304
submitted by oakley *

The  tremendously controversial, yet highly persuasive,  argument that our devotion to the largely  unexamined myth of egalitarianism lies at the heart of the  ongoing "dumbing of America."

Americans have always stubbornly clung to the  myth of egalitarianism, of the supremacy of the  individual average man. Pulitzer Prize-winning critic William A. Henry III  takes on, and debunks, some basic, fundamentally ingrained ideas: that everyone is pretty much alike  (and should be); that self-fulfillment is more important than objective achievement; that everyone  has something significant to contribute that all  cultures offer something equally worthwhile; that a truly just society would automatically produce equal success results across lines of race, class, and gender; and that the common man is almost always right. Henry makes clear, in a book full of vivid examples and unflinching opinions, that while these notions are seductively democratic they  are also hopelessly wrong. The book is " In Defense of Elitism".

The  tremendously controversial, yet highly persuasive,  argument that our devotion to the largely  unexamined myth of egalitarianism lies at the heart of the  ongoing "dumbing of America."

Americans have always stubbornly clung to the  myth of egalitarianism, of the supremacy of the  individual average man. Pulitzer Prize-winning critic William A. Henry III  takes on, and debunks, some basic, fundamentally ingrained ideas: that everyone is pretty much alike  (and should be); that self-fulfillment is more important than objective achievement; that everyone  has something significant to contribute that all  cultures offer something equally worthwhile; that a truly just society would automatically produce equal success results across lines of race, class, and gender; and that the common man is almost always right. Henry makes clear, in a book full of vivid examples and unflinching opinions, that while these notions are seductively democratic they  are also hopelessly wrong. The book is " In Defense of Elitism".
Comments (15)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
ncmarc (1 point)

why should we have medals in the Olympics?