submitted by Mad_Hattie
Was he under Oath? because that is quite a whopper.
He also stated that they didn't have to prove a crime to move forward with Impeachment.
Was he under Oath? because that is quite a whopper.
He also stated that they didn't have to prove a crime to move forward with Impeachment.
To bad they won't extend the process in the Senate.
They can put him under oath there then ask him the same questions with the obligatory "remember sir, you are under oath."