Bond villain.

3
dixie_knormous 3 points ago

Of course they did, what silly fucks. They are such cowards, we certainly can't have competing points of view.

3
Destineed369 3 points ago

wow finally got to watch the whole vid. Im glad that they left politics out of it, and those reporters kept on lol But even those reporters were asking at least kinda understandable quesions.

"We are using data, not models."

"this is the first time weve quarantined all the healthy people" good stuff. No wonder youtube banned this lol. This makes them all look really fucking bad hahahaha

2
FakeName4Safety 2 points ago

They are still on YouTube, but this is a good backup just in case.

2
Wyndthough 2 points ago

"if you stomp on our freedoms that has one ending; and that is violence"

2
Batman 2 points ago

I just searched and there are multiple channels with this video on YouTube.

6
SampsonSimpson 6 points ago

The original, which was shared many, had millions of views and was going viral. That one was taken down. Likely to “slow the spread.”

2
brsmith77 [S] 2 points ago

Yes but they don't have 3.5m views and aren't from a mainstream news source unlike the original. As soon as they start getting up there they will start vanishing.

-1
deleted -1 points ago
3
sply1 3 points ago

But on a different URL? That would greatly reduce the viewership via sharing if the original link was nixed.

2
Skabliggum2 2 points ago

Consider the username...

1
sply1 1 point ago

Ah, ok.

1
Bernier4Canada 1 point ago

it can be different by country. I remember when crowder claimed his videos weren't searchable, but I could find them all instantly. Turns out his videos were only blocked from search in the US.

2
Southern_Belle 2 points ago

Just downloaded this version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfiFoXtfVU8 (audio corrected version)

Please download and save offline.

2
Guinnessfan 2 points ago

Ugh what commie fucks.

2
biotechengineer 2 points ago

Someone should make a torrent. I would seed it. I prefer decentralized methods of sharing when it comes to things like these.

2
Medtex1 2 points ago

Sticky this!!

1
Winston 1 point ago

"The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) jointly and emphatically condemn the recent opinions released by Dr. Daniel Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi. These reckless and untested musings do not speak for medical societies and are inconsistent with current science and epidemiology regarding COVID-19. As owners of local urgent care clinics, it appears these two individuals are releasing biased, non-peer reviewed data to advance their personal financial interests without regard for the public’s health.

COVID-19 misinformation is widespread and dangerous. Members of ACEP and AAEM are first-hand witnesses to the human toll that COVID-19 is taking on our communities. ACEP and AAEM strongly advise against using any statements of Drs. Erickson and Massihi as a basis for policy and decision making."

https://www.acep.org/corona/COVID-19/covid-19-articles/acep-aaem-joint-statement-on-physician-misinformation/

1
BlackPeople 1 point ago

It’s not deleted. If you simply search “dr Erickson covid” multiple results appear and some of them were uploaded 5+ days ago.

9
brsmith77 [S] 9 points ago

The main video that garnered 3.5m+ views has been deleted. The others will be deleted as soon as they start getting the same kind of traction, believe it.

1
BlackPeople 1 point ago

Interesting. Who was the original uploader?

2
brsmith77 [S] 2 points ago

Some local news channel. 23 ABC News or something like that.

1
Skabliggum2 1 point ago

ABC 23 News/ KERO. Oddly, part 2 is still available on YT, currently with 1.8M views. Part 1 is gone.

https://youtu.be/zb6j7o1pLBw

1
ChocktawRidge 1 point ago

Well, that went well...

-4
deleted -4 points ago