131
submitted by nothingberg *

Iran’s Supreme Leader vows jihad for Qassem Soleimani’s killing


Jihad, as I understand it (and this may not be sufficient, I admit) is a HOLY WAR, a TOTAL WAR of ISLAM against a country, people, a nation, etc

If JIHAD is declared, shouldn't we immediately suspend / furlough All muslims from Public Sector (US) Employment (possibly with pay, to be ethical and fair) Out of National Security Threat and Conflict-of-Interest?

Or they can optionally renounce their religion (which they won't do because Islam considers this a crime punishable by death)?

It would be a conflict- of-interest to keep them there, because they could be acting against the US in a JIHAD capacity...their religion in a JIHAD context is at odds with US employment because of the MIXED LOYALTIES problem

It would be a national security threat for them to maintain their security clearances because they could be using the information to ratline state secrets to JIHADSTERS ABROAD

It would be a national security threat to keep them in office because they could be undermining our government in the name of ISLAM and JIHAD

I am not islamaphobic, except when an ideological leader of an ENTIRE RELIGION DECLARES TOTAL WAR against me.

So there's that.

Please leave your thoughts, opinions and MOHAMMADJIHAD death threats to me below.

Thank you

(edits for formatting)

**[Iran’s Supreme Leader vows jihad for Qassem Soleimani’s killing](https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/01/irans-supreme-leader-vows-jihad-for-qassem-soleimanis-killing)** --- Jihad, as I understand it (and this may not be sufficient, I admit) is a HOLY WAR, a TOTAL WAR of ISLAM against a country, people, a nation, etc > ***If JIHAD is declared, shouldn't we immediately suspend / furlough All muslims from Public Sector (US) Employment (possibly with pay, to be ethical and fair) Out of National Security Threat and Conflict-of-Interest?*** Or they can optionally renounce their religion (which they won't do because Islam considers this a crime punishable by death)? It would be a conflict- of-interest to keep them there, because they could be acting against the US in a JIHAD capacity...their religion in a JIHAD context is at odds with US employment because of the MIXED LOYALTIES problem It would be a national security threat for them to maintain their security clearances because they could be using the information to ratline state secrets to JIHADSTERS ABROAD It would be a national security threat to keep them in office because they could be undermining our government in the name of ISLAM and JIHAD I am not islamaphobic, except when an ideological leader of an ENTIRE RELIGION DECLARES TOTAL WAR against me. So there's that. Please leave your thoughts, opinions and MOHAMMADJIHAD death threats to me below. Thank you (*edits for formatting*)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
shipoutofdanger (1 point)

all the ones that do not publicly disavow.

I'm waiting for them to publicly disawow. Just ONE of them. Anyone.

(hint: they never will)

Fuckreddit01 (1 point) *

Did you see the posters for the Canadian candle light vigil that was held in solidarity for Soileddiapermani? There were counter protesters that showed up. The counter protesters were actually Iranians that escaped.