3390
Comments (437)
sorted by:
454
PyroSphere 454 points ago

It's funny how when people actually need leadership old, white guys suddenly start to become useful again. When people want to live they call daddy for help.

170
Ex-libtard 170 points ago

They just want to play in the same sandbox guys! It should be fine if they cant keep up, its just all of civilization on the line.

140
Jabron661 140 points ago

Things like this are the result of "participation trophy" social justice driven society.

112
stratocaster_patriot 112 points ago

"I'm going to name a black woman as VP". That means when Joe is removed we get a black woman POTUS who is only there because of the color of her skin and her pussy. This is irresponsible and could fuck us up very badly.

59
dandylionsummer 59 points ago

It'll be Obama, and nobody knows if she has a pussy.

30
LacyLiberty 30 points ago

I don't think either Obama HAS a pussy... but one of them IS a pussy.

45
MondoBurger 45 points ago

How dare you assume our presumptive future female POTUS will even have a pussy. Men with cocks and balls can be women now bucko.

23
dianneschinesedriver 23 points ago

Big Mike and his cock

26
12
deleted 12 points ago
10
cusp-of-carabelli 10 points ago

Username checks out.

4
LostViking1985 4 points ago

You know EXACTLY what kind of voice I read that in...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gv5v2uOzshA

1
dianneschinesedriver 1 point ago

Please sir don't hit me sir

8
DeplorableCentipede 8 points ago

No, he said he would appoint a black woman to the Supreme Court, which is even worse. I can’t think of a single qualified candidate.

12
DutchDonFan 12 points ago

Diamond or Silk?

3
DeplorableCentipede 3 points ago

Would be a great meme, but I can’t really envision them sitting on the Supreme Court, lol.

3
INK10 3 points ago

Nah, they got off the plantation a long time ago. Dems have no use for them.

2
fac1 2 points ago (edited)

Diamond or Silk?

He'll appoint Silk's evil twin, "Satin".

She's a demo(n)crat.

.

Edit: the joke was based on the fact that the material satin is a synthetic version of silk. Just learned that a few days ago. I thought it was probably somewhat common knowledge, but nobody upvoted my hilarious joke. ¯\(ツ)

9
FakeNametag 9 points ago

Joe is so confused he'll end up nominating a conservative white man.

3
Imransgarage 3 points ago

Chance Joe can reliably identify another actual concrete discernable human being is low.

3
cusp-of-carabelli 3 points ago

How about the gal from What's Happening? who worked in the soda shop?

6
teabag4giggles 6 points ago

With corn pop?

2
rugburnd 2 points ago

Candice Owens for the Supreme Court.

6
Jcholl9 6 points ago

"I'm going to name a black woman as VP".

Referring to Mike Obama I'm sure?

MSM BREAKING NEWS: "The black woman commits suicide..."

bidenbama: "My alternative choice... I'm going to name a crooked white woman as VP"

And now bidenbama finishing statement: "We cannot win this re-election… We can only re-elect Donald Trump"

3
Southern_Belle 3 points ago

That's how we got obama and big mike.

Those two set black people back about a hundred years. They don't know it yet, but when they find out....

3
knowIdotruth 3 points ago

How sexist of him.

He should be her VP.

3
russianbot4673 3 points ago

haven't you ever heard 'it's all pink in the middle'?

5
jimmajamma 5 points ago

The problem started well before that with women's suffrage.

2
Southern_Belle 2 points ago

This.

This is why I hate identity politics.

Just take the person with the best brain. The most competent. The best suited for the job.

Who cares about the gonads or the shrink wrap?

2
AlohaSnackbar 2 points ago

Honeste, i didn't like the participation "trophy" for my kids in their younger years, and i still don't, BUT one of the leagues did it "right"not with a trophy but with Certificates of "practices" attended, games attended and WL record. I had no problem framing that, because win or not, they SHOWED up, which is more than those who didn't participate did.

Trophies i agree are bullshit, those are for WINNERS, but i think it's fair to carve out a little recognition for walking on the field, when so many others didn't bother to try.

2
SqueegyPeegy 2 points ago

Agreed, it’s kind of like military: everyone who serves in a campaign gets a ribbon, but only men and women who go above and beyond are given individual awards.

1
patriotmaga 1 point ago

My son was on swim team a few years back. Zero participation trophies given. At the end of the season each kid got a T-Shirt that said "I Survived Sharks Swim Team, Summer 2015"

I loved it, and so did my kiddo. It was his first year and he sucked, but the kid gave his best, didn't leave an ounce of effort off the table, and he was proud of that shirt - even though he knew damn well he sucked. So next season he kept on truckin', and earned the "Most Improved" award.

Nothing wrong with a lil something-something for kids taking part. But trophies? Trophies are for top finishers. Always have been, it's actually the fucking meaning of a trophy. It's an award that recognizes achievement. Not attendance and trying hard.

46
fac1 46 points ago

The slogan "the future is female" was originally coined by a radical lesbian separatist who meant the phrase literally.

She coined it in an essay arguing for the genocide of 90% of males. She later went on to found and run the first Women's Studies university department.

http://theothermccain.com/2014/09/13/feminism-the-final-solution/

http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2003/0812roberts.html

https://fathersforlife.org/feminism/miller_gearhart.html

16
SoYuge 16 points ago

Can we get a save button mods?

7
fac1 7 points ago

That would be useful. You could also do what I always do with useful information for political arguments: send it to yourself in an email with the appropriate labels, so you can do a search on your inbox for it and related subjects when you need it.

8
anon1011101 8 points ago

are you me?

2
fac1 2 points ago

Yes.

7
Prom3th3us 7 points ago (edited)

I low-key want feminists to experience a world where 90% are female and 10% are male.

Let’s just pretend there were 7B females and 700M males on earth. Who do you think would have ALL the social power in everyday life? An average man would have 10 women to pick from at all times. If one is kinda annoying, just dump her; after all, you were only seeing her once every week and a half anyway. You could have 4 chicks that did anything you asked, 3 chicks who follow what the group does, and 3 chicks who might give you attitude. You just kick those chicks with attitude out. Men would have all the social power

Every time a man showed up to any event or joined any organization he would be the center of all attention. He could be as rude as he wished and girls would still flock to him. Men would leverage their social power for political positions, business deals, and preferential treatment. A man could get rich easy.

The average woman would have a hard life. She would have to do some of the jobs typically done by men today. Particularly the dangerous and low skilled jobs. The best life she could hope to have would be that her income and physical beauty would be good enough for her to be selected as the 4th or 5th wife of a average dude. She would go through all the pain of pregnancy and childbirth just to have kids that crave their father’s attention 10 times more that her own.

This isn’t speculation. In history there were several time periods where men were outnumbered by women because so many men died in battle. These time periods were overwhelmingly in favor of men over women. Supply and demand is a natural law.

3
fac1 3 points ago

Haha I never thought it out that thoroughly. Definitely a scenario that would only appeal at all to lesbians. Such as the one who coined the phrase. Yet, at least a couple times I've seen feminist women comment literally in support of this idea - once from someone who lives in my area and knows people I know.

good enough for her to be selected as the 4th or 5th wife of a average dude.

Well, to be fair, the "average dude" in this scenario would be a 9/10 from today's scale, since it's completely obvious that 9's and up would be the only ones who would make the cut and be spared from this genocide.

https://www.yourtango.com/2016285828/women-find-80-percent-men-unattractive-says-crazy-study

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*iC0UjKDxFViE3XZuk6MMUw.jpeg

Feminists complain that men judge women's looks, while pretending that women don't judge men's looks - yet I'm convinced they judge just as hard, if not harder, on different aspects of looks than men do. And then they judge so hard that we get genocidal maniacs literally wanting to kill the 90% of men they find unattractive.

1
hai_Priesty 1 point ago (edited)

Definitely a scenario that would only appeal at all to lesbians.

Most "fashion" Lesbians and Bis would love in on Day 1 (some others are intelligent enough to see what happens next and abhors it), then very soon they discover that being L or B is no longer of any uniqueness and they knocked themselves off the social ladder by 3 or 4 rungs with Lesbianism.

*Edit : Plus now that the Lesbian dating pool is expanded to like 20X times, the "better quality" of the girls would be very picky and many better girls may no longer tolerate flappy belly of the "guy" role and demand that they either become well kempt or body train to have 6-pack. *

When 90% of all men are dead a woman that grabs a good quality men are of "Status" herself. 2-4 rungs higher than an L or B or T.

I consider myself reasonably well versed in Japan culture. You don't get to just weed unattractive men. After the war where 3 quarters of the men died normal women pretty much takes any scarred (facial or emotionally) men they can find. Hiroshima Nuke victim man with his scars and radiation and health problems managed to find wifes okay, someone was desperate enough to say "Yes"to his arranged marriage proposal through relatives' recommendations. (Interviewee surviving to his 80s said that his wife cried on the first marriage night when she look at his body that's scarred in unimaginable ways.)

2
hai_Priesty 2 points ago (edited)

There are proofs in the recent decades - Japan. 1950 and 1960-Japan actually was much more discriminatory against woman than the generation before them exacly because most of their young men died in battles (trying to seige the whole Asia for 8 years, first attacked 14 years before end of WW2 ) as the losing side. The stereotypes of older Japanese women being subservient to their husband was because she cliched a hard-to-get man in a 4-to-1 or 5-to-1 battle, and has to hold on to him.

If you look at their cultural history, there was a time when camera was a craze among Tokyo middle school girls around 1916. Urban Japanese girls were already well educated 100 years ago and parent doted on them like they would to their male heirs (or near-equal). Then wars and natural disasters happened.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

I think it's more likely the jobs wouldn't get done.

4
CharmSung 4 points ago

She coined it in an essay arguing for the genocide of 90% of males.

Even "better", she admitted that she really wanted genocide of 100% of all males, but decided women should keep 10% around in case she was wrong about her ideal society.

4
ChuckieG 4 points ago

Yep

4
anon1011101 4 points ago

"The Future Is Female" sounds a lot more ominous given that context.

2
TheTrooper424 2 points ago

Bump for later

101
nrjk 101 points ago

It's analogous to a teenager/young adult stretching out into the real world and thinking they know better than stupid old people. Between about 25-30 the child realizes their parents know shit.

55
deleted 55 points ago
30
stratocaster_patriot 30 points ago

And 25 should be the voting age for those without military service.

28
MegoThor 28 points ago

Service guarantees citizenship!

14
Keiichi81 14 points ago

I would like to know more.

10
cusp-of-carabelli 10 points ago

The only good bug is a dead bug.

4
NavyGuy 4 points ago

Are you doing your part?

7
lancerprime 7 points ago

Would you like to know more?

10
Cminc 10 points ago

IT'S AFRAID!

17
ADAM_SCHITT 17 points ago

And only people who pay taxes get to vote.

7
SoYuge 7 points ago

at the very least, those on welfare DO NOT get to vote.

we should work on that amendment to the Constitution

14
Randalous83 14 points ago

If that were the case I wouldn’t have been able to vote for Trump in 2016.

I was on food stamps and had state insurance because I couldn’t find a full time job for 5 years (thanks obama!) and couldn’t afford insurance because Nancy didn’t read the thing before signing it.

One year after I voted for Trump I was off food stamps because I was able to quit my part time jobs since I got a full time job making more than I ever have, and that same employer offers insurance at an incredible price.

Would Trump have won without my vote and still done the same things he’s done? Yes. But at least I felt like I had a hand in improving my life by choosing a good leader for the country.

I understand the sentiment, that it’s mostly leftists that vote retarded that are on welfare. But not everyone that is on a form of welfare does. We shouldn’t punish people and take away their rights because elected leaders made poor decisions that destroyed a good thing. We should be lifting those on welfare out of poverty by electing people that make good decisions for the country, thus showing those on welfare that there is a better way and changing their minds on how to vote.

I understand that not all people will see it and some will always vote retarded. There’s nothing that will change their minds.

7
ThePowerOfPrayer 7 points ago

“Elections belong to the people. It's their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters.” ― Abraham Lincoln

2
Kingsidecastle 2 points ago

I'll second this. People on generational welfare should absolutely not be allowed to vote. If it can be demonstrated that one was legitimately seeking employment or legitimately disabled, then they should be granted a waiver, otherwise they should not be able to vote until they are gainfully employed

2
NavyGuy 2 points ago

Tax paying land owners.

4
cluckingducks 4 points ago

Hmm. I was the manager of a restaurant @ 18. Held a state professional license @ 19, and joined the Army @21. I'm thinking 18 is old enough, and that should include the legal consumption of alcohol.

3
stratocaster_patriot 3 points ago

Maybe you were. You are the exception and not the rule. Human brain is not fully developed until 25. When you joined army at 19, then you would be illegible. MIght have agreed with 15 years ago but not anymore. I've seen what has become of our youth.

6
cluckingducks 6 points ago

Fuck that. Today's youth is only different because we make them that way. History is rife with 16 yr olds lying about their age so that they can get the chance to die for their country. Alexander the Great was 20 when he ascended the throne. All that he accomplished was done before his death by the age of 30.

3
Thrasymachus 3 points ago

Agreed. We don't need to push the voting age up and up because our failing school systems have been co-opted by radical leftists who fill heads with drivel and propaganda. Young brains are capable of considering the issues, provided they get the right start on learning critical thinking and the value of competence and independence. Treat the disease, not the symptom.

4
ippwndu 4 points ago

Land ownership.

4
BigMikesBigBlackCock 4 points ago

This is nonsence ! If you can die for your country at 18 you should have a vote

3
stratocaster_patriot 3 points ago

Being able to do something and actually doing something are totally different.

10
hai_Priesty 10 points ago

Only the decent ones (which fortunately most people are). 4th year after graduation of degree in Drama or Gender Studies, there are adult children hold-out who insist they didn't get hired for their deserved roles from their degree due to their gender/colour/etc, and have the audacity to blame starbucks for oppressing them with minimum wage while the company makes billions.

9
deleted 9 points ago
10
Sexual-Assault-Rifle 10 points ago

I think you meant that quote was by Douglas Williams but either way it's a great quote.

2
America1stAndOnly 2 points ago

Sometimes. Other times you see that they really are just an out of touch boomer that watches cable news all day and believes whatever it tells them.

50
Fremium2020 50 points ago

When you live in a haze and think that the biggest issues in the world are "cyberbullying" and "kink shaming", you tend to do dumb shit like Finland is good at doing.

25
sun_wolf 25 points ago

There is also some error in their thinking where they immediatelty jump on whatever the latest trend is. So as soon as someone cooks up a new outrage or hysteria - really just any trendy new word they can use - it’s like they immediately drop whatever their previous pet issue was and jump to that new one instead. What the hell is this? Is it the fashion impulse in women? Is it the same instinct they use to get women to keep jumping back and forth from skinny heels to fat heels with each new fashion season? Because that shit doesn’t work on men. You tell a man it’s autumn now so those workboots he bought in the spring are no longer any good because of some cosmetic style issue, and he looks at you like you are insane. They’re his workboots, they’re fine, no holes, see? But women can be told by these corporations that the lacing mechanism on the boots is no longer in style and most of them will go out and buy a new pair of workboots for $300 just to match whatever the trend is. We see this susceptibility over and over in many different areas of female behavior. And the women who tend not to fall for it usually have a strong male presence - husband, boyfriend, father - to guide them and protect them against these manipulations.

10
CheekyVetBoi 10 points ago

I agree, Women need men to keep them on the straight and narrow, but I also believe men need the same thing. To remind us that emotions are fine, and it's shitty to be an asshole all the time. We complete each other, no hold barred.

4
flashersenpai 4 points ago

Men know emotions are fine. The people most famous for expressing and invoking emotions are men. Women just don't like men's emotions, and definitely don't like when those emotions are expressed.

1
CheekyVetBoi 1 point ago

I think it's that not everyone knows how to deal with emotions, and sadly, I think men are more prone to being emotionally crippled in this society.

9
IAbsolutelyDare 9 points ago

It's because women are basically dependent on others, therefore their biggest fear is ostracism. An instinct that can be easily exploited in all sorts of ways.

9
Scooby721 9 points ago

What a very appropriate example. I work in a factory, we are required to wear composite toed boots or shoes. I've worn the same pair of shoes for the past 2 years. We have very few women working there. One of those women, in her late 20s, a single mother, has gone through 4 different pairs over the last year.

9
rooftoptendie 9 points ago

that whole entire diatribe was keks

5
Thrasymachus 5 points ago

Except for the new generation of lady-men who stand in line to buy the latest sneakers. What a con; I still can't wrap my head around them having convinced men of any generation to collect low-utility shoes at fashion prices.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago

You're wrong. It's not because of effeminate behavior, it's a simple example of conspicuous consumption aka a display of status. Fashion prices are not affordable to everyone.

1
patriotmaga 1 point ago

Dude, plenty of us buy into some such bullshit. Most of collect something. Most of have fallen prey to consumerism. A city boy may collect and dig sneakers, a suburban boy may collect and dig baseball cards and sports paraphernalia. A country boy may collect and dig cowboy hats and cool, big ass belt buckles. My redneck cousin has a collection of over 200 trucker hats, and he started that collection probably two decades before trucker hats became cool.

It's all cheap shit with very little utility.

2
TheTrooper424 2 points ago

I collect guitars and firearms. Perfectly fine with it 😎

4
ippwndu 4 points ago

teh shiny

4
thehutman 4 points ago

checks boots - yep, look fine to me!

1
JGirl 1 point ago (edited)

Those women generally have discretionary money to spend ;-) I do have more clothes than the average man has, but mine all come to me secondhand, and I don't follow trends. And I also tend to hold onto clothing for far too long. I have a pair of crocs I wear at home that have to be nearly 18 years old. I have repaired them with superglue where they are cracked. They are ugly as sin, but the most comfortable pair of shoes I own, and I will mourn them the day they become irreparable.

ETA: crocs, not clogs!

43
Tenenmous 43 points ago

Honey, please come into the kitchen and kill this spider. And prevent the collapse of society.

3
JGirl 3 points ago

And then there are people like my mother who once saw a mouse and stomped it.

23
stratocaster_patriot 23 points ago

And when they are under physical attack they call on young white men and expect them to be the ones who die.

7
CheekyVetBoi 7 points ago

Young men, not just white ones. They call all men to fight for them. But that's what men are here for. Don't rag on women just because those cunts try and act like men but fail, then rely on us when they're in need. If you have a woman in your life that holds herself accountable, it makes a huge difference in perspective.

9
RawJa777 9 points ago

Really good points. Women are spectacular at being everything men are not...it's why we love them. The problem comes when they try to be men.

8
CheekyVetBoi 8 points ago

Thank you for the kind words stranger. I've been on a real self improvement kick recently, including clearing out my own personal negativity. God bless and have a good day!

7
RawJa777 7 points ago

You too brother :)

0
flashersenpai 0 points ago

That's not what men are here for. Men are here to live their owns lives and pursue their own purpose in life. They may choose to protect, but to not do so doesn't invalidate them.

And I'd like to ask, by the way, out of all those accountable women how many have organized to abolish the male only draft or march to at least set their own voting age back to 21 like it used to be before the draft/26th Amendment.

1
CheekyVetBoi 1 point ago

No I agree, men aren't here to protect women per say, but biologically, we evolved(Or were created, depending on your religious views.) to be what women aren't, men and women both provide a very necessary, and co-dependent function on the human society.

As for the second point, what if I am a traditionalist and dislike women in the military in general, especially in any forward operation. The military is about supremacy, strength, loyalty, willpower, and the drive to protect the tribe. These are all traits that good men hold dear. And a good woman would support that decision, and if she wants to serve her country too, there are lots of logistics needs, medical staffing, and stateside comms. That isn't an accountability thing, in a pinch i wouldn't want the government to draft my wife, I'd rather get recalled to service in her stead.

12
hai_Priesty 12 points ago (edited)

When people want to live they call daddy for help.

Metaphorically decent woman "call Daddy for help" at much less frequency that snowflakes, because they get into much less trouble - don't max their cards, pay their rent on time, don't sleep around behind your BF's back (muh Sexual Liberation) such that now angry ex bangs on your door at midnight etc etc.

In a sense I think society - including the parents - failed on unhinged chicks and all snowflake (in general) by allowing all those nonsense to fester in the first place and didn't set firm boundries. There are only 2 genders and equal outcome is not equal opportunity, deal with it.

(I don't have the picture now but I'm always reminded of the pic of super badbass Russia General pic followed by that 4 Nordic Equal-outcome hire of Secretary of States. The Russia guy look like he could have beat that 4 housewife-looking female SoS to a pulp with bare fists even if the 4 are armed with knives.)

9
CheekyVetBoi 9 points ago

Fuck yes, it's women who rely on being a woman to get out of a shitty situation. She cheated? He MUST have abused her, right? No, fuck that shit, hold women accountable for their actions.

Everyone makes mistakes friend. But after so long mistakes become behavior.

5
Crockett 5 points ago

Then there's the weird thing where some people act like the only reason for any kind disparity is "boys not letting girls play with their toys." As if every endeavor is just play-acting. Results are unmoored from actions of competence. The only reason for anyone to to be excluded is bullying, because merit doesn't exist.

Not every feminist is like that, thank god, but the ones that are truly frighten me. It's like handing a gun to a child who can't tell the difference between pretending to be Buzz Lightyear and murder.

7
Philhelm 7 points ago

For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!" But it's "Saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot;

7
itdood 7 points ago

This has happened to me at work many times, on IT projects. I had a lady that works for me once say, during a big project falling apart that, "you need to bring a man into the project manager role to fix this", and she was a liberal woman. I will never forget this. All of our project failures at work were run by women. Then they bring in a white guy to fix it. then they blame the white guy. It sucks we've allowed this to get to this point

6
NvJohansson 6 points ago

There must be a reason why through-out history its always been old white guys running their empires since the Roman senate...

1
Crockett 1 point ago

Poppycock. Asians had good empires, too.

6
Macatho 6 points ago

It’s like this where I work too. All the women are “working from home”. In other words checking emails and maybe a conference call here and there. While the men all come in, virus be damned, and keep the place running.

4
trumplandslide 4 points ago

I call BS. Neither gender nor race determines the individual in either direction.

There are competent men, women, black, white, etc. There are incompetent men, women, black, white, etc. There are good men, women, black, white, etc. There are evil men, women, black, white, etc.

Look at and judge the individual.

5
Rosewolf 5 points ago

History shows your statement is false and your reality is that old white men are who built the entire world you see outside your window from electricity to cars, your phone, your constitution. Plumbing. Etc etc etc

There are people who live in reality and people who have a good heart and try to bend reality to match their heart.

Fact is, it's old white men who have been dragging society forward since greece.

-1
AnhHaiSaigon -1 points ago

The Greeks and Romans didn't think themselves white. Race is a deep state construct to divide and conquer.

3
rooftoptendie 3 points ago

WHAT.

-1
AnhHaiSaigon -1 points ago (edited)

Many of the Christian saints were brown or black skinned.

Race is a Bolshevik construct to destroy the Christian foundation.

Edit: you are hating because I just exposed your useful idiocy that plays right into the hands of the deep state.

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago

Agree.

My favorite example is Margaret Thatcher.

It's an aura or something...there's a force that the person radiates from within.

We need to start looking at THAT; not at skin and gonads.

Now, men are more likely to have it, but that's our shortcoming as a society. We build weak women.

0
DonaldsTrump 0 points ago

Yeah this thread has got some retarded responses. There could be an amazing all female cabinet, one better or worse than an all male one.

The difference is, was it elected by merit or progressive points?

The issue with these ladies is they were all voted in by progressives just because they're women. And it shows.

3
CheekyVetBoi 3 points ago

I guess thats why soyboys like sanders.

FUCK RICH OLD WHITE GUYS! EXCEPT YOU! Please give me free propaganda college Daddy Sanders. Pay for me to whine on Twitter Daddy!

3
deplorablebob 3 points ago

What the feminist movement fails to realize is they just want to supplant the perceived enemy. They want to become what they hate.

edit: grammar

2
AndyCuomoIsAMobster 2 points ago

Drop the "old white" part. I think any quality MAN can be a great leader. It takes integrity, giant balls, and morals. Not qualities any of our modern presidents before Trump have had. If Obama had Trump's integrity, I'd support him just as much.

2
christianknight 2 points ago

Islam is right about women.

1
deleted 1 point ago
149
OrangeElvis 149 points ago

Lol - women can be great leaders - just like white guys can be great basketball players... They are just less common - and that is OK! Voting for someone because of their gender or race is f-tarded and pretty much guaranteed to produce a dumpster show.

At some point, I would love some based country to begin giving all middle-school students and HS students "aptitude" tests. Put them into tracks that best fit their gifts and interests. This would help everyone - gets the kids who want to be outside and doing things with their hands out of the classroom parts of the day and lets the academically gifted do their thing without the distraction or the teacher teaching to the lowest common denominator. Jr-high you do basic separation of "trade" vs "academic" vs "arts" then break them down further in HS - and this is where you could probably identify those gifted in leadership and train them to be good leaders, among other things...

sigh It'll never happen.

81
freespeech4all 81 points ago

Conservative women are good. Liberal women are not leaders but whiney, stupid bitches. See The Squad.

52
FreeRein 52 points ago

Margaret Thatcher, the Iron Lady

Elizabeth I

Catherine the Great

Sorry, just woke up, keeping quarantine hours

40
rooftoptendie 40 points ago

good morning, spicy pede! It is a beautiful day today.

I wanted to add to your list but I can't think of any. Women like that really are a rarity.

As a female, I resent feminism. I like being a woman. I like doing woman things. Real women are sensible, insightful, imaginative, and sensitive. They do not belong in the fucking workplace for the mostpart, IMO. They wreck productive work environments. Even the best of them can fall into destructiveness... for instance, a female may be your best employee, or your favorite and most reliable employee... until you hire another female who doesn't get along with her, and watch what happens. They fight to the death, and it is female fighting so it is long, drawn out, and poisonous.

Females do not belong on the field of battle. They are weaker, their reaction times are slower, and they are easily distracted and confused. They put everybody in danger.

Females do not belong in sports, unless its something they look beautiful doing, like volleyball or tennis.

I especially do not like what commies have done to this culture, because now dykey liberal bluehaired trolls force women to do things they naturally shouldnt. Like work. Or be extra competitive, wich goes against their nature. And this makes women emotionally beat up and confused on a deep deep level. Then they act like psychos, trying to control their biology using cognitive reasoning alone. We as females get such a reputation for acting indecent and crazy, that now women are disrespected and made fun of in general. When they should be appreciated. and I dont just mean for their titties. But for their ladylike behavior and their grace. Their nurturing skills.

As a female, when males talk about women it makes me feel like shit. It makes me feel like we are a joke, unwanted, ugly, badly behaved. And this poisonous generalization that men make about women IS DESERVED. Its deserved because women are squeezed by communism into crazyness and ugliness and suffering. Then the males suffer too because we act like they are somehow replaceable. that women can do anything men can do. I'm sure they feel useless too. Women are psycho bitches and men are pigs, right? Its all very unhealthy. Its a vicious cycle. The commies started this. I absolutely HATE it.

end rant/

10
stratocaster_patriot 10 points ago

like volleyball or tennis.

Huh. Have you seen women's tennis? It's a grunt fest. Loudest cringiest shit in the world. I was thinking more like gymnastics, ice skating.

7
rooftoptendie 7 points ago (edited)

kek, i was just thinking that right before you wrote it. you are right. But think about ladies playing tennis, and not dykes. Its actually rather graceful and beautiful, if played properly. The way Melania will play it, will not be like Martina, lol

edit:

ice skating and gymnastics = exactly!

4
residue69 4 points ago

How to... beat both Williams sisters in one afternoon

Preparation is crucial. Remember that a game like this is light-hearted - taking it too seriously would be a mistake. My training regime consisted of a leisurely round of golf in the morning followed by a couple of shandies. I turned up on court feeling suitably laid-back.

Worth a read as the story only gets better.

3
christianknight 3 points ago

Thats because of American SJWs.

2
Southern_Belle 2 points ago

I'm not sure there are any women in women's tennis.

Not many, at any rate.

9
Rock_Flag_Eagle 9 points ago

Well said. I loathe what communism and leftism at large has done to women, and thus what they've done to poison the relationship between the sexes. My boomer mom and I disagree about plenty, but even she said to me that the Sexual Revolution is one of the most destructive things that has ever happened to our country and women at large. The backlash to this decay can't come soon enough. I want marry a woman and love and cherish her one day. But the number of marriageable women is declining fast because they've been convinced to put aside the most wonderful aspects of themselves in favor of trying to be caricatures of men. I truly feel terribly for women in and approaching their 30s who haven't figured this out. All the career success and promotions in the world are not going to keep them company when they're older and have no family to cherish and care for.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

What communism and leftism did TO women? Do women not bear any responsibility for what they've bought into and promoted?

How is this any different from the victim mentality of feminism?

7
de9ebkmd7 7 points ago

Females do not belong in sports, unless its something they look beautiful doing,

Okay that is kind of silly. Women can play all the sports they want. What is absurd though is demanding that women's sports be valued economically the same as men's sports.

10
rooftoptendie 10 points ago

I suppose. But IMHHHO, I don't think ladies should be doing things that make them look undignified. I know my opinions seem extreme in this modern commie world of ours... I'm not popular for these opinions, I can tell you.

5
accountable 5 points ago

People don't "get" what you're talking about because they've never met a real-deal woman in their lives. Dignity, respect for self, respect for others. It's just lost on people. A critical fault in Western culture.

3
rooftoptendie 3 points ago (edited)

I live in a deep blue zone. You get leered at for being a lady, by men and women. Just LEERED at. Its weird. It's a mini-version of what Melania must go through every single day. I can't tell you how relieved I was to finally have a REAL LADY in the WH. It is so telling people's reactions to her. Its nasty behavior. It aint easy.

edit: but not complaining, in the sense that no matter what we go through, I still think men have it worse, all in all. Respec to REAL MEN. I can't even really imagine what that must be like.

... continue reading thread?
4
IcculusBased9 4 points ago

Not extreme at all.

2
christianknight 2 points ago

You are right.

2
deleted 2 points ago
1
deleted 1 point ago
3
slimcoat 3 points ago

iNtErNaLiZEd mIsOGyNy!!!!!!

j/k I appreciated your thoughts

3
Scooby721 3 points ago

Marry me?

2
iehava 2 points ago

Yo...you single?

2
freespeech4all 2 points ago

I think conservative women with a backbone are good for our society. It sucks most women tend to be democrats or feminists, or just loud and stupid. But there’s good women out there, like you!

2
deleted 2 points ago
2
christianknight 2 points ago

Men 18, women 21 with property.

1
deleted 1 point ago
0
deleted 0 points ago
0
deleted 0 points ago
1
RumpVeryGood 1 point ago

And we could choose to ingnore female opinions

2
residue69 2 points ago

You'll probably enjoy this story:

How to... beat both Williams sisters in one afternoon

Preparation is crucial. Remember that a game like this is light-hearted - taking it too seriously would be a mistake. My training regime consisted of a leisurely round of golf in the morning followed by a couple of shandies. I turned up on court feeling suitably laid-back.

Worth a read as the story only gets better.

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago

I agree with what you said about women in the workplace EXCEPT that even the best can fall prey to it.

I don't.

I prefer to work with men for that reason.

1
rooftoptendie 1 point ago

y'ever notice its always the ones who say "oooh i just love working with women! Girl Power, isnt that right ladies?"

and you just slowwly back away, kek

6
marsajane1949 6 points ago

Jealous, whiney, stupid bitches..

5
Lurker404 5 points ago (edited)

That's the difference between strong and entitled.

4
astro_eng 4 points ago

Libtard is the natural default though.

4
Carry_Your_Name 4 points ago

Those pussy wussies are no leader. You know the saying, the hand that rocks the cradle is the hand that rules the world. When someone who has never been a leader in the family and has no future - genetically, how would you expect her to be a leader of a nation and offer a future for everyone?

22
Erikabodereka 22 points ago

Fuck that. Doesn't Germany do that? You get a college track or a trade track real early. Doesn't China pick their Olympic athletes like that?

Would you like a test to determine your path in life?

3
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 3 points ago

Yes, I'd prefer my pilots, doctors, engineers, first responders, etc. to have testing that determined their path in life. Not everyone is suited for every profession, people are unique and have different aptitudes. This fact was made very clear to me after working for many years in software development. I worked with many people who had degrees in computer science yet completely lacked the aptitude and ability to write code, and I don't just mean they sucked at it, I mean they couldn't do it. These people managed to get hired because of their degrees and managed to stay employed because of policies that made firing someone for incompetence extremely difficult and sometimes impossible.

By the way, I lived in Germany and they use aptitude tests just like we use the SAT test, they only difference is that they use do it earlier to determine if students should go to a college prep or a trade high school.

6
Erikabodereka 6 points ago

We disagree. Have a nice day.

1
stratocaster_patriot 1 point ago

No but maybe my track record, or grades before high school should come to bare.

0
Yucky 0 points ago

If the government is paying, then yes, a test is appropriate.

If the individual is paying, feel free to take whatever path you like.

8
Gadsden 8 points ago

The government.... is you.

Thw government pays for NOTHING. Anything they buy, is with your money. You pay way more than is necessary in taxes, and the government uses it to buy what they want.

I feel like too many people don't understand this. Maybe I should make a thread about it.

1
Yucky 1 point ago

I'm well aware of that, and that was actually my point.

When I said "the government" paying, of course I mean the taxpayer paying.

And my point was that if the taxpayer is paying, then the elected representatives of said taxpayers get to make the rules and restrictions on how the money is spent.

If the individual is paying for their degree, then they are free to get whatever one they can afford.

21
missusellis 21 points ago

As long as it's not government doing the "aptitude tests" because... that's what communists do.

18
WinMoreReeLess 18 points ago

Its one of those things that sounds good on paper, until you realize what you are proposing is to strip away all freedoms and upwards mobility. One's life shouldn't be determined by how well you did on a test when you were 12. That's a huge difference between the US and Europe.

While there clearly are too many people being ram-rodded into the college track these days. It should always be an option, just not the only option as it is now. Then there is the issue of placing all of these people in their specific jobs. That would require a nationalized economy, which can only work under a totalitarian regime, and that is unacceptable.

7
Oddsalamander6 7 points ago

Agreed! That's the beauty of the American Dream!

We need technical and trade schools to make a resurgence. Many of those industries are desperate for workers. We need plumbers, electricians, etc.

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago

It actually works.

This used to be the way we did it.

Yes, you could move from one group to the other. Teachers could see if you were in the average class but were bored and not at all challenged by the work.

20
Oizen 20 points ago

I've always had the hunch that women smart enough to be strong powerful leaders are also smart enough to not take the job due to all the bullshit they'd have to deal with.

17
MuadDon 17 points ago (edited)

Unfortunately, true leadership has to be forged via experience/adversity. Anyone can go get an MBA, but that doesn't mean you're a business leader when you graduate. The greatest of leaders have met severe failure and success and melded it into actionable qualities that really they don't even need to be cognizant of - it's just doing.

Classic example is the field commission in the military. Many enlisted men in the world wars and korea, in particular, rose to the occasion on the field and showed great leadership. Not just the kind of leadership that kept their platoon or squad together, like an NCO, but knowing how to lead the group when a problem arose. They weren't trying to, they weren't trained to be officers or to lead men, they just "knew how" when the time came. Same reason why many officers in the military are trained to be leaders and aren't. The essence isn't in everyone.

13
flashersenpai 13 points ago (edited)

Public school is useless after 8th grade and is more child care than education for the majority of families. It would be more useful to let teens get work experience than expect that reorganizing schooling will fix anything.

3
stratocaster_patriot 3 points ago

Doing what though? The constant influx of unskilled peasants who want to raise big families means that teens have no jobs.

5
Fabius 5 points ago

Build a wall; Deport them all.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago

Yes, and minimum wage hurts their chances as well. Both things could use fixing.

10
BrotherAmerica 10 points ago

But who can you trust to actually administer or grade the test?

8
de9ebkmd7 8 points ago

We already solved this problem. The parents working with the teachers together in the best interest of the child.

6
Shroudedf8 6 points ago

Whoa! What is this 'working together' thing of which you speak? Best interest of the child? To many foreign concepts this morning.

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago

What. You assume parents know anything about it these days. Last I heard parents can barely even feed their kids let alone understand things or take an active part in eduating them. Lots of dumb fuck parents out there.

2
OrangeElvis 2 points ago

The US does not currently have trade schools - a travesty.

2
123breadman 2 points ago

I don't trust anyone to decide that so early. They should have entrance exams to all colleges. You do too bad, they tell you to fuck off.

9
Paul_Revere 9 points ago

Would you trust the people in charge of public educationto be doing that kind of educational triage on your kids?

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago

Sure -- after the commies are gone.

It does work. I grew up with that method.

8
I_Love_45-70_Gov 8 points ago (edited)

Germany does that with schools (cradle to grave govt run education). The kids have zero choice in their education. It is the headmasters who make the decisions at an early age whether thet are flipping burgers, turning wrenches, or going to be a surgeon.

I like your idea, unfortunately, every parent thinks there's kid can be a capable surgeon. Common sense tells us that 98 times out of 100, their beliefs are far, far removed from reality.

6
BigMikesBigBlackCock 6 points ago

Wait so you want public schools to dictate our children's career paths?

5
Jabron661 5 points ago

Like Macho Man Randy Savage says, "the cream of the crop" should rise to the top!

Let the best be the best, and don't be afraid to label dumb kids dumb, let losers lose, let winner win. Don't hand out jobs to people just because they are a certain type or gender.

Common sense.

3
Chancehappeneth 3 points ago

Agree agree agree!

The country really has to stop pretending everyone needs to be on a college track and that degree paths are somehow better or tied to intelligence. It's such a waste.

Just my observations, but men tend to lead with clear given tasks and expectations. The goal is the goal. Women tend to lead in a cooperative way, tailoring expectations from individuals and helicoptering over details of how tasks will be performed. Cooperation and harmony are more important than the goal. Both of these styles can work well in the right groups and on the right goals. But since most goals are actually important, clearness wins over harmony nearly every time.

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago

It won't happen becaue you will see more Latinos in trades and more whites and Asians in academics and, given the disparity in pay scales in the inudstry, it will be claimed to be a racist system.

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago

Well, we did see almost 100% whites in the college-bound group and an over-representation of blacks in the remedial group.

But the first thing you need to identify and fix a problem is accurate data.

1
Magadeth 1 point ago

good white players are intentionally passed over because lots of coaches thinking they cant be as good, srs

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago

Put them into tracks that best fit their gifts and interests.

It will happen again if we demand it.

That's how I grew up. We were tracked starting around middle school.

Kept me from being bored.

We need to go back to this.

Only commies want everyone to be the same -- or pretend that everyone is the same.

1
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 1 point ago

The big problem is that the people advocating the loudest for this forced "diversity and inclusion" disaster are spectacularly incompetent, completely devoid of personal responsibility, and accustomed to blaming everything but themselves for their failures. These are the people that get elevated to positions far above their level of competence, and the catastrophic results are predictable.

1
Crockett 1 point ago

I get it, but shuttling kids down paths so quickly wouldn't work out. You can't figure out whether someone should be a tradesman or an academic from a week of testing when they're 13.

The paths are good, but people need to be allowed to experiment. And there needs to be a path onto each path at every level. You can't have a 25 year old who realizes they've been on the wrong path left high and dry because they're too old for the basic courses taught to 8th graders, but would be way behind without those basics.

1
deleted 1 point ago
0
AHickey1995 0 points ago

Why the hell is this upvoted so much? This is fucking evil. Basically government assigned jobs at the age of 13. That’s not MAGA at all. Also I fucking hate PC participation trophies, but that doesn’t mean you can just completely disregard feelings at all. That’s how you make sociopaths. Imagine how shit it would be to get cast into for instance the “Arts” program because of some test when you’re not even good at art. Do you not see how resentful that could make someone? Specifically when looking at job prospects, the people in the trade and arts sector are doomed by the age of 13 to not be able to make the same amount of money. Not to mention the corruption that would occur. Most of the time, kids drop out of programs not necessarily because they can’t do the work, they drop out because of the commitment it takes. Those who work hard are usually the ones who end up the best doctors, engineers etc. This idea you came up with doesn’t need to happen, what needs to happen is the public waking up and start holding people actually accountable. Everyone nowadays say “oh becoming an engineer is so hard, the math is really difficult.” It needs to be “being an engineer is hard because it is your personal and legal responsibility to ensure the safety of your projects.”

2
OrangeElvis 2 points ago

Identifying skills is evil? Lol. I never said anything about involuntary forcing anyone to do anything. Aptitude testing is a hell of a lot more valuable than the tests they give these kids now. If you dont think some kids need to be outside while other need to be allowed to focus on academics then you don't know any teachers and you haven't been around a lot of kids.

1
Southern_Belle 1 point ago

That’s how you make sociopaths. Imagine how shit it would be to get cast into for instance the “Arts” program because of some test when you’re not even good at art. Do you not see how resentful that could make someone? Specifically when looking at job prospects, the people in the trade and arts sector are doomed by the age of 13 to not be able to make the same amount of money. Not to mention the corruption that would occur.

That's not how it works at all. I lived it. This used to be the norm.

0
Faintlight 0 points ago

Where are these great women leaders? And this is a woman asking. I can't think of any. Women shouldn't run politics, play rock drums, or be architects.

99
deleted 99 points ago
26
Cmchn 26 points ago

I think part of it's also how we shield women from harsh criticism. When we're little boys, we're taught to be extra nice to girls, and then their opinions get better and more awesome as they develop. Just look at how the feminists in recent years were screaming about how "having expectations" of women was sexist. They have to overcome their nurturing instincts, and a lifetime without harsh male criticism.

6
Tryhardneckbeard 6 points ago

Whole lotta this, the stupid ass "White Knight Shit cause my pp needs wetting" has got to stop.

9
stepping_razor123 9 points ago

The best people to lead Finland might be female, who knows

There may be a few strong female leaders but they are well outside the mean by a few standard deviations. The best people to lead Finland will be mostly male.

8
flashersenpai 8 points ago

At what point does self-bias count as identity politics? It's well established that women have a group preference toward women and men do not have a group preference toward men.

7
krzyzowiec 7 points ago

But isn’t that because a woman’s nature is to take care of people, while men tend to be competitive?

62
Barbieblonde 62 points ago

As a woman, all female councils, groups, boards of directors are terrifying if I have any interest in an outcome.

Why? We fight over who is in charge and how to undermine them... instead of solving problems and looking out for others.

Ask any survival reality T.V. show producer about how all female groups fared on the deserted islands, without outside support or men in their group.

Utter chaos, pandemonium, crying, complaining and nearing starvation.

39
Apersonofinterest 39 points ago

I caught one of those man vs. woman survival shows and it was hilarious. Day one on the island and the women were all tired, laying around complaining, disorganized with some women going off on their own and getting lost. By nightfall, they had no food or shelter and went to sleep cold and starving.

Meanwhile, over in the men’s camp, as soon as they landed, they divided up the tasks. You build the shelter, you get the fire started, we’ll hunt for food and supplies. By nightfall, they had shelter, a fire going and food to eat.

30
Isolated_Patriot 30 points ago

Last summer some construction workers were taking down a house across the street. They were preserving the materials for reuse.

My wife came outside where I was working and was laughing about the men standing around, she thought they were arguing. "Every one of them has an opinion."

I said: "Sure, but unlike women, it will take them about five minutes to decide who's opinion is the best one, and they'll start taking that wall down."

Sure enough, I hadn't finished speaking and they were splitting up to tie down the walls they were leaving, and then they lowered the front wall down with a few ropes, and heaved it up onto the flatbed.

She said: "Yeah, I don't think any women I've worked with could work together like that. They'd still be discussing what to do."

Note the men were 'arguing' and each one had an 'opinion' while the women would be 'discussing' in perpetuity.

9
Chancehappeneth 9 points ago

This is why I always prefer working with men. Let's quickly sort the heirarchy and get to the task.

I'm much less interested in scoring social points with women as the decision making stage drags on and on.

12
stratocaster_patriot 12 points ago

And with guys, if you really cant get along, you kick each others asses and end up friends. Women stew and hold a grudge and get passive agressive.

7
RiverFenix 7 points ago

the men also probably tried to plot a snuggle session in the women's camp...

I don't know of any place on each where men and women are segregated and nighttime doesn't become 'night recce/excursion' to the womens' side..

The women on the other hand, just lay there waiting and hoping for their man to sneak into the tent.

2
Apersonofinterest 2 points ago

They gather extra supplies to barter with.

22
trout007 22 points ago

That’s only natural. A woman’s survival instinct is tied to manipulating men to provide resources. This is biological because having a kid take you out of the action for a while. Need that guy to provide and protect.

9
Barbieblonde 9 points ago

I'd disagree, we are a hunter-gatherer species at our core. It is why women are deceptive with other women not of their own offspring. We know where the ripe berries, sea shells, copper deposits are and do not share this information and will fight tooth and nail to remain relevant to the men of the group, by providing the location if not the actual items for the group.

Our prized male/children like a certain food, trinket? We will target an outsider woman to get her stash of it. She does not know when the attack/theft is coming, but it will, make no doubt. We are sneaky, conniving and devious to our core to gain, preserve and camouflage resources and methods of procurement.

While the men are killing the wild game together, we women are bringing the little details to the table that make life as humans comfortable and enjoyable... beyond a full stomach and a roof over our heads.

When a woman is angry or unsatisfied with a man, she treats him as an outsider woman she wants to see suffer/be punished. Just my two cents.

6
Fabius 6 points ago

Finally someone gets it. A woman's prime instinct is survival, as it should be. She's the carrier of the reproductive ability of the species. If she dies, the species ends.

This is why concepts like glory, valor, and self-sacrifice are of little importance to most women. These are male-created social values to give us something to do while the women do the important work of propagating the species. Women who espouse these values tend not to live long, and therefore don't reproduce.

I'm pretty sure the traditionally masculine traits I listed above are not genetic, but the behaviors that tend toward them might be, and I'd be willing to guess that they are sex linked. It would be an interesting hypothesis to test.

3
stratocaster_patriot 3 points ago

That is a new one to me but very interesting theory.

1
trout007 1 point ago

I don’t see this as a disagreement.

2
Barbieblonde 2 points ago

Women don't manipulate men they care about. That is my point. If she is manipulating you she has no interest in your happiness in any way whatsoever... run don't walk.

0
flashersenpai 0 points ago

That's terribly naive.

1
Barbieblonde 1 point ago

Ask you waifu pillows. Neither of them like sleeping with you... Coomer. How many Chinese made "Katanas" do you own?

0
flashersenpai 0 points ago

Wow you've convinced me with the eloquence of your arguments. Simp. :D

1
stratocaster_patriot 1 point ago

I thought we were all science deniers around here./s Thing is there is science behind what you are saying but the people who all claim to be on the side of science want feelinsg to dictate how they are treated and how they treat others.

12
GinaDraconi 12 points ago

Practically no women have an innate understanding of hierarchy. Why would we? Back in the hunter/gatherer days, men had to work together to bring down game. Want to survive the hunt? Know your place and your duties. Women, on the other hand, well, one woman can easily subdue an entire blueberry thicket.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

Completely untrue. Women's hierarchies exist and are different from men's. They exist.

1
artifex_mundi_x 1 point ago

The behavior of women can be mostly explained by two evolutionary factors, first being that pregnancies take 9 months, which leaves them vulnerable. "Strong women" that produce no offspring are evolutionarily irrelevant. Second is the warbride hypothesis. The women that would switch sides and subject to the new conquerors were the ones that ultimate filled the genepool

9
Oddsalamander6 9 points ago

Do you find you dislike working with other women? I'm a female, but I am rather pragmatic at work (flight attendant). I would rather work with a male crew than a female crew. The women I work with are catty, passive aggressive, and just mean to each other. My best guy friend is also a flight attendant and he tells me all the time, "women treat each other poorly." It's sad but true.

6
Barbieblonde 6 points ago

Me on a team/group of all men feels so comfy! I feel like a protected Princess, but always have this gut feeling of not wanting any other women around "my guys", by interacting with them.

A gamer guy told me that when I talk like that it reminds him of the Family Guy episode where they spoof Return of the Jedi.

Han Solo : "Hey Leia, look! It is the only other woman in galaxy!"

Princess Leia : (Arms crossed and scowling) "I don't like her."

1
Rosewolf 1 point ago

It's because your biology told you to feel threatened. As there was another women competing for attention.

Women shouldn't be in the work force, and women's biggest obstacle in life in general are other women.

Its fucking both pathetic and hilarious.

1
Barbieblonde 1 point ago

Found the Incel Coomer... from Reddit.

0
NoCommies 0 points ago

I'm also the only woman working in a group of men (IT so not uncommon) but never feel like a protected princess wtf. That's so bizarre, they're just colleagues I get along with so we can finish the projects, not "my guys" like potential husbands

This is some low-IQ brainlet stuff

0
Barbieblonde 0 points ago

Does stack overflow call all your questions imbecilic? I'd bet they do... you are no woman... simply a transexual male.

0
NoCommies 0 points ago

I don't ask questions on SO, I answer them.

you are no woman

Because I don't feel like a princess around my male colleagues? Because I don't call them "my guys"? How does your own husband/boyfriend feel about you acting this way -- mine would be confused, I get my female validation from him and my family in my home not others in the workplace

0
Barbieblonde 0 points ago

How many women have you beaten? Did it start with your sisters and then mother?

0
NoCommies 0 points ago

What on Earth... are you trolling? You have to be. MAGA women love our husbands and partners, we don't get possessive over random men in the workplace.

Focus your energy towards your children, not towards trolling

... continue reading thread?
3
sickofSJWs 3 points ago

I totally agree as another woman. I really dislike being in female dominated work environments. I’ve experienced far more bullying from other women than from men. “Mean girls” don’t stop after high school.

2
JGirl 2 points ago

As a woman, I find that I am most comfortable in a mixed environment. All female groups tend to be catty.

Then again, I have worked in a female-only group at one job and didn't run in that. Then later on, it became more mixed. And a different woman came in. A narcissist. Oh, my god, if you think all female groups might be bad, try adding in a narcissist. The group will rot from within.

And to be honest, I think as bad as catty coworkers can be, one thing is worse: nepotism. Nepotism, like narcissism, will wreck things too. Because it's rare that I have ever seen a that the person who was hired due to connections be the right person for the job. That means others have to not only deal with how the nepo treats them, but generally do parts of the nepo's job for the nepo.

1
Rosewolf 1 point ago

Women shouldn't be in the work force :/

5
spezisapedo 5 points ago

you sound like a woman id want on my team

2
Barbieblonde 2 points ago

Thanks, that is so sweet!

I know that men are valuable and that we are strongest as a team of both genders!

1
Rosewolf 1 point ago

Eh

3
deleted 3 points ago
40
Swolehas 40 points ago

Honestly, women make crap leaders 90% of the time. Too much emotion, not enough control. Too much feeling, not enough critical thinking. Call me sexist if you want, but I've had multiple female bosses in the past, and it has been terrible. I can tell you, that something odd happens to women when they are placed in positions of authority over young men. They overcompensate for their femininity by acting overly-aggressive and overly-competitive.

17
Oddsalamander6 17 points ago

I'm a female flight attendant. I hate all the female captains I fly with. Their problem becomes my problem every time. The last captain was a smoker. She asked me to sit and watch her stuff while she went and took a smoke (we had a few hour layover at the airport). That would mean I would be waiting on her for who knows how long. I would be stuck in one place watching her bags. When I said no because I wanted to do my own thing and walk around, you would have thought I told her to sacrifice her first born. She spent the rest of the trip making sure I "paid" for telling her no.

Actually, I just hate working with other women in general. I tend to be more pragmatic in how I work, and my female coworkers hate it. If a passenger annoys me or is rude, I get over it and move on quickly. Many of my female coworkers will spend the rest of the flight finding ways to be passive aggressive against the person. Drives me nuts.

7
Swolehas 7 points ago

My last boss was a female biological scientist. I had male scientist bosses in the past, and we would often work through problem-solving together. With my female boss, however, I was never allowed to disagree with her opinion, or attempt to rationalize why a certain experiment produced an atypical result. I once tried to discuss why a certain experiment had visible contamination in the results, and her instant response was "you have bad technique, you need better technique, your technique is bad." This was funny, because she NEVER ONCE SAW MY TECHNIQUE, nor did she offer observe me while I did the experiment. It also wasn't true because I had done this specific experiments at least 100 times before working in her lab. She became furious at me when I tried to make a point of some of the non-sterile laboratory conditions such as: experiment being performed outside of the fume hood, old tip and tube boxes that have been previously used (and possibly contaminated) by someone else, work-space that was not decontaminated before I began working there. She should have sterilized my work space before I moved in, and NOT told me to use old equipment that somebody else could have rubbed their hands all over.

She became visibly angry and yelled at me on the spot, and gave 0 fucks about my input (so much for being a scientist). Our relationship was torn from there after, and each time it got close to normal she would do something crazy again. She once yelled at me because I used the phrase "pretty good" to describe someone else's work. According to her my "tone of voice" was off. She consistently described me as very "defensive". I suppose "defensive" is the adjective you use to describe somebody who is strong-minded and geared toward problem solving. I mean, I was trained to be a goddamn scientist! Of course I'm going to think critically and attempt to problem solve.

Our relationship became so ridiculous, that it got to the point where it would take me 10 minutes to type a four sentence e-mail to send to her. Every time I spoke, I had to make sure that I was asserting absolutely nothing. I would have to use uncertain phrasing such as:

"If you think it's better I can try to..." "Do you want me to do X... or would you rather me do Y?" "I am unsure why this is" (even if I had strong opinions as to what may have happened. Again, I was not allowed to attempt to explain why something atypical happened"

It was seriously difficult to type an e-mail. I had to make sure I was making absolutely 0 assertions, and that I strongly came off as a beta in the relationship.

Every time an atypical result was produced, I would begin by saying "it could have been my technique"

I've got hundreds of more things to say about it, but that is the gist of her.

I also had ANOTHER female boss before her (not science related) and she once threatened me to work on the weekend. She also purposely paid me $20 less than I earned one paycheck because, despite working there for 3 years, she accused me of lying about my hours for more pay. Mind you, I was running this damn company for them by my 3rd year. All of her husbands jobs were getting pushed on to me and my crew because she wanted him around while she was pregnant for the 11th time. I had to tell her husband she underpaid me, and he nervously confronted me about it (because she made him). He trusted me 100% though.

Now, I've also had male bosses who were bad too, and who have snapped at me or had other serious personality faults. The difference I've noticed between female vs male bosses is that I ALWAYS develop a strong level of mutual respect between me and my male boss. Even if it starts of rocky, or if we don't always see eye-to-eye. Their always ends up being strong respect between us. With my female bosses, we never develop this level of respect. Instead, they are always more authoritarian.

12
GinaDraconi 12 points ago

Only 90% of the time? You know who really doesn't like working for a woman boss? Other women. Men form hierarchies, women form cliques.

11
Fabius 11 points ago

They overcompensate for their femininity by acting overly-aggressive and overly-competitive.

This is exactly why I can't stand lesbians. They think being a dick is masculine, so they really pump up the unfriendliness when you meet them.

This is also why Hillary would have gone to war with the first country to defy her - to show that she's just as "tough" as any man. Dangerous.

34
DisrespectfulNipples 34 points ago

And the 'men' allow this. Never forget.

8
krzyzowiec 8 points ago

Underrated comment.

4
Work2gethrBiglyOrDie 4 points ago

"The amount of tyranny you get, is the exact amount you put up with." Thomas Jefferson. 

22
freespeech4all 22 points ago

This is literally Sweden all over again

They went to Greek border to HELP MIGRANTS. These fucking idiots

5
Telcontar2012 5 points ago

LOL! I imagine that went over well with the Greeks. The more the EU fucks with them, the closer they get to breaking out the spears and bronze shields. Last thing they need is a pack of these harpies showing up to screech at them for not accepting illegal migrants.

2
Fremium2020 2 points ago

Greeks are not people to be messed with. They are like ripped versions of Israelis and if they weren't leashed to the EU and NATO, they would have gone ape shit on people coming into their house like that.

21
TrumpTrain_MAGA2020 21 points ago

Women are, by design, not created to be leaders.

3
deleted 3 points ago (edited)
-5
freespeech4all -5 points ago

And you’ll vote for the first female president, but she will be a conservative. Deal with it.

7
TrumpTrain_MAGA2020 7 points ago

Lol no I won't. Deal with THAT.

5
Spirit_of_Resistance 5 points ago

conservative

Ah yes, the based conservatives who are only leftists with lag time (see gay marriage)

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

Gay marriage wouldn't be a problem if the government didn't stick its nose into marriage to begin with. The whole argument of gay marriage was a farce to begin with.

3
MAGAngelo 3 points ago

Yeah, how bout no?

2
spezisapedo 2 points ago

if its Ivanka and she loses the sjw bullshit..

5
UpTrump 5 points ago

Ivanka is cucked

18
Mad_Hattie 18 points ago

A feminist government sounds good on paper and then you see this and Sweden.

38
ViaAlpina 38 points ago

Doesn't sound good on paper either.

30
Coalville 30 points ago

Can you kindly direct me to the paper, where it looks good?

I can't see how any form of leadership can thrive, when physical traits are put over ability and qualification.

4
WinMoreReeLess 4 points ago

I hear there is an well worn copy of "How to be a Cuck 101" somewhere in Bernie's pocket...

3
Mad_Hattie 3 points ago

To an idealist leftist it looks good on paper but many of their ideals never function in reality.

7
human_centipede 7 points ago

It looks like a good idea to the mentally ill.

21
lefty295 21 points ago

Imagine being a “feminist” government and importing people from a culture that hates women...

8
ViaAlpina 8 points ago

I guess women got bored with kind, decent, competent men, because the demand for shiftless, violent rapists is apparently through the roof.

5
Barbieblonde 5 points ago

Women from Europe culture have always lusted after being ravaged by savages.

Ask their husbands and boyfriends that were forced to travel with them on sex vacations to 3rd word nations to get their fix. Cuckolding is an E.U. staple.

The only thing that has changed is that once these women took control of their nations, they had their savages imported directly... as "refugees".

The looks on the faces of the women holding up the welcome signs is not that of charity, but instead animal lust and desire. Revolting.

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago

Which is pretty much all of non-white culture. For example, Africans like to tell you that their women have always held a place of power and reverence in their cultures. Yeah, and then virgins get raped in an attempt to cure AIDS. Women have asbolutley no power over there. The point is, if you are importing non-whites, the chances are very good that these people see women as inferior.

12
disqus11 12 points ago

Or Canada, our whole government is a Diversity Hire.

6
Jabblemonkey1 6 points ago

Not even on paper.

17
raven0ak 17 points ago

from Finland here actually, I can give pointer that this feminist government came to be via sleight of hand done in summer where old pm resigned and instead of following parliamentary laws new elections were not held but rather government reformed without even reshuffling positions. Also this is socialist government made by forming 3 far-left parties+ 2 yes-man parties; but fear not fellow pedes as next election very very likely changes nationalist party onto lead and shrinks current 5 onto very low seats for next 20 or so years.

5
cccpneveragain 5 points ago

There's even a Finn on here! I tried to point out in my own post that Finns aren't the cucks everyone thinks they are. Conservative support is growing quickly there.

I've been there a couple times and found Finns to be very friendly to myself as a quiet reserved American tourist. I hope to go back in a year or two.

What I didn't see is people that will be walked over my migrants and outside influence for the sake of being nice and friendly like some of the other Nordics do.

2
raven0ak 2 points ago

Yup, further away you get from city center of capitol and university cities, more based people you find here; especially if you visit Lapland regions you will find little to no support on left-wing agendas.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

I haven't heard bad things about Finns for what it's worth. Everyone usually makes fun of Sweden.

1
raven0ak 1 point ago

As far as it its only stereotypes on world about us is "mute","drunk" and "aggressive" ; last two very likely available on sight only in Balkan area with Finnish "tourists"

3
IcculusBased9 3 points ago

Good luck, fren!

1
sickofSJWs 1 point ago

Good to have your perspective here. Hope that you’re right that the next election brings things back in order.

1
raven0ak 1 point ago

It's quite likely, locally pendulum tends swing from hard right to staying there for years until left swings for one time opportunity, and with current party formation either lining to nationalist agenda to siphon even little support from Finns party or trying please socialites and loosing support across country heavily as old voter base moves behind Finns, democrats have higher change of impeaching Trump than left become majority within this decade again here.

15
Ebbie8708 15 points ago

All I see in the top pic is that they got picked because they are attractive.

If there’s any disparity between men and women is that women can use their hotness to get ahead while ugly liberal women gotta bitch to get ahead. Lol

10
RiverFenix 10 points ago

Justin Trudeau Intensifies

7
Ebbie8708 7 points ago

Cucks aren’t men.

6
RiverFenix 6 points ago

I meant as a case of a man getting elected based on looks.

Too bad the women voting for him based on the looks didn't realize he's a gay posing as a metrosexual hipster.

5
Ebbie8708 5 points ago

When you support gender based abortions or fucking up your son in the name of virtual points, you are gonna have a country of fucked up people.

4
stratocaster_patriot 4 points ago

I don't see a lot of hotness there honestly. The one in the back maybe. What I do see is a lack of diverstiy lol.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago

They're "congress hot", like AOC.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

Gabbard. And yes, Omar.

13
RedTie45 13 points ago

Just spit balling here, but perhaps being qualified for a job is more important than trying to make everything equal in every way.

3
krzyzowiec 3 points ago

It’s only equal when women have every position. And even then there will be a fear of the patriarchy returning.

5
Isolated_Patriot 5 points ago

Yep. Back when Hillary was still a shoe in (according to the fake polls) there were articles about how it would not actually be 'equality' until there had been 45 female presidents. Then it would be 'equal' and the men might be allowed to have another shot at the presidency.

There is no end to their incessant lust for power, and this whole equality thing has given them far too much support from the useful idiots.

2
spezisapedo 2 points ago

BUT MAH GENITALSSSS

12
Oddsalamander6 12 points ago

I'm a woman. I'm totally fine that women aren't leading our country. I find the vast majority of women are very emotional and would be unable to make quick decisions under high pressure.

Obviously women are very valuable to society and government, but men and women have different strengths and weaknesses, and that is perfectly okay! Look at Melania. She is powerful, gracious, and doing a lot of good in her role as First Lady. I am thankful we have a president who supports his wife and encourages her in her strengths. That's a true partnership!

4
sickofSJWs 4 points ago

Also a woman, and I agree with you. I have had many bad experiences with female dominated groups. Men and women are different. ON AVERAGE, I think men are better at making decisions based on logic rather than emotions.

3
stratocaster_patriot 3 points ago

GIving woment the right to vote was not popular among women when it happened. Women just weren't interested. It's odd that we today expect women and men to want the same things. If they dont then it gets interpreted as lack of equality.

0
flashersenpai 0 points ago

(repeal the 26th amendment)

1
deleted 1 point ago
-6
3rdTerm4Trump -6 points ago

Ok. Get back in the kitchen now.

11
Dereliction 11 points ago

They may be incompetent, but they're female!

3
RiverFenix 3 points ago

Think of how much they could charge in sex services, being members of parliament...

new definition for 'High Class Hookers'

3
Dereliction 3 points ago

I don't know about high class, but politicians are just hookers already.

10
Magentapede 10 points ago

Women who are successful leaders have masculine personality traits. That doesn't mean that they are hambeasts, just that they are decisive and able to maintain under certain kinds of pressure. By contrast, feminine males make poor leaders because they lack these traits.

10
MAG_n_KAG 10 points ago

Feminist leaders are fairweather leaders. They only exist when things are good.

9
MaxineWaters4Prez 9 points ago

Maybe the best person or persons for the job should lead instead of checking off oppression checkboxes.

8
KekistanPM 8 points ago (edited)

Feminists be like "They did a good job, you're just setting your expectations too high! And they would have done better but jealous men keep throwing road blocks in their way!"

7
Ghostridersixseven 7 points ago

hmm....it would be easy to hammer on these women on many levels for their apparent failings. What is more truthful, and perhaps insightful is real world experience with women in leadership roles. In my lifetime I have worked for women in and out of the military and find them to usually be adequate leaders and managers. The problens arise when you get more than two of them teamed up together. They do not work well in groups where power needs to be shared. In millinia of being singular in existance due to the whole " Me man, you woman, you mine" mindset, and onward to the whole equality drive woman have always had this one issue among themselves: Unreasoned jealousy and infighting to be the most desirable. The conversation of literally any group of females will inevitably devolve to bitchy coments, snide references to looks, unfalttering comparisons of abilities in sex, marriage, beauty and behaviour. Not to mention morals and charector. They all want to be the leader of the pack and hold others in contempt. Whereas men typically fall into a more regimented group dynamic once a leader has been appointed/ chosen and hierachy is emplaced and adhered to, with the inevitable acception of the grasper for power who will work to displace him. Very different wiring for very different reasons since day one. I say this is the GENERAL RULE, not a hard and fast rule for EvERYONE so dont flame me with but this , and but that...

5
Oddsalamander6 5 points ago

I love what you said. I hate working with other women for these very reasons. It's not that I don't like working with another female. She would be just another coworker to me. It's that it's inevitable my female coworker will treat me awful at some point. I'm a flight attendant, and it's seniority based. I'm in my 30s, but I'm senior to many women in their 50s and 60s. They treat me horribly because they can't stand I'm senior to them as a younger women. My best guy friend tells me all the time, in the 14 years he's been a flight attendant, he's learned women treat each other horribly. It's quite sad.

Thankfully, I have a fantastic self image, and I have self confidence, so I move on quickly. It just makes me sad women can't work together.

1
Ghostridersixseven 1 point ago

Good on ya! Nothing is more attractive in a woman, or a man than self confidence. I once had a woman as a Colonel, her exec was a woman, and the Sgt. Major was as well, They were, individually, great soldiers, leaders, and managers. Together they were dysfunctional. That is a dangerous thing in a military setting.

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago

leader of the pack and hold others in contempt.

They do not understand that these two work counter to each other. You must pick one. Holding others in contempt, especially behind their backs or in a passive aggressive way, is what betas do.

2
Ghostridersixseven 2 points ago

agreed.

6
namaste_trump 6 points ago

all I can say is fukc quotas. anything not merit based will always lead to rotten results.

6
ramennov 6 points ago

Feminist "equality" really meant 100% women.

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago

Certailty true of more recent decades. Old school feminists are starting to be concerned about boys becaue they were truly more focused on equality. I believe most if not all the gaps have been closed which is why the newer feminists have to invent things to be oppressed by and want men destroyed. Easy times make for weak women.

6
IvIA6A 6 points ago

It's less about being female than it is about lacking life and leadership experience. These are all 30 something millennials trying to run a country when they don't know shit, don't know the people who have dealt with a crisis like this before.

I couldn't run a country

1
AmannamedRJ 1 point ago

It's almost entirely about being female. Angela Merkel, HRC, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Sweden's MILF Brigade, the "half female cabinet of Castro Jr. (Justin) etc. All fucking GARBAGE leaders

Most women go through life in our modern era with the easy mode turned on - even still they complain it's too hard. they become leaders and then they fuck up royally because reality doesn't care about feminism, and won't change when you bitch at it to be less sexist - Case and point, bitching about calling it a "Chinese virus" does not change that it's a Chinese Virus, and likely a bio weapon. Should the bioweapon theory turn out to be true, the political implications are fucking Monumental and every single ONE of us in this world needs to act on it.

Women aren't meant to be leaders. their goal is to negotiate resources, not create those resources. MEN create the resources. Wealth is a resource Men create wealth, they have since the times before Wealth meant money. When "Wealth" meant land and food. Women were never designed for it. Put even the most simpy, uneducated, and disorganized of soy-boys in a group and they will out perform women as leaders.There is no biological imperative for women to lead. Women are by design selfish. Life is about THEM and then Them and their children. For men, It's about family, and society. Men go out and die in wars. Men created postmortem incentives to go out and die in droves.

Men are objective focused. Women are lesser so. Can there be good female leaders? Sure. What are the chances? Very slim.

6
cccpneveragain 6 points ago

Finland is a really weird case to look at and of course these articles love to stretch and twist things.

The reality is in Finland they have something like 10 different parties with seats in their Parliament and no one party holds 20% of the seats. Some of these parties are fairly conservative and others are more cucked than our Democrats. Many of the large parties are led by men, but because their leading party (by one seat) has a female leader it fits the MSM narrative to put pictures of women and how feminist they are. They have no single strong leadership because their government just isn't set up that way.

There was some German cuck that opened some "woman-only" island there a couple years ago and I think while she did eventually get her island open she's been quite bitchy about how Finland treated her because they were investigating it as discrimination. The way the property laws are there it's basically impossible for her to keep men off the island anyway. They don't just let anything with a vagina walk all over their laws.

I've been to Sweden and Finland both and while Sweden was a beautiful place it was obvious that it was getting rolled over my migrants and they were too busy being nice to do anything about it. Finland really was a lot different and was a place I very much enjoy. Yes, there is still a ton of socialist stuff there and a lot of it works because their country is very homogeneous and has less people than many of our cities. A lot of them know if they flood it with migrants it won't work and they aren't exactly ones that hide their opinions to try to be friendly. The Finns will be fine, social distancing and personal independence is their culture. Their borders are also incredibly easy to close if necessary.

6
GinaDraconi 6 points ago

Women actually capable of leadership are few and far-between. Not only does leading take a particular way of thinking, it demands an ability to inspire confidence in those being led.

5
nrjk 5 points ago

When you can't fight a virus with social justice and virtue signaling.

5
fac1 5 points ago

The slogan "the future is female" was originally coined by a radical lesbian separatist who meant the phrase literally.

She coined it in an essay arguing for the genocide of 90% of males. She later went on to found and run the first Women's Studies university department.

http://theothermccain.com/2014/09/13/feminism-the-final-solution/

http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2003/0812roberts.html

https://fathersforlife.org/feminism/miller_gearhart.html

3
publ1us 3 points ago

I’m horrified yet glad to hear my interpretation of that phrase was spot on...

5
Binski 5 points ago

I hate zoomers and their Sponge Bob memes but this would be a prime example of putting in the 2 weeks later in the middle

4
RiverFenix 4 points ago

When I'm watching a movie and it says something like "Three to six months later" as in the case of Oceans 11...

I most certainly hear it in the Sponge Bob narrator voice... "Six Weeks Latur"

5
infinitysupreme 5 points ago

Women are less likely to resist liberal educational indoctrination than men are.

Women are social creatures. They're DNA-programmed to believe what their group tells them. Liberal professors know this, and target women for educational indoctrination which weaponizes womens' instincts to do as the group does, especially as the other women do.

Plus, women are emotional creatures. The emotional appeal of the illogical arguments of liberalism naturally appeal to them, especially to first world women who have never encountered a real world problem.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago

I'd like to see the actual data. I would suggest that, in terms of politics, it's actually a divide between married women and unmarried women. And if I were to be cynical, a divide between women who want the government as a husband and women who want the government to stop taking money from their actual husband.

4
NvJohansson 4 points ago

Im sure they would be really good at making me a sandwich.

4
Tusculan2 4 points ago

But but...we just need to tell the virus about our no-no squares.

4
Trump2024 4 points ago (edited)

Real cute experiment. Now can you get your ass back in the kitchen, make me a sandwich and squat out some babies?

4
MissionPrez 4 points ago

My wife is amazing at what she does, makes a lot more money than me, and does it in an industry dominated by men. But she didn't organize protests to get where she is, she earned it.

And that's why she voted for Donald Trump.

4
disqus11 4 points ago

Diversity Hires... WHO did the same thing

4
Davidaware01 4 points ago

People think it’s cute when a female takes leadership. You don’t need cute you need a thatcher type of woman to take the reigns.

4
KekBotSupreme 4 points ago

Hahahahahahahahaha takes a deep kek Hahahahahahahahaha

4
MetallicOpeth 4 points ago

lmfao holy shit that's incredible

4
Brnruhcount 4 points ago

I can't breathe!

4
tomthung 4 points ago

I predict a seventh wave feminism movement, where women on a whole take back the reins of society and return to their traditional roles of loving, caring, and comforting their children and husband.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

And when that happens, none of those women will organize to remove the feminist/tradcon laws that were put in place.

Look up Schlafley's movement to defeat the original Equal Rights Amendment if you want a realistic view of what these old timey traditional women thought of equality.

4
womp_squared 4 points ago

I don't care how sexist this makes me but women should never be in charge of anything. Their emotions are too powerful and I have met very few women who can turn them off when needed. There are a few managers where I work that have been here for years and are capable of taking emotion out of their decisions, I have seen far more come and go because of grudges and inability to handle stress without succumbing to their emotions and losing it. Clinton would have been a disaster up to this point by starting wars with Russia and North Korea, her dealing with the chink flu would have been the final nail in the coffin for America.

Thank God for Trump winning.

3
TrumpTrain_MAGA2020 3 points ago

Yep yep - although your comment will be shadow-removed by the couple of white knight cuck Mods we have here.

Women, in general and by and large, make terrible leaders.

3
Blowsticks 3 points ago

You know strict moderation isn't a good thing but it helps sometimes I mean no offense but there must be a line between debates and just being 4chan

3
toophless 3 points ago

When woman hunt..they all talk about the best way to kill the beast and when they finally come to a decision, the beast has either run away or killed them all.

When men hunt, they don't talk about the best way to kill the beast..THEY JUST KILL THE DAMN THING...then bring it home to the women who can talk about the best way to cook it!

3
harrison_bergeron 3 points ago

Maybe next time pick leaders instead of putting a coven in charge.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago

"a coven" kek

3
Metalhead_Gamer 3 points ago

This is what happens when you hire based on affirmative action and not qualification. If a woman is the best for the job, so be it. But just making the entire team female just to be female is just stupid.

3
not_a_shill 3 points ago

Its like the kicking out of the white farmers in africa...and suddenly theres no food.

3
GenerationX 3 points ago

Who in the world could predicted if you stop picking the best and most qualified person for a position, instead let race/gender be the ruling factor, shit goes sideways?

3
OGRapHat 3 points ago

Life comes at you fast.

3
xopi 3 points ago

Women have an advantage that men don't when shit hits the fan.

Things go really bad? Country being invaded and destroyed? No problem, spread your legs, then we spare them.

We can't be white knighting these countries. They need to be taught a lesson. If Finland no longer exists, so be it.

3
PotentialWizard 3 points ago

They probably pushed out all the experienced males in government.

3
OGAmerica 3 points ago

When will future be qualified worker?

3
olthoi_jelly 3 points ago

We don't need pussies in charge. We need iron battleaxes that know how to win.

I know a few women like that and I can assure you they don't identify as feminist.

1
Blackhammer 1 point ago

Funny thing is, they dont wear pantsuits either.

3
minotaurbeach 3 points ago

I bet they are all Liberal. This is Leftists Identity politics putting people in roles because of their identity, instead of ability.

I can see Sara Huckabee as a leader of a group of women. Conservative women would just have a vote, and make sure everyone agrees to follow who gets choose. They just need to adapt and choose a leader to follow, and follow that leader until they are chosen to lead, but my guess is they were given the role as token minorities. . This is why it is important that women's sports are women-only. It builds strength in women, and they gain respect for each other. They have to learn to be a team, and with a man on the team, there is always drama.

In every ancient culture that kept the women at home, they let them train to defend the children and the elderly, so it is important to learn how to work together.

3
GeoG85 3 points ago

It's one of my favorite Attack On Titan quotes.

"Everyone loves to judge a decision, a choice, after they see the outcome. But they always forget, when the person is making that choice, they don't know the outcome." People love to step up, and say, a decision coulda been handled better their way. But when they see it from the front row seats...

3
fac1 3 points ago

This issue with Scandinavian countries must be because they have the most attractive women, and thus the men are more easily manipulated by them.

3
techadm 3 points ago

Men self-organize like pack animals such as dogs - Women disorganize like cats and hate each other.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

Except feminism is a mass organization of women to take from society at large. Unless you'd suggest that they have success because men are stupid fools that let them run wild.

1
techadm 1 point ago

Even cats gather to feast on a corpse - yet they still hate eachother.

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago

When you have a bunch of shrews constantly in your face, it seems easier just to let them have what they want unless it impinges upon you too much to be acceptable. We are at a point today where they have gone too far.

3
_TheConsumer_ 3 points ago

Anyone who has been in a room filled with female “leaders” knows that they are indecisive and needlessly abrasive.

I’m an attorney. I dread having to work with female opposition. It’s always “I dont know/I’m not sure/I’ll have to check” or my favorite “You’re a misogynist!”

3
Rubberbunnies 3 points ago

Ohhh no. Former corporate paralegal in Canuckistan here, it’s even worse. The male lawyers I served? Clear instruction and deadlines, and while they are usually A-type borderline alcoholics, they are reasonable in disputes. The female lawyers I served don’t know how to prioritize files and timebox, will argue aggressively then get proven wrong on something, and then pretend they never argued their incorrect position in the first place. If you call them on anything they absolutely screech about misogyny.

3
swallowtrumpscum 3 points ago

The future is female... it just won't be very futuristic.

1
deleted 1 point ago
3
try4gain 3 points ago

top kek

3
SSJ3NAPPA 3 points ago

Lol

3
ed_shaw 3 points ago

When you can think like a Democrat, or a Marxist, it makes perfect sense to create and promote "Women" as a separate identity. For a variety of reasons, the identity has been made quite vulnerable to that manipulation.

3
Farmerbob1 3 points ago

While there are plenty of competent women in the world, I think it is safe to say that the policy makers for the Swedish government have proven themselves to be far from competent in how they have dealt with their nation being overrun by immigrants who have no desire to adapt to Swedish culture.

3
droden 3 points ago

its not that women cant lead. Gwynne Shotwell is a huge chunk of the success of Spacex. its that when you pick people just to fill the diversity bingo card you will have a bad time.

3
NET123 3 points ago

Cant trust women to choose a place to eat but people want them to run a country

3
saco 3 points ago

Leftists thrive on being perpetual victims. This is proof.

1
Blackhammer 1 point ago

Gives excuse for being losers

3
OozingMachismo 3 points ago

...drilled the communists into the heads of the West with hopes of society falling for it, knowing the obvious outcome.

2
MythArcana 2 points ago

I'll just leave this here.

1 Timothy 2:12

2
MAGAnic316 2 points ago

The future sucks

2
MissionPrez 2 points ago

My wife is amazing at what she does, makes a lot more money than me, and does it in an industry dominated by men. But she didn't organize protests to get where she is, she earned it.

And that's why she voted for Donald Trump.

2
VikingHalo45 2 points ago

Only women, exact opposite of equality.

2
SemperFree 2 points ago

So woke

2
deleted 2 points ago
2
FAQ-REDDIT 2 points ago

Maybe they should stick to building bridges in Florida?

2
Gramma53 2 points ago

Justin Trudeau...

2
UsurpTheNarrative 2 points ago

Feminism is a Lie!

2
Titan93 2 points ago

Since the garden women have been cursed with this desire to not be ruled by men. These ladies think they're on the cutting edge of humanity, but their desire is thousands of years old. ( from Genesis 3:16)

Truth is we're equal in value, but we were made with different strengths. I wish all these women would find a loving man to submit to, and be taken care of.

Let's bring back manliness men, this world is waging a war on masculinity and true humility.

2
GEOTUSfan 2 points ago

To be honest, not just women that fucked up. most european countries fucked up

2
_Cabal_ 2 points ago

When burning your bra is more important to you than being qualified and competent.

2
Scuffers 2 points ago

Dawin at work...

2
tr808 2 points ago

its just perfect lol

2
memechallenger33 2 points ago

They didn’t fail because they are female. Probably because they are leftists.

2
TRUMPets 2 points ago

GET YOUR BITCH ASS IN THE KITCHEN AND COOK ME SOME PIE!!

2
TrumpsterFire2020 2 points ago

I swear, this site turns more and more into /pol/ light.

0
anon1011101 0 points ago

Nice observation concern troll faggot.

1
TrumpsterFire2020 1 point ago

Thank You

2
GottliebPins 2 points ago

When making important decisions like on leadership and job qualifications the most important factors to consider are always skin color and genitalia.

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago

Women want the attention of leadership, but not the actual responsibility. That is fine! Most men don’t want to take on that level of leadership either. Stop letting feminism drive you insane, ladies. It’s ok to be a mom.

3
EPic 3 points ago

Men take on the level of leadership because they have to, not because its fun. Otherwise they know companies / countries wont be able to function.

2
Scroon 2 points ago

There are some women who are fucking on top of things, but when your selection process prioritizes female sex over actual leadership ability, then this is what you get.

2
when_we_win_remember 2 points ago

Female primates are, in general, unwilling/unable to fight against new males invading their territory. This is true despite the fact that such invaders are a threat to the pre-existing offspring.

2
captainweasel 2 points ago

Women have enough problems trying to get more than 3 friends together for a dinner. So this makes sense.

Source- I'm a woman

2
sharkman100 2 points ago

SHOCKER!

2
Lawless 2 points ago

That was quick

2
MadRussian 2 points ago

No female-led society ever prospered.

Learn history or learn the hard way.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago

ha ha checkmate there's an obscure rain forest society lead by women who have never produced anything of value for the world at large

take that sexist!

2
OhLollyLollyPop 2 points ago

Finland is doomed. All matriarchies are failures.

2
LBTrumplican 2 points ago

Almost like it has nothing to do with race and gender, but character and ability.

2
DONTRUMP 2 points ago

WOMEN ARE NOT NATURAL BORN LEADERS.

2
Dialectic 2 points ago

Oof

2
Birdlawyer85 2 points ago

I think women should have their own country. I can't wait to see the thriving society they will build with all the new software, aircrafts, rockets, etc they will build!

3
OhLollyLollyPop 3 points ago

No! Please don't make me go there!!!

2
chairborne101 2 points ago

Let's not forget that there are plenty of capable and intelligent women who are more than qualified to run a country. Just not those bitches.

1
CJBarnacle 1 point ago

No there aren't.

2
RT_America 2 points ago (edited)

”HERE CUM THE HORRIFIC SOMALISWEDISTANI RAPES FROM ACROSS THE BORDER!”

— Soros

2
CJBarnacle 2 points ago

We need to get serious about ejecting women from politics for the sake of Western civilization.

2
donotclickjim 2 points ago

Play stupid identity politics, win stupid prize disasters

2
clampie 2 points ago

Imagine the cat fights in that government. That's all they get done.

2
Indianapede 2 points ago

Ooof!

2
TheyBernedTheirCash 2 points ago

Nothing wrong with female leadership. The problem is with femnazi leadership.

1
UpdootVeteran 1 point ago

look its really simple, if someone can do they job and they have a vagina, then hire them. But, don't hire someone just because they have a vagina

hire based on qualifications not gentiles or any other victim marker.

1
deleted 1 point ago
1
N0Brakes 1 point ago

Don't vote because of muh genitals. E.g. "My vice president will be female" or "it was her time"

1
the-new-style 1 point ago

If you want to meet a based Finn look up Kai Murros

1
MrBojangles 1 point ago

projecting only goes so far.

1
mrj5552 1 point ago

We still doing Ladies' Night flairs?

1
DONTRUMP 1 point ago

women cannot lead , the few that can are the exception...and usually dont get involved in politics.

1
EmilJacobsen 1 point ago

This is one more reason why women should not have leadership roles in society at all. They do not have the genes. Accept you're different, and that nature has made us this way.

1
severian 1 point ago

What a top tier troll that first image is. How can the fight not be over for equality when the entire political stratus is 100% women? I guess they haven't dominated the multiverse yet.

1
we_won_the_war_jack 1 point ago

Boobs.

2
OhLollyLollyPop 2 points ago

No men left...

1
Jcholl9 1 point ago

Yep, when everything turns for the worse they turn to Trump for help...

Myself I have a feeling everything will work out just have to be patient.

1
Guardiandy 1 point ago

lol friggin hilarious

1
deleted 1 point ago (edited)
1
BaconIsNotHaram 1 point ago

Hey! Criticizing women for anything is misogynist!

1
deleted 1 point ago
1
bovineblitz 1 point ago

Three of them aged 10 years in six months.

1
basedtexapede 1 point ago

I'm really surprised they used that picture to go with that headline. I can only guess there was no way they could use a picture of F***IN' WHITE MALES, even if it required lying.

1
GWNorthman 1 point ago

Turns out calling everyone racist doesn't cure diseases either.

1
FuckReddit4545 1 point ago

Identity politics strikes again. Fuck it, I hope they double down on this nonsense. Maybe the next generation will wake the hell up.

1
Bigwhistle 1 point ago

Oops too soon

1
JGirl 1 point ago

I'm usually a lurker here and on the reddit group, but I wanted to chime on a subtopic here because it touches on something I've been thinking lately.

The nature versus nurture debate has been raging for decades. Do I believe there are biological differences between men and women? Yes. But do I also believe that we are strongly shaped by things outside our brains and bodies? Yes! And it starts in our childhood.

Children are little sponges, and they pick up a lot of cues on what is correct and incorrect behavior by those who take care of them. They go by what we say to them, how we correct them, and by mimicking what we do. They pick up on far more than what we intend to share with them. What we learn early on can shape us for life, because it becomes like habit, and habits are the autopilots of our lives.

To see this in your life, look at what we tell children on how to play, what to play with, and how to interact. Really think about if we don't give different rules and use different words to children depending upon not only our gender, but the child's gender.

You can look at most men's views on emotions, as an example. Do I think women are more prone, biologically, to care about emotions (their own and other people's)? Yes. Do I think men's almost morbid hatred/condemnation of emotion to come from what they are taught (from a young age onward)? Yes!

Mostly because even though some men will claim their decisions are purely based in logic, it's just not true.

Why do I say that? Because I remember reading a story in a Charles Duhigg book. I think I found the same or similar story here: https://www.thecut.com/2016/06/how-only-using-logic-destroyed-a-man.html The case boils down to this: "when emotion was impaired, so was decision-making."

What we are taught to do with our emotions, or how we are taught to judge our own decisions, comes strongly from the "nurture" side of side of the nature-nurture debate.

0
Texas-Centipede 0 points ago

Allowing women to vote. This is what it leads to. It sounds unfair, but realistically we need to only allow land owning men to vote. Or we can just let Western civilization slowly be destroyed. Those are the two options. Because letting women have political influence has been a disaster.

Men are the leaders. Men are the stewards of civilization. Women have important jobs in society, but it's not leadership.

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago

Women have influence whether they vote or not. That's how they got the vote to begin with. That's how they accomplished Prohibition. You'd have to work on adjacent issues to make any progress.

-1
kek_saved_the_world -1 points ago

Let's hope they get some help and get it together..