330
Comments (8)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
rooftoptendie (12 points) *

“no authority supports the proposition that we may require litigants, judges, court personnel, or anyone else to refer to gender-dysphoric litigants with pronouns matching their subjective gender identity.”

“We decline to enlist the federal judiciary in this quixotic undertaking,” Judge Duncan concluded.

YEAH!!!

IvIA6A (4 points)

Sanity is right. Reading that judgement was a breath of fresh air compared to the cry babies on twatter.

Guy didn't legally change name I guess, so fuck off with that first part. Second, we're not forcing everyone else to use your "preferred" pronouns because your dysphoric bullshit.

Pronouns are for the people using them. What these people want is power to control how others communicate about them.