Found this list below of justifications for secession on wiki. No idea of legal rights/ramifications, but if states could secede from the union during the civil war, why can’t counties at least attempt a peaceful solution first? Prolly need a whole legal team to get something like this going, but the alternative of bowing to the dems is way worse....
-Economic enfranchisement of an economically oppressed class that is regionally concentrated within the scope of a larger national territory.
-The right to liberty, freedom of association and private property
-Consent as important democratic principle; will of majority to secede should be recognized
-Making it easier for states to join with others in an experimental union
-Dissolving such union when goals for which it was constituted are not achieved
-Self-defense when larger group presents lethal threat to minority or the government cannot adequately defend an area
-Self-determination of peoples
-Preserving culture, language, etc. from assimilation or destruction by a larger or more powerful group
-Furthering diversity by allowing diverse cultures to keep their identity
-Rectifying past injustices, especially past conquest by a larger power
-Escaping "discriminatory redistribution", i.e., tax schemes, regulatory policies, economic programs, etc. that distribute resources away to another area, especially in an undemocratic fashion
-Enhanced efficiency when the state or empire becomes too large to administer efficiently
-Preserving "liberal purity" (or "conservative purity") by allowing less (or more) liberal regions to secede
Providing superior constitutional systems which allow flexibility of secession
-Keeping political entities small and human scale through right to secession
Aleksander Pavkovic,[14] associate professor at the Department of Politics and International Studies at Macquarie University in Australia and the author of several books on secession describes five justifications for a general right of secession within liberal political theory:[15]
Anarcho-Capitalism: individual liberty to form political associations and private property rights together justify right to secede and to create a "viable political order" with like-minded individuals.
Democratic Secessionism: the right of secession, as a variant of the right of self-determination, is vested in a "territorial community" which wishes to secede from "their existing political community"; the group wishing to secede then proceeds to delimit "its" territory by the majority.
Communitarian Secessionism: any group with a particular "participation-enhancing" identity, concentrated in a particular territory, which desires to improve its members' political participation has a prima facie right to secede.
Cultural Secessionism: any group which was previously in a minority has a right to protect and develop its own culture and distinct national identity through seceding into an independent state.
The Secessionism of Threatened Cultures: if a minority culture is threatened within a state that has a majority culture, the minority needs a right to form a state of its own which would protect its culture.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secession
Found this list below of justifications for secession on wiki. No idea of legal rights/ramifications, but if states could secede from the union during the civil war, why can’t counties at least attempt a peaceful solution first? Prolly need a whole legal team to get something like this going, but the alternative of bowing to the dems is way worse....
-Economic enfranchisement of an economically oppressed class that is regionally concentrated within the scope of a larger national territory.
-The right to liberty, freedom of association and private property
-Consent as important democratic principle; will of majority to secede should be recognized
-Making it easier for states to join with others in an experimental union
-Dissolving such union when goals for which it was constituted are not achieved
-Self-defense when larger group presents lethal threat to minority or the government cannot adequately defend an area
-Self-determination of peoples
-Preserving culture, language, etc. from assimilation or destruction by a larger or more powerful group
-Furthering diversity by allowing diverse cultures to keep their identity
-Rectifying past injustices, especially past conquest by a larger power
-Escaping "discriminatory redistribution", i.e., tax schemes, regulatory policies, economic programs, etc. that distribute resources away to another area, especially in an undemocratic fashion
-Enhanced efficiency when the state or empire becomes too large to administer efficiently
-Preserving "liberal purity" (or "conservative purity") by allowing less (or more) liberal regions to secede
Providing superior constitutional systems which allow flexibility of secession
-Keeping political entities small and human scale through right to secession
Aleksander Pavkovic,[14] associate professor at the Department of Politics and International Studies at Macquarie University in Australia and the author of several books on secession describes five justifications for a general right of secession within liberal political theory:[15]
Anarcho-Capitalism: individual liberty to form political associations and private property rights together justify right to secede and to create a "viable political order" with like-minded individuals.
Democratic Secessionism: the right of secession, as a variant of the right of self-determination, is vested in a "territorial community" which wishes to secede from "their existing political community"; the group wishing to secede then proceeds to delimit "its" territory by the majority.
Communitarian Secessionism: any group with a particular "participation-enhancing" identity, concentrated in a particular territory, which desires to improve its members' political participation has a prima facie right to secede.
Cultural Secessionism: any group which was previously in a minority has a right to protect and develop its own culture and distinct national identity through seceding into an independent state.
The Secessionism of Threatened Cultures: if a minority culture is threatened within a state that has a majority culture, the minority needs a right to form a state of its own which would protect its culture.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secession
My state rep in Illinois introduced a bill to ceded Chicago from Illinois. It didn't get anywhere.
2A is a limit on government, not people. States should pound salt.