Iran’s Supreme Leader vows jihad for Qassem Soleimani’s killing
Jihad, as I understand it (and this may not be sufficient, I admit) is a HOLY WAR, a TOTAL WAR of ISLAM against a country, people, a nation, etc
If JIHAD is declared, shouldn't we immediately suspend / furlough All muslims from Public Sector (US) Employment (possibly with pay, to be ethical and fair) Out of National Security Threat and Conflict-of-Interest?
Or they can optionally renounce their religion (which they won't do because Islam considers this a crime punishable by death)?
It would be a conflict- of-interest to keep them there, because they could be acting against the US in a JIHAD capacity...their religion in a JIHAD context is at odds with US employment because of the MIXED LOYALTIES problem
It would be a national security threat for them to maintain their security clearances because they could be using the information to ratline state secrets to JIHADSTERS ABROAD
It would be a national security threat to keep them in office because they could be undermining our government in the name of ISLAM and JIHAD
I am not islamaphobic, except when an ideological leader of an ENTIRE RELIGION DECLARES TOTAL WAR against me.
So there's that.
Please leave your thoughts, opinions and MOHAMMADJIHAD death threats to me below.
Thank you
(edits for formatting)
**[Iran’s Supreme Leader vows jihad for Qassem Soleimani’s killing](https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/01/irans-supreme-leader-vows-jihad-for-qassem-soleimanis-killing)**
---
Jihad, as I understand it (and this may not be sufficient, I admit) is a HOLY WAR, a TOTAL WAR of ISLAM against a country, people, a nation, etc
> ***If JIHAD is declared, shouldn't we immediately suspend / furlough All muslims from Public Sector (US) Employment (possibly with pay, to be ethical and fair) Out of National Security Threat and Conflict-of-Interest?***
Or they can optionally renounce their religion (which they won't do because Islam considers this a crime punishable by death)?
It would be a conflict- of-interest to keep them there, because they could be acting against the US in a JIHAD capacity...their religion in a JIHAD context is at odds with US employment because of the MIXED LOYALTIES problem
It would be a national security threat for them to maintain their security clearances because they could be using the information to ratline state secrets to JIHADSTERS ABROAD
It would be a national security threat to keep them in office because they could be undermining our government in the name of ISLAM and JIHAD
I am not islamaphobic, except when an ideological leader of an ENTIRE RELIGION DECLARES TOTAL WAR against me.
So there's that.
Please leave your thoughts, opinions and MOHAMMADJIHAD death threats to me below.
Thank you
(*edits for formatting*)
How about we first do something about the possible Iranian operatives and assets in our own government?
Strzok and Page have Iranian parents - I think they grew up there. Check me on that, though.
Then there's VJ and Huma -- both with an Iranian connection.
And John Kerry, of course.
Awan had a spy ring going in Congress. He's Pakistani, and one rumor is that he was sending yellow cake to Iran (I think -- if I've understood George Webb correctly).
A couple of congress critters have very close ties to Iran. I think Pelosi or Feinstein -- can't recall now who was on the phone to Iran...someone who should not have been.
Iran might be bigger than Ukraine. The traitor's playground.
But we do need to tighten up immigration. I'm with you on that.
And looking into the jihad question would be an excellent idea.