Yeah, let's be sure to undercut every positive development./s
"Al-Aqidi and her family fled Iraq to escape Saddam Hussein’s regime when she was in her 20s and became US citizens in the early 1990s. Omar fled war-torn Somalia with her family at age 9.
The challenger established a prestigious career as a political reporter, working for Voice of America and then as a White House correspondent for Middle Eastern television networks where she traveled around the world, covering conflicts in her native Iraq and neighboring Lebanon."
She has been talking and writing for years. We ought to be able to tell where she really stands.
There is no freedom of religion in Islam. You cannot support and defend the First Amendment and at the same time hold the belief that all religions must brought into submission to Islam and apostates must be murdered. Which side does she choose?
There is no freedom of speech in Islam. You cannot support and defend the First Amendment and at the same time believe in murder for anyone who criticizes Islam. Which side does she choose?
There is no right to bear arms in Islam. Disarmament is a cornerstone of the pervasive civil inferiority imposed on non-Muslims, a status known as dhimmitude. You cannot support and defend the Second Amendment and at the same time support the disarmament of non-Muslims. Which side does she choose?
There is no equality in Islam. Men and women are not equal, and non-Muslims are inferior to Muslims. You cannot support and defend the declaration that all men are created equal and at the same time believe women and men aren't equal, and non-Muslims are inferior to Muslims. Which side does she choose?
There is no democracy in Islam. Democracy is contrary to Islam, because Allah's laws override man's laws. No Muslim can be loyal to both Islam and a democratic republic. You cannot support and defend both democracy and at the same time the supremacy of Islam. Which side does she choose?
There is no abolition in Islam. Slavery is deeply embedded in Islamic law, texts, and tradition, and has been since its beginning (Mohammed was a slave-owner and slave-trader). You cannot support and defend the Thirteenth Amendment and at the same time support slavery, an inherent part of Islam and Islamic law for 1400 years. Which side does she choose?
Cruel and unusual punishments are allowed in Islam. Punishment for disbelief is cutting off fingers and decapitation. Apostasy, adultery, and homosexuality get the death penalty. You cannot support and defend the Eighth Amendment and at the same time support the cruel and unusual punishments inherent in Islam. Which side does she choose?
The establishment of Sharia is a fundamental objective of every Muslim (Koran 9:29). Any government that limits Sharia in any way is the enemy of Allah and must be fought (Sahih Muslim 1:33, and many more).
Islam violates at minimum the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. It is in direct opposition to our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and all we value and have fought and died for in this country.
This comment is available as a text file here. Please feel free to repost it.
Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. This is deeply rooted in Islamic teaching, beginning 1400 years ago with the examples set by the founder of their cult, Mohammed, and they've been doing it ever since. Mohammed is considered by Muslims to have been the perfect human being and they are to emulate him in literally every way (Koran 33:21 and 68:4).
Allah was a liar. Koran 3:54 says "Allah is the best of deceivers." (Who else is called "the father of lies?" Hm...) The Arabic word used is makara which literally means "deceit." If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)
Mohammed was a liar. He infamously said, "War is deceit." (Sahih Bukhari 52:269) The context for this was slaughter of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed companions by Mohammed's soldiers, after they had been disarmed and "guaranteed" safe passage.
There are several different forms of lying that are sacred to Muslims:
Taqiyya is saying something that isn't true as it relates to the Muslim identity. This is a Shiite term. The Sunni counterpart is muda'rat.
Kitman is lying by omission.
Tawriya is intentionally creating a false impression.
Muruna is "blending in" by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.
This comment is available as a text file here. Please feel free to repost it.
NEVER, EVER VOTE FOR A MUSLIM CANDIDATE.
This is how it started in Europe and they are trying to do the same here.
Muslims are attempting to normalize themselves as candidates, so it won't seem unusual to see their names on ballots. They can be stopped by outing them for what they are and what they represent. Every Muslim candidate must be PUBLICLY confronted and asked where they stand on Sharia (Islamic law):
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which abolishes the first amendment and freedom of speech?"
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which abolishes equal justice under the law?"
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which denies Second Amendment rights to non-Muslims?"
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which allows slavery?"
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which allows wife-beating?"
"Do you support marriage equality for gay Muslims?"
"Do you condemn and reject Mohammed's advise to use deception when dealing with non-Muslims? Yes or no?"
"What is the highest law in the United States? Is it your Sharia or our Constitution?"
Hang Sharia and the pedophile warlord Mohammed around the neck of EVERY Muslim candidate. Make Sharia a constant political issue. Of course the Muslims will lie but that does not matter because the goal is to educate every voter who is watching and listening.
Filthy-pedo-terrorist vs filthy-pedo-terrorist.
Who will win?
(not America)
Ill take the R instead of the D, IJS.
They shouldn't be trusted, though. Some cultures do not value the truth, or speaking it.
Got facts about this person? Cite? Anything?
Yeah, let's be sure to undercut every positive development./s
"Al-Aqidi and her family fled Iraq to escape Saddam Hussein’s regime when she was in her 20s and became US citizens in the early 1990s. Omar fled war-torn Somalia with her family at age 9.
The challenger established a prestigious career as a political reporter, working for Voice of America and then as a White House correspondent for Middle Eastern television networks where she traveled around the world, covering conflicts in her native Iraq and neighboring Lebanon."
She has been talking and writing for years. We ought to be able to tell where she really stands.
There is no freedom of religion in Islam. You cannot support and defend the First Amendment and at the same time hold the belief that all religions must brought into submission to Islam and apostates must be murdered. Which side does she choose?
There is no freedom of speech in Islam. You cannot support and defend the First Amendment and at the same time believe in murder for anyone who criticizes Islam. Which side does she choose?
There is no right to bear arms in Islam. Disarmament is a cornerstone of the pervasive civil inferiority imposed on non-Muslims, a status known as dhimmitude. You cannot support and defend the Second Amendment and at the same time support the disarmament of non-Muslims. Which side does she choose?
There is no equality in Islam. Men and women are not equal, and non-Muslims are inferior to Muslims. You cannot support and defend the declaration that all men are created equal and at the same time believe women and men aren't equal, and non-Muslims are inferior to Muslims. Which side does she choose?
There is no democracy in Islam. Democracy is contrary to Islam, because Allah's laws override man's laws. No Muslim can be loyal to both Islam and a democratic republic. You cannot support and defend both democracy and at the same time the supremacy of Islam. Which side does she choose?
There is no abolition in Islam. Slavery is deeply embedded in Islamic law, texts, and tradition, and has been since its beginning (Mohammed was a slave-owner and slave-trader). You cannot support and defend the Thirteenth Amendment and at the same time support slavery, an inherent part of Islam and Islamic law for 1400 years. Which side does she choose?
Cruel and unusual punishments are allowed in Islam. Punishment for disbelief is cutting off fingers and decapitation. Apostasy, adultery, and homosexuality get the death penalty. You cannot support and defend the Eighth Amendment and at the same time support the cruel and unusual punishments inherent in Islam. Which side does she choose?
The establishment of Sharia is a fundamental objective of every Muslim (Koran 9:29). Any government that limits Sharia in any way is the enemy of Allah and must be fought (Sahih Muslim 1:33, and many more).
Islam violates at minimum the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. It is in direct opposition to our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and all we value and have fought and died for in this country.
Exactly.... just another version of Omar, but probably involved less in crimes.
This comment is available as a text file here. Please feel free to repost it.
Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. This is deeply rooted in Islamic teaching, beginning 1400 years ago with the examples set by the founder of their cult, Mohammed, and they've been doing it ever since. Mohammed is considered by Muslims to have been the perfect human being and they are to emulate him in literally every way (Koran 33:21 and 68:4).
Allah was a liar. Koran 3:54 says "Allah is the best of deceivers." (Who else is called "the father of lies?" Hm...) The Arabic word used is makara which literally means "deceit." If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)
Mohammed was a liar. He infamously said, "War is deceit." (Sahih Bukhari 52:269) The context for this was slaughter of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed companions by Mohammed's soldiers, after they had been disarmed and "guaranteed" safe passage.
There are several different forms of lying that are sacred to Muslims:
Taqiyya is saying something that isn't true as it relates to the Muslim identity. This is a Shiite term. The Sunni counterpart is muda'rat.
Kitman is lying by omission.
Tawriya is intentionally creating a false impression.
Muruna is "blending in" by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.
More about the four types of lies here.
Muruna: Violating Sharia to Fool the West
Muslims lying about taqiyya
Islam is deceit. Islam is hate. Islam is death.
This comment is available as a text file here. Please feel free to repost it.
NEVER, EVER VOTE FOR A MUSLIM CANDIDATE.
This is how it started in Europe and they are trying to do the same here.
Muslims are attempting to normalize themselves as candidates, so it won't seem unusual to see their names on ballots. They can be stopped by outing them for what they are and what they represent. Every Muslim candidate must be PUBLICLY confronted and asked where they stand on Sharia (Islamic law):
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which abolishes the first amendment and freedom of speech?"
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which abolishes equal justice under the law?"
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which denies Second Amendment rights to non-Muslims?"
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which allows slavery?"
"Do you condemn and reject Sharia, which allows wife-beating?"
"Do you support marriage equality for gay Muslims?"
"Do you condemn and reject Mohammed's advise to use deception when dealing with non-Muslims? Yes or no?"
"What is the highest law in the United States? Is it your Sharia or our Constitution?"
Hang Sharia and the pedophile warlord Mohammed around the neck of EVERY Muslim candidate. Make Sharia a constant political issue. Of course the Muslims will lie but that does not matter because the goal is to educate every voter who is watching and listening.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN EUROPE MUST NOT HAPPEN HERE.
Dr. Bill Warner explains this further. Educate yourself. Educate others. TELL EVERYONE.
FIGHT IGNORANCE. FIGHT BACK NOW!