you talked about RINOs preventing witnesses that would be damaging from testifying. I replied that their deep state lines have been cut in exchange for leniency. this is about introducing evidence without needing to follow normal collection procedures. a show.
I know why you are here but please, can we stay on topic? he is literally being charged with following the constitution. so America will be shown why that document is so important. I'd like to see a real argument against this. want to play?
Maybe I missed something, but I don’t believe RINOs in the senate have anything hanging over their heads that would persuade them from voting against our President.
As to the original point, again, witnesses that never make it to the stand don’t get to “put evidence into the record”.
Finally, I don’t know who you think you are. Are you Nostradamus or some shit? How could you possibly suggest to know why I’m here as if it’s for some off color reason? Unless you smoked a bowl right before coming up with your opinion, you haven’t made a sentient point that I can follow.
Putting a historically great president on trial is not a help. I will not support the RINOs that support the hoax.
Come on Prez! Designate these Cockroaches as Homeland Terrorists already! And let's roll'em up an smoke'em!
Same way the Mueller investigation helped.
Because witness for his side get to put evidence into the record. This isn’t rocket science
Did you read any of the article? Trump’s witnesses would very likely not be chosen based on the rules.
Yes, it is one mans opinion.
Each will need 51 votes. You think the same few RINOS won’t just go against the grain again?
you think deals for leniency haven't been made in exchange for co-operation?
No. The witnesses aren’t on trial.
that has no relation to your comment or my reply.
you talked about RINOs preventing witnesses that would be damaging from testifying. I replied that their deep state lines have been cut in exchange for leniency. this is about introducing evidence without needing to follow normal collection procedures. a show.
I know why you are here but please, can we stay on topic? he is literally being charged with following the constitution. so America will be shown why that document is so important. I'd like to see a real argument against this. want to play?
Maybe I missed something, but I don’t believe RINOs in the senate have anything hanging over their heads that would persuade them from voting against our President.
As to the original point, again, witnesses that never make it to the stand don’t get to “put evidence into the record”.
Finally, I don’t know who you think you are. Are you Nostradamus or some shit? How could you possibly suggest to know why I’m here as if it’s for some off color reason? Unless you smoked a bowl right before coming up with your opinion, you haven’t made a sentient point that I can follow.
A senate trial would be absolutely devastating to trump.
I respectfully disagree.
It's OK, it's going to the senate. I think it's safe now to stop pretending that not exactly what we wanted