Here's where we see the SC jumping the shark in broad daylight. IT'S IN THE FRIGGIN' CONSTITUTION FOR A REASON! Founders never wanted democracy, best summarized as two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner by vote.
You are 180 degrees off what this is about. It's not about abolishing the electoral college (which the Supreme Court couldn't do anyway). it is about the validity of state laws preventing a state's electors from voting contrary to their state's popular vote, laws the dems want to void. "Faithless electors". Just like in 2016, remember that drama at the end? It is good that they are taking the case now, before the election, because if Trump wins, the dems WILL try to turn electors.
Gee, judging from the number of cases that have gone the right way?
Like do you people only ever pay attention to the SCOTUS decisions that didn't? Amazing how people going on about whom the fuck to "trust", cannot even be trusted to examine the whole of SCOTUS's decisions.
Would you rather, like me, have it done by June, or wait until bunch of electors defect after the Nov. election and have to have the issue start out and work its way up then, keeping the election results in limbo for months, like in Bush v. Gore?
Here's where we see the SC jumping the shark in broad daylight. IT'S IN THE FRIGGIN' CONSTITUTION FOR A REASON! Founders never wanted democracy, best summarized as two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner by vote.
You are 180 degrees off what this is about. It's not about abolishing the electoral college (which the Supreme Court couldn't do anyway). it is about the validity of state laws preventing a state's electors from voting contrary to their state's popular vote, laws the dems want to void. "Faithless electors". Just like in 2016, remember that drama at the end? It is good that they are taking the case now, before the election, because if Trump wins, the dems WILL try to turn electors.
Here's a very short article from FOX explaining the case, roughly. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-hear-faithless-elector-case-ahead-2020-presidential-election
You trust Roberts and the lefties to go strictly by the Constitution? How has that been working out in the Roberts court?
Gee, judging from the number of cases that have gone the right way?
Like do you people only ever pay attention to the SCOTUS decisions that didn't? Amazing how people going on about whom the fuck to "trust", cannot even be trusted to examine the whole of SCOTUS's decisions.
Hey, I just live by GWB's axiom: Fool me once, shame on....me. or something like that. Thanks for the downvote, though!
Would you rather, like me, have it done by June, or wait until bunch of electors defect after the Nov. election and have to have the issue start out and work its way up then, keeping the election results in limbo for months, like in Bush v. Gore?